![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hii Accesscrawl, Greetings to you. You place a db -u1 tag on the article, did you mean to delete the page you created? pls advise as the tag you is incorrect.
-- CASSIOPEIA( talk) 12:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Accesscrawl! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 05:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm planning to create a Page,but there is already a Page existing of a person with the same name. How can i create a Page in this case? Accesscrawl ( talk) 14:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamoudou Gassama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamoudou Gassama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty ( talk) 16:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Naggar Castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thenewshimachal.com/2012/08/hotel-castle-naggar-gets-heritage-status/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 16:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
great for the visuals, but dont forget all the rest is still there.... Really adverserial style editing and behaviour at /info/en/?search=Talk:Rajneesh is disruptive and in the end will remove substantially acceptance in the editing community. You may get a high on such activity, but in the end, it does not augur well in the long run, try something that involves improving by contribution rather than deleting and changing with such enthusiasm (even if you have conviction you are right), wikipedia is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND. If you want to gain acceptance a contributory member of the community, try adding something. But, hey, in the end its your choice. Ignore such advice at your own peril. cheers JarrahTree 03:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No problems - we all are learners if you understand the bigger picture. spine in an argument is not a very typical expression, and could very easily be taken the wrong way, take care with using a phrase like that. Whatever you might think about the topic, doesnt make you right. There are a pair of very very good humorous essay from the old days - well worth taking this to heart rather than metaphors about spines and arguments - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Drop_the_stick_and_back_slowly_away_from_the_horse_carcass /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_about_winning JarrahTree 14:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Taking things wrong is very subjective. I might not take things wrong, maybe someone can take a minute thing wrong way and feel off about it. Btw, thanks for the share and making this talk little loose, i was going too much in my head. Accesscrawl ( talk) 14:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Why does this version of Naggar Castle contain content found at this Trip Advisor review? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Naggar Castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g297618-d3705849-r586623142-Naggar_Castle-Manali_Manali_Tehsil_Kullu_District_Himachal_Pradesh.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
You failed to gain consensus for a move. It is disruptive for you to edit the lead as you did. Please stop. You could get blocked for this. I cannot block you because I expressed an opinion on the move, but another administrator can. Please be careful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. Accesscrawl ( talk) 07:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
You are making a large number of ungrammatical changes to articles. What is going on? -- Green C 13:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The definition of ungrammatical: "In violation of one or more of the rules and conventions of a language as defined by the grammar, resulting in unacceptable, or incorrect, usage." This has occurred repeatedly in your edits. Examples include:
-- Green C 14:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Few changes here and there can be considered ungrammatical. However, most of them are very precise observation. Accesscrawl ( talk) 14:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Here are few examples of very minute observations.
Accesscrawl ( talk) 15:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
It's a question of competency in the English language. From WP:Disruptive editing:
If you are unaware of your misunderstandings about the English language - or deny there is a competency problem given the evidence - and keep making such a large percentage of grammatical mistakes, this is a disruption, even when made in good faith and accidentally. Reconsider making edits for the purpose of 'improving English' and focus on other areas besides this. -- Green C 17:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The language you use doesn't seems [ sic] very professional.confirms all the other examples.
Both sources say Mount, not Peak. Xx236 ( talk) 10:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Changed to mount
Accesscrawl ( talk) 11:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Accesscrawl,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sharmila Thackeray for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Akhiljaxxn ( talk) 05:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sharmila Thackeray should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharmila Thackeray .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Akhiljaxxn ( talk) 06:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
In this edit [22] - one thing the English Wikipedia needs, which you may be well positioned with your bi-lingual skills, is translation into English for readers in other countries (UK, USA, Canada etc). So for example it would be:
{{cite news |title=VIDEO: एनएसजी के 20 कमांडो ने फतह किया देउ टिब्बा, अब एवरेस्ट की तैयारी |language=Hindi |trans-title=20 of the NSG commandos have defeated the Dew Dune, now preparing for the Everest |url=https://hindi.news18.com/videos/20-army-commandos-of-nsg-have-defeated-deo-dunes-now-preparing-for-everest-1419187.html |accessdate=26 June 2018 |publisher=News 18 Hindi}}
..adding |language=
and |trans-title=
. I don't think my translation is very good (via Google Translate) you may be able to help in these cases. --
Green
C
14:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Amou Haji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk)
13:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amou Haji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amou Haji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Fine work in regards to Deo Tibba, where you linked to it in Special:Diff/847564694 from Pir Panjal Range. I was just about to ask you, what can we do with Ankit Arora (cyclist)? Currently it is an WP:ORPHAN, ie. no other article in main space links to it (apart from the hatnote in Ankit Arora). Sam Sailor 07:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Ankit Arora (cyclist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, freelance journalist on leave of absence, push-biking around India in pursuit of a Guinness World Records-entry. We don't get to know a whole lot more about him, and searches for more sources are obstructed by false positives about his namesake, the TV actor Ankit Arora. A WP:BLP1E case that fails WP:BASIC/ WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sam
Sailor
20:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankit Arora (cyclist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Arora (cyclist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor 05:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Further to the section above:
1. Nimbhi jodhan was already tagged with {{ unreferenced}} when you added {{ refimprove}} in Special:Diff/844999228. Refimprove is redundant when the article is unreferenced and tagged as such. It is a good idea to read the individual template's documentation, others are not quite as intuitive as these. Better than tagging for refs is to go find some sources. Also, since this is a proper name, do you think we should move the article to Nimbhi Jodhan? Or would Nimhi Jodhan be a better choice? If yes, why? (Hint: search for sources, compare with WP:COMMONNAME)
2. Calling for updates (26 bytes edits): in
a,
b,
c,
d,
e, and
f you tag with {{
update|date=June 2018}} without a |reason=
parameter. Take the first,
Kevin L. Evans, what is it you think should be updated and why don't you
just do it?
Sam
Sailor
17:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sam, the page is supposed to be Nimbi Jodha. U could not understand what to do
Page move? Accesscrawl ( talk) 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I moved the article to Nimbi Jodha, deprodded it, and added a few references and an infobox. Do you want to follow up? Ask, if you have any questions. Sam Sailor 16:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Accesscrawl. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Talk:Rajneesh, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Accesscrawl. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Accesscrawl|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. I believe this edit originated from a request posted on a freelance job website
Till date have covered 12 states and 6 UTs in 310 days and 14000 kms" bit that you added in this edit (it was falsely ascribed to two newspaper articles; the information is not even on the blog)? Abecedare ( talk) 02:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
@Accesscrawl: I hope you don't mind if I butt in here and follow up where Abecedare started: Their first question was which source you used in this diff to change the text
from | to |
---|---|
Arora was a journalist for eNews Room, a digital magazine based in Kolkata, India.<ref> https://enewsroom.in/author/ankit-arora/</ref> | Arora worked for Genpact between 2014-16 and later as a journalist for Arbit newspaper , based in Jaipur, India. His last job was as a content writer before he left for the cycling journey. <ref> https://enewsroom.in/author/ankit-arora/</ref> |
The enewsroom.in source does support the text in the previous revision. You replace "journalist for eNews Room ..." with "Genpact ... Arbit ...", but that is not supported by the enewsroom.in source. In Wiki-lingo that is called
reference hijacking.
Your reply was "the information I've found for ankit arora is from a personal
blog"
, but that link does not, AFAICT, talk about him working for Genpact and Arbit. Abecedere in their reply hints to
WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, and it is always best to stick to
reliable sources, or at least sources that are publicly available. (I hate to labour the point, but it is important to read those WP:xxxx pages.)
I also butt in here, because your last message sounds honest and deserves a reply: my gut-feeling is that you have not been paid for proposing the Rajneesh RM, or for starting the Ankit Arora article, and you do the right thing when you accept the mistakes and take responsibility. It also gives me some confidence that you are simply making good-faith beginner's mistakes, when a long-term editor like Gpkp says he knows you in person. But finally – and please don't take this in any way belittling or discouraging – would a journalist like Arora pay for this 1-liner? Wouldn't he rather write a neutral autobiography with more substance, and then pay a seasoned SPA for sourcing, wikifying and publishing? I think so. Kind regards, Sam Sailor 05:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felix Starck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Starck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 06:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Accesscrawl! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Please do not make bogus COMMONNAME claims as you did at Talk:Swami Nithyananda#Requested move 18 July 2018; it literally took under one minute of looking at the real-world sources to disprove that notion. The general "do some homework" advice at WP:BEFORE applies to all WP:XFD-type discussions, including RM. Our consensus decisions are based on facts, not opinion or supposition. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 345 18:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Shikha Makan has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. 345 18:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Expedition Happiness should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expedition Happiness .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Accesscrawl, thank you for monitoring the druze page , I've noticed that you had been reverting my edits to the page and your reverts look to be in goodwill.
As a Druze myself with deep knowledge of the faith , I don't see that my edits had been controversial or that the version its being reverted to is more informative or accurate .
Please can we discuss the points you don't want to be removed from the page so we can reach a common ground rather than reverting all my edits.
Please lets discuss changes on talk page:
/info/en/?search=Talk:Druze#Discussing_changes_suggested_to_introduction
Thank you and looking forward to hear from you. « Hiram111Δ TalK Δ 05:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, can you please add references to 2015 in Indian television? Thanks, Boleyn ( talk) 19:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I moved the Pankaj Chaturvedi back to User:Amyers98/sandbox - it's a student's article draft that wasn't ready for mainspace. I believe this is a well-intentioned attempt to write an article, but one that missed the mark on tone. I intend to work with them to try to fix the tone issues, and sort out the notability issues. To that end, I removed your speedy tag. If you disagree, please feel free to re-tag the page. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 12:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamoudou Gassama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamoudou Gassama (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 16:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you please respond to my previous two messages? Thanks, Boleyn ( talk) 15:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2015 in Indian television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Boleyn (
talk)
14:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2017 in Indian television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Boleyn (
talk)
14:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dial911 ( talk) 01:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Hello, Accesscrawl,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jasleen Matharu, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.
scope_creep Talk 23:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I see you recently deleted the page on Shadow Yoga, which I wrote years ago with some hope that others would fill in details I didn't have time to add back then. I appreciate you need to pull out weeds and keep the garden here neat and tidy, so to speak, but I'm a bit confused why something like Chair Yoga is kept but Shadow Yoga is not. I'd be happy to keep working on the page if you are able to bring it back. Wspr81 ( talk) 22:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Kunal Kamra.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I'm honestly really surprised that this was deleted at AfD last time it was in the new page queue.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 04:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello you removed my eduts to battlefield archaeology. I'm actually part of the Ministry of Cultures team working on improving our digital outreach at Grand Sites Archaeologiques. I may not have added the citation to the text but it is taken from our website which is a report of battefield archaeology from WWI, would you please be able to replace the text you removed and i will add the citation. Thank you
Archeonationale ( talk) 12:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC) ---- Anastasia from GrandSitesArcheologiques
Thanks yes I had read the COI article which is why i removed the discussion of website, however the rest of the paragraph merely dicussing the first world war battlefield archaeology of france and its relevance which is why I think it should stay. Also the website which i added in the external links section also remains relevant to the page 14:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC) Archeonationale
Hello, Accesscrawl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Expedition Happiness".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 20:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi I need to add a few changes for Kamal Rashid Khan.
We need a table like this
Year | Shows | Role | Channel | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | Bigg Boss 3 | Celebrity Contestant | Colors TV | Ejected, Day 19 |
this should go under filmography.
Please put
at the bottom and also add Category:Bigg Boss contestants as well.
Thanks-- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
References
I did but know one is anwering me go and check. Please can you go and do it for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoraFatehi231 ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
You recently reverted two of my revisions on George Armstrong Custer's page (ids 881115846 and 881110353), claiming that no sources were provided. This is inaccurate. A source was provided for 881115846, in which I added a missing entry to the table listing Custer's military ranks. The missing rank was Custer's final appointment to brevet major general, which occurred in 1868. The provided source was a National Parks Service webpage that contains a complete list of Custer's promotions, including photos of their official certificates. Unless you have a good argument for why this is not an adequate source, I am adding this back to the page. I can also cite multiple biographies that mention this promotion.
For revision 881110353, I removed a mention of Gail Kelly-Custer's book, who claims to be a direct descendant of Custer and a Cheyenne woman named Monaseetah. The article states as fact that Gail is indeed a descendant, despite her book providing no proof of that. Her book is not a scholarly work, and I believe falls under Wikipedia's definition of a questionable source. I, too, could write a book claiming to be a direct Custer descendent, but that would not make it true. The section regarding Custer's relationship with Monaseetah needs further elaboration in general, but Gail's book should not be given the credence it is now. Twcus ( talk) 21:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
I added an acquisition detail on GSS Infotech page. I referenced it to one of many press reports. You have deleted it.Could you pl tell me the reason?
WikiKavita ( talk) 08:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2019-05-25. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 16:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I was informed that my edit on Hallasan National Park was reverted by you. I edited the number of national parks in South Korea to 22 (the old number in the page is 20 and it is out of date. In the website of Korea National Park Service, they state that "The organization manages 21 of the 22 national parks in Korea, as only the Hallasan National Park is managed by Jeju Special Self-Governing Province since it’s located in an island." ( http://english.knps.or.kr/AboutUs/NationalParks/Default.aspx?MenuNum=6&Submenu=NationalParks) Even in Wiki page of " List of national parks of South Korea", it is also writen that: "As of 2016, there are 22 national parks in South Korea; the parks, with the exception of Hallasan National Park, are managed by the Korea National Park Service, established in 1987.[2] The Authority operates its own police force, and since 1998 has been under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment. It was previously under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Construction." So if you determined to reverted my edit in this number, please give me an explanation. Thanks Quy Nhơn Bình Định ( talk) 02:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl,
Thanks for your feedback on editing and advertising. I would really appreciate it if you have communicated with me first, before taking the action to undo everything. Yesterday night, I have posted the following message:
If I do need to remove the links now, I will. It would be very kindly appreciated if I could be confirmed as soon as possible.
Thanks, Harry Princeton Harry Princeton ( talk) 17:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Actually, WP:TITLETM and MOS:TM say not to do what you did by moving Osho Times to OSHOTimes. I have reverted your undiscussed changes. — BarrelProof ( talk) 18:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-03-09. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 08:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
I've semi protected the article for two days. A content dispute is not vandalism. Horribly performed edits which break formatting are incompetence, not vandalism. Please report edit warring to WP:3RR. Please recall the instructions from the Editnotice on AIV when reporting:
thank you! Killer Chihuahua 20:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl! I am sure you made a mistake reverting my changes in this article. If you would carefully check the difference between the old and my versions, you would see that I removed wordings "court office" and "district office", which describe wrongly an essence of the "stolnik" COURT TITLE. The reason of this initial mistake may be bad command of English of the person who wrote the article. Providing "a reliable source" has nothing to do with my changes. Making changes in this article, I improved its language, that's it. Natalia Kocharova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natalia Kocharova ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you took part in a discussion of the proposed deletion for an article on Frederick Goold in August 2018, and the result at the time was "no consensus". I am just letting you know that I have renominated this article for deletion here. [27]. I am contacting all contributors to that discussion to see if you wish to comment again. In my view, the additional sources provided at the time did nothing to establish notability as definied by WP. I have also proposed two others for deletion for the same reason here [28] and here [29]. Thanks -- Sirfurboy ( talk) 11:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
See your comment here: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mariedegournay
I did indeed put a comment explaining my edit. The explanation is on the Talk page which I edited prior to changing the article. Moreover, the content you restored is marked “citation needed” whereas I made a change supported by a citation from NYT. So you have reverted cited and evidenced material to an uncited statement which is not entirely correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariedegournay ( talk • contribs) 01:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
On the Acceleration talk page, you removed my comment, claiming it was "disruptive".
It contained several cites from journal-published and publisher-published sources, proving that the acceleration tensor is rank 2 in accord with Einstein's General Relativity. This is, in fact, exactly what a prior admin had requested... so I was 'disruptive' by doing exactly what was asked of me?
I've re-entered the last cite... this is the third time the information has been removed. Wikipedia's admins don't seem to like having their little 'realities' disrupted by scientific fact. Does Jimbo know you guys are denying reality in favor of a comforting simplification of scientific fact, or shall I talk to him?
You're not a coloring book and you're not supposed to be pandering to the hoi polloi, you're supposed to be an online encyclopedia. When facts are presented, you should fold them into your knowledge base. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.43.236 ( talk) 05:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hii Accesscrawl, Greetings to you. You place a db -u1 tag on the article, did you mean to delete the page you created? pls advise as the tag you is incorrect.
-- CASSIOPEIA( talk) 12:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Accesscrawl! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 05:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm planning to create a Page,but there is already a Page existing of a person with the same name. How can i create a Page in this case? Accesscrawl ( talk) 14:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamoudou Gassama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamoudou Gassama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty ( talk) 16:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Naggar Castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thenewshimachal.com/2012/08/hotel-castle-naggar-gets-heritage-status/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 16:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
great for the visuals, but dont forget all the rest is still there.... Really adverserial style editing and behaviour at /info/en/?search=Talk:Rajneesh is disruptive and in the end will remove substantially acceptance in the editing community. You may get a high on such activity, but in the end, it does not augur well in the long run, try something that involves improving by contribution rather than deleting and changing with such enthusiasm (even if you have conviction you are right), wikipedia is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND. If you want to gain acceptance a contributory member of the community, try adding something. But, hey, in the end its your choice. Ignore such advice at your own peril. cheers JarrahTree 03:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No problems - we all are learners if you understand the bigger picture. spine in an argument is not a very typical expression, and could very easily be taken the wrong way, take care with using a phrase like that. Whatever you might think about the topic, doesnt make you right. There are a pair of very very good humorous essay from the old days - well worth taking this to heart rather than metaphors about spines and arguments - /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Drop_the_stick_and_back_slowly_away_from_the_horse_carcass /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_about_winning JarrahTree 14:41, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Taking things wrong is very subjective. I might not take things wrong, maybe someone can take a minute thing wrong way and feel off about it. Btw, thanks for the share and making this talk little loose, i was going too much in my head. Accesscrawl ( talk) 14:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Why does this version of Naggar Castle contain content found at this Trip Advisor review? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Naggar Castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowUserReviews-g297618-d3705849-r586623142-Naggar_Castle-Manali_Manali_Tehsil_Kullu_District_Himachal_Pradesh.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
You failed to gain consensus for a move. It is disruptive for you to edit the lead as you did. Please stop. You could get blocked for this. I cannot block you because I expressed an opinion on the move, but another administrator can. Please be careful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. Accesscrawl ( talk) 07:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
You are making a large number of ungrammatical changes to articles. What is going on? -- Green C 13:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The definition of ungrammatical: "In violation of one or more of the rules and conventions of a language as defined by the grammar, resulting in unacceptable, or incorrect, usage." This has occurred repeatedly in your edits. Examples include:
-- Green C 14:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Few changes here and there can be considered ungrammatical. However, most of them are very precise observation. Accesscrawl ( talk) 14:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Here are few examples of very minute observations.
Accesscrawl ( talk) 15:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
It's a question of competency in the English language. From WP:Disruptive editing:
If you are unaware of your misunderstandings about the English language - or deny there is a competency problem given the evidence - and keep making such a large percentage of grammatical mistakes, this is a disruption, even when made in good faith and accidentally. Reconsider making edits for the purpose of 'improving English' and focus on other areas besides this. -- Green C 17:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
The language you use doesn't seems [ sic] very professional.confirms all the other examples.
Both sources say Mount, not Peak. Xx236 ( talk) 10:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Changed to mount
Accesscrawl ( talk) 11:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Accesscrawl,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sharmila Thackeray for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Akhiljaxxn ( talk) 05:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sharmila Thackeray should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharmila Thackeray .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Akhiljaxxn ( talk) 06:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
In this edit [22] - one thing the English Wikipedia needs, which you may be well positioned with your bi-lingual skills, is translation into English for readers in other countries (UK, USA, Canada etc). So for example it would be:
{{cite news |title=VIDEO: एनएसजी के 20 कमांडो ने फतह किया देउ टिब्बा, अब एवरेस्ट की तैयारी |language=Hindi |trans-title=20 of the NSG commandos have defeated the Dew Dune, now preparing for the Everest |url=https://hindi.news18.com/videos/20-army-commandos-of-nsg-have-defeated-deo-dunes-now-preparing-for-everest-1419187.html |accessdate=26 June 2018 |publisher=News 18 Hindi}}
..adding |language=
and |trans-title=
. I don't think my translation is very good (via Google Translate) you may be able to help in these cases. --
Green
C
14:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Amou Haji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk)
13:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amou Haji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amou Haji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Fine work in regards to Deo Tibba, where you linked to it in Special:Diff/847564694 from Pir Panjal Range. I was just about to ask you, what can we do with Ankit Arora (cyclist)? Currently it is an WP:ORPHAN, ie. no other article in main space links to it (apart from the hatnote in Ankit Arora). Sam Sailor 07:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
The article Ankit Arora (cyclist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, freelance journalist on leave of absence, push-biking around India in pursuit of a Guinness World Records-entry. We don't get to know a whole lot more about him, and searches for more sources are obstructed by false positives about his namesake, the TV actor Ankit Arora. A WP:BLP1E case that fails WP:BASIC/ WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sam
Sailor
20:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankit Arora (cyclist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankit Arora (cyclist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor 05:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Further to the section above:
1. Nimbhi jodhan was already tagged with {{ unreferenced}} when you added {{ refimprove}} in Special:Diff/844999228. Refimprove is redundant when the article is unreferenced and tagged as such. It is a good idea to read the individual template's documentation, others are not quite as intuitive as these. Better than tagging for refs is to go find some sources. Also, since this is a proper name, do you think we should move the article to Nimbhi Jodhan? Or would Nimhi Jodhan be a better choice? If yes, why? (Hint: search for sources, compare with WP:COMMONNAME)
2. Calling for updates (26 bytes edits): in
a,
b,
c,
d,
e, and
f you tag with {{
update|date=June 2018}} without a |reason=
parameter. Take the first,
Kevin L. Evans, what is it you think should be updated and why don't you
just do it?
Sam
Sailor
17:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sam, the page is supposed to be Nimbi Jodha. U could not understand what to do
Page move? Accesscrawl ( talk) 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I moved the article to Nimbi Jodha, deprodded it, and added a few references and an infobox. Do you want to follow up? Ask, if you have any questions. Sam Sailor 16:46, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Accesscrawl. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Talk:Rajneesh, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Accesscrawl. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Accesscrawl|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. I believe this edit originated from a request posted on a freelance job website
Till date have covered 12 states and 6 UTs in 310 days and 14000 kms" bit that you added in this edit (it was falsely ascribed to two newspaper articles; the information is not even on the blog)? Abecedare ( talk) 02:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
@Accesscrawl: I hope you don't mind if I butt in here and follow up where Abecedare started: Their first question was which source you used in this diff to change the text
from | to |
---|---|
Arora was a journalist for eNews Room, a digital magazine based in Kolkata, India.<ref> https://enewsroom.in/author/ankit-arora/</ref> | Arora worked for Genpact between 2014-16 and later as a journalist for Arbit newspaper , based in Jaipur, India. His last job was as a content writer before he left for the cycling journey. <ref> https://enewsroom.in/author/ankit-arora/</ref> |
The enewsroom.in source does support the text in the previous revision. You replace "journalist for eNews Room ..." with "Genpact ... Arbit ...", but that is not supported by the enewsroom.in source. In Wiki-lingo that is called
reference hijacking.
Your reply was "the information I've found for ankit arora is from a personal
blog"
, but that link does not, AFAICT, talk about him working for Genpact and Arbit. Abecedere in their reply hints to
WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, and it is always best to stick to
reliable sources, or at least sources that are publicly available. (I hate to labour the point, but it is important to read those WP:xxxx pages.)
I also butt in here, because your last message sounds honest and deserves a reply: my gut-feeling is that you have not been paid for proposing the Rajneesh RM, or for starting the Ankit Arora article, and you do the right thing when you accept the mistakes and take responsibility. It also gives me some confidence that you are simply making good-faith beginner's mistakes, when a long-term editor like Gpkp says he knows you in person. But finally – and please don't take this in any way belittling or discouraging – would a journalist like Arora pay for this 1-liner? Wouldn't he rather write a neutral autobiography with more substance, and then pay a seasoned SPA for sourcing, wikifying and publishing? I think so. Kind regards, Sam Sailor 05:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felix Starck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Starck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 06:48, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Accesscrawl! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Please do not make bogus COMMONNAME claims as you did at Talk:Swami Nithyananda#Requested move 18 July 2018; it literally took under one minute of looking at the real-world sources to disprove that notion. The general "do some homework" advice at WP:BEFORE applies to all WP:XFD-type discussions, including RM. Our consensus decisions are based on facts, not opinion or supposition. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 345 18:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
The article Shikha Makan has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. 345 18:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Expedition Happiness should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Expedition Happiness .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:33, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Accesscrawl, thank you for monitoring the druze page , I've noticed that you had been reverting my edits to the page and your reverts look to be in goodwill.
As a Druze myself with deep knowledge of the faith , I don't see that my edits had been controversial or that the version its being reverted to is more informative or accurate .
Please can we discuss the points you don't want to be removed from the page so we can reach a common ground rather than reverting all my edits.
Please lets discuss changes on talk page:
/info/en/?search=Talk:Druze#Discussing_changes_suggested_to_introduction
Thank you and looking forward to hear from you. « Hiram111Δ TalK Δ 05:11, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, can you please add references to 2015 in Indian television? Thanks, Boleyn ( talk) 19:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I moved the Pankaj Chaturvedi back to User:Amyers98/sandbox - it's a student's article draft that wasn't ready for mainspace. I believe this is a well-intentioned attempt to write an article, but one that missed the mark on tone. I intend to work with them to try to fix the tone issues, and sort out the notability issues. To that end, I removed your speedy tag. If you disagree, please feel free to re-tag the page. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 12:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamoudou Gassama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamoudou Gassama (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 16:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you please respond to my previous two messages? Thanks, Boleyn ( talk) 15:25, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2015 in Indian television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Boleyn (
talk)
14:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
2017 in Indian television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Boleyn (
talk)
14:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Accesscrawl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dial911 ( talk) 01:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Hello, Accesscrawl,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jasleen Matharu, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Publish Changes
button.But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.
scope_creep Talk 23:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I see you recently deleted the page on Shadow Yoga, which I wrote years ago with some hope that others would fill in details I didn't have time to add back then. I appreciate you need to pull out weeds and keep the garden here neat and tidy, so to speak, but I'm a bit confused why something like Chair Yoga is kept but Shadow Yoga is not. I'd be happy to keep working on the page if you are able to bring it back. Wspr81 ( talk) 22:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Kunal Kamra.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I'm honestly really surprised that this was deleted at AfD last time it was in the new page queue.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 04:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello you removed my eduts to battlefield archaeology. I'm actually part of the Ministry of Cultures team working on improving our digital outreach at Grand Sites Archaeologiques. I may not have added the citation to the text but it is taken from our website which is a report of battefield archaeology from WWI, would you please be able to replace the text you removed and i will add the citation. Thank you
Archeonationale ( talk) 12:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC) ---- Anastasia from GrandSitesArcheologiques
Thanks yes I had read the COI article which is why i removed the discussion of website, however the rest of the paragraph merely dicussing the first world war battlefield archaeology of france and its relevance which is why I think it should stay. Also the website which i added in the external links section also remains relevant to the page 14:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC) Archeonationale
Hello, Accesscrawl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Expedition Happiness".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 20:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi I need to add a few changes for Kamal Rashid Khan.
We need a table like this
Year | Shows | Role | Channel | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | Bigg Boss 3 | Celebrity Contestant | Colors TV | Ejected, Day 19 |
this should go under filmography.
Please put
at the bottom and also add Category:Bigg Boss contestants as well.
Thanks-- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
References
I did but know one is anwering me go and check. Please can you go and do it for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NoraFatehi231 ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
You recently reverted two of my revisions on George Armstrong Custer's page (ids 881115846 and 881110353), claiming that no sources were provided. This is inaccurate. A source was provided for 881115846, in which I added a missing entry to the table listing Custer's military ranks. The missing rank was Custer's final appointment to brevet major general, which occurred in 1868. The provided source was a National Parks Service webpage that contains a complete list of Custer's promotions, including photos of their official certificates. Unless you have a good argument for why this is not an adequate source, I am adding this back to the page. I can also cite multiple biographies that mention this promotion.
For revision 881110353, I removed a mention of Gail Kelly-Custer's book, who claims to be a direct descendant of Custer and a Cheyenne woman named Monaseetah. The article states as fact that Gail is indeed a descendant, despite her book providing no proof of that. Her book is not a scholarly work, and I believe falls under Wikipedia's definition of a questionable source. I, too, could write a book claiming to be a direct Custer descendent, but that would not make it true. The section regarding Custer's relationship with Monaseetah needs further elaboration in general, but Gail's book should not be given the credence it is now. Twcus ( talk) 21:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
I added an acquisition detail on GSS Infotech page. I referenced it to one of many press reports. You have deleted it.Could you pl tell me the reason?
WikiKavita ( talk) 08:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2019-05-25. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 16:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I was informed that my edit on Hallasan National Park was reverted by you. I edited the number of national parks in South Korea to 22 (the old number in the page is 20 and it is out of date. In the website of Korea National Park Service, they state that "The organization manages 21 of the 22 national parks in Korea, as only the Hallasan National Park is managed by Jeju Special Self-Governing Province since it’s located in an island." ( http://english.knps.or.kr/AboutUs/NationalParks/Default.aspx?MenuNum=6&Submenu=NationalParks) Even in Wiki page of " List of national parks of South Korea", it is also writen that: "As of 2016, there are 22 national parks in South Korea; the parks, with the exception of Hallasan National Park, are managed by the Korea National Park Service, established in 1987.[2] The Authority operates its own police force, and since 1998 has been under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Environment. It was previously under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Construction." So if you determined to reverted my edit in this number, please give me an explanation. Thanks Quy Nhơn Bình Định ( talk) 02:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl,
Thanks for your feedback on editing and advertising. I would really appreciate it if you have communicated with me first, before taking the action to undo everything. Yesterday night, I have posted the following message:
If I do need to remove the links now, I will. It would be very kindly appreciated if I could be confirmed as soon as possible.
Thanks, Harry Princeton Harry Princeton ( talk) 17:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Actually, WP:TITLETM and MOS:TM say not to do what you did by moving Osho Times to OSHOTimes. I have reverted your undiscussed changes. — BarrelProof ( talk) 18:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-03-09. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 08:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
I've semi protected the article for two days. A content dispute is not vandalism. Horribly performed edits which break formatting are incompetence, not vandalism. Please report edit warring to WP:3RR. Please recall the instructions from the Editnotice on AIV when reporting:
thank you! Killer Chihuahua 20:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Accesscrawl! I am sure you made a mistake reverting my changes in this article. If you would carefully check the difference between the old and my versions, you would see that I removed wordings "court office" and "district office", which describe wrongly an essence of the "stolnik" COURT TITLE. The reason of this initial mistake may be bad command of English of the person who wrote the article. Providing "a reliable source" has nothing to do with my changes. Making changes in this article, I improved its language, that's it. Natalia Kocharova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natalia Kocharova ( talk • contribs) 13:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you took part in a discussion of the proposed deletion for an article on Frederick Goold in August 2018, and the result at the time was "no consensus". I am just letting you know that I have renominated this article for deletion here. [27]. I am contacting all contributors to that discussion to see if you wish to comment again. In my view, the additional sources provided at the time did nothing to establish notability as definied by WP. I have also proposed two others for deletion for the same reason here [28] and here [29]. Thanks -- Sirfurboy ( talk) 11:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
See your comment here: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mariedegournay
I did indeed put a comment explaining my edit. The explanation is on the Talk page which I edited prior to changing the article. Moreover, the content you restored is marked “citation needed” whereas I made a change supported by a citation from NYT. So you have reverted cited and evidenced material to an uncited statement which is not entirely correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariedegournay ( talk • contribs) 01:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
On the Acceleration talk page, you removed my comment, claiming it was "disruptive".
It contained several cites from journal-published and publisher-published sources, proving that the acceleration tensor is rank 2 in accord with Einstein's General Relativity. This is, in fact, exactly what a prior admin had requested... so I was 'disruptive' by doing exactly what was asked of me?
I've re-entered the last cite... this is the third time the information has been removed. Wikipedia's admins don't seem to like having their little 'realities' disrupted by scientific fact. Does Jimbo know you guys are denying reality in favor of a comforting simplification of scientific fact, or shall I talk to him?
You're not a coloring book and you're not supposed to be pandering to the hoi polloi, you're supposed to be an online encyclopedia. When facts are presented, you should fold them into your knowledge base. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.43.236 ( talk) 05:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)