![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
All scenes with Madison in season 4 are NOT in the present and take place before Morgan Jones meets Alicia and Nick, they're all flashbacks. Here's the source. [1] The Optimistic One ( talk) 05:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period.Reading: It's REALLY fundamental! Come back when you know what you're talking about. Thanks! -- Alex TW 08:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
You did revert me THREE times!And? Does that not relate to 3RR, or are you trying to pull at straws here by just tossing in random comments? You added unsourced content three times. Your time on this talk page is done here - this is my request for you to not post on my talk page any further from here on out. Thank you. -- Alex TW 08:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I would be very grateful if you could explain the reason to remove Romance from genres of the show, Lucifer. I thought Lucifer can be considered as a show about romance. So I'm just wondering why you removed it. I'm a newbie. So please tell me if there's anything I should know about adding genres. Please pardon my brevity and typos. Savindu Sihilel ( talk) 00:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alex. I've been looking at List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present) and I've noticed that for the links that should go to List of Doctor Who episodes (1963-1989) on the series overview (i.e. Seasons 1-26 and the TV film), they instead go to the 2005-present article. This is not true the other way around i.e. the links for Series 1-11 on the 63-89 article work fine, so I can't figure out what the problem was, so I wondered if you could. Ted Edwards 12:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi AtW. You may have seen that we have an editor who is trying to add death info to the Tom Baker article. I can't find any info about this on the net. However, I did come across an article at mediamass.net which is blacklisted so I can't leave the link but it talks about a hoax that started last month. I'm heading out to run errand in a bit so you might keep an eye on his article. Of course, you might be going off wikiP as well so any pf your TPW's who can lend an eye will be appreciated. MarnetteD| Talk 14:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Why did you draftify this article when my attempts to draftify an article like The Simpsons (season 30) with hardly any content get reverted? Mine had a lot more. Matt14451 ( talk) 07:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi again AtW. Only a few days to go! There are lots of creative people producing good Dr Who videos on Youtube. This is one of my favourites and perfect as a lead in to Sunday. It is nice that (as with the The Day of the Doctor - can five years have gone by already) we will all be seeing it at the same time. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 18:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if you are aware that I have been on wikipedia for a few years now. And I'm aware that I have to sign every post! Thanks! Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quiet storm. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
There was a good reason, I moved it because it makes more sense as (duo) rather than (DJs). Looks more professional. -- Larcombe ( talk) 05:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "AlexTheWhovian". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 12 October 2018.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
18:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey, is User talk:ALWhovian another account of yours? -- Gonnym ( talk) 21:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning AlexTheWhovian, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
04:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi
I just wanted to apologise for the earlier issue. As you know I took the information from this site: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bp1brh
I thought that this would be adequate as it is an official BBC site as opposed to an external body. I did not consider a typo.
I apologise for the issue and also apologies for you having to lock the thread (fellow user) I did not mean any malice I was just trying to help make the page more accurate.
That was my FIRST EVER edit on this site and I am sorry, once again, if I caused you any porblems
Joe Age 17 JoeLea591 ( talk) 14:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the kind words You too! JoeLea591 ( talk) 14:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok thanks JoeLea591 ( talk) 14:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey Alex, I saw that you created this category
Category:Pages using infobox television episode with incorrectly formatted episode list and added it as a tracking category to the infobox, but I think this issue is a bit larger. I was looking at the first article in the category, which is
2-D Blacktop and that uses
Template:Infobox Futurama episode, which is a "wrapper" of television episode and has in its code | episode_list = [[Futurama (season {{{season}}})|''Futurama'' (season {{{season}}})]]<br>[[List of Futurama episodes|List of ''Futurama'' episodes]]
. Since I'm not familar with what you did and how this tracks, I don't know how to fix this. Mind taking a look? --
Gonnym (
talk)
15:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
|season_article=
and |episode_list=
with just the plain links in each parameter; joining both by using |episode_list=
with the formatted links is a deprecated format. I've updated the Futurama episode infobox template, so the category should soon begin to clear out. I'll see what other episode infobox templates do this too - cheers for the heads up! --
Alex
TW
06:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Wikilink to the "<showname> (season #)" article. Use plain text, the template will automatically format and link the article; text manually formatted will not be affect and still be displayed as such.should be changed? -- Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Title for the "<showname> (season #)" article? -- Alex TW 08:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Title of the season article, usually in the form of "<showname> (season #)" article. Use plain text, the template will automatically format and link the article.- I removed the end part as even if the infobox can deal with it, the code you added will put it in the maintenance category, so we shouldn't promote it. Comments? -- Gonnym ( talk) 08:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
After what user Legacypac suggested over here, I've decided to do the same. But not right away; I'll need you and Brojam to say it's good to go. Previously you said, "The Production section needs a great deal of expanding. Some of those sections are one, two, maybe three lines long. Critical response as well. No home media dates given for other regions, and it really ought to be in prose. Broadcast has one sentence." Just glimpse at these sections now, and please share your updated view on Talk:List of Supergirl episodes (I'm sure you have time for this). That is a key move in establishing the consensus of the draft being fit to enter the mainspace. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
| Hello, Alex 21. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Doctor Who (series 5) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Mini apolis 01:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kind of Blue. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi just wanted to bring this to your attention
I don't think it means anything I just though it was interesting.
There is NO ONE listed as director.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bp1brh
Ok you were right ...
JoeLea591 ( talk) 16:37, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, can you explain to me how your move of Niki (singer) to the all caps-stylized NIKI does not go against Wikipedia rules for stylized all caps artist names, MOS:ALLCAPS, etc.? I am honestly puzzled.
See, for example, Zayn, Neiked, Sohn, Alma, 6lack, PartyNextDoor, etc., all of whom are not represented by their stylized all caps names on Wikipedia. Thanks! — Electricnet ( talk) 06:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alex. On Template:Infobox Doctor Who episode for a Doctor Who episode, as I assume you know, it lists both the 1963-89 and the 2005- episode articles at the bottom. As this was unlike the infoboxes on the Doctor Who season articles, I thought I would sandbox the episode infobox and I have made it so that the template doesn't have to list both episode articles, using DWC and DWN for the show parameter instead of DW (see User:TedEdwards/sandbox1 and User:TedEdwards/sandbox2). What I'm asking about though is whether I should edit the template to implement what I've done in my sandboxes (and use AWB to update all the episode articles) or should I just leave the articles as they are? Ted Edwards 14:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
|number=
, everything less than or equal to
156 gets the 1963-89 article, everything else gets the 2005-article. Saves having to use two separate templates, no AWB required. --
Alex
TW
14:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
{{#ifexpr: {{{number}}} <= {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (1963–1989)]] | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] }}
|number=
is something like 160a. Any ideas?
Ted
Edwards
14:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC){{#iferror: {{#ifexpr: {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} >= {{{number}}}| | }} | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] | {{#ifexpr: {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} >= {{{number}}}| [[List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (1963–1989)]] | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] }} }}
Ted
Edwards 15:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC) and can you think of any way to improve it before I implement it?
Ted
Edwards
17:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
{{#ifexpr: {{Str number/trim| {{{number}}} }} <= {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (1963–1989)]] | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] }}
There was an error being generated if the number parameter is not defined. So as a temporary fix, I have omitted the link altogether if no number is given. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 07:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Titans (2018 TV series) Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:57, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought until you reverted my edit on Class (2016 TV series) that if an actor appeared in a title sequence, they were considered to be starring in that show. Or do they have to appear in more than one episode to star? Ted Edwards 22:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
"Starring" cast members are here defined as actors whose names appear in the opening titles sequence.TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that [...] "main" cast members are determined by the series producers (not by popularity, screen time, or episode count) and generally have a set order in the credits. The general consensus is that a guest starring actor is the same as a regular guest actor. -- Alex TW 06:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from what essentially is edit warring at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, I already asked you to leave my question there for the IP to answer it. A better solution is maybe to move it to contested requests, which I will do. Sam Sailor 06:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
09:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
The article
Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
01:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Infobox television season is only valid for US broadcast networks given they are the only ones that use true affiliate based networks. Every pay tv provider has channels and the same is true of non-US broadcasters. And it's only North America that uses the term season due to broadcast always scheduling on seasons. 119.224.3.221 ( talk) 01:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The article
Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
03:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
All scenes with Madison in season 4 are NOT in the present and take place before Morgan Jones meets Alicia and Nick, they're all flashbacks. Here's the source. [1] The Optimistic One ( talk) 05:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period.Reading: It's REALLY fundamental! Come back when you know what you're talking about. Thanks! -- Alex TW 08:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
You did revert me THREE times!And? Does that not relate to 3RR, or are you trying to pull at straws here by just tossing in random comments? You added unsourced content three times. Your time on this talk page is done here - this is my request for you to not post on my talk page any further from here on out. Thank you. -- Alex TW 08:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot ( talk) 17:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I would be very grateful if you could explain the reason to remove Romance from genres of the show, Lucifer. I thought Lucifer can be considered as a show about romance. So I'm just wondering why you removed it. I'm a newbie. So please tell me if there's anything I should know about adding genres. Please pardon my brevity and typos. Savindu Sihilel ( talk) 00:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alex. I've been looking at List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present) and I've noticed that for the links that should go to List of Doctor Who episodes (1963-1989) on the series overview (i.e. Seasons 1-26 and the TV film), they instead go to