This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Is that a real movie and if so, how did you find out about it? Joet51078 ( talk) 14:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
In the Begining, if Posibl why did [Daryl Kern] leave his Budy Marvin behind on Streets?( 73.235.66.78 ( talk) 05:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)).
Hi, i don't understand why you allways undo the edit that i make on the episode list. What i write there, is information taken directly from that same page. I would like it, if we could resolve this without continuing this edit war.
Sincerely, TheGamingMouse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGamingMouse ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Please don't remove tag without improving the article. The second review in fact advised that I wait for some time before nominating. Nothing has changed in the article, there is no more sources added. It will be nominated agin if no more sources are found. Add more sources if you want to remove the tag. Hzh ( talk) 10:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
you cannot state that anything has been given support. There was indeed clear support, the closer chose to ignore that. I will repeat the question, do you in fact intend to improve the sourcing of this and other articles? Hzh ( talk) 11:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure why I need to repeat this, it stays current because nothing has changed, and a no consensus do not change that, in fact it affirms it (otherwise it would have been deleted/redirected/merged/ or kept). There are millions of articles in Wikipedia, my job here is to assess whether something is notable enough to stay, it is not for me improve these articles I checked (although I actually do sometimes improve the articles I curated). In this case, there is nothing for me to improve because I cannot find the sources needed. It is for someone like you who claim that these articles are notable to demonstrate it because I cannot see it. I will just note that the tag was there, and is still there in many of the poorly-sourced articles, and that you are perfectly aware of the issue. If you don't improve them, that will be taken as something deliberate should the next deletion discussion come up for these articles. Hzh ( talk) 11:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be willing to change else window.location = window.location.href.substr(0, window.location.href.indexOf('#'))+"?action=edit";
to use ?action=submit";
? This ~should~ have no effect on editors using the legacy 2006 editor, but for those like me using the 2010 one submit brings them to the 2006 interface, where the script works. Thanks, --
DannyS712 (
talk) 06:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
wpTextbox1
still works. --
DannyS712 (
talk) 06:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)The Barnstar of Diligence | |
You'd have cleared the whole TPE list if it weren't for the one outstanding which I'm dealing with. Sorry to mess with your perfect record there. Cabayi ( talk) 13:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I think you have made a mistake in a change you made on infobox school district. You changed an Infobox section title from "District Information" to " NCES District ID". Instead, you should have changed label22 from "District ID" to " NCES District ID". — Archer1234 ( talk) 12:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I created this template a while back. I have been able to expand the template with more sources...until now. I don't have permission to edit a template I created? Can you help me get in to edit add other sources? Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 20:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I tried to repair a cite error on "List of Star Trek: Discovery episodes", but I had a suspicion it was not quite correct. Strangely enough, I just had to work out a similar footnote on a different wiki, and I know what I did wrong. You reverted my attempt, but the cite error is back. It reads, "Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Futon" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page)." I will let you fix it this time. Regards Therin of Andor ( talk) 10:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The Edit Request Barnstar | |
Thank you for the help with my multiple simultaneous edit requests! DannyS712 ( talk) 07:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, Alex21. I gave a reason for removing the columns from the Gotham pages. I was told by another user who monitors the edits, that we should make every effort to save space on the pages. To me, it was a waste of space to use columns as it means that it takes people longer to scroll through the section. For example, with columns, it would take 5 lengths of my phone's screen to view the entire cast of Gotham. Without, it takes 3 lengths. Why would we want it cast to read this way:
Ben Mackenzie as James Gordon
When it can read this way instead:
Ben Mackenzie as James Gordon
Again, trying to save space. Anyway, that's my two cents. Allindsey1978 ( talk) 08:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I understand that the IP edit you reverted here was not necessary. But so was your revert. Or is there a special reason you made that revert? Debresser ( talk) 10:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who (series 12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bowmans ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Not sure if you understood the G6 for Legacies (season 1) here. Legacies (Season 1) was created, but that capitalization of "Season" is never used. Which is why it has to move to Legacies (season 1) which is now a redirect only. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 15:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Alex 21, as per WP:BLANKING, the user is allowed to remove this notices, including the {{Dynamic IP}} one. Thank you. -- MrClog ( talk) 23:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
From reading through the history of the series, it is clear that there is one series titled Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures, which switched from an animated to live-action format for its third season, retaining the voice cast from the second season to portray the characters in live-action. Each season had (for the most part a different crew), so there isn't really any reason to keep the articles separate. I do admit that it'll take a small amount of work to explain the transition, but that's what Wikipedia is for, after all. Would you be able to assist me in constructing this page? Hope to hear back from you shortly. MacCready ( talk) 10:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I noticed you left a message on my profile saying that I added information to Brooklyn Nine-Nine (season 6) without a proper reference. I was wondering if you can tell me what my edit was, and what you undid, so I can find a more reliable source to reference? Thanks! -Rebekah
My page is not a "draft", it's a fully fledged article created in user space that I'm requesting be moved over a redirect. I have page mover rights, but it is considered inappropriate for a user to move a redirect another user created out of the way for their own article based on prior incidents, so I request this when I have created an article at RM/TR. If you think this is not something that can be done at RM/TR, then I suggest you talk to various admins like Anthony Appleyard and Sergecross73, who both have carried this out when it's been requested by users at RM/TR. It is a technical request because I can't delete a redirect outright. If admins consider it appropriate to do, then I can't see why you don't. A user does not have to go through AfC to make an article. Ss 112 05:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex. I don't want to continue this silly argument about the Season 3 section with you, it is because of things like this that I don't spend much time on Wikipedia anymore. The thing that is confusing me the most is that you and I have worked on the MCU TV articles together for years, and every formatting decision I have made while getting the Discovery pages set-up has been copied from those articles that you very much are aware of. So to have you arguing with me as if you have never seen this done before is very confusing to me. - adamstom97 ( talk) 20:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I just wanted your opinion. Someone updated the summaries of Victoria and I feel that the original summaries were perfectly fine and the 3rd season's is a bit too long. Think you can check it once you have the chance? Thanks! Mirrorthesoul ( talk) 04:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey Alex, we seem to have a bug with Module:Episode list. I've tried comparing the versions of the sandbox vs live code, but since the change was a new feature, pin-pointing the issue is a bit hard.
Issues:
{{Episode table |background=#2E5528 |overall= |title= |director= |writer= |episodes= {{Episode list | EpisodeNumber = 2 | NumParts = 2 | Title_1 = Title1 | Title_2 = Title2 | DirectedBy = director | WrittenBy_1 = 1 | WrittenBy_2 = 2 | ShortSummary = Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. | LineColor = 2E5528 }} }}
No. | Title | Directed by | Written by | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | "Title1" | director | 1 | ||||
"Title2" | 2 | ||||||
Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. |
{{Episode table |background=#2E5528 |overall= |title= |director= |writer= |episodes= {{Episode list | EpisodeNumber = 2 | NumParts = 2 | Title_1 = Title1 | Title_2 = Title2 | DirectedBy_1 = Director1 | DirectedBy_2 = Director2 | WrittenBy_1 = Writer1 | WrittenBy_2 = Writer1 | ShortSummary = Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. | LineColor = 2E5528 }} }}
No. | Title | Directed by | Written by | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | "Title1" | Director1 | Writer1 | ||||
"Title2" | Director2 | Writer1 | |||||
Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. |
I think the issue is at <syntaxhighlight lang="lua" inline>local function createCells(args, isSerial, currentRow, onInitialPage, title, numberOfParameterGroups)"</source >: <syntaxhighlight lang="lua"> local thisRowspan if (firstParameterGroupCell and k < firstParameterGroupCell) then thisRowspan = numberOfParameterGroups else thisRowspan = 1 end if (currentRow == 1 or (currentRow > 1 and k >= (firstParameterGroupCell or 0))) then createTableData(args[v], thisRowspan, textAlign) end </source >
As the sandbox version always passed "1" for the span <syntaxhighlight lang="lua" inline>local function createTableData(args[v], 1, textAlign)</source >
Also this is a bad function:
<syntaxhighlight lang="lua"> -- Local function which is used to retrieve the NumParts value. local function getnumberOfParameterGroups(args) for k, v in ipairs(cellNameList) do local numberedParameter = v .. "_" .. 1 if (args[numberedParameter]) then parameterGroupCells[v] = true if not firstParameterGroupCell then firstParameterGroupCell = k end end end if (hasValue(args.NumParts)) then return args.NumParts, true else return 1, false end end </source >
As the first part has nothing to do with the second one which means it is its own function. I'm not sure if the issues above have to do with parameterGroupCells or firstParameterGroupCell, as the code that uses those seems to be working, but it's worth looking at that as those are the changes in the code. Let me know if you think you know what the issue is as I've only spent an hour or so reviewing the code differences but not actually diving into it. -- Gonnym ( talk) 09:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and removed the protection on User:Alex 21/sandbox2. My apologies for the delay, I have been unfortunately rather busy outside of Wikipedia this week. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 03:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
addiction to Doctorr Who | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1957 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello A 21 (formerly ATW). Today is the 100th anniversary of Jon Pertwee's birth! Here is a nice interview with Sean. Being the child of any of the actors playing the Dr would be amazing. With Jon's love of gadgets Sean's youth must have been a real treat. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 17:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
For move warring at Good Omens (TV series), I have revoked your page mover permission. Further move warring will result in a block. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
unilateral decisions should be avoided, and moves should be reverted upon request". If you think you can follow this, make a request at WP:PERM. Having a recent history that shows that you're willing to reverse your actions upon request would probably help. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 10:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Template:Horizontal ToC has been nominated for merging with Template:Horizontal TOC. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 09:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
You reverted my edit on the basis that my edit did not have a consensus and that you were restoring the article to the WP:STATUSQUO. The problem here is that the version you restored was not the "status quo" either. The image was changed without discussion and consensus as I explained on the talk page. Furthermore, I was the only editor who actually started a discussion about a change of image. Since nobody objected to my proposal then there was a WP:SILENT consensus for changing the image. As I explain at Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_films#Image_in_highest-grossing_films_section consesnus is not "permission" i.e. I do not have to seek permission to the article. You cannot revert an editor simply because an editor has not been given permission by the community; you can only revert an editor if there is a substantive objection to their edit i.e. it goes against policy, it violates the MOS, or there is a consensus for something else.
Also, if you are going to revert in accordance with WP:BRD then you are obligated to join the discussion. You can't just revert and abstain from the discussion because WP:Communication is required. As you can see from the talk page discussion it has advanced to the stage where there is tacit agreement to restore the original image, so in fact your edit not only did not restore the status quo, it actually goes against the evolving consensus on the talk page. Betty Logan ( talk) 02:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Betty Logan ( talk) 03:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, long time no see! I barely remembered who you were until I saw your name show up in the sandbox of someone I had come into conflict with fairly recently. I don't know why he specifically chose to name you and Adamstom rather than any of the other editors I had briefly come into conflict with at various points in 2015-2018, but it seems very likely that the list he is working with was furnished by you. (If it were Adamstom who was responsible, he would almost certainly have mentioned Favre1fan93, and perhaps not mentioned you.)
If you are continuing to monitor me and email editors I come into conflict with, I would ask you to kindly stop.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 03:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Alex! I know you're not on here much anymore (as with me), but I realized that {{ Arrowverse summary}} needs to be updated to handle the Crisis crossover. I gave it an attempt but couldn't quite figure out the coding to make it handle a fifth show. Whenever you get a sec, if you could update it, that'd be great. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Brooklyn Nine-Nine Season 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Is that a real movie and if so, how did you find out about it? Joet51078 ( talk) 14:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
In the Begining, if Posibl why did [Daryl Kern] leave his Budy Marvin behind on Streets?( 73.235.66.78 ( talk) 05:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)).
Hi, i don't understand why you allways undo the edit that i make on the episode list. What i write there, is information taken directly from that same page. I would like it, if we could resolve this without continuing this edit war.
Sincerely, TheGamingMouse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGamingMouse ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Please don't remove tag without improving the article. The second review in fact advised that I wait for some time before nominating. Nothing has changed in the article, there is no more sources added. It will be nominated agin if no more sources are found. Add more sources if you want to remove the tag. Hzh ( talk) 10:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
you cannot state that anything has been given support. There was indeed clear support, the closer chose to ignore that. I will repeat the question, do you in fact intend to improve the sourcing of this and other articles? Hzh ( talk) 11:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure why I need to repeat this, it stays current because nothing has changed, and a no consensus do not change that, in fact it affirms it (otherwise it would have been deleted/redirected/merged/ or kept). There are millions of articles in Wikipedia, my job here is to assess whether something is notable enough to stay, it is not for me improve these articles I checked (although I actually do sometimes improve the articles I curated). In this case, there is nothing for me to improve because I cannot find the sources needed. It is for someone like you who claim that these articles are notable to demonstrate it because I cannot see it. I will just note that the tag was there, and is still there in many of the poorly-sourced articles, and that you are perfectly aware of the issue. If you don't improve them, that will be taken as something deliberate should the next deletion discussion come up for these articles. Hzh ( talk) 11:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be willing to change else window.location = window.location.href.substr(0, window.location.href.indexOf('#'))+"?action=edit";
to use ?action=submit";
? This ~should~ have no effect on editors using the legacy 2006 editor, but for those like me using the 2010 one submit brings them to the 2006 interface, where the script works. Thanks, --
DannyS712 (
talk) 06:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
wpTextbox1
still works. --
DannyS712 (
talk) 06:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)The Barnstar of Diligence | |
You'd have cleared the whole TPE list if it weren't for the one outstanding which I'm dealing with. Sorry to mess with your perfect record there. Cabayi ( talk) 13:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I think you have made a mistake in a change you made on infobox school district. You changed an Infobox section title from "District Information" to " NCES District ID". Instead, you should have changed label22 from "District ID" to " NCES District ID". — Archer1234 ( talk) 12:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
I created this template a while back. I have been able to expand the template with more sources...until now. I don't have permission to edit a template I created? Can you help me get in to edit add other sources? Best Regards, Barbara ✐ ✉ 20:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I tried to repair a cite error on "List of Star Trek: Discovery episodes", but I had a suspicion it was not quite correct. Strangely enough, I just had to work out a similar footnote on a different wiki, and I know what I did wrong. You reverted my attempt, but the cite error is back. It reads, "Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Futon" defined multiple times with different content (see the help page)." I will let you fix it this time. Regards Therin of Andor ( talk) 10:49, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The Edit Request Barnstar | |
Thank you for the help with my multiple simultaneous edit requests! DannyS712 ( talk) 07:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, Alex21. I gave a reason for removing the columns from the Gotham pages. I was told by another user who monitors the edits, that we should make every effort to save space on the pages. To me, it was a waste of space to use columns as it means that it takes people longer to scroll through the section. For example, with columns, it would take 5 lengths of my phone's screen to view the entire cast of Gotham. Without, it takes 3 lengths. Why would we want it cast to read this way:
Ben Mackenzie as James Gordon
When it can read this way instead:
Ben Mackenzie as James Gordon
Again, trying to save space. Anyway, that's my two cents. Allindsey1978 ( talk) 08:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I understand that the IP edit you reverted here was not necessary. But so was your revert. Or is there a special reason you made that revert? Debresser ( talk) 10:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who (series 12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bowmans ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Not sure if you understood the G6 for Legacies (season 1) here. Legacies (Season 1) was created, but that capitalization of "Season" is never used. Which is why it has to move to Legacies (season 1) which is now a redirect only. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 15:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Alex 21, as per WP:BLANKING, the user is allowed to remove this notices, including the {{Dynamic IP}} one. Thank you. -- MrClog ( talk) 23:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
From reading through the history of the series, it is clear that there is one series titled Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures, which switched from an animated to live-action format for its third season, retaining the voice cast from the second season to portray the characters in live-action. Each season had (for the most part a different crew), so there isn't really any reason to keep the articles separate. I do admit that it'll take a small amount of work to explain the transition, but that's what Wikipedia is for, after all. Would you be able to assist me in constructing this page? Hope to hear back from you shortly. MacCready ( talk) 10:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I noticed you left a message on my profile saying that I added information to Brooklyn Nine-Nine (season 6) without a proper reference. I was wondering if you can tell me what my edit was, and what you undid, so I can find a more reliable source to reference? Thanks! -Rebekah
My page is not a "draft", it's a fully fledged article created in user space that I'm requesting be moved over a redirect. I have page mover rights, but it is considered inappropriate for a user to move a redirect another user created out of the way for their own article based on prior incidents, so I request this when I have created an article at RM/TR. If you think this is not something that can be done at RM/TR, then I suggest you talk to various admins like Anthony Appleyard and Sergecross73, who both have carried this out when it's been requested by users at RM/TR. It is a technical request because I can't delete a redirect outright. If admins consider it appropriate to do, then I can't see why you don't. A user does not have to go through AfC to make an article. Ss 112 05:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex. I don't want to continue this silly argument about the Season 3 section with you, it is because of things like this that I don't spend much time on Wikipedia anymore. The thing that is confusing me the most is that you and I have worked on the MCU TV articles together for years, and every formatting decision I have made while getting the Discovery pages set-up has been copied from those articles that you very much are aware of. So to have you arguing with me as if you have never seen this done before is very confusing to me. - adamstom97 ( talk) 20:47, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I just wanted your opinion. Someone updated the summaries of Victoria and I feel that the original summaries were perfectly fine and the 3rd season's is a bit too long. Think you can check it once you have the chance? Thanks! Mirrorthesoul ( talk) 04:17, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hey Alex, we seem to have a bug with Module:Episode list. I've tried comparing the versions of the sandbox vs live code, but since the change was a new feature, pin-pointing the issue is a bit hard.
Issues:
{{Episode table |background=#2E5528 |overall= |title= |director= |writer= |episodes= {{Episode list | EpisodeNumber = 2 | NumParts = 2 | Title_1 = Title1 | Title_2 = Title2 | DirectedBy = director | WrittenBy_1 = 1 | WrittenBy_2 = 2 | ShortSummary = Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. | LineColor = 2E5528 }} }}
No. | Title | Directed by | Written by | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | "Title1" | director | 1 | ||||
"Title2" | 2 | ||||||
Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. |
{{Episode table |background=#2E5528 |overall= |title= |director= |writer= |episodes= {{Episode list | EpisodeNumber = 2 | NumParts = 2 | Title_1 = Title1 | Title_2 = Title2 | DirectedBy_1 = Director1 | DirectedBy_2 = Director2 | WrittenBy_1 = Writer1 | WrittenBy_2 = Writer1 | ShortSummary = Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. | LineColor = 2E5528 }} }}
No. | Title | Directed by | Written by | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | "Title1" | Director1 | Writer1 | ||||
"Title2" | Director2 | Writer1 | |||||
Locke meets the Others' mysterious leader Jacob. |
I think the issue is at <syntaxhighlight lang="lua" inline>local function createCells(args, isSerial, currentRow, onInitialPage, title, numberOfParameterGroups)"</source >: <syntaxhighlight lang="lua"> local thisRowspan if (firstParameterGroupCell and k < firstParameterGroupCell) then thisRowspan = numberOfParameterGroups else thisRowspan = 1 end if (currentRow == 1 or (currentRow > 1 and k >= (firstParameterGroupCell or 0))) then createTableData(args[v], thisRowspan, textAlign) end </source >
As the sandbox version always passed "1" for the span <syntaxhighlight lang="lua" inline>local function createTableData(args[v], 1, textAlign)</source >
Also this is a bad function:
<syntaxhighlight lang="lua"> -- Local function which is used to retrieve the NumParts value. local function getnumberOfParameterGroups(args) for k, v in ipairs(cellNameList) do local numberedParameter = v .. "_" .. 1 if (args[numberedParameter]) then parameterGroupCells[v] = true if not firstParameterGroupCell then firstParameterGroupCell = k end end end if (hasValue(args.NumParts)) then return args.NumParts, true else return 1, false end end </source >
As the first part has nothing to do with the second one which means it is its own function. I'm not sure if the issues above have to do with parameterGroupCells or firstParameterGroupCell, as the code that uses those seems to be working, but it's worth looking at that as those are the changes in the code. Let me know if you think you know what the issue is as I've only spent an hour or so reviewing the code differences but not actually diving into it. -- Gonnym ( talk) 09:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and removed the protection on User:Alex 21/sandbox2. My apologies for the delay, I have been unfortunately rather busy outside of Wikipedia this week. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 03:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
addiction to Doctorr Who | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1957 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello A 21 (formerly ATW). Today is the 100th anniversary of Jon Pertwee's birth! Here is a nice interview with Sean. Being the child of any of the actors playing the Dr would be amazing. With Jon's love of gadgets Sean's youth must have been a real treat. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 17:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
For move warring at Good Omens (TV series), I have revoked your page mover permission. Further move warring will result in a block. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 17:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
unilateral decisions should be avoided, and moves should be reverted upon request". If you think you can follow this, make a request at WP:PERM. Having a recent history that shows that you're willing to reverse your actions upon request would probably help. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 10:12, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Template:Horizontal ToC has been nominated for merging with Template:Horizontal TOC. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 09:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
You reverted my edit on the basis that my edit did not have a consensus and that you were restoring the article to the WP:STATUSQUO. The problem here is that the version you restored was not the "status quo" either. The image was changed without discussion and consensus as I explained on the talk page. Furthermore, I was the only editor who actually started a discussion about a change of image. Since nobody objected to my proposal then there was a WP:SILENT consensus for changing the image. As I explain at Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_films#Image_in_highest-grossing_films_section consesnus is not "permission" i.e. I do not have to seek permission to the article. You cannot revert an editor simply because an editor has not been given permission by the community; you can only revert an editor if there is a substantive objection to their edit i.e. it goes against policy, it violates the MOS, or there is a consensus for something else.
Also, if you are going to revert in accordance with WP:BRD then you are obligated to join the discussion. You can't just revert and abstain from the discussion because WP:Communication is required. As you can see from the talk page discussion it has advanced to the stage where there is tacit agreement to restore the original image, so in fact your edit not only did not restore the status quo, it actually goes against the evolving consensus on the talk page. Betty Logan ( talk) 02:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Betty Logan ( talk) 03:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, long time no see! I barely remembered who you were until I saw your name show up in the sandbox of someone I had come into conflict with fairly recently. I don't know why he specifically chose to name you and Adamstom rather than any of the other editors I had briefly come into conflict with at various points in 2015-2018, but it seems very likely that the list he is working with was furnished by you. (If it were Adamstom who was responsible, he would almost certainly have mentioned Favre1fan93, and perhaps not mentioned you.)
If you are continuing to monitor me and email editors I come into conflict with, I would ask you to kindly stop.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 03:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey Alex! I know you're not on here much anymore (as with me), but I realized that {{ Arrowverse summary}} needs to be updated to handle the Crisis crossover. I gave it an attempt but couldn't quite figure out the coding to make it handle a fifth show. Whenever you get a sec, if you could update it, that'd be great. Thanks. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 17:12, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Brooklyn Nine-Nine Season 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |