This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Doctor Who specials (2008–2010) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Doctor Who specials (2008–2010) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am just curious into finding out why that this page along with the Discussion/Talk page was moved to a newer page. What was wrong with the previous page? Docwhoaza93 ( talk) 09:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
I've removed Steven Moffat's name from the writers column for End of Time: Part 2. This is mainly because it misrepresents the writing of the episode and implies both writers wrote significant portions to the episode. I feel it is something that is appropriately covered in the article itself. I'm fine with The Fires of Pompeii (Series 4) and Impossible Planet/Satan Pit (series 2) to have the uncredited writer because they contributed heavily to the episode. I don't think it would be appropriate to add Steven Moffat's name to The God Complex & Closing Time (both Series 6) just because he wrote the final scenes of those episodes. If you disagree, please discuss.  The Windler talk 11:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that The End of Time takes up two rows in the episode summary box. While this is understandable, as it is a two episode story, I find it odd. Unlike all of the other multi episode stories made since the show's revival in 2005, this one has only one overall title as opposed to each episode having its own title. As such, this story in particular is treated more like a classic serial on Wikipedia; the title is italicised instead of put in quotation marks, and it has only one article for the story as a whole as opposed to one for each episode. However, the summary box for each classic season has only one row for each story instead of one for each episode of each story. Because of this, I think it would be a good idea to condense the two rows in the episode summary box dedicated to The End of Time into one, for consistency. — The Mighty Trought ( talk) 05:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi guys The reason why I keep deleting the references is due to the fact that no other Doctor Who series page has references in their main bios. Just thought I'd throw this out in the open. JackWhovian ( talk) 14:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Various maintens tags have been placed dating back to May 2020. I plan on fixing them myself but I wanted to see if anyother issues had arrised since then. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
All the modern Doctor Who entries beginning in 2005 should be on one page and list all episodes, specials, shorts, etc. chronologically and, within the list, noted as part of a series, special, etc. This entry on the specials highlights this problem since there are a lot of "specials" that relate to a series, or the time of year (e.g. Christmas) so the reader trying to track them has a very difficult time following the Wikipedia scheme. 108.51.114.180 ( talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Doctor Who specials (2008–2010) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Doctor Who specials (2008–2010) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am just curious into finding out why that this page along with the Discussion/Talk page was moved to a newer page. What was wrong with the previous page? Docwhoaza93 ( talk) 09:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
I've removed Steven Moffat's name from the writers column for End of Time: Part 2. This is mainly because it misrepresents the writing of the episode and implies both writers wrote significant portions to the episode. I feel it is something that is appropriately covered in the article itself. I'm fine with The Fires of Pompeii (Series 4) and Impossible Planet/Satan Pit (series 2) to have the uncredited writer because they contributed heavily to the episode. I don't think it would be appropriate to add Steven Moffat's name to The God Complex & Closing Time (both Series 6) just because he wrote the final scenes of those episodes. If you disagree, please discuss.  The Windler talk 11:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I noticed that The End of Time takes up two rows in the episode summary box. While this is understandable, as it is a two episode story, I find it odd. Unlike all of the other multi episode stories made since the show's revival in 2005, this one has only one overall title as opposed to each episode having its own title. As such, this story in particular is treated more like a classic serial on Wikipedia; the title is italicised instead of put in quotation marks, and it has only one article for the story as a whole as opposed to one for each episode. However, the summary box for each classic season has only one row for each story instead of one for each episode of each story. Because of this, I think it would be a good idea to condense the two rows in the episode summary box dedicated to The End of Time into one, for consistency. — The Mighty Trought ( talk) 05:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.
To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.
To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.
Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi guys The reason why I keep deleting the references is due to the fact that no other Doctor Who series page has references in their main bios. Just thought I'd throw this out in the open. JackWhovian ( talk) 14:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Various maintens tags have been placed dating back to May 2020. I plan on fixing them myself but I wanted to see if anyother issues had arrised since then. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
All the modern Doctor Who entries beginning in 2005 should be on one page and list all episodes, specials, shorts, etc. chronologically and, within the list, noted as part of a series, special, etc. This entry on the specials highlights this problem since there are a lot of "specials" that relate to a series, or the time of year (e.g. Christmas) so the reader trying to track them has a very difficult time following the Wikipedia scheme. 108.51.114.180 ( talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)