the 2005-present article. This is not true the other way around i.e. the links for Series 1-11 on the 63-89 article work fine, so I can't figure out what the problem was, so I wondered if you could. Ted Edwards 12:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi AtW. You may have seen that we have an editor who is trying to add death info to the Tom Baker article. I can't find any info about this on the net. However, I did come across an article at mediamass.net which is blacklisted so I can't leave the link but it talks about a hoax that started last month. I'm heading out to run errand in a bit so you might keep an eye on his article. Of course, you might be going off wikiP as well so any pf your TPW's who can lend an eye will be appreciated. MarnetteD| Talk 14:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Why did you draftify this article when my attempts to draftify an article like The Simpsons (season 30) with hardly any content get reverted? Mine had a lot more. Matt14451 ( talk) 07:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi again AtW. Only a few days to go! There are lots of creative people producing good Dr Who videos on Youtube. This is one of my favourites and perfect as a lead in to Sunday. It is nice that (as with the The Day of the Doctor - can five years have gone by already) we will all be seeing it at the same time. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 18:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if you are aware that I have been on wikipedia for a few years now. And I'm aware that I have to sign every post! Thanks! Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC) User:Matt Campbell Matt Campbell ( talk) 18:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quiet storm. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
There was a good reason, I moved it because it makes more sense as (duo) rather than (DJs). Looks more professional. -- Larcombe ( talk) 05:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "AlexTheWhovian". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 12 October 2018.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
18:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey, is User talk:ALWhovian another account of yours? -- Gonnym ( talk) 21:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning AlexTheWhovian, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
04:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi
I just wanted to apologise for the earlier issue. As you know I took the information from this site: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bp1brh
I thought that this would be adequate as it is an official BBC site as opposed to an external body. I did not consider a typo.
I apologise for the issue and also apologies for you having to lock the thread (fellow user) I did not mean any malice I was just trying to help make the page more accurate.
That was my FIRST EVER edit on this site and I am sorry, once again, if I caused you any porblems
Joe Age 17 JoeLea591 ( talk) 14:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the kind words You too! JoeLea591 ( talk) 14:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok thanks JoeLea591 ( talk) 14:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey Alex, I saw that you created this category
Category:Pages using infobox television episode with incorrectly formatted episode list and added it as a tracking category to the infobox, but I think this issue is a bit larger. I was looking at the first article in the category, which is
2-D Blacktop and that uses
Template:Infobox Futurama episode, which is a "wrapper" of television episode and has in its code | episode_list = [[Futurama (season {{{season}}})|''Futurama'' (season {{{season}}})]]<br>[[List of Futurama episodes|List of ''Futurama'' episodes]]
. Since I'm not familar with what you did and how this tracks, I don't know how to fix this. Mind taking a look? --
Gonnym (
talk)
15:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
|season_article=
and |episode_list=
with just the plain links in each parameter; joining both by using |episode_list=
with the formatted links is a deprecated format. I've updated the Futurama episode infobox template, so the category should soon begin to clear out. I'll see what other episode infobox templates do this too - cheers for the heads up! --
Alex
TW
06:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Wikilink to the "<showname> (season #)" article. Use plain text, the template will automatically format and link the article; text manually formatted will not be affect and still be displayed as such.should be changed? -- Gonnym ( talk) 08:18, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Title for the "<showname> (season #)" article? -- Alex TW 08:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Title of the season article, usually in the form of "<showname> (season #)" article. Use plain text, the template will automatically format and link the article.- I removed the end part as even if the infobox can deal with it, the code you added will put it in the maintenance category, so we shouldn't promote it. Comments? -- Gonnym ( talk) 08:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
After what user Legacypac suggested over here, I've decided to do the same. But not right away; I'll need you and Brojam to say it's good to go. Previously you said, "The Production section needs a great deal of expanding. Some of those sections are one, two, maybe three lines long. Critical response as well. No home media dates given for other regions, and it really ought to be in prose. Broadcast has one sentence." Just glimpse at these sections now, and please share your updated view on Talk:List of Supergirl episodes (I'm sure you have time for this). That is a key move in establishing the consensus of the draft being fit to enter the mainspace. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
| Hello, Alex 21. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Doctor Who (series 5) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Mini apolis 01:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kind of Blue. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi just wanted to bring this to your attention
I don't think it means anything I just though it was interesting.
There is NO ONE listed as director.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bp1brh
Ok you were right ...
JoeLea591 ( talk) 16:37, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, can you explain to me how your move of Niki (singer) to the all caps-stylized NIKI does not go against Wikipedia rules for stylized all caps artist names, MOS:ALLCAPS, etc.? I am honestly puzzled.
See, for example, Zayn, Neiked, Sohn, Alma, 6lack, PartyNextDoor, etc., all of whom are not represented by their stylized all caps names on Wikipedia. Thanks! — Electricnet ( talk) 06:46, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Alex. On Template:Infobox Doctor Who episode for a Doctor Who episode, as I assume you know, it lists both the 1963-89 and the 2005- episode articles at the bottom. As this was unlike the infoboxes on the Doctor Who season articles, I thought I would sandbox the episode infobox and I have made it so that the template doesn't have to list both episode articles, using DWC and DWN for the show parameter instead of DW (see User:TedEdwards/sandbox1 and User:TedEdwards/sandbox2). What I'm asking about though is whether I should edit the template to implement what I've done in my sandboxes (and use AWB to update all the episode articles) or should I just leave the articles as they are? Ted Edwards 14:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
|number=
, everything less than or equal to
156 gets the 1963-89 article, everything else gets the 2005-article. Saves having to use two separate templates, no AWB required. --
Alex
TW
14:37, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
{{#ifexpr: {{{number}}} <= {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (1963–1989)]] | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] }}
|number=
is something like 160a. Any ideas?
Ted
Edwards
14:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC){{#iferror: {{#ifexpr: {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} >= {{{number}}}| | }} | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] | {{#ifexpr: {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} >= {{{number}}}| [[List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (1963–1989)]] | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] }} }}
Ted
Edwards 15:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC) and can you think of any way to improve it before I implement it?
Ted
Edwards
17:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
{{#ifexpr: {{Str number/trim| {{{number}}} }} <= {{tmpv|Doctor Who (film)|Infobox Doctor Who episode||number}} | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (1963–1989)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (1963–1989)]] | [[List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present)|''Doctor Who'' episodes (2005–present)]] }}
There was an error being generated if the number parameter is not defined. So as a temporary fix, I have omitted the link altogether if no number is given. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 07:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Titans (2018 TV series) Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:57, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought until you reverted my edit on Class (2016 TV series) that if an actor appeared in a title sequence, they were considered to be starring in that show. Or do they have to appear in more than one episode to star? Ted Edwards 22:45, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
"Starring" cast members are here defined as actors whose names appear in the opening titles sequence.TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Please keep in mind that [...] "main" cast members are determined by the series producers (not by popularity, screen time, or episode count) and generally have a set order in the credits. The general consensus is that a guest starring actor is the same as a regular guest actor. -- Alex TW 06:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from what essentially is edit warring at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, I already asked you to leave my question there for the IP to answer it. A better solution is maybe to move it to contested requests, which I will do. Sam Sailor 06:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
09:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
The article
Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
01:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Infobox television season is only valid for US broadcast networks given they are the only ones that use true affiliate based networks. Every pay tv provider has channels and the same is true of non-US broadcasters. And it's only North America that uses the term season due to broadcast always scheduling on seasons. 119.224.3.221 ( talk) 01:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
The article
Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Adamstom.97 --
Adamstom.97 (
talk)
03:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |