![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please revert your recent move of the article Khyber Agency because a move discussion about it is taking place at Talk:Kurram_Agency#Requested_move_29_June_2018. Why don't you wait for the discussion to end before the moves so that we can have consensus? Thanks for the cooperation, Khestwol ( talk) 06:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, though I was not aware of the comment above, I have reverted the move of Khyber Agency to Bajaur District because it appeared to be an error. There was already an open move discussion at Talk:Kurram Agency as noted here, where Khyber Agency was proposed to be moved to Khyber District (there is another article, Bajaur Agency, which is proposed to be moved to Bajaur District). I have noted somewhat belatedly that there was previous significant history of undiscussed moves being reverted to the original title ( Khyber Agency) per WP:RMTR at the page, which resulted in move protection. I am assuming you were attempting to fulfill a request at "uncontroversial technical requests" that actually turned out not to be uncontroversial (there is already an editor opposing in the open move discussion), but please let me know if you need me to undo this reversion––I hope that it will not be taken as an attempt to wheel war. Best, Dekimasu よ! 09:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you just moved the article Anatolian peoples to the title Ancient peoples of Anatolia after a request was made at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests. Such a move is in fact not uncontroversial. There is an ongoing discussion on this topic at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 July 2#Category:Anatolian peoples. In your rationale for the move you say that "the scope of the article is the peoples of Anatolia in ancient times". This is wrong. The summary of the article says that its scope is "Indo-European peoples of Anatolia identified by their use of the Anatolian languages." Information about peoples of Anatolia in ancient times is already contained at List of ancient peoples of Anatolia. In fact, the move you just made only created more problems. Krakkos ( talk) 11:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Just wanted to clarify that I only recreated the page to redirect it as was specifically mentioned in the close of the AfD " It can also be editorially redirected, as a plausible search term, to
Eric Weinstein#Intellectual dark web". Just wanted to make sure you were aware of that statement in the close. I think the redirect should still exist and would have thought it would have needed to go back through AfD or something similar before deleting it, since a redirect was specifically mentioned as an option in the last AfD. {{u|
zchrykng}} {
T|
C}
19:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, This is up at FAC and I just wanted to check that the start of the page history is ok - it was supposed begun after a WP:RM request, but begins without any indication of its origin. Please see the history and the discussion at the FAC first point in my section. Do you think this is ok? On another point. There is Yeomanry Cavalry (disambiguation) which redirects to Yeomanry after an edit by you in February, and isn't hatnoted at either Yeomanry or Yeomanry Cavalry Johnbod ( talk) 13:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The page Draft:2018 US Darts Masters (version 2) was deleted as a broken redirect. But it had some non-redirect revisions in its history. So, can you please undelete that page, move it to 2018 US Darts Masters (version 2), and then retarget the redirect to 2018 US Darts Masters? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Rahul Aggarwal is now about an Indian producer. But it also had deleted revisions about a business manager. To avoid confusion, you should move all the deleted revisions for Rahul Aggarwal and Talk:Rahul Aggarwal to Rahul Aggarwal (manager) and Talk:Rahul Aggarwal (manager) respectively, and then immediately re-delete the business manager page and its talk page. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
2018 United Kingdom heat wave. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be
verifiable through
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see
here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
18:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of
archiving. According to
Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 258.4 KB. See
Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a
bot. If you have any questions, place a {{
help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the
help desk. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
18:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Please place {{archive|User talk:Anthony Appleyard}} at the top of User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2018/January-June like you have done for earlier archives. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 05:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I undid your deletion of that redirect. That draft hasn't been approved and looks like it fails GNG, and in the process we're replacing a potentially useful redirect with a red link. – Muboshgu ( talk) 05:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Could you merge the history of The Finest Hours (film) into The Finest Hours (2016 film)? As means to eliminate unneeded redirections without edit history loss. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 16:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mobile phone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
The page 2019 Indian Premier League had some deleted revisions from 2017. Can those revisions please be restored? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony - I was starting to edit and tidy up the Invalid carriage article, but was puzzled when I found the talk page deleted. I note that you moved the talk page for this article to Cars for wheelchair users in 2016. Was the intent to merge the two articles? NealeFamily ( talk) 10:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Here's a star for your collection. This one is in recognition of your diligent work doing page moves and fixing page histories. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 20:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC) |
Sandstein's user talk page does not use numbered archives, but rather monthly archives. So, can you please move User talk:Sandstein/Archive 1 to User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2005/July, add a link to the July page under User talk:Sandstein/Archives#2005, and remove the {{ archives}} template from User talk:Sandstein? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
You have moved User:Pbsouthwood/AP Diving to AP Diving. You should therefore also replace the red link to the former under the "Malplaced disambiguation pages" link in the Links section at the top of your user talk page with a blue link to the latter article. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Antony
Can you kindly open this page Joseph Kalimbwe protected from creation? The page was deleted for not having notable sources. I have sinse found more reliable sources which I suppose meets Wikipedia rules and regulations. I wish to first submit it as a draft for review by an Admin rather create it instantly so I do not suffer the misfortune of seeing it deleted again.
Best regards
105.232.255.39 ( talk) 18:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Paine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Paine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing ++ 21:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vistula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puncture ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Could you merge the draft history of Draft:Downton Abbey (film) into Downton Abbey (film)? Draft need not exist now with it being in mainspace but edit history I fer should be preserved. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 23:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
The page Toy Story 4 (old version) had some useful history. You should therefore restore that page, move it (without redirect) to Toy Story 4 (version 2), and then redirect the latter page to Toy Story 4. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
The other day I put in a request for a histmerge because I found that Japanese Pig was created by copy and pasting content from Japanese Boar. When I read WP:CutPaste I thought that asking for a histmerge might solve the content fork problem, but since you rejected it I suppose that wasn't the way to go. But since that's the case, do you have any suggestions for what should be done with the redundant article? Should it be changed to a redirect?
Thank you for your time. Mcampany ( talk) 01:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you please bring it to the mainspace? The film completed its shoot this May (thereby passing WP:NFF) and is scheduled to be released on August 31. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
In case you don't have Phabricator notifications turned on, I mentioned you at phab:T20493#4440118. As our top history merger, I think your comments on the topic would be helpful. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
-- Alexandrov98 ( talk) 09:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)The article about Stanislav V Shekshnia was deleted: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Alexandrov98#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Stanislav_V._Shekshnia
Stanislav Shekshnia is a leading professor at one of the top business universities in the world - INSEAD: https://www.insead.edu/faculty-research/faculty/stanislav-shekshnia His latest contributions were published in Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2018/03/how-to-be-a-good-board-chair and discussed in Forbes https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/berlinschoolofcreativeleadership/2018/04/03/stanislav-shekshnia-on-athletic-leaders-in-turbulent-times/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/
Recently My Page "Lavi Hoss" has been deleted by you because of copyright claim of taking info from source. If I change text, can I create? sbshuvol ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vistula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marienburg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sun. Since you had some involvement with the The Sun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 06:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. You deleted two files, File:Detroyat class uss niantic.jpg and File:Statue of Poseidon.jpg, under speedy criterion G5 (creations by banned users). The two files were uploaded by a user who was not banned at the time of uploading. They were, however, using an alternate account in violation of an Arbcom restriction, in which case you might consider that G5 applies anyway, but just in case you were not aware of the situation, please consider reviewing your action. Thanks. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The first revision in the history of User:Thestageisset was not a redirect. You should therefore do the following: move the last 2 deleted revisions to Gravity Rush 2 (version 2), delete the version 2 page as an unnecessary duplicate of Gravity Rush 2, and finally restore the remaining deleted revision, the one prior to 2016. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion about retargeting The Sun from Sun to a disambiguation page. Because you have participated in the previous discussion, I am inviting you to participate in the current discussion here - Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_July_25#The_Sun. The editor whose username is Z0 07:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Please restore Karamot Ullah Biplob article, Now I am working on this. I want to solve this copyright issue and I also told this in talk page. But you already delete this article. Now, I request you to restore this article for only next 1 hour.- Shahadat Hossain ( talk) 14:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
I want to request the undeletion of page Emily_L._Spratt.
I added the needed citations that the previous discussion demanded. I carefully reviewed the guidelines of Wikipedia:Notability and Spratt does have significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. I have provided verifiable evidence of this subject’s notability in the references. This subject has been notable since 2005 upon receiving a major award, therefore subject’s notability is not temporary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerWilson ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for answering my comment. The page you directed me to says not to modify it. I've addressed the issues that were raised in that discussion and want to contest the deletion of the Spratt page. Also note that User:Anthony Bradbury undeleted the page after looking over the revisions that have been made. RogerWilson ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore all deleted revisions of the pages Ruby Tuesday (except the redirect revision from 21:28, 13 October 2005) and Ruby Tuesday (disambiguation) to complete their histories? Also, can you restore the revision of page Timberwolf (color) you forgot to restore? 198.136.32.56 ( talk) 18:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore all deleted revisions of the Mango (color) page to complete the history? 2601:584:100:E310:7880:E4ED:7369:5B66 ( talk) 23:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Karam Apnaa Apnaa (G3: Blatant hoax) was deleted by you recently. Let us get this straight, the programme tv show is very much real and there are very well established references that are available on internet for the article use. This is more than a decade old famous show and the wikipedia article was crucial for information on it and deleting it is like deleting it from history. A request to kindly undelete it and in turn I will provide the page with solid 5 references? My gripe is that it has wrongly been labeled as hoax and we hope to right out wrong on wikipedia. Thanks. 2405:205:A08C:DE3E:636B:2834:834C:27B0 ( talk) 13:53, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I would ask that you please revert the page move that was requested from Champaign, Illinois to Champaign. While I agree with the move in principle that U.S. cities that do not need to be disambiguated should not be, this is not the current consensus per WP:USPLACE. This was a potentially controversial that should not have happened. Aspects ( talk) 21:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted revision of page Professional Development Day to complete the redirect's history? 2601:584:100:E310:B8F7:5126:C9B4:73F0 ( talk) 22:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Just wondering, when you were doing the Young Sinatra: Undeniable page, were you doing it on Logic's mixtape or something else. Just wondering. You don't have to reply if you don't want to. Also, if this is the wrong user, please let me know.
Hi Anthony, as noted on the "contest this deletion" page for Innovit, this page should not be speedily deleted because it is intended to be a purely informational, non-promotional entry backed by reliable sources. If the article does appear to be promotional, it is simply written according to the sources. The references come from legitimate sources, and, given the chance to update or recreate the page, the content can be toned down and address the "not in citation given" tags placed on the page before it was deleted. For instance, the third source from Becker’s Hospital Review directly supports Innovit's work in the healthcare and supply chain industries, but more language from the source could be inserted to eliminate any missed connection between the source and the Wikipedia entry -- and thereby address the "not in citation given" tag.
If the deletion can be lifted from this page for updates to be made, that would be much appreciated. If not, that would be fine too for you to even move the article to a userspace where I can improve the article. I'd like to create the best page possible while meeting administrator guidelines to help improve Wikipedia, not spam an article. Jahub ( talk) 22:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, thank you very much for granting my request to update the page in the Sandbox. I've stripped all the promotional language and links from the page. Let me know what you think, and if this now meets Wikipedia guidelines. Jahub ( talk) 22:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Anthony,
You have deleted my page that i have recently created on wiki. But I believe I had never used promotional word or any wrong information for the company.
I don't want to promote through wiki. I know this is encyclopedia. But Still I don't believe why this happened. I have read several company articles in wiki, then I had prepared the post.
Can you please tell me what is the difference between the page I have created and about this company page? /info/en/?search=Bluehost
I have never used keyword spam, never posted link through this article. so can you please review again it.
i know it's hard to publish article through wiki. But why???
why we can't publish company info. We have not that much capable to post simple company information. As you mentioned can you please tell me where link spamming done through this article?
If possible, please have look again on it.
Thank you, 07:56, 7 August 2018 User:Dhirenray1985
Hi, was that an article on Frank Klausz the woodworker? Unless it was some sort of attack page, I can't see any justification for deleting it, 7 minutes after tagging. Article quality might have been an issue, but he (the woodworker) at least has been a sourceable, notable worker, and mostly educator, in the field for decades. Andy Dingley ( talk) 08:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
You speedily deleted Vivek (playback singer), presumably because you interpreted this comment by its creator as a request for deletion (G7). However, in conjunction with that user's actual attempt to remove the AfD template (see User talk:Ecstaticmind#Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))), I'm fairly convinced that deletion, let alone speedy, was not their intention. Not having seen the article in question in any form or shape, I have no opinion on the merits of the article itself. -- Lambiam 10:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
I would like to ask you a question about deletion of a page “Evgeny Ponasenkov”. I would like to contest this deletion. Igorsky ( talk) 12:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
...with the letter “i” added. Qwirkle ( talk) 18:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Aaron I Butler, with no period after the middle initial. Qwirkle ( talk) 21:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey there *@ Anthony Appleyard:!
Recently it came to my attention that you have deleted one of my Articles due to G11 violation (Draft:Probe.ly). I don't believe I used any promotional wording or material on it, and I have cited most of my claims in the article. I also didn't find a way to contest the deletion so I decided to contact you on here. I wrote the article guiding myself by Wikipedia articles of other companies similar to Probe.ly, so my writing could have some mistakes and violations. Could I please get the text I've written back and get some more info about which parts you found promotional, just so I can improve the article? DavorPetreski ( talk) 10:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning this up. I think it's pretty obvious that DASDshould be a redirect to Direct-access storage device and DASD (disambiguation) should contain the contents currently in DASD. i attempted to do this with cut and paste and that was not well received. How do we get this done? Peter Flass ( talk) 10:46, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 Great Britain and Ireland heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Great Britain and Ireland heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 11:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted revisions of page Gullah Gullah Island (up to 02:02, 13 February 2005) and the deleted revisions of page Gulla Gulla Island (up to 06:29, 6 December 2015) to complete the histories of the two mentioned pages? 73.1.54.180 ( talk) 15:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Could you merge the history of Draft:Dora the Explorer (film) into Dora the Explorer (2019 film)? And as there’s no other film with that title could you delete the Dora the Explorer (film) redirect to make way for the (2019 film) article to move there? Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 17:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Why did you delete my article Judge Judy 5AM Episode? 22:42, 10 August 2018 User:Popthemop27
talks about the wrong thing because this article was not a comment it was a real episode that aired at 5AM and was only a single episode. Popthemop27 ( talk)09:07, 11 August 2018 (EDT)
Can you restore the deleted revisions of page Template:Db-a11 if okay. When a page is recreated, the deleted revisions usually become unnecessary to permanently stay deleted. 2601:584:100:E310:8DC2:DAD0:FFC8:E5EA ( talk) 13:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the missing revision(s) of page Marianne Thornberry? 208.54.85.152 ( talk) 16:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, I've asked for Nova (RL Grime album) to be histmerged with Draft:Nova (RL Grime album), as a page move I asked for took place earlier and the page histories were swapped. Both main editors who contributed to the draft also edited the main article (before its move) as well, in what looks like a bit of an attempt to flesh it out there, and I think it's important to preserve. What do you think? Ss 112 18:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
For fixing my mistakes. ☕ Antiqueight chatter 07:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
You have protected this pace back in 2013, and it's never considered fair to set indefinite for first time offence without arbitration. I suggest you could remove the protection and find another way to curb vandalism. Thank you. 202.161.64.247 ( talk) 11:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I was sort of confused, but what I meant is please unprotect the Māori people article. 202.161.64.247 ( talk) 13:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
When Category:Possible cut-and-paste moves gets deleted, please remember to remove the links to that category from the top of your user talk page as well as under Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Repair requests. In the mean time, do not remove the links until after the category gets deleted per the CfD. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sech (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sech (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 15:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sech (disambiguation), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 17:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, Could you move this to Vienna porcelain, over the redirect? "Viennese Porcelain Manufactory" is just wrong - it should be Vienna Porcelain Manufactory, but "Vienna porcelain" is better & more the common name I think - the modern factory is always called Augarten to avoid confusion. Thanks, Johnbod ( talk) 02:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
When you moved Dreaming tree (Geumcheon-gu 'ggumna') to Dreaming Tree (café), you forgot to suppress the creation of a redirect, which is why I filed it at WP:MOVEREQ instead of doing it myself. The problem is that the old title was an implausible search term. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted revisions of page Bubblestand to complete the page history. You may need to change visibility of some of those revisions. Ssjhowarthisawesome ( talk) 23:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I didn't even know there was a draft when I made the article, and nothing I made on my article was like what the user had written on their draft, and now you've taken credit away from me on an article I started myself by giving it to somebody who made a non-notable draft that was never going to be promoted to article status on its own. You've now given into Z0's grudge against me, and I'd like you to undo it because as other editors around here say, it's not fair to take credit away from one editor for writing an article themselves. There is no commonality between what Aitch & Aitch wrote and what I made. I believe you have said yourself that two pages that have different histories and clearly do not come from one another do not have to be histmerged, and even if there is a draft of an existing page, it doesn't have to be promoted to mainspace if it was never going to be in the state it was in. Please undo this, because you are taking credit away from editors who have made their own articles and quite honestly, it's not fair to do this. Ss 112 07:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
See also the discussion on my talk page. The editor whose username is Z0 08:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
@ Ss112, Z0, Aitch & Aitch Aitch, Primefac, and Sergecross73: Following the above, I have added a request to move the "short" revisions for Slime Language back to Draft:Slime Language at WP:RFHM. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Robert Marlow albums is not empty. Please restore it and its talk. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've nominated a bunch of redirects with which you were involved for deletion, please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 August 18#سكس. – Uanfala (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted edits of page Denim (color) to complete history. 73.1.54.180 ( talk) 22:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi! You've closed a couple AfD recently without specifying a result: [2] [3]. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 09:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keesingia (redirects). Since you had some involvement with the Keesingia (redirects) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 09:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you complete the history of the Pink-orange page by restoring all deleted revisions? Ssjhowarthisawesome ( talk) 23:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wino and Derelict ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
User talk:GracyM#Warina Hussain, August 2018. —usernamekiran
(talk)
14:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
You have moved Keesingia (redirects) to Keesingia gigas. Can you please also move Talk:Keesingia (redirects) to Talk:Keesingia gigas (without redirect)? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Anthony, please restore the original title here after two undiscussed moves. Thanks, Johnbod ( talk) 09:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Sir,
I see that you deleted the page for artist Lydia Janssen. Can it be put back up again? I did pay some Indian company $200 or something for it when they spammed me. I didn't know paying wasn't allowed, I was busy at the time and wanted to save myself the time working out how to create pages.
I apologise I didn't read the rules on that. But the page was accurate and I think unbiased. I see that other artists at similar stages of their career (for example cecily brown) have wikipedia entries.
How do I get the page reinstated? or should I write another one. I feel stupid now for wasting money. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukejanssen ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
How can I get it reinstated? Do I correctly refer to external press sources? And takeaway any links to the artists website?
Dear Anthony,
I usually edit in the Hebrew Wikipedia but a new user asked me for my help in getting an old draft of the article in the title that was deleted in 2016. She wants to improve the article in order to republish it. Can you send me the original article from 2016? Best regards, Avner 16:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by אבנר ( talk • contribs)
It seems weird to delete a draft article for any reason other than copyright violation or, I don't know, evil or something. Duplication of a deleted article is actually a great reason for a draft article. The article was deleted for insufficiently broad documentation. It would have been an easy article to fix but I didn't have time, so I saved it as a draft for later use. A professional researcher who starts/improves Wikipedia articles as part of her library job already told me she'd added it to her queue and had wrangled a number of sources. So the draft was for her use as well. Regardless of those facts, drafts are for unfinished articles. An article that was deleted because it was unfinished is appropriately made into a draft. In fact, I've known one admin who did just that rather than deleting, which was very cool of her. Please restore Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes. Thank you. Thmazing ( talk) 19:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Lebanon national basketball team (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AaronWikia ( talk) 17:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, please revert the move that was requested by AncestorTrracer and processed by you in good faith. While it is correct that the municipal classification is in fact rural municipality, its official legal name is the Municipality of Killarney-Turtle Mountain. Evidence can be found on the municipality's own official website, and in the provincial regulation that created the amalgamated municipality (see sections 2 and 4). Also note the use of two spaces and dash in the official legal name. Cheers, Hwy43 ( talk) 05:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, please review the history of Draft:Al-Ahli SC Handball (Amman) and Draft:Al-Ahli SC Basketball (Amman), as both pages now refer to the handball team. Might you have mixed up the page history for the basketball and handball teams? – Fayenatic London 08:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, could you help me with a few histmerges? An editor has been creating blank/unreferenced/one-sentence articles when substantial drafts made by other users on the same subject exist, then either copy-pasting the article contents over themselves or waiting for someone else to do so. The following all could do with a histmerge so that the original edits are attributed and preserved. Thanks in advance!
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I can't imagine what Wikipedia would be without your tireless histmerging work! Bennv3771 ( talk) 10:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hey, since you seem to be an army of one when it comes to these, I figured I'd start here. It looks like Fishstick ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Fish finger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) have been the victim of repeated copy/paste moves. First, would it be possible to get the history sorted out on that? =) Second, would it be possible (per WP:ENGVAR) to get the final page placed at Fishstick ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) with a redirect from Fish finger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)? Thanks! — Locke Cole • t • c 03:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Does this qualify for Speedy G4 again (I can't see the previous version)? If so, might need salting. Pam D 15:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Unfavorable Semicircle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhkohh ( talk) 14:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
First off, I'd like to thank you for all the excellent work you did with the numerous requests I filed at WP:RMT.
Here's a feedback to a request that was handled poorly earlier this year, when admin GB fan disregarded said request and created a new page instead ("no need to move, just create a new redirect"). The way this was handled is not only discouraging, but also undermines the concept of preserving a coherent edit history of this naming-anomaly. Hope this feedback is appreciated. Rfassbind – talk 10:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I must be missing something here. An editor creates two identical articles one after the other. I redirect one to the other. Why then do you delete this, perform a histmerge, and restore this, meaning that we now have a much more complicated history (with two creations) for what appears to be zero benefit to the encyclopedia, the readers, or the editors? No attribution was lost before your histmerge, but after your edits, my redirecting is lost and your actions supersede it. This seems like a total waste of time and energy to make things worse, not better. Fram ( talk) 11:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
This is about 2018–19 Mid-American Conference men's basketball season and 2018–19 Mid-American Conference men's basketball season, btw Fram ( talk) 11:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Anthony, sorry to bother you - please revert this undiscussed move from the usual term ( High Renaissance), for which a rather silly rationale is given by a fairly new user. Johnbod ( talk) 01:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
hi,
I am a somewhat experienced wikipedia editor and -user, and I would very much like to have read-only access to the Deleted Pages. How could this be arranged?
I do not have time to become an Admin myself.
-- Mick2 ( talk) 15:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Genie (feral child. Since you had some involvement with the Genie (feral child redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 08:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. Every time you move a page to/from Zxcvbnm, it gets added to my watchlist. I am certain I am not the only watchlist being affected. See Wikipedia:Page_mover#Watchlists, User_talk:Paine_Ellsworth/Archive_15#Pet_page, and Wikipedia_talk:Requested_moves/Archive_29#Watchlists. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:14, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! You just moved this page in response to a "request" somewhere else (which I can't see). But it needs to be discussed on the talk page of the article. The claims in the "request" are at least in part simply false: the term generally used in English appears to be "Char siu", and until recently this was the name used throughout the article. The "request" confuses two things: terms commonly used in English ("char siu") and (more or less standardised) romanisations of Chinese words (cha siu); in other words I think this is not NPOV reporting of the real world, but what someone thinks the real world ought to be. I'm not sure of the best way to handle this: just to move back, and start a talk page discussion?? Imaginatorium ( talk) 04:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Please quote your sources. Xx236 ( talk) 13:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
The page Zxcvbnm had some deleted revisions from 2008 and earlier. To avoid problems in the future, you should move all of those revisions to Zxcvbnm (nonsense), which should then be immediately deleted. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
You have only restored Talk:Timothy Heller, but not Timothy Heller. Please move the deleted revisions for Timothy Heller to Draft:Timothy Heller (version 3), redirect that page to Draft:Timothy Heller, and move Draft talk:Timothy Heller (version 2) to Draft talk:Timothy Heller (version 3). GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
I just took a look at the history of the title of the B.o.B article (note the absence of a dot after the second 'B'). It appears that there was an RM consensus declared that it should not be moved to that title (21 March 2010), and then you helped complete a unilateral copy-paste move just three weeks later (15 April 2010). When you do histmerges, do you look at Talk pages for recent RMs first? — BarrelProof ( talk) 17:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deoxyribozyme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cofactor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
This is for your valuable efforts in the field of history merge. Thank you for your contributions in wikipedia as an administrator. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 13:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
This is for your valuable contributions and service in the field of HISTMERGE. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 13:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC) |
Yes this scam unfortunately exists. Article here [8] Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 23:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
For moving my draft into mainspace. Thanks.
Toshio Yamaguchi (
talk)
11:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Need some help at Nota (film). The film is named after the NOTA option in the election voting ballets which stands for none of the above. Since this is an abbreviation, which naturally are written in all-caps, does the film also needs to be in ALLCAPS ? Is this a proper noun ? --Let There Be Sunshine 15:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony please undo the deletion of the Draft: Bia Mustafa Alloush it was created under articles for common and I was following it since its creation last week. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal ( talk • contribs) 08:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Anthony for your kind support and restoring the draft, we will keep improving the page article as necessary. Thank you.Bilal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted as "Unambiguous copyright infringement". I'm not so sure about that, on Commons we have OTRS from (IIRC) the campaign manager. This should at least be discussed before deletion. Alexis Jazz ( talk) 18:05, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Please restore all the deleted revisions for User:Felestin1714/sandbox. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 18:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
But User:Felestin1714/sandbox had lots of blanking edits. You should therefore delete that page and restore the 161 non-blank revisions (i.e. excluding revision 678609107 and other revisions with "Blanked the page" in their edit summaries). GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
You have made a minor mistake while splitting some revisions from Parbati Rai to Parbati Rai (politician). Please correct this mistake by doing the following steps:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Now, the dancer's article appears to have been deleted. Please do the following:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 22:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
In Special:Diff/864596842, you have accidentally removed 2 requests instead of marking them as done. Please restore those 2 requests and mark them as done under Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Completed requests October 2018. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
You have restored 119 revisions for Mord Fustang, but then re-deleted the page and restored only 88 revisions. Please discuss the controversial issue of whether the rest of the deleted revisions should stay deleted or be restored. If they should stay deleted, then you should simply delete the page and restore all the revisions from December 2016 and later except revisions 755477897, 768878199, 796280190, and 802963582 (since one of these was mistakenly restored). Also, in that case, Talk:Mord Fustang should be deleted and then have only the revisions from December 2016 and later be restored, leaving the earlier revisions deleted. Perhaps, the deleted revisions for the article from 2015 to early 2016 should also be moved back to Draft:Mord Fustang, where they were originally from. Otherwise, the article should be deleted and then all the revisions except the 4 mentioned earlier restored. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do the following, then, to avoid confusion:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 22:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you moved Jaggi Vasudev to Sadhguru upon a user's request. Another user has now reverted the move and there's a discussion going on at the talk page. Request your participation Madrasiman ( talk) 16:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Anthony Appleyard, I'm disappointed to see you speedied this, despite the objection raised on the article's talk page — did you consider it?
I contend the new version was totally different and overcame the (perceived) shortcomings concerning notabiity. Far more independent reliable sources were cited in the new article and process does allow "re-creation" of a previously deleted article if these new additional sources are provided.
I further contend that, as a completely new article, it was out of process to be speedily deleted, but instead any attempt to remove it again should have been settled by the community on a new AFD.
Please re-consider. JGHowes talk 21:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Thanks, Anthony. Here's a morning cup of coffee for you! JGHowes talk 11:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hi. Could you please explain this. I'm not criticising, I simply do not understand it. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 22:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
You have merged the history of User:Sidiperla/sandbox to Andreas Eppink, which I have since moved to Draft:Andreas Eppink. So, can you please restore Talk:Andreas Eppink and move it to Draft talk:Andreas Eppink? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello.
You recently nominated my user page for a speedy deletion on the grounds of unambiguous advertising (G11). I had been editing an article, "HIV/AIDS in Honduras," solely with the purpose of improving it for an assignment for one of my college courses. It is unclear to me how any of the information I added could be considered advertising, as it was simply factual, though I admit I had mistakenly been editing it in my user page rather than my sandbox, which I was under the impression I had been using. I need to retrieve my work urgently, as it is part of my class grade. Additionally, I will be moving this article to the main space when I am done, and I am happy to make any changes necessary to prevent it from being "speedily deleted" again.
Joarfr ( talk) 18:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Please restore the deleted revisions for Rainbow S.p.A. and Vector (disambiguation). You forgot to do so for both redirects. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Please revert Nekso (company) to revision 864170114. You forgot to do this earlier. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 14:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. The two articles are: Olympic Airways v. Hanson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Olympic Airways v. Husain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). The COMMONNAME is Olympic Airways v. Husain. The Hanson article is the older of the two, and today it became a redirect to the Husain article. Both articles were apparently developed independently of each other and there is no cut and paste move involved, at least not yet. Is there a case for a history merge of these two articles, or should the material of the Hanson article be pasted to the Husain article with proper attribution? Dr. [[User talk:|K.]] 06:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Please respond to #Mord Fustang and #Restore Rainbow S.p.A. and Vector (disambiguation) as soon as possible. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anthony Appleyard:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
—usernamekiran
(talk)
06:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm the instructor for Public Relations and Digital Media. I'm not sure why you deleted my student's Sandbox. Their user page is clearly marked as being enrolled in my course. Their task is to find nonprofits in Chicago that are notable and create pages for them. Please revert their sandbox as they haven't even gotten time to get proper instruction to edit, as they've only stared with an annotated bibliography. ZachMcDowell ( talk) 12:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Last year, you have created a useless blank page at Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge/Rambot. Please delete that page now. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:37, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RoboCop (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoboCop (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 18:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, I created a page that you deleted because you considered it advertising.
I believe you could have let me know so I can work on it as I am not yet at your kind of level when it comes to setting up pages - 10 till date.
I am about to create the same page differently as I consider that the Nigerian startup community are quite prominent to be mentioned on Wikipedia starting with the e-commerce platforms. I plan to create for others as well who are making waves in the country and taking Africa to the world.
-- Ladispeaks ( talk) 16:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Chandrashekhar (TV series) has been recreated. You should therefore restore the deleted revisions for the article and its talk page. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
The histories of Template:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2), Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2), Template:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/doc, and Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/doc all consist of redirects only. You should therefore delete those 4 unneeded "version 2" redirects. Also, you should move Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/Archive 1 and Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/Archive 2 back to Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar/Archive 1 and Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar/Archive 2 respectively. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 21:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering, after rfa/getting the tools, is there any page to perform experiments with histmerges? Also, what do you think of User:Usernamekiran/my RfA criteria? It's still under construction though. —usernamekiran
(talk)
04:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
struck out the silliness. —usernamekiran
(talk)
10:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Please restore the deleted revisions for Draft talk:Survive the Nights (video game) from September 2018 and later that you forgot to restore. After restoring, please do a text merge. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 17:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Crowhurst (film) has been recreated. You should therefore restore the deleted revisions for the article and its talk page. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 04:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breech birth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amelia ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
First off, I'd love to thank you for all the work you've done handling all of the move requests I have made in the last year. Truly, your work and effort is greatly appreciated. However, I messaging you to discuss a move that you made today that was done in error. You recently moved the draft (Draft: The Sword in the Stone (upcoming film)) to a new title at (Draft: The Sword in the Stone (2019 film)). This is an issue as there has been no confirmation from any reliable, secondary source as to when any of the television series or films that are being produced for Disney+ will premiere. All that has been confirmed is that the service will launch in late-2019. So, basically, The Sword in the Stone and all other upcoming Disney+ films should continue to be listed as upcoming until such as a time as Disney announced their official premiere dates. I hope you will initiate the moving of the draft back to its original title as soon as you are able. Also, please see Draft talk:The Sword in the Stone (2019 film) for the discussion that has been generated over this.
Sincerely, BoogerD ( talk) 19:39, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Surreal Barnstar |
Greatest admin ever! Flooded with them hundreds 10:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Anthony; should this page be deleted? I don't understand the "version 2" thing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony,
My submission 'OurPath' was recently deleted by you under G11. Are you able to retrieve the deleted material for me? I have submitted a deletion review.
Thank you!
Sdfish78 ( talk) 12:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, can you please close the move at Talk:President of the Government of Morocco. Not only will it have been 7 days since relisting, the initial user who queried the technical request has not returned since, and for the reasons given in the actual request. I believe it should be moved. Thanks, -- Tærkast ( Discuss) 10:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
You forgot to do a history merge from Babylon.js to Draft:Babylon.js. Please restore Babylon.js and then merge its history to that of Draft:Babylon.js, with all the revisions for the draft page from April 2018 and later restored. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
You should have histmerged Draft:Story to Draft:Story (social media), not Story (social media). Please correct this mistake by doing the following:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
And finally, there is one more mistake that needs to be corrected. You have moved too many revisions to the draft's history. Please do the following history split steps:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 06:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I was in the MIDDLE of discussing with another admin why the New Saxon Spelling page I'd posted met the criteria and shouldn't be deleted, when you deleted it. It had only been nominated for speedy deletion less than 24 hours before. I can't even see the talk page to see what that admin's responses to my comments were. -- Infinitum11 ( talk) 21:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Anthony, you seem to have done a history move on this significant page with an hour or so of a completely undiscussed move by an editor with fewer than 200 edits over some 6 years! What on earth? At the least, you should set up a retrospective move discussion, and warn the editor about this sort of behaviour. Would this be picked-up by people who have the now-deleted old pages on their watchlists? There is a case for the move, but as you know, this is absolutely not how things should be done. Johnbod ( talk) 15:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Cedar101 made Zxcvbnm a redirect to QWERTY. Then you have deleted the redirect, and the original redirect creator recreated the redirect. You should therefore restore the deleted revisions for the "Zxcvbnm" redirect. Also, to avoid having to keep on deleting and undeleting the redirect every time you make a temporary page move, you should stop making temporary moves to "Zxcvbnm" and instead simply append "zxcvbnm" to the end of the page title for temporary moves. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 19:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthony Appleyard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthony Appleyard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, Page: /info/en/?search=Draft:Nullcon I had created a community page draft. I request you to restore the draft, if it is looking like the promotional draft, I would like to improve the draft. nullcon is community helping spread infosec awareness in India. I had provided proper references for each writing. -- Ghumade ( talk) 16:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, not that I have any objections, but can I ask who G6ed Richard Nixon (song)? It seems quite out of the blue. Ss 112 02:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
While I'm disappointed that you declined the G5 on Sunny Pawar, I'm more perturbed by your logic that there were " only 3 edits by a banned user (Shrinivaskulkarni1388)". There were also 1 by User:TheUnbeatable (a sock of User:RohithKumarPatali - SPI) and 9 by User:Prasath94. However, I nominated it as the creation of User:LisaWilliams (a sock of User:Rudra.shukla - SPI). Just my 2¢. Cabayi ( talk) 11:25, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. There won't be any parallel history on Governor of Massachusetts. Please merge all revisions of List of Governors of Massachusetts from creation up to and including December 2, 2005, into Governor of Massachusetts. The earliest two revisions from Governor of Massachusetts should be merged into List of Governors of Massachusetts. -- Bsherr ( talk) 07:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Why did you perform a history merge on Randy Cooper? Please {{ ping}} me when you respond. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 16:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of
archiving. According to
Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 184.1 KB. See
Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a
bot. If you have any questions, place a {{
help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the
help desk. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
16:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, I was thinking about creating a page for Namibian student leader Joseph Kalimbwe and I notice that someone already tried to do this and it got deleted a few times. You closed the discussion I believe, saying that the piece was promotional and didn't establish notability. I create a lot of pages for people from underrepresented parts of the world, and a Namibian person on Twitter asked me if it would be possible to create a page for Kalimbwe. It seems to me that he might be notable enough, but that when someone tried to create the page before, they did it badly and broke NPoV rules. I wonder if you think that if I created the page again, with better sourcing and following guidelines, that it would still get deleted or not? All the best. -- Jwslubbock ( talk) 16:32, 24 November 2018 (UT
Anthony, this article was not supposed to have been moved, and am requesting it to be moved back to Get Together (The Youngbloods song). I know you didn't move it to begin with, but simply put, it is not a Beatles article. Best, -- Discographer ( talk) 16:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Delighted to see that you're using it now! I need to get back to working on clearing out that backlog! I took a break from it after I finished emptying Category:Possible cut-and-paste moves in August. wbm1058 ( talk) 12:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Question: Why was this article removed and turned into a redirect without any discussion on the talk page? The title in question was covered and reviewed in multiple books, magazines, websites, etc. I was in the process of cleaning up and expanding the article this afternoon.
More specifically, there is a book published by Bloomsbury Academic, as part of their Approaches to Digital Game Studies series, that goes into some analysis and detail on this title, but I had not gotten to that point before the page was removed. Thanks. --Surv1v4l1st ▌ Talk| Contribs▌ 23:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Dark Tower (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the The Dark Tower (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:10, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, I see you deleted a page I created [Baba Ijebu registered as Premier Lotto Limited] and gave the reason as "Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." Well I should let you know Baba Ijebu is the oldest and biggest lotto company in Nigeria operating since 2001 [9], I am surprised you deleted the page when most Nigerian lottos are underrepresented here on Wikipedia including Nigeria betting sites. Baba Ijebu was listed out of the two Nigeria lotto companies listed on Wikipedia Lotteries by country. Also a company that generates over 1 billion naira in taxes surely is of importance [10]. A company that allows citizens earn via commission is significant [11] See more stories on Baba Ijebu here It is also only the lotto company in Nigeria that operates online and offline [12]. A game that both women and men play [13], A woman played and lost 1.9 million naira in a single day [14]. Another woman killed her husband over Baba Ijebu [15], even cops are not left over. [16]. Baba Ijebu is seen as the hope for the common man and most average Nigerians play it on a daily basis [17] [18] [19]
They also signed a table tennis star, Quadri Haruna for $75,000 [20]. I believe with these verifiable links and notable sources, you will agree with me they sure are of importance and significant. Everybody, young or old knows Baba ijebu and even plays it. I think it operates in Ghana as well, not sure about though, I will have to do a research to confirm Mantosa ( talk) 22:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for helping implement the new IIoT article! I noticed that there's still a redirect to Internet_of_things#IIoT ( redirect page here), but I think it has to do with the capitalization of the title. Do you think you could take a look and help resolve the problem? Would it also then be appropriate to add a {{Template:Main}} tag to the section the redirect is pointing to? I appreciate any help with the issue.-- FacultiesIntact ( talk) 00:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Please reconsider your recent move of Tied test per Wikipedia:CRICKET#Style. Cheers. -- Mattinbgn ( talk) 03:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
It looks like you deleted Category:Building using deprecated parameters. It is used by Template:Infobox building to flag problems. Perhaps it was missing the Template:empty category? MB 14:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pharmacology of lead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rasa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, you deleted my page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Thomas_W._W._Johnson and I disagree with your decision, I was not finished editing it either. Could you please restore the page, I had spent a lot of time on this already and was about to edit it some more, as well as starting an entry for my company (Digital Asset Management Ltd) Wiki profile. If you have any suggestions for review I am happy to take them on-board. Thank you 23:34, 4 December 2018 User:Radarlight
@ Anthony Appleyard: thank you for restoring it - I take on-board your comment on writing the article neutrally and not like an advertisement however I would argue it is already neutrally written, with positive and negative points i.e. family divorce, incomplete law degree... I have used profiles such as #REDIRECT [ [21]] and #REDIRECT [ [22]] as examples and I see little difference between the three as an example... would less or more referencing help? More details in certain areas, or less? Please specify. Your advice is appreciated. Thank you
It appears you were asked by FWTH to move his article over my redirect. By this point I'm sure you're well aware of our history of not getting along, but for the record, my comments at WP:RM/TR were not objections, so he didn't need to directly ask you. I knew the article he made would be moved over my redirect, I was simply saying I wish(ed) not to have my redirect history swapped with his userspace draft, as has previously happened. Ss 112 13:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xindi/version 1. Since you had some involvement with the Xindi/version 1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi AA,
I was typing up an AFD submission that would have suggested that as alternative to outright deletion, it might possibly be a useful
WP:REDIRECT to
Play That Funky Music#Other cover versions, when you deleted the article.
What are your thoughts about this?
Pete AU aka --
Shirt58 (
talk)
10:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Good day! Why did you delete " The Profane Rights of Man", " Songs for the Dead Live", " Profane Rights of Man" and " My Sanity"? Three are Bad Religion songs, and the other is an upcoming King Diamond album. Please {{ ping}} me when you respond. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 19:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of
archiving. According to
Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 208.5 KB. See
Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a
bot. If you have any questions, place a {{
help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the
help desk. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
19:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry Anthony - can you move Sarah Cowley (disambiguation) over your new Sarah Cowley, and I think we're there. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 23:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
There was one deleted revision for Talk:April 1914 that you forgot to restore a while ago. Can you restore that revision please? Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-abortion movement/version 2. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-abortion movement/version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 01:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony,
You deleted my page on No/Hugs even though it was approved and checked by other members of the community. You just listed "multiple reasons" as an excuse. There was nothing wrong with it and I have created multiple wikipedia pages since to know that it was meeting all guidelines. Please restore?
A. It was not advertising. I already resolved this issue in April and re-wrote everything based on other band profiles.
B. It was not unimportant or insignificant. No/Hugs is a national band with performances at Vans Warped Tour, NAMM etc. There are other artists with less succesful careers that have wikipedia pages and it seems to be fine.
Hikoulini ( talk) 12:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Hikoulini
I understand the reasons of deletion. Again I'm saying that if anything was perceived as promotional I could have re written it or paraphrased. Respectfully, No/Hugs is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. I am basing this statements on other Wikipedia pages currently existing for other bands. Hikoulini ( talk) 22:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
User:Anthony Appleyard thank you for considering my note and for undeleting. Hikoulini ( talk) 22:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Appleyard,
I have seen that you have deleted Bekir Kaya. I would like to understand why. I have asked an Admin and the nominator of the deletion about what to change. The nominator answered, that it showed a 44% compatibility of the page with a source. I changed rather a lot, reformulated several phrases, but some info is simply as it is and should be able to be included. There are plenty of pages with simply a phrase like here or here. My article had education, professional and political career as well as legal prosecution. Before to speedy delete a page I have seen (thanks to your many links on the talk page) an Admin should decide if a page can not be saved. Now there were two phrases that were rather similar in the text. This was it. You could have just deleted these two phrases. The sources themselves were fine, sure as good as others also used. And Bekir Kaya is/was a rather influential human rights lawyer and mayor of a larger city. Julie Auger is someone in a University Administration and can stay, too. Why could Bekir Kaya not stay? Because of two phrases that could have been deleted or rephrased?
Just, I would like to understand why you deleted it, and what can be done better.
Best,
-- Lean Anael ( talk) 19:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The current redirect at Good form is terrible. It has an uncapitalized "f" and redirects to a song article disambiguated with "(song)". You have also restored revisions that were deleted in 2007. Please delete the "Good form" redirect. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 17:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not opening an RM on Apollo Lunar Module, just asking for the reversal of a controversial move. Did I put it in the wrong place? If so, please reverse the move to upper-case and let Dicklyon or someone else open the RM (if so I would have worded it different, thanks). Randy Kryn ( talk) 05:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mandragora (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandragora (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx ( talk) 16:23, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. When the other admin restored the article he forgot to restore the talk page and I wasn't sure how to go about getting it undeleted. ♟♙ ( talk) 20:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
In the above diff, you have removed 4 requests I have added at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Please restore them and move them to the "Completed requests" section. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 21:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
I rather summarily reverted your recent edit to the Biggles article (contrasting Johns' and Tolkien's approach to chronological and thematic consistency) on the grounds of OR. On reflection, this was rather silly of me - the article is, of course riddled with uncitable statements, and in fact would be very dull and boring otherwise! I have made amends (I hope) with a version of your basic idea - with a (cited) reference to one of Tolkien's own letters. I omit your valuable (and, as I said in my original comment) probably true enough explanation of this in the much more chaotic world of magazine fiction for adolescents in which Johns was working, although I would not object to your reinstating this yourself (preferably with some kind of citation this time!) Best regards. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 23:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Good morning, this Monday I wrote to contest the nomination to the speedy deletion from English Wikipedia of the "Datalogic S.p.A." page, translation of the Italian page. I tried to rewrite the whole content eliminating the promotional tones, and including the major possible number of external sources and datas for each adfirmation which could still sound "biased" (the Italian version still brings the label "Article with a promotional tone" due to the lack of negative data, as it has been explained to me, and I'll work on it in the next steps). Another Wikipedia admin answered me that, despite agreeding with my contestation, he rightly noticed that I shot myself in the foot by making so much of it in bold type, clearly contravening WP:MOS, and suggesting me to contact you and request that the article be recreated as a user draft so that I could clean it up. May I ask you if it could be possible to recreate it, or elseware if there's a preferrable way of uploading the new "unbold" version of it and submit it for revision to the admin team to overcome correctly the speedy deletion? Thank you in advance, and have a pleasant Thursday! -- Riccardo Bigazzi ( talk) 15:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2019! |
Hi Anthony Appleyard/2018, Sending you a warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Good morning,
User:Anthony Appleyard can you kindly help move this article /info/en/?search=User:Jwslubbock/Joseph_Kalimbwe as created by user:Jwslubbock into main space. It had been created but was moved into John's space for needed improvement. Since then, with the help of the editor experienced in Namibian content user:pgallet, it has been significantly improved and has its neutrality tone improved as the subject has been subjects to arrests and prosecutions. The issue of him being a notable author and youth activist have also been significantly outlined in that regard and I believe it now fits to be moved 41.182.2.20 ( talk) 07:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Could you please restore that? Nikkimaria ( talk) 18:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)). Since you had some involvement with the Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for fixing my error. Can you also close this request on Requested moves page, I had done it in hurry? [23]-- Nicoljaus ( talk) 16:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks so much quickly sorting out the issue. Much has changed in the field since I lasted edited the article 3 years ago, and it's going to take a few days to work out how to best integrate it in to the article. But the promised update should be coming in the next week or so. FeydHuxtable ( talk) 23:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello.
You recently deleted my own user page for me at my own request. The reason for my doing so was to do away with the edit history for privacy concerns. My question to you is if I choose to re-create my user page to look exactly as it was before the deletion, will the edit history re-appear? I would think not, but I want to make sure there is no "glitch" in the system or any triggers in the system that would signal a flag for a page which has been deleted to suddenly appear again without being "officially" restored through the "proper" WP:REFUND channels (which I most definitely would NEVER want to do). Any insight would be helpful. You seem like a very busy person, so I appreciate your time. Thanks. Huggums537 ( talk) 23:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
I apologize again for talking to you about this issue but it seems that the page on No/Hugs was deleted again for the same reasons even though I included press links to support from national press in the U.S , international press from England, Greece, Cyprus and Malta. I think that the user that is deleting the page has a personal grudge against No/Hugs since I asked him to tell me if the page was up to his standards and he never responded with corrections and I would like you to please undelete the page once more. It is not right to delete pages off of wikipedia just because of someone's personal bias. Please advise.
Hikoulini ( talk) 05:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
According to this history for Draft:Naman Ambavi, I was wondering why the Aug 22, 2013 A7 is not included? Also, see the FYI I just posted. After you've had a chance to see the history and SPI case, do you think it is a candidate for CSD or does the restore require a different approach? Atsme ✍🏻 📧 07:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Christmas! | |
Hello Anthony Appleyard, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD| Talk 07:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
See above. You deleted this page without explanation while I was editing it. Regards So Why 13:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony Appleyard, I stumbled upon a botched WP:ROBIN move and wasn't sure if any revisions should be history merged or just simply deleted as improbable redirects.
Thanks, — Andy W. ( talk) 18:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
I see this has been deleted, yet my protest against the speedy deletion was never answered, care to elaborate on the reasoning behind it? the article linked as copyright infringement is a copy of the original Wikipedia article and does not constitute copyright infringement at all. Jurryaany ( talk) 23:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, ISKCON Temple Siliguri, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
CASSIOPEIA( talk) 15:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
I do not think it so promotional that G11 applies. I was aboutto replace the speedy tag with a NPOV tag as you were eleting it. I'm very reluctant to use G11 conr content disputes regarding historical figures. DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anthony Appleyard: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ 00:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
==Deletion review for File:The Offspring @ Good Things 2018 Sydney.jpg==
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The Offspring @ Good Things 2018 Sydney.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I reuploaded this file, this time as a free-work, with permission from the owner and i linked the email receipt i got. why was it stil deleted? I did everything right this time... Boofhead185 ( talk) 04:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Can you sort this out?
Stefan2 ( talk) 21:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anthony Appleyard, Would You Be So Kind To Bring Back The Brother Lion Article Because I'm Making A Prequel To The 2003 Disney Animated Film Brother Bear If You Bring Back The Article You Have A Option. You Can Come To Auditions For Brother Lion. Thank You APaoloL — Preceding unsigned comment added by APaoloL ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Aoi (青い) (
talk)
12:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
It seems that when the page was moved to removed some parallel history, some of the older history was accidentally removed. Some people noticed this in the talk page as well [24]. Can you please restore this history? SNS ( talk) 04:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey, since you moved "Just Got Paid" to only list Sigala in the article title, I think its only fair that the same be done to all his other songs. If you check here, every single article from "Only One" onwards has two artists listed in the title. Regards.-- N Ø 05:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, Happy New Year, It seems the two of us clashed again. I completed the move request of Prairie oyster at the same time you started a discussion thread. After reading the reply by the requestor User:Sigehelmus and doing my own research on the topic, I agree that the Prairie oyster cocktail is indeed the primary topic, so I have created a DAB page and moved the cocktail article to the Prairie oyster location. I find the RM discussion redundant, If you agree with me kindly revert the RM discussion thread, if you think discussion is needed, then feel free to undo my page moves and continue with the RM discussion. regards. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 23:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please revert your recent move of the article Khyber Agency because a move discussion about it is taking place at Talk:Kurram_Agency#Requested_move_29_June_2018. Why don't you wait for the discussion to end before the moves so that we can have consensus? Thanks for the cooperation, Khestwol ( talk) 06:52, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, though I was not aware of the comment above, I have reverted the move of Khyber Agency to Bajaur District because it appeared to be an error. There was already an open move discussion at Talk:Kurram Agency as noted here, where Khyber Agency was proposed to be moved to Khyber District (there is another article, Bajaur Agency, which is proposed to be moved to Bajaur District). I have noted somewhat belatedly that there was previous significant history of undiscussed moves being reverted to the original title ( Khyber Agency) per WP:RMTR at the page, which resulted in move protection. I am assuming you were attempting to fulfill a request at "uncontroversial technical requests" that actually turned out not to be uncontroversial (there is already an editor opposing in the open move discussion), but please let me know if you need me to undo this reversion––I hope that it will not be taken as an attempt to wheel war. Best, Dekimasu よ! 09:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed you just moved the article Anatolian peoples to the title Ancient peoples of Anatolia after a request was made at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests#Uncontroversial technical requests. Such a move is in fact not uncontroversial. There is an ongoing discussion on this topic at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 July 2#Category:Anatolian peoples. In your rationale for the move you say that "the scope of the article is the peoples of Anatolia in ancient times". This is wrong. The summary of the article says that its scope is "Indo-European peoples of Anatolia identified by their use of the Anatolian languages." Information about peoples of Anatolia in ancient times is already contained at List of ancient peoples of Anatolia. In fact, the move you just made only created more problems. Krakkos ( talk) 11:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Just wanted to clarify that I only recreated the page to redirect it as was specifically mentioned in the close of the AfD " It can also be editorially redirected, as a plausible search term, to
Eric Weinstein#Intellectual dark web". Just wanted to make sure you were aware of that statement in the close. I think the redirect should still exist and would have thought it would have needed to go back through AfD or something similar before deleting it, since a redirect was specifically mentioned as an option in the last AfD. {{u|
zchrykng}} {
T|
C}
19:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, This is up at FAC and I just wanted to check that the start of the page history is ok - it was supposed begun after a WP:RM request, but begins without any indication of its origin. Please see the history and the discussion at the FAC first point in my section. Do you think this is ok? On another point. There is Yeomanry Cavalry (disambiguation) which redirects to Yeomanry after an edit by you in February, and isn't hatnoted at either Yeomanry or Yeomanry Cavalry Johnbod ( talk) 13:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The page Draft:2018 US Darts Masters (version 2) was deleted as a broken redirect. But it had some non-redirect revisions in its history. So, can you please undelete that page, move it to 2018 US Darts Masters (version 2), and then retarget the redirect to 2018 US Darts Masters? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Rahul Aggarwal is now about an Indian producer. But it also had deleted revisions about a business manager. To avoid confusion, you should move all the deleted revisions for Rahul Aggarwal and Talk:Rahul Aggarwal to Rahul Aggarwal (manager) and Talk:Rahul Aggarwal (manager) respectively, and then immediately re-delete the business manager page and its talk page. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
2018 United Kingdom heat wave. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be
verifiable through
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see
here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
18:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of
archiving. According to
Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 258.4 KB. See
Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a
bot. If you have any questions, place a {{
help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the
help desk. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
18:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Please place {{archive|User talk:Anthony Appleyard}} at the top of User talk:Anthony Appleyard/2018/January-June like you have done for earlier archives. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 05:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I undid your deletion of that redirect. That draft hasn't been approved and looks like it fails GNG, and in the process we're replacing a potentially useful redirect with a red link. – Muboshgu ( talk) 05:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Could you merge the history of The Finest Hours (film) into The Finest Hours (2016 film)? As means to eliminate unneeded redirections without edit history loss. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 16:17, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mobile phone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
The page 2019 Indian Premier League had some deleted revisions from 2017. Can those revisions please be restored? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony - I was starting to edit and tidy up the Invalid carriage article, but was puzzled when I found the talk page deleted. I note that you moved the talk page for this article to Cars for wheelchair users in 2016. Was the intent to merge the two articles? NealeFamily ( talk) 10:16, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Here's a star for your collection. This one is in recognition of your diligent work doing page moves and fixing page histories. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 20:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC) |
Sandstein's user talk page does not use numbered archives, but rather monthly archives. So, can you please move User talk:Sandstein/Archive 1 to User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2005/July, add a link to the July page under User talk:Sandstein/Archives#2005, and remove the {{ archives}} template from User talk:Sandstein? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
You have moved User:Pbsouthwood/AP Diving to AP Diving. You should therefore also replace the red link to the former under the "Malplaced disambiguation pages" link in the Links section at the top of your user talk page with a blue link to the latter article. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear Antony
Can you kindly open this page Joseph Kalimbwe protected from creation? The page was deleted for not having notable sources. I have sinse found more reliable sources which I suppose meets Wikipedia rules and regulations. I wish to first submit it as a draft for review by an Admin rather create it instantly so I do not suffer the misfortune of seeing it deleted again.
Best regards
105.232.255.39 ( talk) 18:09, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Paine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Paine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing ++ 21:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vistula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puncture ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Could you merge the draft history of Draft:Downton Abbey (film) into Downton Abbey (film)? Draft need not exist now with it being in mainspace but edit history I fer should be preserved. Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 23:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
The page Toy Story 4 (old version) had some useful history. You should therefore restore that page, move it (without redirect) to Toy Story 4 (version 2), and then redirect the latter page to Toy Story 4. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
The other day I put in a request for a histmerge because I found that Japanese Pig was created by copy and pasting content from Japanese Boar. When I read WP:CutPaste I thought that asking for a histmerge might solve the content fork problem, but since you rejected it I suppose that wasn't the way to go. But since that's the case, do you have any suggestions for what should be done with the redundant article? Should it be changed to a redirect?
Thank you for your time. Mcampany ( talk) 01:37, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you please bring it to the mainspace? The film completed its shoot this May (thereby passing WP:NFF) and is scheduled to be released on August 31. -- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
In case you don't have Phabricator notifications turned on, I mentioned you at phab:T20493#4440118. As our top history merger, I think your comments on the topic would be helpful. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
-- Alexandrov98 ( talk) 09:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)The article about Stanislav V Shekshnia was deleted: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Alexandrov98#Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Stanislav_V._Shekshnia
Stanislav Shekshnia is a leading professor at one of the top business universities in the world - INSEAD: https://www.insead.edu/faculty-research/faculty/stanislav-shekshnia His latest contributions were published in Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2018/03/how-to-be-a-good-board-chair and discussed in Forbes https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/berlinschoolofcreativeleadership/2018/04/03/stanislav-shekshnia-on-athletic-leaders-in-turbulent-times/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/
Recently My Page "Lavi Hoss" has been deleted by you because of copyright claim of taking info from source. If I change text, can I create? sbshuvol ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vistula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marienburg ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Sun. Since you had some involvement with the The Sun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 06:28, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. You deleted two files, File:Detroyat class uss niantic.jpg and File:Statue of Poseidon.jpg, under speedy criterion G5 (creations by banned users). The two files were uploaded by a user who was not banned at the time of uploading. They were, however, using an alternate account in violation of an Arbcom restriction, in which case you might consider that G5 applies anyway, but just in case you were not aware of the situation, please consider reviewing your action. Thanks. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The first revision in the history of User:Thestageisset was not a redirect. You should therefore do the following: move the last 2 deleted revisions to Gravity Rush 2 (version 2), delete the version 2 page as an unnecessary duplicate of Gravity Rush 2, and finally restore the remaining deleted revision, the one prior to 2016. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion about retargeting The Sun from Sun to a disambiguation page. Because you have participated in the previous discussion, I am inviting you to participate in the current discussion here - Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_July_25#The_Sun. The editor whose username is Z0 07:04, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Please restore Karamot Ullah Biplob article, Now I am working on this. I want to solve this copyright issue and I also told this in talk page. But you already delete this article. Now, I request you to restore this article for only next 1 hour.- Shahadat Hossain ( talk) 14:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
I want to request the undeletion of page Emily_L._Spratt.
I added the needed citations that the previous discussion demanded. I carefully reviewed the guidelines of Wikipedia:Notability and Spratt does have significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. I have provided verifiable evidence of this subject’s notability in the references. This subject has been notable since 2005 upon receiving a major award, therefore subject’s notability is not temporary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerWilson ( talk • contribs) 17:18, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for answering my comment. The page you directed me to says not to modify it. I've addressed the issues that were raised in that discussion and want to contest the deletion of the Spratt page. Also note that User:Anthony Bradbury undeleted the page after looking over the revisions that have been made. RogerWilson ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore all deleted revisions of the pages Ruby Tuesday (except the redirect revision from 21:28, 13 October 2005) and Ruby Tuesday (disambiguation) to complete their histories? Also, can you restore the revision of page Timberwolf (color) you forgot to restore? 198.136.32.56 ( talk) 18:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore all deleted revisions of the Mango (color) page to complete the history? 2601:584:100:E310:7880:E4ED:7369:5B66 ( talk) 23:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Karam Apnaa Apnaa (G3: Blatant hoax) was deleted by you recently. Let us get this straight, the programme tv show is very much real and there are very well established references that are available on internet for the article use. This is more than a decade old famous show and the wikipedia article was crucial for information on it and deleting it is like deleting it from history. A request to kindly undelete it and in turn I will provide the page with solid 5 references? My gripe is that it has wrongly been labeled as hoax and we hope to right out wrong on wikipedia. Thanks. 2405:205:A08C:DE3E:636B:2834:834C:27B0 ( talk) 13:53, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I would ask that you please revert the page move that was requested from Champaign, Illinois to Champaign. While I agree with the move in principle that U.S. cities that do not need to be disambiguated should not be, this is not the current consensus per WP:USPLACE. This was a potentially controversial that should not have happened. Aspects ( talk) 21:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted revision of page Professional Development Day to complete the redirect's history? 2601:584:100:E310:B8F7:5126:C9B4:73F0 ( talk) 22:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Just wondering, when you were doing the Young Sinatra: Undeniable page, were you doing it on Logic's mixtape or something else. Just wondering. You don't have to reply if you don't want to. Also, if this is the wrong user, please let me know.
Hi Anthony, as noted on the "contest this deletion" page for Innovit, this page should not be speedily deleted because it is intended to be a purely informational, non-promotional entry backed by reliable sources. If the article does appear to be promotional, it is simply written according to the sources. The references come from legitimate sources, and, given the chance to update or recreate the page, the content can be toned down and address the "not in citation given" tags placed on the page before it was deleted. For instance, the third source from Becker’s Hospital Review directly supports Innovit's work in the healthcare and supply chain industries, but more language from the source could be inserted to eliminate any missed connection between the source and the Wikipedia entry -- and thereby address the "not in citation given" tag.
If the deletion can be lifted from this page for updates to be made, that would be much appreciated. If not, that would be fine too for you to even move the article to a userspace where I can improve the article. I'd like to create the best page possible while meeting administrator guidelines to help improve Wikipedia, not spam an article. Jahub ( talk) 22:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, thank you very much for granting my request to update the page in the Sandbox. I've stripped all the promotional language and links from the page. Let me know what you think, and if this now meets Wikipedia guidelines. Jahub ( talk) 22:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Anthony,
You have deleted my page that i have recently created on wiki. But I believe I had never used promotional word or any wrong information for the company.
I don't want to promote through wiki. I know this is encyclopedia. But Still I don't believe why this happened. I have read several company articles in wiki, then I had prepared the post.
Can you please tell me what is the difference between the page I have created and about this company page? /info/en/?search=Bluehost
I have never used keyword spam, never posted link through this article. so can you please review again it.
i know it's hard to publish article through wiki. But why???
why we can't publish company info. We have not that much capable to post simple company information. As you mentioned can you please tell me where link spamming done through this article?
If possible, please have look again on it.
Thank you, 07:56, 7 August 2018 User:Dhirenray1985
Hi, was that an article on Frank Klausz the woodworker? Unless it was some sort of attack page, I can't see any justification for deleting it, 7 minutes after tagging. Article quality might have been an issue, but he (the woodworker) at least has been a sourceable, notable worker, and mostly educator, in the field for decades. Andy Dingley ( talk) 08:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
You speedily deleted Vivek (playback singer), presumably because you interpreted this comment by its creator as a request for deletion (G7). However, in conjunction with that user's actual attempt to remove the AfD template (see User talk:Ecstaticmind#Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))), I'm fairly convinced that deletion, let alone speedy, was not their intention. Not having seen the article in question in any form or shape, I have no opinion on the merits of the article itself. -- Lambiam 10:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
I would like to ask you a question about deletion of a page “Evgeny Ponasenkov”. I would like to contest this deletion. Igorsky ( talk) 12:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
...with the letter “i” added. Qwirkle ( talk) 18:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Aaron I Butler, with no period after the middle initial. Qwirkle ( talk) 21:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Hey there *@ Anthony Appleyard:!
Recently it came to my attention that you have deleted one of my Articles due to G11 violation (Draft:Probe.ly). I don't believe I used any promotional wording or material on it, and I have cited most of my claims in the article. I also didn't find a way to contest the deletion so I decided to contact you on here. I wrote the article guiding myself by Wikipedia articles of other companies similar to Probe.ly, so my writing could have some mistakes and violations. Could I please get the text I've written back and get some more info about which parts you found promotional, just so I can improve the article? DavorPetreski ( talk) 10:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning this up. I think it's pretty obvious that DASDshould be a redirect to Direct-access storage device and DASD (disambiguation) should contain the contents currently in DASD. i attempted to do this with cut and paste and that was not well received. How do we get this done? Peter Flass ( talk) 10:46, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 Great Britain and Ireland heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Great Britain and Ireland heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 11:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted revisions of page Gullah Gullah Island (up to 02:02, 13 February 2005) and the deleted revisions of page Gulla Gulla Island (up to 06:29, 6 December 2015) to complete the histories of the two mentioned pages? 73.1.54.180 ( talk) 15:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Could you merge the history of Draft:Dora the Explorer (film) into Dora the Explorer (2019 film)? And as there’s no other film with that title could you delete the Dora the Explorer (film) redirect to make way for the (2019 film) article to move there? Thank you. Rusted AutoParts 17:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Why did you delete my article Judge Judy 5AM Episode? 22:42, 10 August 2018 User:Popthemop27
talks about the wrong thing because this article was not a comment it was a real episode that aired at 5AM and was only a single episode. Popthemop27 ( talk)09:07, 11 August 2018 (EDT)
Can you restore the deleted revisions of page Template:Db-a11 if okay. When a page is recreated, the deleted revisions usually become unnecessary to permanently stay deleted. 2601:584:100:E310:8DC2:DAD0:FFC8:E5EA ( talk) 13:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the missing revision(s) of page Marianne Thornberry? 208.54.85.152 ( talk) 16:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, I've asked for Nova (RL Grime album) to be histmerged with Draft:Nova (RL Grime album), as a page move I asked for took place earlier and the page histories were swapped. Both main editors who contributed to the draft also edited the main article (before its move) as well, in what looks like a bit of an attempt to flesh it out there, and I think it's important to preserve. What do you think? Ss 112 18:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
For fixing my mistakes. ☕ Antiqueight chatter 07:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
You have protected this pace back in 2013, and it's never considered fair to set indefinite for first time offence without arbitration. I suggest you could remove the protection and find another way to curb vandalism. Thank you. 202.161.64.247 ( talk) 11:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I was sort of confused, but what I meant is please unprotect the Māori people article. 202.161.64.247 ( talk) 13:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
When Category:Possible cut-and-paste moves gets deleted, please remember to remove the links to that category from the top of your user talk page as well as under Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Repair requests. In the mean time, do not remove the links until after the category gets deleted per the CfD. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:18, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sech (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sech (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 15:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sech (disambiguation), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 17:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, Could you move this to Vienna porcelain, over the redirect? "Viennese Porcelain Manufactory" is just wrong - it should be Vienna Porcelain Manufactory, but "Vienna porcelain" is better & more the common name I think - the modern factory is always called Augarten to avoid confusion. Thanks, Johnbod ( talk) 02:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
When you moved Dreaming tree (Geumcheon-gu 'ggumna') to Dreaming Tree (café), you forgot to suppress the creation of a redirect, which is why I filed it at WP:MOVEREQ instead of doing it myself. The problem is that the old title was an implausible search term. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted revisions of page Bubblestand to complete the page history. You may need to change visibility of some of those revisions. Ssjhowarthisawesome ( talk) 23:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
I didn't even know there was a draft when I made the article, and nothing I made on my article was like what the user had written on their draft, and now you've taken credit away from me on an article I started myself by giving it to somebody who made a non-notable draft that was never going to be promoted to article status on its own. You've now given into Z0's grudge against me, and I'd like you to undo it because as other editors around here say, it's not fair to take credit away from one editor for writing an article themselves. There is no commonality between what Aitch & Aitch wrote and what I made. I believe you have said yourself that two pages that have different histories and clearly do not come from one another do not have to be histmerged, and even if there is a draft of an existing page, it doesn't have to be promoted to mainspace if it was never going to be in the state it was in. Please undo this, because you are taking credit away from editors who have made their own articles and quite honestly, it's not fair to do this. Ss 112 07:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
See also the discussion on my talk page. The editor whose username is Z0 08:04, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
@ Ss112, Z0, Aitch & Aitch Aitch, Primefac, and Sergecross73: Following the above, I have added a request to move the "short" revisions for Slime Language back to Draft:Slime Language at WP:RFHM. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Robert Marlow albums is not empty. Please restore it and its talk. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 07:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've nominated a bunch of redirects with which you were involved for deletion, please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 August 18#سكس. – Uanfala (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you restore the deleted edits of page Denim (color) to complete history. 73.1.54.180 ( talk) 22:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi! You've closed a couple AfD recently without specifying a result: [2] [3]. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 09:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keesingia (redirects). Since you had some involvement with the Keesingia (redirects) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 09:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Can you complete the history of the Pink-orange page by restoring all deleted revisions? Ssjhowarthisawesome ( talk) 23:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derro, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wino and Derelict ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
User talk:GracyM#Warina Hussain, August 2018. —usernamekiran
(talk)
14:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
You have moved Keesingia (redirects) to Keesingia gigas. Can you please also move Talk:Keesingia (redirects) to Talk:Keesingia gigas (without redirect)? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Anthony, please restore the original title here after two undiscussed moves. Thanks, Johnbod ( talk) 09:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Sir,
I see that you deleted the page for artist Lydia Janssen. Can it be put back up again? I did pay some Indian company $200 or something for it when they spammed me. I didn't know paying wasn't allowed, I was busy at the time and wanted to save myself the time working out how to create pages.
I apologise I didn't read the rules on that. But the page was accurate and I think unbiased. I see that other artists at similar stages of their career (for example cecily brown) have wikipedia entries.
How do I get the page reinstated? or should I write another one. I feel stupid now for wasting money. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukejanssen ( talk • contribs) 14:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
How can I get it reinstated? Do I correctly refer to external press sources? And takeaway any links to the artists website?
Dear Anthony,
I usually edit in the Hebrew Wikipedia but a new user asked me for my help in getting an old draft of the article in the title that was deleted in 2016. She wants to improve the article in order to republish it. Can you send me the original article from 2016? Best regards, Avner 16:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by אבנר ( talk • contribs)
It seems weird to delete a draft article for any reason other than copyright violation or, I don't know, evil or something. Duplication of a deleted article is actually a great reason for a draft article. The article was deleted for insufficiently broad documentation. It would have been an easy article to fix but I didn't have time, so I saved it as a draft for later use. A professional researcher who starts/improves Wikipedia articles as part of her library job already told me she'd added it to her queue and had wrangled a number of sources. So the draft was for her use as well. Regardless of those facts, drafts are for unfinished articles. An article that was deleted because it was unfinished is appropriately made into a draft. In fact, I've known one admin who did just that rather than deleting, which was very cool of her. Please restore Draft:Joseph Barlow Forbes. Thank you. Thmazing ( talk) 19:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Lebanon national basketball team (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AaronWikia ( talk) 17:27, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, please revert the move that was requested by AncestorTrracer and processed by you in good faith. While it is correct that the municipal classification is in fact rural municipality, its official legal name is the Municipality of Killarney-Turtle Mountain. Evidence can be found on the municipality's own official website, and in the provincial regulation that created the amalgamated municipality (see sections 2 and 4). Also note the use of two spaces and dash in the official legal name. Cheers, Hwy43 ( talk) 05:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, please review the history of Draft:Al-Ahli SC Handball (Amman) and Draft:Al-Ahli SC Basketball (Amman), as both pages now refer to the handball team. Might you have mixed up the page history for the basketball and handball teams? – Fayenatic London 08:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, could you help me with a few histmerges? An editor has been creating blank/unreferenced/one-sentence articles when substantial drafts made by other users on the same subject exist, then either copy-pasting the article contents over themselves or waiting for someone else to do so. The following all could do with a histmerge so that the original edits are attributed and preserved. Thanks in advance!
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I can't imagine what Wikipedia would be without your tireless histmerging work! Bennv3771 ( talk) 10:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hey, since you seem to be an army of one when it comes to these, I figured I'd start here. It looks like Fishstick ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Fish finger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) have been the victim of repeated copy/paste moves. First, would it be possible to get the history sorted out on that? =) Second, would it be possible (per WP:ENGVAR) to get the final page placed at Fishstick ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) with a redirect from Fish finger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)? Thanks! — Locke Cole • t • c 03:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Does this qualify for Speedy G4 again (I can't see the previous version)? If so, might need salting. Pam D 15:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Unfavorable Semicircle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hhkohh ( talk) 14:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
First off, I'd like to thank you for all the excellent work you did with the numerous requests I filed at WP:RMT.
Here's a feedback to a request that was handled poorly earlier this year, when admin GB fan disregarded said request and created a new page instead ("no need to move, just create a new redirect"). The way this was handled is not only discouraging, but also undermines the concept of preserving a coherent edit history of this naming-anomaly. Hope this feedback is appreciated. Rfassbind – talk 10:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I must be missing something here. An editor creates two identical articles one after the other. I redirect one to the other. Why then do you delete this, perform a histmerge, and restore this, meaning that we now have a much more complicated history (with two creations) for what appears to be zero benefit to the encyclopedia, the readers, or the editors? No attribution was lost before your histmerge, but after your edits, my redirecting is lost and your actions supersede it. This seems like a total waste of time and energy to make things worse, not better. Fram ( talk) 11:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
This is about 2018–19 Mid-American Conference men's basketball season and 2018–19 Mid-American Conference men's basketball season, btw Fram ( talk) 11:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Anthony, sorry to bother you - please revert this undiscussed move from the usual term ( High Renaissance), for which a rather silly rationale is given by a fairly new user. Johnbod ( talk) 01:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
hi,
I am a somewhat experienced wikipedia editor and -user, and I would very much like to have read-only access to the Deleted Pages. How could this be arranged?
I do not have time to become an Admin myself.
-- Mick2 ( talk) 15:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Genie (feral child. Since you had some involvement with the Genie (feral child redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ( TALK CONT) 08:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. Every time you move a page to/from Zxcvbnm, it gets added to my watchlist. I am certain I am not the only watchlist being affected. See Wikipedia:Page_mover#Watchlists, User_talk:Paine_Ellsworth/Archive_15#Pet_page, and Wikipedia_talk:Requested_moves/Archive_29#Watchlists. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:14, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! You just moved this page in response to a "request" somewhere else (which I can't see). But it needs to be discussed on the talk page of the article. The claims in the "request" are at least in part simply false: the term generally used in English appears to be "Char siu", and until recently this was the name used throughout the article. The "request" confuses two things: terms commonly used in English ("char siu") and (more or less standardised) romanisations of Chinese words (cha siu); in other words I think this is not NPOV reporting of the real world, but what someone thinks the real world ought to be. I'm not sure of the best way to handle this: just to move back, and start a talk page discussion?? Imaginatorium ( talk) 04:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Please quote your sources. Xx236 ( talk) 13:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
The page Zxcvbnm had some deleted revisions from 2008 and earlier. To avoid problems in the future, you should move all of those revisions to Zxcvbnm (nonsense), which should then be immediately deleted. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
You have only restored Talk:Timothy Heller, but not Timothy Heller. Please move the deleted revisions for Timothy Heller to Draft:Timothy Heller (version 3), redirect that page to Draft:Timothy Heller, and move Draft talk:Timothy Heller (version 2) to Draft talk:Timothy Heller (version 3). GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
I just took a look at the history of the title of the B.o.B article (note the absence of a dot after the second 'B'). It appears that there was an RM consensus declared that it should not be moved to that title (21 March 2010), and then you helped complete a unilateral copy-paste move just three weeks later (15 April 2010). When you do histmerges, do you look at Talk pages for recent RMs first? — BarrelProof ( talk) 17:28, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deoxyribozyme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cofactor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
This is for your valuable efforts in the field of history merge. Thank you for your contributions in wikipedia as an administrator. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 13:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
This is for your valuable contributions and service in the field of HISTMERGE. Thank you. PATH SLOPU ( Talk) 13:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC) |
Yes this scam unfortunately exists. Article here [8] Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 23:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
For moving my draft into mainspace. Thanks.
Toshio Yamaguchi (
talk)
11:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Need some help at Nota (film). The film is named after the NOTA option in the election voting ballets which stands for none of the above. Since this is an abbreviation, which naturally are written in all-caps, does the film also needs to be in ALLCAPS ? Is this a proper noun ? --Let There Be Sunshine 15:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony please undo the deletion of the Draft: Bia Mustafa Alloush it was created under articles for common and I was following it since its creation last week. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal ( talk • contribs) 08:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Anthony for your kind support and restoring the draft, we will keep improving the page article as necessary. Thank you.Bilal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalrahal ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted as "Unambiguous copyright infringement". I'm not so sure about that, on Commons we have OTRS from (IIRC) the campaign manager. This should at least be discussed before deletion. Alexis Jazz ( talk) 18:05, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Please restore all the deleted revisions for User:Felestin1714/sandbox. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 18:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
But User:Felestin1714/sandbox had lots of blanking edits. You should therefore delete that page and restore the 161 non-blank revisions (i.e. excluding revision 678609107 and other revisions with "Blanked the page" in their edit summaries). GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
You have made a minor mistake while splitting some revisions from Parbati Rai to Parbati Rai (politician). Please correct this mistake by doing the following steps:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Now, the dancer's article appears to have been deleted. Please do the following:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 22:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
In Special:Diff/864596842, you have accidentally removed 2 requests instead of marking them as done. Please restore those 2 requests and mark them as done under Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Completed requests October 2018. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
You have restored 119 revisions for Mord Fustang, but then re-deleted the page and restored only 88 revisions. Please discuss the controversial issue of whether the rest of the deleted revisions should stay deleted or be restored. If they should stay deleted, then you should simply delete the page and restore all the revisions from December 2016 and later except revisions 755477897, 768878199, 796280190, and 802963582 (since one of these was mistakenly restored). Also, in that case, Talk:Mord Fustang should be deleted and then have only the revisions from December 2016 and later be restored, leaving the earlier revisions deleted. Perhaps, the deleted revisions for the article from 2015 to early 2016 should also be moved back to Draft:Mord Fustang, where they were originally from. Otherwise, the article should be deleted and then all the revisions except the 4 mentioned earlier restored. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Please do the following, then, to avoid confusion:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 22:49, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you moved Jaggi Vasudev to Sadhguru upon a user's request. Another user has now reverted the move and there's a discussion going on at the talk page. Request your participation Madrasiman ( talk) 16:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Anthony Appleyard, I'm disappointed to see you speedied this, despite the objection raised on the article's talk page — did you consider it?
I contend the new version was totally different and overcame the (perceived) shortcomings concerning notabiity. Far more independent reliable sources were cited in the new article and process does allow "re-creation" of a previously deleted article if these new additional sources are provided.
I further contend that, as a completely new article, it was out of process to be speedily deleted, but instead any attempt to remove it again should have been settled by the community on a new AFD.
Please re-consider. JGHowes talk 21:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
|
Thanks, Anthony. Here's a morning cup of coffee for you! JGHowes talk 11:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hi. Could you please explain this. I'm not criticising, I simply do not understand it. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 22:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
You have merged the history of User:Sidiperla/sandbox to Andreas Eppink, which I have since moved to Draft:Andreas Eppink. So, can you please restore Talk:Andreas Eppink and move it to Draft talk:Andreas Eppink? GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello.
You recently nominated my user page for a speedy deletion on the grounds of unambiguous advertising (G11). I had been editing an article, "HIV/AIDS in Honduras," solely with the purpose of improving it for an assignment for one of my college courses. It is unclear to me how any of the information I added could be considered advertising, as it was simply factual, though I admit I had mistakenly been editing it in my user page rather than my sandbox, which I was under the impression I had been using. I need to retrieve my work urgently, as it is part of my class grade. Additionally, I will be moving this article to the main space when I am done, and I am happy to make any changes necessary to prevent it from being "speedily deleted" again.
Joarfr ( talk) 18:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Please restore the deleted revisions for Rainbow S.p.A. and Vector (disambiguation). You forgot to do so for both redirects. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Please revert Nekso (company) to revision 864170114. You forgot to do this earlier. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 14:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. The two articles are: Olympic Airways v. Hanson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Olympic Airways v. Husain ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). The COMMONNAME is Olympic Airways v. Husain. The Hanson article is the older of the two, and today it became a redirect to the Husain article. Both articles were apparently developed independently of each other and there is no cut and paste move involved, at least not yet. Is there a case for a history merge of these two articles, or should the material of the Hanson article be pasted to the Husain article with proper attribution? Dr. [[User talk:|K.]] 06:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Please respond to #Mord Fustang and #Restore Rainbow S.p.A. and Vector (disambiguation) as soon as possible. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anthony Appleyard:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
—usernamekiran
(talk)
06:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm the instructor for Public Relations and Digital Media. I'm not sure why you deleted my student's Sandbox. Their user page is clearly marked as being enrolled in my course. Their task is to find nonprofits in Chicago that are notable and create pages for them. Please revert their sandbox as they haven't even gotten time to get proper instruction to edit, as they've only stared with an annotated bibliography. ZachMcDowell ( talk) 12:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Last year, you have created a useless blank page at Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge/Rambot. Please delete that page now. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:37, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RoboCop (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RoboCop (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 18:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, I created a page that you deleted because you considered it advertising.
I believe you could have let me know so I can work on it as I am not yet at your kind of level when it comes to setting up pages - 10 till date.
I am about to create the same page differently as I consider that the Nigerian startup community are quite prominent to be mentioned on Wikipedia starting with the e-commerce platforms. I plan to create for others as well who are making waves in the country and taking Africa to the world.
-- Ladispeaks ( talk) 16:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Chandrashekhar (TV series) has been recreated. You should therefore restore the deleted revisions for the article and its talk page. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 02:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
The histories of Template:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2), Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2), Template:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/doc, and Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/doc all consist of redirects only. You should therefore delete those 4 unneeded "version 2" redirects. Also, you should move Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/Archive 1 and Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar (version 2)/Archive 2 back to Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar/Archive 1 and Template talk:Alternative medicine sidebar/Archive 2 respectively. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 21:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering, after rfa/getting the tools, is there any page to perform experiments with histmerges? Also, what do you think of User:Usernamekiran/my RfA criteria? It's still under construction though. —usernamekiran
(talk)
04:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
struck out the silliness. —usernamekiran
(talk)
10:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Please restore the deleted revisions for Draft talk:Survive the Nights (video game) from September 2018 and later that you forgot to restore. After restoring, please do a text merge. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 17:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Crowhurst (film) has been recreated. You should therefore restore the deleted revisions for the article and its talk page. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 04:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breech birth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amelia ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
First off, I'd love to thank you for all the work you've done handling all of the move requests I have made in the last year. Truly, your work and effort is greatly appreciated. However, I messaging you to discuss a move that you made today that was done in error. You recently moved the draft (Draft: The Sword in the Stone (upcoming film)) to a new title at (Draft: The Sword in the Stone (2019 film)). This is an issue as there has been no confirmation from any reliable, secondary source as to when any of the television series or films that are being produced for Disney+ will premiere. All that has been confirmed is that the service will launch in late-2019. So, basically, The Sword in the Stone and all other upcoming Disney+ films should continue to be listed as upcoming until such as a time as Disney announced their official premiere dates. I hope you will initiate the moving of the draft back to its original title as soon as you are able. Also, please see Draft talk:The Sword in the Stone (2019 film) for the discussion that has been generated over this.
Sincerely, BoogerD ( talk) 19:39, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Surreal Barnstar |
Greatest admin ever! Flooded with them hundreds 10:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Anthony; should this page be deleted? I don't understand the "version 2" thing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony,
My submission 'OurPath' was recently deleted by you under G11. Are you able to retrieve the deleted material for me? I have submitted a deletion review.
Thank you!
Sdfish78 ( talk) 12:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, can you please close the move at Talk:President of the Government of Morocco. Not only will it have been 7 days since relisting, the initial user who queried the technical request has not returned since, and for the reasons given in the actual request. I believe it should be moved. Thanks, -- Tærkast ( Discuss) 10:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
You forgot to do a history merge from Babylon.js to Draft:Babylon.js. Please restore Babylon.js and then merge its history to that of Draft:Babylon.js, with all the revisions for the draft page from April 2018 and later restored. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
You should have histmerged Draft:Story to Draft:Story (social media), not Story (social media). Please correct this mistake by doing the following:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 16:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
And finally, there is one more mistake that needs to be corrected. You have moved too many revisions to the draft's history. Please do the following history split steps:
GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 06:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I was in the MIDDLE of discussing with another admin why the New Saxon Spelling page I'd posted met the criteria and shouldn't be deleted, when you deleted it. It had only been nominated for speedy deletion less than 24 hours before. I can't even see the talk page to see what that admin's responses to my comments were. -- Infinitum11 ( talk) 21:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Anthony, you seem to have done a history move on this significant page with an hour or so of a completely undiscussed move by an editor with fewer than 200 edits over some 6 years! What on earth? At the least, you should set up a retrospective move discussion, and warn the editor about this sort of behaviour. Would this be picked-up by people who have the now-deleted old pages on their watchlists? There is a case for the move, but as you know, this is absolutely not how things should be done. Johnbod ( talk) 15:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Cedar101 made Zxcvbnm a redirect to QWERTY. Then you have deleted the redirect, and the original redirect creator recreated the redirect. You should therefore restore the deleted revisions for the "Zxcvbnm" redirect. Also, to avoid having to keep on deleting and undeleting the redirect every time you make a temporary page move, you should stop making temporary moves to "Zxcvbnm" and instead simply append "zxcvbnm" to the end of the page title for temporary moves. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 19:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthony Appleyard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anthony Appleyard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, Page: /info/en/?search=Draft:Nullcon I had created a community page draft. I request you to restore the draft, if it is looking like the promotional draft, I would like to improve the draft. nullcon is community helping spread infosec awareness in India. I had provided proper references for each writing. -- Ghumade ( talk) 16:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, not that I have any objections, but can I ask who G6ed Richard Nixon (song)? It seems quite out of the blue. Ss 112 02:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
While I'm disappointed that you declined the G5 on Sunny Pawar, I'm more perturbed by your logic that there were " only 3 edits by a banned user (Shrinivaskulkarni1388)". There were also 1 by User:TheUnbeatable (a sock of User:RohithKumarPatali - SPI) and 9 by User:Prasath94. However, I nominated it as the creation of User:LisaWilliams (a sock of User:Rudra.shukla - SPI). Just my 2¢. Cabayi ( talk) 11:25, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony. There won't be any parallel history on Governor of Massachusetts. Please merge all revisions of List of Governors of Massachusetts from creation up to and including December 2, 2005, into Governor of Massachusetts. The earliest two revisions from Governor of Massachusetts should be merged into List of Governors of Massachusetts. -- Bsherr ( talk) 07:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Why did you perform a history merge on Randy Cooper? Please {{ ping}} me when you respond. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 16:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of
archiving. According to
Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 184.1 KB. See
Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a
bot. If you have any questions, place a {{
help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the
help desk. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
16:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, I was thinking about creating a page for Namibian student leader Joseph Kalimbwe and I notice that someone already tried to do this and it got deleted a few times. You closed the discussion I believe, saying that the piece was promotional and didn't establish notability. I create a lot of pages for people from underrepresented parts of the world, and a Namibian person on Twitter asked me if it would be possible to create a page for Kalimbwe. It seems to me that he might be notable enough, but that when someone tried to create the page before, they did it badly and broke NPoV rules. I wonder if you think that if I created the page again, with better sourcing and following guidelines, that it would still get deleted or not? All the best. -- Jwslubbock ( talk) 16:32, 24 November 2018 (UT
Anthony, this article was not supposed to have been moved, and am requesting it to be moved back to Get Together (The Youngbloods song). I know you didn't move it to begin with, but simply put, it is not a Beatles article. Best, -- Discographer ( talk) 16:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Delighted to see that you're using it now! I need to get back to working on clearing out that backlog! I took a break from it after I finished emptying Category:Possible cut-and-paste moves in August. wbm1058 ( talk) 12:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Question: Why was this article removed and turned into a redirect without any discussion on the talk page? The title in question was covered and reviewed in multiple books, magazines, websites, etc. I was in the process of cleaning up and expanding the article this afternoon.
More specifically, there is a book published by Bloomsbury Academic, as part of their Approaches to Digital Game Studies series, that goes into some analysis and detail on this title, but I had not gotten to that point before the page was removed. Thanks. --Surv1v4l1st ▌ Talk| Contribs▌ 23:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Dark Tower (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the The Dark Tower (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:10, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony, I see you deleted a page I created [Baba Ijebu registered as Premier Lotto Limited] and gave the reason as "Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." Well I should let you know Baba Ijebu is the oldest and biggest lotto company in Nigeria operating since 2001 [9], I am surprised you deleted the page when most Nigerian lottos are underrepresented here on Wikipedia including Nigeria betting sites. Baba Ijebu was listed out of the two Nigeria lotto companies listed on Wikipedia Lotteries by country. Also a company that generates over 1 billion naira in taxes surely is of importance [10]. A company that allows citizens earn via commission is significant [11] See more stories on Baba Ijebu here It is also only the lotto company in Nigeria that operates online and offline [12]. A game that both women and men play [13], A woman played and lost 1.9 million naira in a single day [14]. Another woman killed her husband over Baba Ijebu [15], even cops are not left over. [16]. Baba Ijebu is seen as the hope for the common man and most average Nigerians play it on a daily basis [17] [18] [19]
They also signed a table tennis star, Quadri Haruna for $75,000 [20]. I believe with these verifiable links and notable sources, you will agree with me they sure are of importance and significant. Everybody, young or old knows Baba ijebu and even plays it. I think it operates in Ghana as well, not sure about though, I will have to do a research to confirm Mantosa ( talk) 22:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for helping implement the new IIoT article! I noticed that there's still a redirect to Internet_of_things#IIoT ( redirect page here), but I think it has to do with the capitalization of the title. Do you think you could take a look and help resolve the problem? Would it also then be appropriate to add a {{Template:Main}} tag to the section the redirect is pointing to? I appreciate any help with the issue.-- FacultiesIntact ( talk) 00:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Please reconsider your recent move of Tied test per Wikipedia:CRICKET#Style. Cheers. -- Mattinbgn ( talk) 03:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
It looks like you deleted Category:Building using deprecated parameters. It is used by Template:Infobox building to flag problems. Perhaps it was missing the Template:empty category? MB 14:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pharmacology of lead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rasa ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, you deleted my page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:Thomas_W._W._Johnson and I disagree with your decision, I was not finished editing it either. Could you please restore the page, I had spent a lot of time on this already and was about to edit it some more, as well as starting an entry for my company (Digital Asset Management Ltd) Wiki profile. If you have any suggestions for review I am happy to take them on-board. Thank you 23:34, 4 December 2018 User:Radarlight
@ Anthony Appleyard: thank you for restoring it - I take on-board your comment on writing the article neutrally and not like an advertisement however I would argue it is already neutrally written, with positive and negative points i.e. family divorce, incomplete law degree... I have used profiles such as #REDIRECT [ [21]] and #REDIRECT [ [22]] as examples and I see little difference between the three as an example... would less or more referencing help? More details in certain areas, or less? Please specify. Your advice is appreciated. Thank you
It appears you were asked by FWTH to move his article over my redirect. By this point I'm sure you're well aware of our history of not getting along, but for the record, my comments at WP:RM/TR were not objections, so he didn't need to directly ask you. I knew the article he made would be moved over my redirect, I was simply saying I wish(ed) not to have my redirect history swapped with his userspace draft, as has previously happened. Ss 112 13:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xindi/version 1. Since you had some involvement with the Xindi/version 1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi AA,
I was typing up an AFD submission that would have suggested that as alternative to outright deletion, it might possibly be a useful
WP:REDIRECT to
Play That Funky Music#Other cover versions, when you deleted the article.
What are your thoughts about this?
Pete AU aka --
Shirt58 (
talk)
10:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Good day! Why did you delete " The Profane Rights of Man", " Songs for the Dead Live", " Profane Rights of Man" and " My Sanity"? Three are Bad Religion songs, and the other is an upcoming King Diamond album. Please {{ ping}} me when you respond. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 19:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of
archiving. According to
Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 208.5 KB. See
Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a
bot. If you have any questions, place a {{
help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the
help desk. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
19:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry Anthony - can you move Sarah Cowley (disambiguation) over your new Sarah Cowley, and I think we're there. -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 23:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
There was one deleted revision for Talk:April 1914 that you forgot to restore a while ago. Can you restore that revision please? Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 00:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-abortion movement/version 2. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-abortion movement/version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 01:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey Anthony,
You deleted my page on No/Hugs even though it was approved and checked by other members of the community. You just listed "multiple reasons" as an excuse. There was nothing wrong with it and I have created multiple wikipedia pages since to know that it was meeting all guidelines. Please restore?
A. It was not advertising. I already resolved this issue in April and re-wrote everything based on other band profiles.
B. It was not unimportant or insignificant. No/Hugs is a national band with performances at Vans Warped Tour, NAMM etc. There are other artists with less succesful careers that have wikipedia pages and it seems to be fine.
Hikoulini ( talk) 12:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Hikoulini
I understand the reasons of deletion. Again I'm saying that if anything was perceived as promotional I could have re written it or paraphrased. Respectfully, No/Hugs is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. I am basing this statements on other Wikipedia pages currently existing for other bands. Hikoulini ( talk) 22:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
User:Anthony Appleyard thank you for considering my note and for undeleting. Hikoulini ( talk) 22:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Appleyard,
I have seen that you have deleted Bekir Kaya. I would like to understand why. I have asked an Admin and the nominator of the deletion about what to change. The nominator answered, that it showed a 44% compatibility of the page with a source. I changed rather a lot, reformulated several phrases, but some info is simply as it is and should be able to be included. There are plenty of pages with simply a phrase like here or here. My article had education, professional and political career as well as legal prosecution. Before to speedy delete a page I have seen (thanks to your many links on the talk page) an Admin should decide if a page can not be saved. Now there were two phrases that were rather similar in the text. This was it. You could have just deleted these two phrases. The sources themselves were fine, sure as good as others also used. And Bekir Kaya is/was a rather influential human rights lawyer and mayor of a larger city. Julie Auger is someone in a University Administration and can stay, too. Why could Bekir Kaya not stay? Because of two phrases that could have been deleted or rephrased?
Just, I would like to understand why you deleted it, and what can be done better.
Best,
-- Lean Anael ( talk) 19:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The current redirect at Good form is terrible. It has an uncapitalized "f" and redirects to a song article disambiguated with "(song)". You have also restored revisions that were deleted in 2007. Please delete the "Good form" redirect. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 17:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not opening an RM on Apollo Lunar Module, just asking for the reversal of a controversial move. Did I put it in the wrong place? If so, please reverse the move to upper-case and let Dicklyon or someone else open the RM (if so I would have worded it different, thanks). Randy Kryn ( talk) 05:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mandragora (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandragora (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx ( talk) 16:23, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. When the other admin restored the article he forgot to restore the talk page and I wasn't sure how to go about getting it undeleted. ♟♙ ( talk) 20:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
In the above diff, you have removed 4 requests I have added at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Please restore them and move them to the "Completed requests" section. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 21:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
I rather summarily reverted your recent edit to the Biggles article (contrasting Johns' and Tolkien's approach to chronological and thematic consistency) on the grounds of OR. On reflection, this was rather silly of me - the article is, of course riddled with uncitable statements, and in fact would be very dull and boring otherwise! I have made amends (I hope) with a version of your basic idea - with a (cited) reference to one of Tolkien's own letters. I omit your valuable (and, as I said in my original comment) probably true enough explanation of this in the much more chaotic world of magazine fiction for adolescents in which Johns was working, although I would not object to your reinstating this yourself (preferably with some kind of citation this time!) Best regards. -- Soundofmusicals ( talk) 23:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Good morning, this Monday I wrote to contest the nomination to the speedy deletion from English Wikipedia of the "Datalogic S.p.A." page, translation of the Italian page. I tried to rewrite the whole content eliminating the promotional tones, and including the major possible number of external sources and datas for each adfirmation which could still sound "biased" (the Italian version still brings the label "Article with a promotional tone" due to the lack of negative data, as it has been explained to me, and I'll work on it in the next steps). Another Wikipedia admin answered me that, despite agreeding with my contestation, he rightly noticed that I shot myself in the foot by making so much of it in bold type, clearly contravening WP:MOS, and suggesting me to contact you and request that the article be recreated as a user draft so that I could clean it up. May I ask you if it could be possible to recreate it, or elseware if there's a preferrable way of uploading the new "unbold" version of it and submit it for revision to the admin team to overcome correctly the speedy deletion? Thank you in advance, and have a pleasant Thursday! -- Riccardo Bigazzi ( talk) 15:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2019! |
Hi Anthony Appleyard/2018, Sending you a warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Good morning,
User:Anthony Appleyard can you kindly help move this article /info/en/?search=User:Jwslubbock/Joseph_Kalimbwe as created by user:Jwslubbock into main space. It had been created but was moved into John's space for needed improvement. Since then, with the help of the editor experienced in Namibian content user:pgallet, it has been significantly improved and has its neutrality tone improved as the subject has been subjects to arrests and prosecutions. The issue of him being a notable author and youth activist have also been significantly outlined in that regard and I believe it now fits to be moved 41.182.2.20 ( talk) 07:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Could you please restore that? Nikkimaria ( talk) 18:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)). Since you had some involvement with the Get Together (Get Together (The Youngbloods song)) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much for fixing my error. Can you also close this request on Requested moves page, I had done it in hurry? [23]-- Nicoljaus ( talk) 16:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks so much quickly sorting out the issue. Much has changed in the field since I lasted edited the article 3 years ago, and it's going to take a few days to work out how to best integrate it in to the article. But the promised update should be coming in the next week or so. FeydHuxtable ( talk) 23:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello.
You recently deleted my own user page for me at my own request. The reason for my doing so was to do away with the edit history for privacy concerns. My question to you is if I choose to re-create my user page to look exactly as it was before the deletion, will the edit history re-appear? I would think not, but I want to make sure there is no "glitch" in the system or any triggers in the system that would signal a flag for a page which has been deleted to suddenly appear again without being "officially" restored through the "proper" WP:REFUND channels (which I most definitely would NEVER want to do). Any insight would be helpful. You seem like a very busy person, so I appreciate your time. Thanks. Huggums537 ( talk) 23:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
I apologize again for talking to you about this issue but it seems that the page on No/Hugs was deleted again for the same reasons even though I included press links to support from national press in the U.S , international press from England, Greece, Cyprus and Malta. I think that the user that is deleting the page has a personal grudge against No/Hugs since I asked him to tell me if the page was up to his standards and he never responded with corrections and I would like you to please undelete the page once more. It is not right to delete pages off of wikipedia just because of someone's personal bias. Please advise.
Hikoulini ( talk) 05:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
According to this history for Draft:Naman Ambavi, I was wondering why the Aug 22, 2013 A7 is not included? Also, see the FYI I just posted. After you've had a chance to see the history and SPI case, do you think it is a candidate for CSD or does the restore require a different approach? Atsme ✍🏻 📧 07:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Christmas! | |
Hello Anthony Appleyard, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD| Talk 07:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
See above. You deleted this page without explanation while I was editing it. Regards So Why 13:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony Appleyard, I stumbled upon a botched WP:ROBIN move and wasn't sure if any revisions should be history merged or just simply deleted as improbable redirects.
Thanks, — Andy W. ( talk) 18:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
I see this has been deleted, yet my protest against the speedy deletion was never answered, care to elaborate on the reasoning behind it? the article linked as copyright infringement is a copy of the original Wikipedia article and does not constitute copyright infringement at all. Jurryaany ( talk) 23:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, ISKCON Temple Siliguri, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
CASSIOPEIA( talk) 15:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
I do not think it so promotional that G11 applies. I was aboutto replace the speedy tag with a NPOV tag as you were eleting it. I'm very reluctant to use G11 conr content disputes regarding historical figures. DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anthony Appleyard: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBig Xrayᗙ 00:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
==Deletion review for File:The Offspring @ Good Things 2018 Sydney.jpg==
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:The Offspring @ Good Things 2018 Sydney.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I reuploaded this file, this time as a free-work, with permission from the owner and i linked the email receipt i got. why was it stil deleted? I did everything right this time... Boofhead185 ( talk) 04:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Can you sort this out?
Stefan2 ( talk) 21:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Anthony Appleyard, Would You Be So Kind To Bring Back The Brother Lion Article Because I'm Making A Prequel To The 2003 Disney Animated Film Brother Bear If You Bring Back The Article You Have A Option. You Can Come To Auditions For Brother Lion. Thank You APaoloL — Preceding unsigned comment added by APaoloL ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Aoi (青い) (
talk)
12:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
It seems that when the page was moved to removed some parallel history, some of the older history was accidentally removed. Some people noticed this in the talk page as well [24]. Can you please restore this history? SNS ( talk) 04:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hey, since you moved "Just Got Paid" to only list Sigala in the article title, I think its only fair that the same be done to all his other songs. If you check here, every single article from "Only One" onwards has two artists listed in the title. Regards.-- N Ø 05:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Anthony, Happy New Year, It seems the two of us clashed again. I completed the move request of Prairie oyster at the same time you started a discussion thread. After reading the reply by the requestor User:Sigehelmus and doing my own research on the topic, I agree that the Prairie oyster cocktail is indeed the primary topic, so I have created a DAB page and moved the cocktail article to the Prairie oyster location. I find the RM discussion redundant, If you agree with me kindly revert the RM discussion thread, if you think discussion is needed, then feel free to undo my page moves and continue with the RM discussion. regards. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 23:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)