This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:7%266%3Dthirteen/Archive_2. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I like barber's poles and anything with helixes in them. Getting above 20,000 bytes was a coincidence! Bigturtle ( talk) 21:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Please give one good reason why a triskelion is an "optical illusion"... AnonMoos ( talk) 19:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
You kind of went wild with the categories on that article, and there's the same problem with the "optical illusions" category. Just because a new-agey PDF file mentions that a related symbol (not the Triquetra itself) shows figure-ground vacillation, that doesn't mean that the triquetra is an "optical illusion"[sic]. AnonMoos ( talk) 21:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Please don't throw a large number of only very vaguely-relevant (if at all relevant), categories onto articles, and don't add "Category:Vision rivalry" to all articles about visual symbols... AnonMoos ( talk) 17:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I have rewritten a key paragraph of this article to divide it up into two paragraphs, and clarify it a little; take a look. Bigturtle ( talk) 23:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I am not pleased that an editor is taking the position that the existences of Cougars in the first location (which will I believe spill over to the second) cannot be mentioned in the article, notwithstanding that reliable and complete references were included. To say that they do not exist, or aren't worth reporting seems to be perverse. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 20:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC) Stan
Imzadi, I did not want to post this on your talk page. I under stand that the "in use" tag, when read in the font it has, and at a certain magnification, actually looked like the "muse" tag. Indeed, I understand your intensity and anguish. And I don't want to break my promise to not interfere with you or your muse. I am leaving and found this additional source. U an memorializing it here. Hope it helps. “Barber pole grasshopper” a/k/a “painted grasshopper” is said to be the most beautifuil grasshopper. Beth Thiret, Colorado State University Extension Master Gardener in Larimer County "Ugh: What to do about Grasshoppers". Thank you and happy editing. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 21:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC) Stan
Hi, 7+6=13 -- I am looking for people with interests in folklore (editors I’ve encountered on folklore/mythology articles as well as elsewhere) to visit talk:Folk etymology, where there is an ongoing edit dispute. One view (three people) holds that the term is exclusive to linguistics, and another (just me) finds that the term has been formally defined within folklore, and used in academic journals in that sense for more than a century. The page is currently locked. I ask your input ‘’’not in support of either view,’’’ but because discussion seems to have come to a standstill, it seems to be a page few stumble across, and needs fresh viewpoints to get unstuck. Thanks! DavidOaks ( talk) 17:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Salut Genevieve, Creating a user page at commons is fine, i have one as well; [3]. When you upload photos to commons they can be used by all wiki projects, when they are uploaded here they are for wiki only. The process i do is merely upload a photo here on english wikipedia and typically someone else will move the photo to commons for me (if they want and the image meets certain guidelines See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons). The choice is yours but commons and wikipedia itself have different image procedures, I would recommend uploading first on english wiki then transfering (if you want) to commons. Before doing anything though, familize yourself with Wikipedia:Image use policy(with close attention to Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Privacy_rights) and Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. This is a lengthy read but it will describe what types of photos can and shouldnt be used. I dont think theres many issues with the photos you plan to take though (but they will likely need more info on the privacy issue depending on the type of photo you take). Images are not my strong area as I typically avoid taking pictures of living people, but mostly focus on buildings. But this information should be enough to get you moving in the right direction. When you think your ready take a look at Wikipedia:Uploading images and thenproceed to upload at Special:Upload. Alot to take in....
When you created your commons account did you set up a global account(unified account)? If you didnt you still can, you can link your accounts, let me know if you need help with that. As for uploading the photos, The license i use typically for buildings is Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License- See [4] for details on the licsense. A good example of photo licensing for people (what you appear to be trying to do) is at File:USA-Womens-Hockey-Olympics-5.jpg of Jenny Potter, The minnesota Whitecaps player (if you ever get a chance to see her play, do it ;) ). Let me know if this starts you off ok (or if you need more concise info), again images of living people arent my strong area. Will talk soon
Hi, SS -- I am looking for people with interests in folklore (editors I’ve encountered on folklore/mythology articles as well as elsewhere) to visit talk:Folk etymology, where there is an ongoing edit dispute. One view (three people) holds that the term is exclusive to linguistics, and another (just me) finds that the term has been formally defined within folklore, and used in academic journals in that sense for more than a century. The page is currently locked. I ask your input not in support of either view, but because discussion seems to have come to a standstill, it seems to be a page few stumble across, and needs fresh viewpoints to get unstuck. Thanks! DavidOaks ( talk) 18:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, my apologies for meeting under these circumstances. I am not going to discuss the ANI on the talk page, so I will respond to you here. The problem is that the user above has been involved in quite a long edit war with various inappropriate actions and now has specifically sought out only editors he views as interested in one subject by private message. The selected private recruitment of uninvolved editors based upon their interest in one side of a dispute most certainly does amount to canvassing. I have tried to avoid reporting this user for weeks now, while he has unsuccessfully filed RfC's and ANI's and remained a minority of one. The only person standing in the way of his contributing the relevant material under its own article is him. Be assured that I have no problem with your comments on the article. μηδείς ( talk) 22:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Your works looking good on the page, thanks for the note. Im not an expert on this but, I have seen that sports like rugby and british football (soccer) ( I think a few scottish teams use this pattern) use this style of uniform. For Hockey though Universities populourized this pattern as well. For instance Queens university in Canada uses this theme quite a bit with there throwback sports uniforms (from the late 1800s) and current school clothing lines. But the fundamental trend in canada at least ive noticed (needing sources though of course) was that in the late 1800s and early 1900s sporting teams used the barber pole style of uniform. Anyway just a few ideas for expansions, but an explanation as to why they used the pattern if you could find a source would be a fanatstic addition to the article. Cheers. Ottawa4ever ( talk) 17:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Calamitybrook ( talk) 23:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Pearl-McPhee,Stephanie (2005). Yarn Harlot: The Secret Life of a Knitter. Kansas City: Andrews McMeel Pub. p. 180. ISBN 0740750372. Retrieved December 2, 2010. deliberate mistake. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 04:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Stan
Imzadi 1979 → 16:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Reference templates
Imzadi, You've been leading by example, and I am being guilted into adopting citation templates. Is there an easier way to use them? Less cumbersome? Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC) Stan
|lastn= |firstn=
for author names. If there are multiple authors, add a number in place of the n to separate them out. If there is only one, drop the number.|author=
if the author is an organization, which is rare. I only use organizations as an author if the publisher is different and the organization is explicitly credited as an author|title=
for the title of the article, map, press release, web page or book. Convert the title to Title Case.|work=
the name of the website (which isn't the URL and should be different from the publisher), the name of the newspaper, etc.|publisher=
the company that publishes the content. For most newspapers, this isn't really needed, but this is where to put the TV or radio station's call letters. (I don't use the station's branding as outside of their viewing/listening area, no one knows who "9&10 News" would be, but they'd understand
WWTV-TV.)|location=
the location, if known, of the source. I skip this if the location is listed in the newspaper's name. I usually skip this on state government sources since the assumption would be that it was published in the state capital. (Sometimes with DOT sources, the location is the district office because the source only pertains to a district.)|date=
The date of publication. Similarly, |year=
if only the year is known. Bots will fix this during other edits if you use the "wrong" one.|page= |pages=
use one or the other but not both. The former uses "p. #" as the output, and the latter uses "pp. #" instead. If you have a range of pages, use an en dash (–) as the separator, not a hyphen (-).|accessdate=
for the date you accessed the source, if an online link is provided.|url=
if there is a link to the source, feel free to add it. Except for webpages though, this is usually quite optional.|format=
this is a multipurpose parameter. If the URL links to a PDF, you should indicate that. Same for anything like an Excel file, a Word document, etc. Also, if a subscription is required, I list "Subscription required" to alert readers that they might have to pay to get the article.|archiveurl= |archivedate=
are useful if the webpage is no longer accessible through the website, but it is hosted at
http://www.archive.org/ or another site. In that case, use the original URL in the |url=
parameter|isbn= |issn=
and the like. ISBNs are standard numbers for books, and ISSNs are used on some journals and magazines. If you can provide one of these, the reader will get link to a search page. From there, he can click to find the book in the WorldCat library catalog search, Amazon or Google Books, among other options.You made a correction to the Italian Hall disaster website, regarding Alison Hoagland's book, Mine Towns. However, in her book, she DID say it was a bi-fold door. Although I disagree with her, she wrote on page 223, "This door was hinged in the middle so that one leaf folded flat against the other and both lay flat against the wall on the left." Like I said, she is wrong, but that is what she said. 76.226.1.170 ( talk) 18:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
There's a new tool that was announced in this week's Signpost called ProveIt that's becoming handy for me since I installed it last night. I'll take a look here quick though at the article. <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 23:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Stenopodidea Many species are particularly attractive, with striped red and white bodies, earning them the alternative name barber-pole shrimp. ... John Kay (caricaturist) In 1785, induced by the favour which greeted certain attempts of his to etch in aquafortis, he took down his barber's pole and opened a ... Allotropa
Per your request. Happy editing! QuAz GaA 19:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
The discussion on this page concerns content and sourcing. One of our editors has decided that the following does not belong there.
You made a correction to the Italian Hall disaster website, regarding Alison Hoagland's book, Mine Towns. However, in her book, she DID say it was a bi-fold door. Although I disagree with her, she wrote on page 223, "This door was hinged in the middle so that one leaf folded flat against the other and both lay flat against the wall on the left." Like I said, she is wrong, but that is what she said. 76.226.1.170 ( talk) 18:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I added a reference for Lehto's book being a Notable Book in 2007. It makes the entry consistent on that point. I'd rather edit from an IP. 76.226.1.170 ( talk) 13:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Our esteemed editors deleted the second article, and did a half-assed, inadequate and incomplete merge of the subject matter into the first. I was not given notice of any of this, despite having been a substantial contributor to the second article, and a smaller contributor to the first. This was SNAFU and perhaps FUBAR, but it is water over the Wikipedia dam. So I am not trying to reopen this. I would like access to the deleted article, which actually has a lot of references and citations that need to be in the second. I do not want to have to reinvent the wheel. If somebody would put it (or a link) onto my talk page it would be appreciated. Please give me a hand. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 21:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC) Stan
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date format (
link){{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite book}}
: |work=
ignored (
help); Check date values in: |date=
(
help)An article that you have been involved in editing, Fred Green, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
My earlier text said "he ran the Revenge aground" implying Perry was directing the ship at the time. Research at Google Book search disclosed the 1843 article I mentioned and other sources noting that a pilot was steering the ship when , in the fog, it hit a reef and sank. I changed the text to "the Revenge ran aground." I am aware that today if a captain ran his ship into a reef and it sank, his career would likely be over. (See Holly Graf#Cowpens relief of command, for instance). See also [2] which notes that in 1908 running a ship aground was normally a career ending event, but (future) Admiral Nimitz survived that event. I suspected that Perry had gotten off lightly, perhaps through connections with powerful individuals, which could also have given him his fast promotions. Further research showed that this was not the case: he made the best of a bad situation caused by fog suddenly rolling in, while the local pilot was in charge, and a board fully exonerated him for swift actions to save the crew and much of the contents on the ship. It seemed like a noncontroversial editorial change,to make it the passive voice, but I added the note in case I was later challenged on it, just to remind me of a source. It did not seem important to add a reference to the article. See "Oliver Hazard Perry" by James Fenimore Cooper, Graham;s Magazine, Volume XXII, No. 5, May, 1843, page 268. If you think it is needed, feel free to add it, or let me know and I will. Edison ( talk) 19:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Not a reliable source, so not a good reference to include. As for photos, what would prevent someone from providing any photo, with the inscription photoshopped to say whatever he wished? (Pranksters create even fake wars, fake towns and fake roads on Wikipedia. Way too much time on their hands). It is interesting, but not useful for verifying anything. Edison ( talk) 19:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
There is an interesting discussion about the scope of articles and article content. I am not urging anyone to take a position, but I am urging input from fellow editors. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 19:30, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Stan
Thanks for the anniversary greetings! Have a happy anniversary too! WhisperToMe ( talk) 18:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
(and probably will give in -my usual response to temptation) to attribute the sculpture at the Alpena County Courthouse to Parducci, however his records, those that I have, are blank for 1932 through 1934, so I am not going to make that claim on wikipedia. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 18:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Newspapers for Michigan -- old & new
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 17:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Imzadi 1979 → 19:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
here's a corrected URL for the congressional record citation #18 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2011-03-01/pdf/CREC-2011-03-01-pt1-PgS1071.pdf#page=3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.19.127 ( talk) 19:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen ( ☎)
for 7&6=thirteen. Bravo. For your very good correction in page of Pauline Bebe. Continue your good work in Wikipedia. Pass a good week-end, Best regards -- Geneviève ( talk) 17:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Good article on judicial review that I tripped across, and which could have application to this and other SCOTUS articles. And this was before some of the more recent handiwork of the court. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want me to undo my refactoring of your comments on Barek's page, I will. I was hoping to clarify for his sake. If the user doesn't respond and keeps spamming, I will be headed towards having that site
blacklisted.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 18:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour I am going to write to HJ Mitchell so that a part of this DKY is for you. It was a work Team and you deserve this award.-- Geneviève ( talk) 13:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
On 8 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pauline Bebe, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pauline Bebe was France's first female rabbi? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I better go and spell "university" correctly in my cut-&paste bibliography too. Good catch. EInar aka Carptrash ( talk) 17:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Thirteen, regarding this set of edits at Earl Young, I need to point out some problems. First, all of those categories except one relates to architectural styles, not the architects themselves. "Category:Arts and Crafts architects" was a good addition though, I'd have not thought of it. Second, please do not add both parent and child categories to articles. For example, only "American architectural styles" would be added, not it and "Architectural styles". The article is already in the latter since it is in the former. Same with "Modernist architecture in the United States" and "Modernist architecture", and "Arts and Crafts architects" and "Arts and Crafts Movement". Let me know if you have any questions. — Huntster ( t @ c) 03:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
This morning, I have a big problem with the Infobox national hockey team for Slovenian women's national ice hockey team: see my sandbox User:Genevieve2/sandbox0324. Maybe you can help me ? thanks, merci -- Geneviève ( talk) 16:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
...for the barnstar. That's very kind of you. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 21:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Someone uploaded a new version on Feb. 6 using
Autodesk Maya which changed the file. Apparently this renders it non-working when it is resized. I'll leave a note and may revert the file at Commons.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 15:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Bonsoir dear 7&6=thirteen, I working now on Coupe Dodge. It is a Québecois Championship in Ice hockey (French region of Canada). The old article of wikipedia speak only about men ice hockey. As I know very well this girls competition, I complete now with the women ice hockey User:Genevieve2/sandbox05. My English Language is poor and maybe my draft is filled with grammatical mistakes and with English spelling. Can you hepl me to correct this text? You should not translate everything into English language especially the name of the French-speaking teams. But for the verbs yes it makes translate correctly. If you will to help me, it would be kind. Merci beaucoup -- Geneviève ( talk) 00:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't really get this edit. Why link to a Google copy of the original when you can link just as well to the original? -- Conti| ✉ 17:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed you had re-added the rare dog breeds category to the Bernese Mountain Dog article and I'm curious as to your rationale. I had originally removed it because its AKC ranking is 39, putting it on par with Collies, Miniature Pinschers, Bichon Frise(s?), and Viszlak. As far as I know -- could be wrong -- the breed is even more popular in Europe; not sure about other regions. — anndelion ( talk) 02:31, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
You have reverted a change I made to the Roseville, Michigan page, which was a correct update of the city's demographics. I am reverting them back, as it was accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remisc ( talk • contribs) 04:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Good Evening, Both texts seem to me to be good. I cannot write more because I do not know the subject of magic museums. Bonne chance -- Geneviève ( talk) 00:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Genevieve has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thereby I give you this pie for creating the script, which I use to give this pie to you. :)
To spread more WikiLove, install the
WikiLove user script.
|
Hello! Your submission of La Maison de la Magie Robert-Houdin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Benea ( talk) 12:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
On 25 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article La Maison de la Magie Robert-Houdin, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 12:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Wanted to drop a note off to say I enjoyed reading the La Maison de la Magie Robert-Houdin article, and wanted to point out that two of the pictures in the Jean Eugène Robert-Houdin article could be used in the museum article as well. I took File:Jean Eugène Robert-Houdin museum (statue and display).jpg and File:Jean Eugène Robert-Houdin statue (Blois).jpg when visiting Blois, but didn't get a chance to go inside the musuem. What you are seeing in the former pictures (and the picture in the article) is the "The six-headed dragon automaton" display, where the dragon models move in and out of the windows (the current article caption incorrectly calls the dragons crocodiles, and the "snake" is one of the dragon's tails). I'm sure there are videos of it on YouTube if you look (not sure whether public displays like that in France are accepted on Commons). Anyway, hope those pictures will be of some use. Carcharoth ( talk) 16:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks heaps for the help on the American Akita page, I really appriciate it. Cheers, - Keetanii ( talk) 14:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Cookies! | ||
Keetanii has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Because we all need cookies! To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}! |
Hi, thank you for your help with Armenian Gampr, -- Zara-arush ( talk) 11:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
The original barnstar had been deleted
here on your page because it was deleted at Commons. I've replaced it.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 16:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
This was a live one.:)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 20:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen, thanks for your helpful comments on my talk page. Overall, I had a pretty bad experience editing the pentagram map wiki, and I'd like to both vent and ask for advice about how to avoid these problems again. Some background: I am a mathematician, and the originator of the subject on the wiki. After 20 years of thinking about it, I am recognized as one of the leading authorities on this small topic. The original version of the wiki page was quite sketchy and inaccurate, and indeed there was a tag to this effect on top of the page. I decided to clean the thing up, making it accurate, up-to-date, and well-referenced.
The first 3 hours of my edits were lost, thanks to a user named Abhishek... who thought I was vandalizing the site. Then, my further edits brought several more accusations of vandalism, both from this guy and someone who seemed to be a security expert. Finally, the next morning, the user Asher186 removed all the pictures I had put up. I made these pictures myself and own the copyright, but I did not know enough to actually license the pictures. The pictures were absolutely essential to the text, as anyone with any understanding of the topic could see.
All in all, I spent about 12 hours editing a page which would have taken me half that time without the (in my opinion) hasty intervention of people who probably know very little about the content of the page. I understand the need for wikipedia to protect itself against vandalism and other breaches of publicly responsible editing, but I wish that these users had shown a bit more restraint and discernment.
I noticed, on my talk page, that you suggest inline referencing. Frankly, I am so disgruntled with my experience on wikipedia that I don't have much desire to further edit pages. I might come back to it after cooling off. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 17:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 6&7=thirteen
Thanks for your long and sympathetic reply. As the writer and even occasional editor of many scholarly articles, I am used to doing things somewhat differently than is done on wikipedia. Usually people show more restraint in their edits. Of course, we are talking about a much more narrow and specialized area, where everyone more or less has a similar background.
On the other hand, wikipedia had some great advantages over traditional journals and articles, and is a fabulous resource. It is really a fundamentally different model for publication, so one is bound to expect differences in protocol. I'm happy to improve my wiki editing skills so that it doesn't raise red flags. One problem, I suppose, is that I am an extremely quick and relentless writer. Maybe that can look superficially like vandalism.
You mentioned that I might put some information about myself on my user's page. In fact, I already have a (short) wiki page, Richard Schwartz. This does not quite match my user name, RichardEvanSchwartz. I usually go by the latter, and I wonder if I might somehow consolidate these two names into one, so that both always refer to this page. At the same time, my website http://www.math.brown.edu/~res has quite a bit more information about me.
Thanks much for the offer to do the inline editing for me. I learned how to do this, and did it.
The one last thing I'd like to say is that I'm not a total newbie on wikipedia. In fact, I did a similar job with the outer billiards website around 3 yeas ago, and my colleagues in that little field seemed quite pleased. I didn't have any problems then, though the style is similar. I wonder if, in the 3yr interim, there has been a rise in [[artificial intelligence]] and bots on the net, which makes it harder for atypical editing to fly under the radar. Both websites I have edited are equally obscure.
Anyway, thanks again for your long, sympathetic message. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 21:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen, thanks for your (repeated) kind and encouraging words. They have sweetened this whole experience quite a bit, and I am really quite happy that you appreciate my efforts. (I'm sure that these efforts are tiny in comparison to your own.) In response to several issues you raise: 1. I have been blanking my talk page partly because I haven't yet learned how to archive it and partly because I found the negative comments embarrassing. 2. You refer to a WP:DYK nomination for the pentagram map wiki page, but I am not sure about this. It seems to me that this is a small and specialized subtopic in mathematics. My main point in editing the page was to make it possible for students and other researchers in closely allied areas to find quick and accurate information about it. My collaborators and I thought that this would be a good time to edit the page because this particular topic is getting "hot", with more researchers getting interested and finding connections, but in this business "hot" means that maybe 10 people in the world are interested!
Incidentally, thanks for the tip about inline referencing. This allowed me to be a bit more modest in the presentation of the material. Instead of repeatedly saying "In his 20XX paper, Richard Schwartz proved..." I could just state the fact and give an inline reference to my paper. For the most part, this suits me better. Believe it or not, I didn't like the fact that I was quoting my own name so often. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 04:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen, Thanks for your continued interest in this matter. I'll try to answer your latest questions that you left on my talk page.
1. You asked about the practical importance of this topic, to the outside world. I think that the topic itself has very little practical importance. Like many pieces of pure mathematics, this one does not yet have any real applications. G.H. Hardy's apology is food for thought about this, though I don't really agree with him. Lots of things that seem really pure and inapplicable in one decade turn out to have quite a lot of practical application in later decades. The wiki page about Hardy's Apology has a nice example of this: the application of number theory to RSA cryptography. On still another hand, the fields in which the pentagram map is embedded, namely projective geometry and dynamical systems, each have an enormous number of practical applications.
2. I agree that the number of authors working on this particular object is quite small. Currently about 6 have written papers and maybe another 5-10 are interested in it. What made me write about it now is that the topic seems to be heating up. It seems possible to me that a maybe twice that number of people or more might be interested in the thing in 1-2 years. You might call it something like an emerging topic, though it is hardly a large topic in mathematics. I certainly wouldn't want outside readers to be mislead about the importance of the subject, and I would be happy to add some kind of statement to the effect that this isn't such a big deal in the scheme of mathematics. To tell the truth, my colleagues and I just wanted to have an accurate little article about the thing that would help interested people get the basic facts quickly. (Even as a supposed expert, I usually use wikipedia to look math stuff up these days!) I wonder if perhaps I should migrate the article to scholarpedia, and just have something more abbreviated on wikipedia.
3. Towards the end of the article, I did cite several references that have to do with computer vision. This is where projective geometry, though not the pentagram map itself, has a huge impact. The pentagram map is the kind of operation that could have application possibly in computer vision, but currently does not. In any case, I'll give some thought to how I might tie it in better with the rest of wikipedia.
4. There was one more thing I wanted to add. Your comments bring up an interesting point, which I'm sure lots of wiki folks have pondered. Wikipedia seems to be becoming a really great reference for technical subjects like mathematics -- kind of a universal textbook. I don't think I would have bothered looking up math stuff on wikipedia even 5 years ago, but now (as I said above) I do it all the time. As more mathematicians turn to it, you might see an increase in articles on fairly obscure technical topics like the pentagram map. As the more esoteric branches of knowledge are written about on wikipedia, I wonder if the notion of "obscurity" will change.
RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 22:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've raised the issue of your adding links to pentagram map to the See also section of so many high importance mathematics articles at WT:WPM. It seems like enormously undue weight to a notion that is of fairly minimal importance in mathematics. Sławomir Biały ( talk) 13:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Slawomir and 7&6=thirteen, I completely agree with Slawomir that there shouldn't be too many links from important math articles to the pentagram map. I think that the pentagram map is a beautiful but minor part of mathematics. On the other hand, 7&6=thirteen, I certainly appreciate your efforts to tie the article more fully into wikipedia. Also, once I learn how to archive my talk pages, I will keep all this discussion for the record. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 15:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, regarding the discussion about links to Pentagram map: you have used the phrase "Respectfully, I would suggest that we all wait for a consensus to form", yet you have posted as much as everyone else put together. Please try to stay calm and allow a consensus to form! Note that I did not accuse you of spam. I quoted the relevant part of the page WP:SPAM (since others had raised the subject already) and commented that it's not clear-cut in this case. I am indeed doing my best to assume good faith here--that's why I took the trouble to look at a few more of your edits and mention that some of them seem justified. Can you too please try to assume good faith? Jowa fan ( talk) 00:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Jowa fan, Thank you for your note. I will wait per your suggestion. Indeed, I will not participate further as I have said all I have to say. All I was asking for was a case-by-case consideration of the edits. As mathematics are not a matter of general interest to me, I stand by my declaration that the experts should rule. Obviously, I was wrong on some of the edits (or so it now appears). But I may have been right on others. Of course, even 'a stopped analog clock is right twice a day'. I appreciate your deciding that some of them might be justified. I was working from the connections in the article (and from some of the material in the references themselves (which did mention some concepts that were not in the Wikipedia article). I am very sensitive to the implicit accusation that I was "spamming." It is a word that is 'akin to fightin' words', and I would not use it cavalierly. I will assume that we have just had a failure to communicate, will WP:AGF, and chaulk this up to a misunderstanding. If I gave offense, you may also assume that it was unintentional. I am going out of town so I have no intention of writing further on the matter on way or another. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 00:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
You undid my insertion of a fact.I've read this before, so if you are to delete it then disprove that what I wrote wasn't a fact
Hi Thirteen, I was wondering you you still opposed the merger of American Akita and Akita Inu? Have you had a look at the sample I proposed as a merger? Everything is at a stale mate at the moment because I cannot close the discussion myself due to your strong opposition (which you are free to keep). I'm waiting on an Admin to make the final discussion close..but it's taking al long time, it was suggested to me on my talk page that I come and ask if you view has change at all after looking at my proposed article for the merge. Cheers, Keetanii ( talk) 03:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC) P.S. Haven't seen you around on the Akita pages lately, been missing your contributions :) Keetanii ( talk) 03:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Judges who died while judging and there has to be a People who died while having sex too. Perhaps on those snowy, cold January, February nights...... Carptrash ( talk) 15:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I was recently in the New Mexico Supreme Court building, looking at bas reliefs of former Chiefs and learned about one who died either in court or while giving a lecture to some students. I wonder how many R&R musicians have died on stage? Anyway , it was one relief that led to my article on Bruce Saville, but I have not added that work yet. And my real job today is vacuuming and doing the dishes etc for the BIG MEETING here tomorrow. Ah well, 24 hours a day and that's it. Hmmm I wonder what a list of Folks who died while doing housework would look like? Carptrash ( talk) 15:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
... discospinster talk 18:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I've userfied this to User:7&6=thirteen/Rabbits in the arts while you work on it. Thanks, Gurt Posh ( talk) 17:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Nein, mein führer. Carptrash ( talk) 23:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
a bit of a problem in Bill Smith (Fell runner). But first, I am on the road, have been for a while. But when I received your message I went to the article and discovered the phrase stating that Smith was ""a connoisseur of Cajun or gypsy music." I thought that this was unlikely, that probably "or" should be "and". Now I get back to it and discovered that someone has made this change. Here is the problem. That phrase is a quote and when I check the original source I discover the word "or." We now have a quote in which some editor has changed the language inside a quote, and this is, as we say in my home, bad feng shui. I think that the "and" should be retained and the quotation marks removed, and the citation also retained, but that is not so much my call. Tomorrow I get home and into a whole new set of issues, but at least I will be at home and not in Arizona and Mexico. einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 03:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Your recent post at Template talk:DYK is missing a pair of braces to close the template. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 19:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for signing! Pinkstrawberry02™ talk 16:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Please reply to this message on Pinkstrawberry02's talk page. Thank you.
No, it's fine! It is a great and crafty one. Thanks again for signing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkstrawberry02 ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Please see my response to you query at Talk:List of American Civil War generals. -- IcarusPhoenix ( talk) 05:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm curious to know why you put this template {{ User page}} in my user page?
Pierre cb ( talk) 12:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Here's your original Bill Smith (fell runner) DYK nomination from October 8th: October 8th DYK Nom for Bill Smith. Shearonink ( talk) 19:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
The Nom is still there in the October 8th section between "List of Rugby World red cards, Huw Richards" and "Palacio de las Dueñas". It never got reviewed. Shearonink ( talk) 19:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on September 16, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 16, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Sherman Minton (1890–1965) was a Democratic United States Senator from Indiana and an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He served as a captain in World War I, then launched a legal and political career. In 1934, Minton won election to the United States Senate. As part of the New Deal Coalition, he championed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's unsuccessful court packing plans in the Senate and became one of his top Senate allies. After Minton failed in his 1940 Senate re-election bid, Roosevelt appointed him as a judge to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. After Roosevelt's death, President Harry Truman, who had developed a close friendship with Minton during their time together in the Senate, nominated him to the Supreme Court, where he served for seven years. An advocate of judicial restraint, Minton was a regular supporter of the majority opinions during his early years on the Court; he became a regular dissenter after President Dwight Eisenhower's appointees altered the Bench's composition. In 1956, poor health forced Minton's retirement, after which he traveled and lectured until his death in 1965. ( more...)
Thanks for the compliment, I'm going to try to work on it to featured standards, but I only been avaliable in the late night hours and on weekdays. I could use your help in making the article featured, right now I'm trying to work on the Reggie Jackson article. Thanks Secret account 07:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I haven't reverted or rewritten as yet, and I don't have the books that are cited in front of me ... but I'm afraid the material you just restored in the Minton article doesn't make sense chronologically. I believe that Minton was appointed, along with Tom Clark, by President Truman in 1949; they replaced Justice Rutledge and Justice Murphy, both of whom had died that year. In that light, I don't see how Minton could have found himself more in the minority after Justice Murphy died, since that had already happened when Minton joined the Court; nor was Murphy's successor appointed by Truman. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 14:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
LOL and thanks. I've encountered fell runners. Fell-walking is a big enough adventure for me! -- Orlady ( talk) 23:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
On 4 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bill Smith (fell runner), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I've got your archiving & indexing setup for you now. I would expect both bots to hit within 24 hours...probably sooner. The index will be blank until then.
Are you really on a wikibreak or just forgot to take down the notice?
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 01:53, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, what was your message about? KägeTorä - (影虎) ( TALK) 22:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Great work on Otium Doug Coldwell talk 23:10, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
Here and here is where I gave Cardiffchestnut some tidbits recently on article development and DYK development. Most of this you know already, but there may be something you can pick up on.-- Doug Coldwell talk 11:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The development of the Otium article is an application of the Law of Attraction.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Awesome, what number DYK is this for you? The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 12:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC) I think 210, if I add one or two to my list I last forgot. I forgot to add my last DYK of Mutiny at Sucro. I'll have to do that after Otium becomes a DYK, to make a total of 210.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Rad. I'm working on a new article now, but I doubt it'll be my first DYK. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC) This is where the Law of Attraction comes into play. Think positively, like the new article you have will be your first DYK. Thinking this way sets up positive "vibrations" and events occur in such a manner that the new article becomes a Did You Know. Do you think that each time I wrote up an article I had the attitude that it probably would not become a DYK. No - I thought it will become a DYK and practically every time it did become a Did You Know. Change your attitude - think positively and constructively. Whatever your mind can conceive and believe, it can achieve (Napoleon Hill). Be optimistic. All it takes is 1500 characters - a small article. Make sure its well referenced and you have a good "catchy" hook line. Also make sure the hook line has an excellent inline reference. I go out of my way to make sure they find this and even go to the point of placing the exact words right into that particular inline reference, word for word, with its exact location (usually Google Books) so they can easily find it. Its very important that they find the reference that covers your hook line. If possible, give an ALT1 and ALT2, then this way the chances of it becoming a DYK is very good. I would work the draft offline first as all you have is 5 days to develop the article - offline has no limit. Nice little hint.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the tips. Right now I'm mostly expanding existing articles, but maybe on of the entries I have planned will have something of a hook. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Your welcome. Let me reword your reply a bit to show optimism: One of the entries I have planned will have something of a hook. - see, positive. Hint: Take a stab at it and submit a hook no matter what! I have found if you make an "attempt", there are experts at DYK that will come across your "attempt" and fix it for you or give you an alternative. Happens to me all the time. I would say that I have somehow managed to get a hook line using this method 99 and 44/100's per cent of the time. I have never not had a DYK not go through, if I made an "attempt". In other words: the odds are in your favor.--Doug Coldwell talk 22:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Hint: Make sure your new article links from at least 3 other articles.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC) Another Hint: If you want to get many people viewing your article - make sure it becomes a DYK. Here are some articles I created that received some large numbers on the day they became a Did You Know Pelican Pete Spragg Bag Nonsuch House Conclusion of the American Civil War (Good Article) Cone Sisters Jayco The Whole Shebang Motocycle Gottfried Schloemer Benson raft
Benson raft
Hint to get high numbers on your views: Make sure that your article is the first in the queue and your picture that mainly represents the article is shown in that day's DYK when the administrator lines up the queue. Most of the time when I just asked for this and had a very interesting picture (like Benson raft picture) they would accommodate me.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
If you get some exceptionally high numbers, then they list you in the Hall of Fame stats as they did for my article on the plague doctor and related articles for the 2010 Holloween DYK hook line.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Where it gets a little challenging is to have 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, or 16 articles in the same hook line (articles 87-133). You start pulling hair right out of your head. I have only a few hairs left.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Since you're now canvassing the corners of ancient philosophical movements for your otium article, your last comment compels me to recommend that you read this. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 00:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Cute.--Doug Coldwell talk 12:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
The above ideas come from what I see as the Law of Life. A sub-category is the Law of Attraction. Another is common sense. And still another is reasoning and another is logic (excuse the psychology).--Doug Coldwell talk 11:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit]Couple more ideas
If you get stumped on being able to develop out an artice, seek the services of Ask A Librarian. One in particular that gives some excellent answers on queries is Internet Public Library. I found that the Library of Congress also has such a service and they also come up with excellent answers. Put in Google: "Ask a Librarian" for URLs.
Don't forget when writing up an article make sure you have at least 3 categories for it. You can get an idea for categories from similar articles.
Good luck on your new articles, that will of course be DYKs.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch for the tips, Doug. Hopefully I'll actually finish an article sometime soon. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 15:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
FYI, you can see the activity and "hits" of your article under "History" and then "Page view statistics". Otium is receiving about 300 "hits" per day and I suspect will jump 10 times that on the day of the DYK (about a week from now).--Doug Coldwell talk 18:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Tidbits:
You probably already know that "What links here" shows what articles link to your article. You should have at least 3, as less than that they consider an "orphan" article and it could be deleted. Only real articles count, not Talk pages, etc. See Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 85, Papyrus 50, and Otium.
Add a picture (or group of pictures) to an article, as that enhances it quite a bit. For examples see these articles I created:
Michigan logging wheels
Westinghouse Time Capsules
The Teenie Weenies
Nebraska House
Lithophane
Burr Caswell
Sachet (scented bag)
Blue Ridge Parkway tunnels
Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri IX
Georgia Cayvan
Keedoozle
Bellifortis
Cone Mills Corporation
Pickle Barrel House
Columbus Letter on the First Voyage
Thaddeus Fairbanks
Whitcomb L. Judson
Walter Scott Lenox
Car cooler
Flash-lamp
Giovanni Caselli
English words first attested in Chaucer
The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report
Warren Antoine Cartier
Antoine Ephrem Cartier
Star Watch Case Company
SweeTango (apple)
Century tower clocks
Good Luck on your new articles.--Doug Coldwell talk 14:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips and links, Doug. Amadscientist listed Otium as the Classics Project's current collaboration, so it should probably start getting more views from Latinists. — the cardiff chestnut | talk — 17:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Great! This would be the Law of Attraction in action.--Doug Coldwell talk 19:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Another little tidbit:
IF you happen to expand an article and you want it to become a DYK, it must be 5 times larger within 5 days from when you started increasing its size to be able to qualify. Use this tool to measure before and after character count. This is a good tool also to count hook line characters, as that must be under 200 (with multiple article hooks an exception).--Doug Coldwell talk 15:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Doug. Good to know. — the cardiff chestnut | talk — 22:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit]Tidbits for a DYK
Usually doing items in 3s gives you a real good chance of getting a DYK. Looking at my latest article of Red Cross stove you will notice that it has 3000 characters. Only 1500 is needed, however IF someone objects to a sentence or even a paragraph and you have to remove, you STILL have plenty to qualify for a DYK. There are 3 other articles that link to this article (See "What links here" on left panel). This way it is NOT classified as an orphaned article. It has 3 Categories - then it has plenty without any objections. It has 3 reference sources - which is good for a starter article.
These items are good to know because when you do DYKs you will get the first 5 "free", then you will have to review others' DYKs before yours is approved. You have to be pretty familiar with the qualifications of DYKs to be able to approve another's DYK. Hope to see a list of your DYKs soon.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Do you think "For other uses, see Otium (disambiguate)" is necessary now, since there are no other articles that relate to Otium. After there are other articles that have Otium in the name, THEN I can see that it would be necessary. Now it leads to confussion I believe.-- Doug Coldwell talk 23:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
The script I use is by Ohconfucius, and it's wicked good. Add this line to User:7&6=thirteen/monobook.js (or vector.js, depending on your current skins setup).
Then bypass your browser's cache.
To fire it up, go to your toolbox and click "Body dates to dmy" Chris the speller yack 22:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you have Catton in the list of notable persons of Northern Michigan. I created the article A Stillness at Appomattox written by him. It won the 1954 Pulitzer Prize in history.-- Doug Coldwell talk 15:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for the edit of Yule marble.... All good changes. Any aspect of the subject that needs inclusion? OneHistoryGuy ( talk) 00:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
for your most timely and insightful editing at Alan Fisher (architect), with which you saved both the article and my already too shaky reputation. For that you have earned the seldom coveted Thumbs Up Award. Wear it with pride, or if you do throw it away, please recycle. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 06:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not repeat this reversion. Text which states what its alleged sources do not say is not verifiable, no matter how many footnotes it has. (And much of that text repeats matter elsewhere in the article, phrased more accurately and more clearly.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I've recently made the article more concise. Does it need more "fine tuning"? Good Article possibility?-- Doug Coldwell talk 17:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Our reverts crossed in the mail. Sorry. I also reported them to WP:AIV. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
On 2 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otium, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that otium, a Latin term, has a variety of meanings including leisure time in which a person can enjoy eating, playing, resting, contemplation and academic endeavors? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Otium.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 05:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Excellent improvements to Red Cross stove. Thanks! Enjoy the strawberries... Doug Coldwell talk 14:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC) |
Yes, Mississauga is the third largest city on the Great Lakes. Detroit has 713,777, Buffalo has 261,310, and Mississauga has 738,000. Check the city page if you do not believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waldenbg ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I'd probably count as "odd", but only because I haven't yet got even... Easy to get the adjective wrong; I only know it from the number of times I've tried to Wikilink the name, and come up with a redlink for "International...". Happily, no one's created a redirect from the wrong I-word. Ammodramus ( talk) 23:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm curious why you added The Tridge to the "see also" section of Saginaw River, since the Tridge doesn't actually span this river.-- Asher196 ( talk) 05:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Is the closing of The Tridge in November 2011 temporary, or permanent? If the former, has a reopening date been set yet? Thank you for your work on this article, I didn't know there was a Y-bridge in Michigan. Bigturtle ( talk) 23:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In The Tridge, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Y-Bridge ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Just a reminder that the Good Article Nomination for Oliver Hazard Perry is still open; it's been open for a couple of weeks now, so let me know if you need an extension on it, or if I can close it for the time being. Hchc2009 ( talk) 07:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
The lastest article I created is William Hamlin, Rhode Island's first engraver. You have related e-mail.-- Doug Coldwell talk 20:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
This looks interesting. Perhaps in a week or so it will be an official DYK.-- Doug Coldwell talk 15:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure you didn't intend it that way; but if you'll re-read your comment regarding my recent edit at Yule Marble, I think you'll agree that it comes across as somewhat snappish. I'll attribute it to your having a bad day, or just to an unfortunate choice of words that you didn't spot until you'd hit the "Save" button. However, will urge you to proceed cautiously on other talk pages if you're feeling a bit put-upon or generally short-fused today.
Will respond to the comment itself at the article's talk page; however, wanted to communicate this to you as privately as possible. By all means, delete this once you've read it; I'm certainly not trying to embarrass you or to publicly accuse you of wanting courtesy to your fellow editors. Ammodramus ( talk) 00:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
I found this information interesting about the Octave flute.-- Doug Coldwell talk 12:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
The only thing I remember in speech from Mitt Romney is: "Come over here honey, he wants to take a picture of us!" I went on the same Shipley boat he did to Mackinac Island in 2007. He sat directly behind us on the boat. Shook his hand.-- Doug Coldwell talk 13:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
On 12 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Hamlin, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that William Hamlin was the first engraver for the state of Rhode Island? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Hamlin.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 19:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Is above article like below boat?
http://books.google.com/books?id=1vI8AQAAIAAJ&pg=PA146&lpg=PA146&dq=The+Experiment+horse+boat&source=bl&ots=_mtOn1Wkmp&sig=j2r9cXrn1kHF_OHWSpqS9NkNXoA&hl=en&ei=wGTmTtjNJq3E2QWkiam8BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&sqi=2&ved=0CD8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=The%20Experiment%20horse%20boat&f=false
Do you think then that the "first"
Airboat would support an article by itself, since it looks they are one and the same (just earlier or later versions)?--
Doug Coldwell
talk 23:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Experiment | |
Excellent research on the Experiment. Great job in finding the facts and putting the loose ends together. Doug Coldwell talk 15:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for the citation on Pictured Rocks. TexianPolitico ( talk) 21:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
I have discovered that Famous First Facts by Joseph Nathan Kane is an excellent source for potential DYKs.-- Doug Coldwell talk 20:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
On 16 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Experiment (horse powered boat), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Experiment was a boat powered by horses running on a treadmill and propelled by a then-novel type of screw propeller? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Experiment (horse powered boat).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 14:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Why did you add {{ User Page}} to by talk page? Not that I'm getting rid of it, but were you on a mirror site or something? Why me? BCS (Talk) 02:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Great teamwork and outstanding improvements you have made on Patent Office 1836 fire Doug Coldwell talk 12:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC) |
I hearby give you an
accolade (an article I created) for the grand work you have done on
Patent Office 1836 fire.
I dub thee Knight Editor. I declare you are officially one of the
Wikipedia Editors of the Round Table.
Looks like I received some accolades on
Otium.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 20:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I hereby give you a couple more accolades: one for
1877 U. S. Patent Office fire,
and another well deserved one for
Abraham Lincoln's patent.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 21:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
and still another for the speedy work on
John Henry Devereux.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 22:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
discovered Starr Kempf - who I had forgotten was an architect. A Colorado one. The picture there is one of my favorites - the sculpture, one of three which was set up in an almost abandoned weird shopping center in the middle of nowhere NM have since been removed, and i miss them. I am not usually a big fan of modern sculpture but his stuff rocked! Literally and figuratively. eek aka Carptrash ( talk) 16:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
On 22 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Patent Office 1836 fire, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the U.S. Patent Office 1836 fire occurred in the same building that housed the local fire department? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patent Office 1836 fire.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
i have made what u want so please delete your headtitle from an article. i will put citates from journals too. The neutrality of this article is not disputed, it is fact what i whote
for the edit to the alberger prossece. my brother found my password. i dont know why i didnt say that before, but i have a new password. Jake1993811 ( talk) 06:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on Mildred Lewis Rutherford. Ladyof Shalott 02:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, 7&6=thirteen, and thank you for your contributions!
An article you worked on Mildred Seydell, appears to be directly copied from http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-2460. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Mildred Seydell if necessary. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 22:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
On 3 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1877 U. S. Patent Office fire, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that despite the devastation of the second U.S. Patent Office fire (pictured), in a supposedly fireproof building, not one patent was lost? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
I was guessing 10,000 views. We got 6,900 and maybe a couple thousand more as the world turns. Let's see how close I was on my Road to Prediction tommorrow night.-- Doug Coldwell talk 00:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
On 3 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Abraham Lincoln's patent, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abraham Lincoln's patent.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 23:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations! It looks like you are getting DYKs left and right.-- Doug Coldwell talk 00:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | ||
Lovely article, and exemplary cooperation. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
Happy new year, my best wishes of health and happiness for year 2012. Je vous offre mes meilleurs vœux de santé et de bonheur pour l'année 2012, ושל אושר לשנה 2012. -- Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève ( talk) 10:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Great citation improvements to Christopher Werner and a great job in expanding the article. Doug Coldwell talk 22:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
There are two Roman swords laying horizonital in the middle of the gates at handle level.
Can you look into:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/John_Henry_Devereux
I copyedited the hook line replacing the word "made" with "designed".
After you do what-ever fixing, then maybe drop a note to
User talk:Drmies that we have fixed the problems and if he would now give us a "tick". Thanks.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 20:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
You've been doing on those CFS articles. :) Ladyof Shalott 02:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Charleston Female Seminary (Massachusetts), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Baptist Church ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
The relevant guideline is WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Proper attribution is in an edit summary, and {{ Copied}} on the talk page is a recommended additional step. WP:Plagiarism#Copying within Wikipedia has a little on why footnotes would be excessive. Flatscan ( talk) 05:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
On 31 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Henry Devereux, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Irish plasterer John Henry Devereux became a noted architect in South Carolina, designing a church (pictured) that was the state's tallest building for 101 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Henry Devereux.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on my talkpage. However I am not very clear about your message. Cheers AKS 20:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm not really under siege; I just cut everything out of the article except a list of accomplishments and everyone agreed that was wonderful. However, my account was blocked without warning when the article was deleted, apparently on the basis of the article's chronological structure and "style" rather than paraphrasing. The blocking suggests an attack. This is a volunteer activity, after all, and I'm a prolific contributor. It will be difficult to justify the time and effort if that kind of thing starts happening. Pkeets ( talk) 20:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey there 7&6=thirteen, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:DASHBot/Logs/2012/February#February 02.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thriteen, I reviewed Ablaq and the nomination looks set to pass, but there's one little issue regarding a missing inline citation that needs to be taken care of before I could approve. See DYK nom. -- Al Ameer son ( talk) 23:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
I am intrigued to know what you meant in this edit by "give the piggies fodder for their trough". 79.123.71.209 ( talk) 15:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for defending the article. This time when I checked for references, I located a listing in the Norton/Grove dictionary, which is a definitive citation for notability. It should be proof against any further proposals for deletion. Would you have any idea why the proposed deletion didn't show up in my watchlist? Pkeets ( talk) 14:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
For such a unique Wikipedia ID, and so many DYK nominations :) Keep Editing,Keep Inspiring! AbhiSuryawanshi ( talk) 03:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC) |
Ping.-- Doug Coldwell talk 19:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Antoinette Kirkwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Collection ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Feel free to expand the article. What's there is very brief, but there's some traffic on the history and various activities of the organization(s) and it probably warrants a larger article, including maybe a paragraph on the history of each of the organizations that merged. I spent about half my time on it working on redirects for the awards and the three organizations. There were mentions in a number of articles, and I see that a Bot has been busy overnight tidying up double redirects. The Composers' Guild of Great Britain (CGGB), in particular, provides a number of links. I just didn't see a lot of information available right off. It would take a bit of research. Pkeets ( talk) 14:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
On 5 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mildred Seydell, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mildred Seydell was one of the first women newspaper journalists in the State of Georgia while breaking the gender barrier in journalism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mildred Seydell.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
On 6 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christopher Werner, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Christopher Werner made a lifelike South Carolina Palmetto tree out of iron, copper, and brass? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christopher Werner.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Victuallers ( talk) 00:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Charleston Female Seminary at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady ( talk) 04:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
On 8 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mildred Lewis Rutherford, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mildred Lewis Rutherford thought that the only problem with slavery was the burden it placed on white slaveholders? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mildred Lewis Rutherford.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
On 9 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ablaq, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that ablaq is an Arabic term for the use in stonework of alternating or fluctuating rows of light and dark color stone (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ablaq.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Rs chen 7754 02:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Susan (dog), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corgi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
On 19 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that members of the British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors include United Kingdom's most experienced and successful songwriters like Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney and Elton John? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 22:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
A ref was already provided and the link you added had NOTHING to do with the species in question. Please do not vandalize the page. You have an obvious agenda, don't you? You stated it was the same source (ABC news) when in fact it wasn't. How about you leave the page in question ALONE. Thank you. SaberToothedWhale ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Frank Gehry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Museum ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! When using certain templates on talk pages, such as welcome templates and user warnings, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:welcome}} instead of {{welcome}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. If you need any further help on the matter just ask me on my talk page. Cheers. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 01:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station
I did a few tweaks and did a review of Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station. There is a small question about "the only." You might want to address that. Otherwise, nicely done! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Ellin, You might want to put the newly inserted "Further reading" in someplace as an in line reference. Just a thought. It is generally preferred. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:21, 14 April 2012 (UTC) You don't need to do this, because you haven't had your fifth DYK yet, but it might be good practice to
check Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria find a DYK that hasn't been reviewed yet. Review it and specifically state 1) was it nominated with 5 days of creation or (minor eligibility criteria), 2) long enough ( have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose) 3) is the hook properly cited - i.e. from the sources do you actually believe what the hook says? 4) policy considerations - no BLP problems, no verifiability problems, and a hard one - no plagiarism problems including close parallelism. How to check for copyright problems? - check the sources, maybe search for a strange phrase, use your judgement. Then put in the template you created for your hook "Reviewed:XYZ Darning Needles" or similar. Just being tough on you today - but it will help the guy whose hook you review, and will also help you next time you submit a DYK.
All the best,
Smallbones (talk) 23:07, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
On 6 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charleston Female Seminary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 19th-century American female seminary movement, which aimed to give women educational opportunities, lent its name to a pair of similarly named institutions in Charleston, South Carolina, and Charlestown, Massachusetts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charleston Female Seminary.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
On 6 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charlestown Female Seminary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 19th-century American female seminary movement, which aimed to give women educational opportunities, lent its name to a pair of similarly named institutions in Charleston, South Carolina, and Charlestown, Massachusetts? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
On 6 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Female seminary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 19th-century American female seminary movement, which aimed to give women educational opportunities, lent its name to a pair of similarly named institutions in Charleston, South Carolina, and Charlestown, Massachusetts? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
...
Someone copied your sig...mostly.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Got Baileys? | |
This Irish coffee is for you to celebrate St. Patrick's Day and clear the palette before downing copious amounts of stout. Drink early, drink often! ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 14:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Just FYI, "See also" sections are generally put before "References" sections, not after. Just a convention, arguments can be made in support of either placement. Best, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 06:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Has this been brought to your attention? [ [4]] The HighBeam paywalled database people would like to improve the public profile of their database, and to accomplish this goal have offered to grant free access to diligent Wikipedians who fill out a short, two-line application prior to April 9. It sounds mildly interesting; I am frustrated by the amount of U.S. newspaper archival material that is stuck behind paywalls, and HighBeam apparently has access to a fair amount of it. At any rate I thought you should learn about this offer. Bigturtle ( talk) 05:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
So User:Brightgalrs, without once discussing it with anyone else, looking at the article histories, or bothering to read the talk pages (not to mention Wikipedia:Consensus) has suddenly shown up and made a massive 22,000 character addition to List of American Civil War Generals (Union) and a 307,000 character deletion from List of American Civil War Generals (Confederate), both of which (particularly the latter) drastically change the very nature of both articles. When asked why, the user insisted that her (?) way was "superior" and that she would allow for no discussion on this point from anyone. As another editor of the page, I'm turning to you and a few others to ask assistance in trying to reign in actions that frankly border on vandalism. While some of her changes are more than welcome (additions of photos of Union officers, for example), the wholesale elimination of notations that were being worked on and the changes is format, to say nothing of refusing to discuss it with anyone else - either before or after - are, in my opinion, invasive. May I ask for you to take a look and give your opinion on the matter? IcarusPhoenix ( talk) 20:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen. Thank you for your fine work reviewing the article's DYK nomination. If doesn't meet the criteria for a DYK article that would appear on the mainpage as a DYK, then it won't appear on the mainpage as a DYK, but will remain be a little WP:STARTCLASS article. I'm fine with that. Thanks again.-- Shirt58 ( talk) 13:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Imzadi 1979 → 18:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Imzadi, I am (more or less) the sole editor of this new article. It has gotten nearly 18,000 views in the last 2 days. Lots of traffic. It needs a fresh set of eyes. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 18:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
{{#tag:ref||group="nb"|name=""}}
for doing
nested references. That way you aren't repeated the full citation inside the explanatory footnote.|deadurl= no
at the end of the citation template, the template will link the title to the original online source and list the archive link afterwards. Then if/when the link goes dead in the future, you just removed that deadurl parameter and the template switches to link to the archive as the title and put the original link later. Most online news articles will go dead when the publisher moves them behind a paywall or simply deletes the article from their website. The only caveat is that video is not archived, and I'm concerned by the number of online videos you've used.
Imzadi 1979
→ 18:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits and review on Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station, much appreciated !! I replied to your comment at Template:Did you know nominations/Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station. Ellin Beltz ( talk) 19:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but nesting footnotes still elude me. Please tweak. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
You should see this. [5] ...William 15:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Catch me if you can.
...William 15:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld, The German Wikipedia has a nice article on this subject. I posted a long time ago asking for volunteers to interpret the article. It would be a good addition. I hesitate to ask you, although you seem to have the requisite proficiency. Any suggestions? 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 18:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
User:Gerda Arendt, User:Bermicourt are fluent German speakers but also very busy. I'm not I'm afraid. I use google translate and then request proof reading! Perhaps you could have a go at translating from de wiki using google translate and then ask one of them to check it for you?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
There is a Straw Poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 02:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Millie's been promoted to GA. :) Ladyof Shalott 13:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
We're getting real close to a natural benchmark. Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. 3,997,655 articles in English. How cool is that! 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 19:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mishipeshu , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Uyvsdi ( talk) 19:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
WHat was that message about? TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 19:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Stan, I've noticed that you are working hard on the Pierce Butler article and wanted to let you know that there are
several photos at Commons in case that helps. Cheers,
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 22:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your careful construction of a South Carolina entry for 270 King Street, Charleston, South Carolina, within List of Masonic buildings in the United States back in January. I just got around to restoring and expanding it. I considered developing separate articles for other South Carolina masonic buildings but ended up agreeing with your implicit judgment about that one being most notable in the state. So i just added back yours, bolstered with 5 or so references, mostly from the architect Devereux article. Thanks for your contribution. -- do ncr am 17:54, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
your cleaning up the recent vandalism at my user page. It is, I believe, the first time that this has happened ant it's comforting to know that there are folks such as yourself around to help out. Life is good. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 22:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I had the chance to look at the Owney article, and made some changes. I imagine this article, with your improvements, will be much better viewed than most and may average at the 100-views-a-day mark for some time. A few readers may be troubled by a reference in one of your sources to a post office in "Hardacre, Minnesota." A quick search on a well-known search engine does not indicate that a substantial history exists for any town or settlement of that name. There is probably no good solution to this dilemma, as "Hardacre" is what the source says; it looks like a secondary-source misprint.
Should the article make a reference to the role of the New York-based St. Nicholas Magazine in developing Owney's image? I'll bet the pooch hopped the New York Central down the Hudson many times and his well-tagged collar repeatedly jingled in Manhattan, and his image would have gone nowhere with a leg (or paw) up from friends in the national media capital.
Does the USPS grant us the right to embed an image of the Forever Stamp honoring Owney? Bigturtle ( talk) 22:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
.....for getting back to me and explaining the process. It is, however typical of what happens. I have had several disputes over precedence being given to US versions of particular breeds, which, as in the case of the Akita, may differ considerably from those bred in the country of origin. The US version is almost always "bigger" or "cuter" or more brightly coloured than that at the source of origin. Amandajm ( talk) 03:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! You might like to take a look at the talk page of El Grande. I'm afraid that having seen the debris and blown the whistle, I was shattered by what happened. That tree, standing as isolated as it was after the other tall trees had been logged, was the most spectacular living thing that I have ever seen in my life. The El Grande talk page says rather more than is in the article, but because I am the source, and didn't put it in writing at the time, I can't publish it. The lesson that I have learnt from that is always issue properly prepared lecture notes with name, date and copyright.
I must say that if that tree had been in the US, then it would have been identified much sooner, World Heritage listed and be a major tourist attraction.
Part of the experience was that we met a man on the road whose vehicle had broken down. We gave him a lift, and the poor bugger found himself sitting in the back seat with a six-year-old conservationist who asked him all the hard questions that the adults in the front seat were avoiding: "Just exactly what work do you do in the forest? Oh, you drive a bull-dozer? And what do you bull-doze? Trees? Those big trees? The eagles' homes? And what do you do with the wombats when you bull-doze their burrows? You bait them before you bull-doze. What are baits?"
If you Google earth the map of Tasmania, much of the south looks beautifully green. When you zoom you become aware that the greenness is tidy rows of plantation timber, mainly pinus radiata. Australian fauna doesn't survive in pinus radiata forests.
I could rave on about this interminably...... Amandajm ( talk) 04:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Great tweaking of the citations for mail bag, mail sack, mail pouch, mail satchel, catcher pouch, Pony Express mochila, and portmanteau. Good job! Doug Coldwell talk 11:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Citation app 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 21:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Trying to sort out a few things here. I think that the archiving bot doesn't like the div tags but maybe it will come around tomorrow and actually do the archiving now that I've moved it. You also have an index which wasn't showing properly and I've had to kluge it because something appears wrong with the template. The odd link presentation in your archive box is a side effect.
Are you able to create the above linked page with just any simple text like "hello"? ...or were you trying to copy over from your talk when doing it?
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 15:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
If you receive this message when trying to edit, create or move an existing page, follow these instructions:
You may also contact any administrator on their talk page or by e-mail. Be sure to specify the exact title of the page you are trying to create or edit, and if it might be misunderstood (for example, an article with an unusual name), consider explaining briefly what you want to do. If you wrote any text, save it temporarily on your computer until you can edit the page. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Misza bots are just plain buggy since May when something went wrong at toolserver.org. I notice that May 25 was the last time it archived your page so the timeline matches. Without being able to get an answer from Misza13 you can archive manually or switch to ClueBot III. That's the only solution I can see for now. Brad ( talk) 20:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Ditto :) ComputerJA ( talk) 19:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:7%266%3Dthirteen/Archive_2. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I like barber's poles and anything with helixes in them. Getting above 20,000 bytes was a coincidence! Bigturtle ( talk) 21:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Please give one good reason why a triskelion is an "optical illusion"... AnonMoos ( talk) 19:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
You kind of went wild with the categories on that article, and there's the same problem with the "optical illusions" category. Just because a new-agey PDF file mentions that a related symbol (not the Triquetra itself) shows figure-ground vacillation, that doesn't mean that the triquetra is an "optical illusion"[sic]. AnonMoos ( talk) 21:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Please don't throw a large number of only very vaguely-relevant (if at all relevant), categories onto articles, and don't add "Category:Vision rivalry" to all articles about visual symbols... AnonMoos ( talk) 17:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I have rewritten a key paragraph of this article to divide it up into two paragraphs, and clarify it a little; take a look. Bigturtle ( talk) 23:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I am not pleased that an editor is taking the position that the existences of Cougars in the first location (which will I believe spill over to the second) cannot be mentioned in the article, notwithstanding that reliable and complete references were included. To say that they do not exist, or aren't worth reporting seems to be perverse. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 20:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC) Stan
Imzadi, I did not want to post this on your talk page. I under stand that the "in use" tag, when read in the font it has, and at a certain magnification, actually looked like the "muse" tag. Indeed, I understand your intensity and anguish. And I don't want to break my promise to not interfere with you or your muse. I am leaving and found this additional source. U an memorializing it here. Hope it helps. “Barber pole grasshopper” a/k/a “painted grasshopper” is said to be the most beautifuil grasshopper. Beth Thiret, Colorado State University Extension Master Gardener in Larimer County "Ugh: What to do about Grasshoppers". Thank you and happy editing. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 21:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC) Stan
Hi, 7+6=13 -- I am looking for people with interests in folklore (editors I’ve encountered on folklore/mythology articles as well as elsewhere) to visit talk:Folk etymology, where there is an ongoing edit dispute. One view (three people) holds that the term is exclusive to linguistics, and another (just me) finds that the term has been formally defined within folklore, and used in academic journals in that sense for more than a century. The page is currently locked. I ask your input ‘’’not in support of either view,’’’ but because discussion seems to have come to a standstill, it seems to be a page few stumble across, and needs fresh viewpoints to get unstuck. Thanks! DavidOaks ( talk) 17:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Salut Genevieve, Creating a user page at commons is fine, i have one as well; [3]. When you upload photos to commons they can be used by all wiki projects, when they are uploaded here they are for wiki only. The process i do is merely upload a photo here on english wikipedia and typically someone else will move the photo to commons for me (if they want and the image meets certain guidelines See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons). The choice is yours but commons and wikipedia itself have different image procedures, I would recommend uploading first on english wiki then transfering (if you want) to commons. Before doing anything though, familize yourself with Wikipedia:Image use policy(with close attention to Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Privacy_rights) and Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. This is a lengthy read but it will describe what types of photos can and shouldnt be used. I dont think theres many issues with the photos you plan to take though (but they will likely need more info on the privacy issue depending on the type of photo you take). Images are not my strong area as I typically avoid taking pictures of living people, but mostly focus on buildings. But this information should be enough to get you moving in the right direction. When you think your ready take a look at Wikipedia:Uploading images and thenproceed to upload at Special:Upload. Alot to take in....
When you created your commons account did you set up a global account(unified account)? If you didnt you still can, you can link your accounts, let me know if you need help with that. As for uploading the photos, The license i use typically for buildings is Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License- See [4] for details on the licsense. A good example of photo licensing for people (what you appear to be trying to do) is at File:USA-Womens-Hockey-Olympics-5.jpg of Jenny Potter, The minnesota Whitecaps player (if you ever get a chance to see her play, do it ;) ). Let me know if this starts you off ok (or if you need more concise info), again images of living people arent my strong area. Will talk soon
Hi, SS -- I am looking for people with interests in folklore (editors I’ve encountered on folklore/mythology articles as well as elsewhere) to visit talk:Folk etymology, where there is an ongoing edit dispute. One view (three people) holds that the term is exclusive to linguistics, and another (just me) finds that the term has been formally defined within folklore, and used in academic journals in that sense for more than a century. The page is currently locked. I ask your input not in support of either view, but because discussion seems to have come to a standstill, it seems to be a page few stumble across, and needs fresh viewpoints to get unstuck. Thanks! DavidOaks ( talk) 18:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, my apologies for meeting under these circumstances. I am not going to discuss the ANI on the talk page, so I will respond to you here. The problem is that the user above has been involved in quite a long edit war with various inappropriate actions and now has specifically sought out only editors he views as interested in one subject by private message. The selected private recruitment of uninvolved editors based upon their interest in one side of a dispute most certainly does amount to canvassing. I have tried to avoid reporting this user for weeks now, while he has unsuccessfully filed RfC's and ANI's and remained a minority of one. The only person standing in the way of his contributing the relevant material under its own article is him. Be assured that I have no problem with your comments on the article. μηδείς ( talk) 22:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Your works looking good on the page, thanks for the note. Im not an expert on this but, I have seen that sports like rugby and british football (soccer) ( I think a few scottish teams use this pattern) use this style of uniform. For Hockey though Universities populourized this pattern as well. For instance Queens university in Canada uses this theme quite a bit with there throwback sports uniforms (from the late 1800s) and current school clothing lines. But the fundamental trend in canada at least ive noticed (needing sources though of course) was that in the late 1800s and early 1900s sporting teams used the barber pole style of uniform. Anyway just a few ideas for expansions, but an explanation as to why they used the pattern if you could find a source would be a fanatstic addition to the article. Cheers. Ottawa4ever ( talk) 17:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Calamitybrook ( talk) 23:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Pearl-McPhee,Stephanie (2005). Yarn Harlot: The Secret Life of a Knitter. Kansas City: Andrews McMeel Pub. p. 180. ISBN 0740750372. Retrieved December 2, 2010. deliberate mistake. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 04:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Stan
Imzadi 1979 → 16:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Reference templates
Imzadi, You've been leading by example, and I am being guilted into adopting citation templates. Is there an easier way to use them? Less cumbersome? Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC) Stan
|lastn= |firstn=
for author names. If there are multiple authors, add a number in place of the n to separate them out. If there is only one, drop the number.|author=
if the author is an organization, which is rare. I only use organizations as an author if the publisher is different and the organization is explicitly credited as an author|title=
for the title of the article, map, press release, web page or book. Convert the title to Title Case.|work=
the name of the website (which isn't the URL and should be different from the publisher), the name of the newspaper, etc.|publisher=
the company that publishes the content. For most newspapers, this isn't really needed, but this is where to put the TV or radio station's call letters. (I don't use the station's branding as outside of their viewing/listening area, no one knows who "9&10 News" would be, but they'd understand
WWTV-TV.)|location=
the location, if known, of the source. I skip this if the location is listed in the newspaper's name. I usually skip this on state government sources since the assumption would be that it was published in the state capital. (Sometimes with DOT sources, the location is the district office because the source only pertains to a district.)|date=
The date of publication. Similarly, |year=
if only the year is known. Bots will fix this during other edits if you use the "wrong" one.|page= |pages=
use one or the other but not both. The former uses "p. #" as the output, and the latter uses "pp. #" instead. If you have a range of pages, use an en dash (–) as the separator, not a hyphen (-).|accessdate=
for the date you accessed the source, if an online link is provided.|url=
if there is a link to the source, feel free to add it. Except for webpages though, this is usually quite optional.|format=
this is a multipurpose parameter. If the URL links to a PDF, you should indicate that. Same for anything like an Excel file, a Word document, etc. Also, if a subscription is required, I list "Subscription required" to alert readers that they might have to pay to get the article.|archiveurl= |archivedate=
are useful if the webpage is no longer accessible through the website, but it is hosted at
http://www.archive.org/ or another site. In that case, use the original URL in the |url=
parameter|isbn= |issn=
and the like. ISBNs are standard numbers for books, and ISSNs are used on some journals and magazines. If you can provide one of these, the reader will get link to a search page. From there, he can click to find the book in the WorldCat library catalog search, Amazon or Google Books, among other options.You made a correction to the Italian Hall disaster website, regarding Alison Hoagland's book, Mine Towns. However, in her book, she DID say it was a bi-fold door. Although I disagree with her, she wrote on page 223, "This door was hinged in the middle so that one leaf folded flat against the other and both lay flat against the wall on the left." Like I said, she is wrong, but that is what she said. 76.226.1.170 ( talk) 18:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
There's a new tool that was announced in this week's Signpost called ProveIt that's becoming handy for me since I installed it last night. I'll take a look here quick though at the article. <span style="background:#006B54; padding:2px; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 23:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Stenopodidea Many species are particularly attractive, with striped red and white bodies, earning them the alternative name barber-pole shrimp. ... John Kay (caricaturist) In 1785, induced by the favour which greeted certain attempts of his to etch in aquafortis, he took down his barber's pole and opened a ... Allotropa
Per your request. Happy editing! QuAz GaA 19:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
The discussion on this page concerns content and sourcing. One of our editors has decided that the following does not belong there.
You made a correction to the Italian Hall disaster website, regarding Alison Hoagland's book, Mine Towns. However, in her book, she DID say it was a bi-fold door. Although I disagree with her, she wrote on page 223, "This door was hinged in the middle so that one leaf folded flat against the other and both lay flat against the wall on the left." Like I said, she is wrong, but that is what she said. 76.226.1.170 ( talk) 18:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I added a reference for Lehto's book being a Notable Book in 2007. It makes the entry consistent on that point. I'd rather edit from an IP. 76.226.1.170 ( talk) 13:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Our esteemed editors deleted the second article, and did a half-assed, inadequate and incomplete merge of the subject matter into the first. I was not given notice of any of this, despite having been a substantial contributor to the second article, and a smaller contributor to the first. This was SNAFU and perhaps FUBAR, but it is water over the Wikipedia dam. So I am not trying to reopen this. I would like access to the deleted article, which actually has a lot of references and citations that need to be in the second. I do not want to have to reinvent the wheel. If somebody would put it (or a link) onto my talk page it would be appreciated. Please give me a hand. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 21:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC) Stan
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date format (
link){{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link){{
cite book}}
: |work=
ignored (
help); Check date values in: |date=
(
help)An article that you have been involved in editing, Fred Green, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
My earlier text said "he ran the Revenge aground" implying Perry was directing the ship at the time. Research at Google Book search disclosed the 1843 article I mentioned and other sources noting that a pilot was steering the ship when , in the fog, it hit a reef and sank. I changed the text to "the Revenge ran aground." I am aware that today if a captain ran his ship into a reef and it sank, his career would likely be over. (See Holly Graf#Cowpens relief of command, for instance). See also [2] which notes that in 1908 running a ship aground was normally a career ending event, but (future) Admiral Nimitz survived that event. I suspected that Perry had gotten off lightly, perhaps through connections with powerful individuals, which could also have given him his fast promotions. Further research showed that this was not the case: he made the best of a bad situation caused by fog suddenly rolling in, while the local pilot was in charge, and a board fully exonerated him for swift actions to save the crew and much of the contents on the ship. It seemed like a noncontroversial editorial change,to make it the passive voice, but I added the note in case I was later challenged on it, just to remind me of a source. It did not seem important to add a reference to the article. See "Oliver Hazard Perry" by James Fenimore Cooper, Graham;s Magazine, Volume XXII, No. 5, May, 1843, page 268. If you think it is needed, feel free to add it, or let me know and I will. Edison ( talk) 19:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Not a reliable source, so not a good reference to include. As for photos, what would prevent someone from providing any photo, with the inscription photoshopped to say whatever he wished? (Pranksters create even fake wars, fake towns and fake roads on Wikipedia. Way too much time on their hands). It is interesting, but not useful for verifying anything. Edison ( talk) 19:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
There is an interesting discussion about the scope of articles and article content. I am not urging anyone to take a position, but I am urging input from fellow editors. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 19:30, 15 January 2011 (UTC) Stan
Thanks for the anniversary greetings! Have a happy anniversary too! WhisperToMe ( talk) 18:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
(and probably will give in -my usual response to temptation) to attribute the sculpture at the Alpena County Courthouse to Parducci, however his records, those that I have, are blank for 1932 through 1934, so I am not going to make that claim on wikipedia. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 18:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Newspapers for Michigan -- old & new
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 17:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Imzadi 1979 → 19:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
here's a corrected URL for the congressional record citation #18 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2011-03-01/pdf/CREC-2011-03-01-pt1-PgS1071.pdf#page=3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.19.127 ( talk) 19:19, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen ( ☎)
for 7&6=thirteen. Bravo. For your very good correction in page of Pauline Bebe. Continue your good work in Wikipedia. Pass a good week-end, Best regards -- Geneviève ( talk) 17:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Good article on judicial review that I tripped across, and which could have application to this and other SCOTUS articles. And this was before some of the more recent handiwork of the court. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want me to undo my refactoring of your comments on Barek's page, I will. I was hoping to clarify for his sake. If the user doesn't respond and keeps spamming, I will be headed towards having that site
blacklisted.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 18:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour I am going to write to HJ Mitchell so that a part of this DKY is for you. It was a work Team and you deserve this award.-- Geneviève ( talk) 13:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
On 8 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pauline Bebe, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pauline Bebe was France's first female rabbi? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I better go and spell "university" correctly in my cut-&paste bibliography too. Good catch. EInar aka Carptrash ( talk) 17:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Thirteen, regarding this set of edits at Earl Young, I need to point out some problems. First, all of those categories except one relates to architectural styles, not the architects themselves. "Category:Arts and Crafts architects" was a good addition though, I'd have not thought of it. Second, please do not add both parent and child categories to articles. For example, only "American architectural styles" would be added, not it and "Architectural styles". The article is already in the latter since it is in the former. Same with "Modernist architecture in the United States" and "Modernist architecture", and "Arts and Crafts architects" and "Arts and Crafts Movement". Let me know if you have any questions. — Huntster ( t @ c) 03:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
This morning, I have a big problem with the Infobox national hockey team for Slovenian women's national ice hockey team: see my sandbox User:Genevieve2/sandbox0324. Maybe you can help me ? thanks, merci -- Geneviève ( talk) 16:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
...for the barnstar. That's very kind of you. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 21:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Someone uploaded a new version on Feb. 6 using
Autodesk Maya which changed the file. Apparently this renders it non-working when it is resized. I'll leave a note and may revert the file at Commons.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 15:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Bonsoir dear 7&6=thirteen, I working now on Coupe Dodge. It is a Québecois Championship in Ice hockey (French region of Canada). The old article of wikipedia speak only about men ice hockey. As I know very well this girls competition, I complete now with the women ice hockey User:Genevieve2/sandbox05. My English Language is poor and maybe my draft is filled with grammatical mistakes and with English spelling. Can you hepl me to correct this text? You should not translate everything into English language especially the name of the French-speaking teams. But for the verbs yes it makes translate correctly. If you will to help me, it would be kind. Merci beaucoup -- Geneviève ( talk) 00:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't really get this edit. Why link to a Google copy of the original when you can link just as well to the original? -- Conti| ✉ 17:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed you had re-added the rare dog breeds category to the Bernese Mountain Dog article and I'm curious as to your rationale. I had originally removed it because its AKC ranking is 39, putting it on par with Collies, Miniature Pinschers, Bichon Frise(s?), and Viszlak. As far as I know -- could be wrong -- the breed is even more popular in Europe; not sure about other regions. — anndelion ( talk) 02:31, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
You have reverted a change I made to the Roseville, Michigan page, which was a correct update of the city's demographics. I am reverting them back, as it was accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remisc ( talk • contribs) 04:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Good Evening, Both texts seem to me to be good. I cannot write more because I do not know the subject of magic museums. Bonne chance -- Geneviève ( talk) 00:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Genevieve has given you a fresh pie! Pies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a fresh pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thereby I give you this pie for creating the script, which I use to give this pie to you. :)
To spread more WikiLove, install the
WikiLove user script.
|
Hello! Your submission of La Maison de la Magie Robert-Houdin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Benea ( talk) 12:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
On 25 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article La Maison de la Magie Robert-Houdin, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 12:10, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Wanted to drop a note off to say I enjoyed reading the La Maison de la Magie Robert-Houdin article, and wanted to point out that two of the pictures in the Jean Eugène Robert-Houdin article could be used in the museum article as well. I took File:Jean Eugène Robert-Houdin museum (statue and display).jpg and File:Jean Eugène Robert-Houdin statue (Blois).jpg when visiting Blois, but didn't get a chance to go inside the musuem. What you are seeing in the former pictures (and the picture in the article) is the "The six-headed dragon automaton" display, where the dragon models move in and out of the windows (the current article caption incorrectly calls the dragons crocodiles, and the "snake" is one of the dragon's tails). I'm sure there are videos of it on YouTube if you look (not sure whether public displays like that in France are accepted on Commons). Anyway, hope those pictures will be of some use. Carcharoth ( talk) 16:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks heaps for the help on the American Akita page, I really appriciate it. Cheers, - Keetanii ( talk) 14:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Cookies! | ||
Keetanii has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Because we all need cookies! To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}! |
Hi, thank you for your help with Armenian Gampr, -- Zara-arush ( talk) 11:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
The original barnstar had been deleted
here on your page because it was deleted at Commons. I've replaced it.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 16:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
This was a live one.:)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 20:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen, thanks for your helpful comments on my talk page. Overall, I had a pretty bad experience editing the pentagram map wiki, and I'd like to both vent and ask for advice about how to avoid these problems again. Some background: I am a mathematician, and the originator of the subject on the wiki. After 20 years of thinking about it, I am recognized as one of the leading authorities on this small topic. The original version of the wiki page was quite sketchy and inaccurate, and indeed there was a tag to this effect on top of the page. I decided to clean the thing up, making it accurate, up-to-date, and well-referenced.
The first 3 hours of my edits were lost, thanks to a user named Abhishek... who thought I was vandalizing the site. Then, my further edits brought several more accusations of vandalism, both from this guy and someone who seemed to be a security expert. Finally, the next morning, the user Asher186 removed all the pictures I had put up. I made these pictures myself and own the copyright, but I did not know enough to actually license the pictures. The pictures were absolutely essential to the text, as anyone with any understanding of the topic could see.
All in all, I spent about 12 hours editing a page which would have taken me half that time without the (in my opinion) hasty intervention of people who probably know very little about the content of the page. I understand the need for wikipedia to protect itself against vandalism and other breaches of publicly responsible editing, but I wish that these users had shown a bit more restraint and discernment.
I noticed, on my talk page, that you suggest inline referencing. Frankly, I am so disgruntled with my experience on wikipedia that I don't have much desire to further edit pages. I might come back to it after cooling off. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 17:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 6&7=thirteen
Thanks for your long and sympathetic reply. As the writer and even occasional editor of many scholarly articles, I am used to doing things somewhat differently than is done on wikipedia. Usually people show more restraint in their edits. Of course, we are talking about a much more narrow and specialized area, where everyone more or less has a similar background.
On the other hand, wikipedia had some great advantages over traditional journals and articles, and is a fabulous resource. It is really a fundamentally different model for publication, so one is bound to expect differences in protocol. I'm happy to improve my wiki editing skills so that it doesn't raise red flags. One problem, I suppose, is that I am an extremely quick and relentless writer. Maybe that can look superficially like vandalism.
You mentioned that I might put some information about myself on my user's page. In fact, I already have a (short) wiki page, Richard Schwartz. This does not quite match my user name, RichardEvanSchwartz. I usually go by the latter, and I wonder if I might somehow consolidate these two names into one, so that both always refer to this page. At the same time, my website http://www.math.brown.edu/~res has quite a bit more information about me.
Thanks much for the offer to do the inline editing for me. I learned how to do this, and did it.
The one last thing I'd like to say is that I'm not a total newbie on wikipedia. In fact, I did a similar job with the outer billiards website around 3 yeas ago, and my colleagues in that little field seemed quite pleased. I didn't have any problems then, though the style is similar. I wonder if, in the 3yr interim, there has been a rise in [[artificial intelligence]] and bots on the net, which makes it harder for atypical editing to fly under the radar. Both websites I have edited are equally obscure.
Anyway, thanks again for your long, sympathetic message. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 21:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen, thanks for your (repeated) kind and encouraging words. They have sweetened this whole experience quite a bit, and I am really quite happy that you appreciate my efforts. (I'm sure that these efforts are tiny in comparison to your own.) In response to several issues you raise: 1. I have been blanking my talk page partly because I haven't yet learned how to archive it and partly because I found the negative comments embarrassing. 2. You refer to a WP:DYK nomination for the pentagram map wiki page, but I am not sure about this. It seems to me that this is a small and specialized subtopic in mathematics. My main point in editing the page was to make it possible for students and other researchers in closely allied areas to find quick and accurate information about it. My collaborators and I thought that this would be a good time to edit the page because this particular topic is getting "hot", with more researchers getting interested and finding connections, but in this business "hot" means that maybe 10 people in the world are interested!
Incidentally, thanks for the tip about inline referencing. This allowed me to be a bit more modest in the presentation of the material. Instead of repeatedly saying "In his 20XX paper, Richard Schwartz proved..." I could just state the fact and give an inline reference to my paper. For the most part, this suits me better. Believe it or not, I didn't like the fact that I was quoting my own name so often. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 04:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen, Thanks for your continued interest in this matter. I'll try to answer your latest questions that you left on my talk page.
1. You asked about the practical importance of this topic, to the outside world. I think that the topic itself has very little practical importance. Like many pieces of pure mathematics, this one does not yet have any real applications. G.H. Hardy's apology is food for thought about this, though I don't really agree with him. Lots of things that seem really pure and inapplicable in one decade turn out to have quite a lot of practical application in later decades. The wiki page about Hardy's Apology has a nice example of this: the application of number theory to RSA cryptography. On still another hand, the fields in which the pentagram map is embedded, namely projective geometry and dynamical systems, each have an enormous number of practical applications.
2. I agree that the number of authors working on this particular object is quite small. Currently about 6 have written papers and maybe another 5-10 are interested in it. What made me write about it now is that the topic seems to be heating up. It seems possible to me that a maybe twice that number of people or more might be interested in the thing in 1-2 years. You might call it something like an emerging topic, though it is hardly a large topic in mathematics. I certainly wouldn't want outside readers to be mislead about the importance of the subject, and I would be happy to add some kind of statement to the effect that this isn't such a big deal in the scheme of mathematics. To tell the truth, my colleagues and I just wanted to have an accurate little article about the thing that would help interested people get the basic facts quickly. (Even as a supposed expert, I usually use wikipedia to look math stuff up these days!) I wonder if perhaps I should migrate the article to scholarpedia, and just have something more abbreviated on wikipedia.
3. Towards the end of the article, I did cite several references that have to do with computer vision. This is where projective geometry, though not the pentagram map itself, has a huge impact. The pentagram map is the kind of operation that could have application possibly in computer vision, but currently does not. In any case, I'll give some thought to how I might tie it in better with the rest of wikipedia.
4. There was one more thing I wanted to add. Your comments bring up an interesting point, which I'm sure lots of wiki folks have pondered. Wikipedia seems to be becoming a really great reference for technical subjects like mathematics -- kind of a universal textbook. I don't think I would have bothered looking up math stuff on wikipedia even 5 years ago, but now (as I said above) I do it all the time. As more mathematicians turn to it, you might see an increase in articles on fairly obscure technical topics like the pentagram map. As the more esoteric branches of knowledge are written about on wikipedia, I wonder if the notion of "obscurity" will change.
RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 22:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've raised the issue of your adding links to pentagram map to the See also section of so many high importance mathematics articles at WT:WPM. It seems like enormously undue weight to a notion that is of fairly minimal importance in mathematics. Sławomir Biały ( talk) 13:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Slawomir and 7&6=thirteen, I completely agree with Slawomir that there shouldn't be too many links from important math articles to the pentagram map. I think that the pentagram map is a beautiful but minor part of mathematics. On the other hand, 7&6=thirteen, I certainly appreciate your efforts to tie the article more fully into wikipedia. Also, once I learn how to archive my talk pages, I will keep all this discussion for the record. RichardEvanSchwartz ( talk) 15:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, regarding the discussion about links to Pentagram map: you have used the phrase "Respectfully, I would suggest that we all wait for a consensus to form", yet you have posted as much as everyone else put together. Please try to stay calm and allow a consensus to form! Note that I did not accuse you of spam. I quoted the relevant part of the page WP:SPAM (since others had raised the subject already) and commented that it's not clear-cut in this case. I am indeed doing my best to assume good faith here--that's why I took the trouble to look at a few more of your edits and mention that some of them seem justified. Can you too please try to assume good faith? Jowa fan ( talk) 00:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Jowa fan, Thank you for your note. I will wait per your suggestion. Indeed, I will not participate further as I have said all I have to say. All I was asking for was a case-by-case consideration of the edits. As mathematics are not a matter of general interest to me, I stand by my declaration that the experts should rule. Obviously, I was wrong on some of the edits (or so it now appears). But I may have been right on others. Of course, even 'a stopped analog clock is right twice a day'. I appreciate your deciding that some of them might be justified. I was working from the connections in the article (and from some of the material in the references themselves (which did mention some concepts that were not in the Wikipedia article). I am very sensitive to the implicit accusation that I was "spamming." It is a word that is 'akin to fightin' words', and I would not use it cavalierly. I will assume that we have just had a failure to communicate, will WP:AGF, and chaulk this up to a misunderstanding. If I gave offense, you may also assume that it was unintentional. I am going out of town so I have no intention of writing further on the matter on way or another. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 00:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
You undid my insertion of a fact.I've read this before, so if you are to delete it then disprove that what I wrote wasn't a fact
Hi Thirteen, I was wondering you you still opposed the merger of American Akita and Akita Inu? Have you had a look at the sample I proposed as a merger? Everything is at a stale mate at the moment because I cannot close the discussion myself due to your strong opposition (which you are free to keep). I'm waiting on an Admin to make the final discussion close..but it's taking al long time, it was suggested to me on my talk page that I come and ask if you view has change at all after looking at my proposed article for the merge. Cheers, Keetanii ( talk) 03:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC) P.S. Haven't seen you around on the Akita pages lately, been missing your contributions :) Keetanii ( talk) 03:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Judges who died while judging and there has to be a People who died while having sex too. Perhaps on those snowy, cold January, February nights...... Carptrash ( talk) 15:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I was recently in the New Mexico Supreme Court building, looking at bas reliefs of former Chiefs and learned about one who died either in court or while giving a lecture to some students. I wonder how many R&R musicians have died on stage? Anyway , it was one relief that led to my article on Bruce Saville, but I have not added that work yet. And my real job today is vacuuming and doing the dishes etc for the BIG MEETING here tomorrow. Ah well, 24 hours a day and that's it. Hmmm I wonder what a list of Folks who died while doing housework would look like? Carptrash ( talk) 15:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
... discospinster talk 18:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I've userfied this to User:7&6=thirteen/Rabbits in the arts while you work on it. Thanks, Gurt Posh ( talk) 17:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Nein, mein führer. Carptrash ( talk) 23:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
a bit of a problem in Bill Smith (Fell runner). But first, I am on the road, have been for a while. But when I received your message I went to the article and discovered the phrase stating that Smith was ""a connoisseur of Cajun or gypsy music." I thought that this was unlikely, that probably "or" should be "and". Now I get back to it and discovered that someone has made this change. Here is the problem. That phrase is a quote and when I check the original source I discover the word "or." We now have a quote in which some editor has changed the language inside a quote, and this is, as we say in my home, bad feng shui. I think that the "and" should be retained and the quotation marks removed, and the citation also retained, but that is not so much my call. Tomorrow I get home and into a whole new set of issues, but at least I will be at home and not in Arizona and Mexico. einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 03:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Your recent post at Template talk:DYK is missing a pair of braces to close the template. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 19:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for signing! Pinkstrawberry02™ talk 16:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Please reply to this message on Pinkstrawberry02's talk page. Thank you.
No, it's fine! It is a great and crafty one. Thanks again for signing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkstrawberry02 ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Please see my response to you query at Talk:List of American Civil War generals. -- IcarusPhoenix ( talk) 05:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
I'm curious to know why you put this template {{ User page}} in my user page?
Pierre cb ( talk) 12:20, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Here's your original Bill Smith (fell runner) DYK nomination from October 8th: October 8th DYK Nom for Bill Smith. Shearonink ( talk) 19:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
The Nom is still there in the October 8th section between "List of Rugby World red cards, Huw Richards" and "Palacio de las Dueñas". It never got reviewed. Shearonink ( talk) 19:33, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on September 16, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 16, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Sherman Minton (1890–1965) was a Democratic United States Senator from Indiana and an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He served as a captain in World War I, then launched a legal and political career. In 1934, Minton won election to the United States Senate. As part of the New Deal Coalition, he championed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's unsuccessful court packing plans in the Senate and became one of his top Senate allies. After Minton failed in his 1940 Senate re-election bid, Roosevelt appointed him as a judge to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. After Roosevelt's death, President Harry Truman, who had developed a close friendship with Minton during their time together in the Senate, nominated him to the Supreme Court, where he served for seven years. An advocate of judicial restraint, Minton was a regular supporter of the majority opinions during his early years on the Court; he became a regular dissenter after President Dwight Eisenhower's appointees altered the Bench's composition. In 1956, poor health forced Minton's retirement, after which he traveled and lectured until his death in 1965. ( more...)
Thanks for the compliment, I'm going to try to work on it to featured standards, but I only been avaliable in the late night hours and on weekdays. I could use your help in making the article featured, right now I'm trying to work on the Reggie Jackson article. Thanks Secret account 07:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I haven't reverted or rewritten as yet, and I don't have the books that are cited in front of me ... but I'm afraid the material you just restored in the Minton article doesn't make sense chronologically. I believe that Minton was appointed, along with Tom Clark, by President Truman in 1949; they replaced Justice Rutledge and Justice Murphy, both of whom had died that year. In that light, I don't see how Minton could have found himself more in the minority after Justice Murphy died, since that had already happened when Minton joined the Court; nor was Murphy's successor appointed by Truman. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 14:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
LOL and thanks. I've encountered fell runners. Fell-walking is a big enough adventure for me! -- Orlady ( talk) 23:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
On 4 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bill Smith (fell runner), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 00:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
I've got your archiving & indexing setup for you now. I would expect both bots to hit within 24 hours...probably sooner. The index will be blank until then.
Are you really on a wikibreak or just forgot to take down the notice?
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 01:53, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, what was your message about? KägeTorä - (影虎) ( TALK) 22:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Great work on Otium Doug Coldwell talk 23:10, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
Here and here is where I gave Cardiffchestnut some tidbits recently on article development and DYK development. Most of this you know already, but there may be something you can pick up on.-- Doug Coldwell talk 11:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The development of the Otium article is an application of the Law of Attraction.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Awesome, what number DYK is this for you? The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 12:58, 5 November 2011 (UTC) I think 210, if I add one or two to my list I last forgot. I forgot to add my last DYK of Mutiny at Sucro. I'll have to do that after Otium becomes a DYK, to make a total of 210.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Rad. I'm working on a new article now, but I doubt it'll be my first DYK. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 21:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC) This is where the Law of Attraction comes into play. Think positively, like the new article you have will be your first DYK. Thinking this way sets up positive "vibrations" and events occur in such a manner that the new article becomes a Did You Know. Do you think that each time I wrote up an article I had the attitude that it probably would not become a DYK. No - I thought it will become a DYK and practically every time it did become a Did You Know. Change your attitude - think positively and constructively. Whatever your mind can conceive and believe, it can achieve (Napoleon Hill). Be optimistic. All it takes is 1500 characters - a small article. Make sure its well referenced and you have a good "catchy" hook line. Also make sure the hook line has an excellent inline reference. I go out of my way to make sure they find this and even go to the point of placing the exact words right into that particular inline reference, word for word, with its exact location (usually Google Books) so they can easily find it. Its very important that they find the reference that covers your hook line. If possible, give an ALT1 and ALT2, then this way the chances of it becoming a DYK is very good. I would work the draft offline first as all you have is 5 days to develop the article - offline has no limit. Nice little hint.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the tips. Right now I'm mostly expanding existing articles, but maybe on of the entries I have planned will have something of a hook. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Your welcome. Let me reword your reply a bit to show optimism: One of the entries I have planned will have something of a hook. - see, positive. Hint: Take a stab at it and submit a hook no matter what! I have found if you make an "attempt", there are experts at DYK that will come across your "attempt" and fix it for you or give you an alternative. Happens to me all the time. I would say that I have somehow managed to get a hook line using this method 99 and 44/100's per cent of the time. I have never not had a DYK not go through, if I made an "attempt". In other words: the odds are in your favor.--Doug Coldwell talk 22:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Hint: Make sure your new article links from at least 3 other articles.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC) Another Hint: If you want to get many people viewing your article - make sure it becomes a DYK. Here are some articles I created that received some large numbers on the day they became a Did You Know Pelican Pete Spragg Bag Nonsuch House Conclusion of the American Civil War (Good Article) Cone Sisters Jayco The Whole Shebang Motocycle Gottfried Schloemer Benson raft
Benson raft
Hint to get high numbers on your views: Make sure that your article is the first in the queue and your picture that mainly represents the article is shown in that day's DYK when the administrator lines up the queue. Most of the time when I just asked for this and had a very interesting picture (like Benson raft picture) they would accommodate me.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
If you get some exceptionally high numbers, then they list you in the Hall of Fame stats as they did for my article on the plague doctor and related articles for the 2010 Holloween DYK hook line.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Where it gets a little challenging is to have 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, or 16 articles in the same hook line (articles 87-133). You start pulling hair right out of your head. I have only a few hairs left.--Doug Coldwell talk 23:42, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Since you're now canvassing the corners of ancient philosophical movements for your otium article, your last comment compels me to recommend that you read this. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 00:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Cute.--Doug Coldwell talk 12:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
The above ideas come from what I see as the Law of Life. A sub-category is the Law of Attraction. Another is common sense. And still another is reasoning and another is logic (excuse the psychology).--Doug Coldwell talk 11:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit]Couple more ideas
If you get stumped on being able to develop out an artice, seek the services of Ask A Librarian. One in particular that gives some excellent answers on queries is Internet Public Library. I found that the Library of Congress also has such a service and they also come up with excellent answers. Put in Google: "Ask a Librarian" for URLs.
Don't forget when writing up an article make sure you have at least 3 categories for it. You can get an idea for categories from similar articles.
Good luck on your new articles, that will of course be DYKs.--Doug Coldwell talk 13:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch for the tips, Doug. Hopefully I'll actually finish an article sometime soon. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 15:26, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
FYI, you can see the activity and "hits" of your article under "History" and then "Page view statistics". Otium is receiving about 300 "hits" per day and I suspect will jump 10 times that on the day of the DYK (about a week from now).--Doug Coldwell talk 18:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Tidbits:
You probably already know that "What links here" shows what articles link to your article. You should have at least 3, as less than that they consider an "orphan" article and it could be deleted. Only real articles count, not Talk pages, etc. See Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 85, Papyrus 50, and Otium.
Add a picture (or group of pictures) to an article, as that enhances it quite a bit. For examples see these articles I created:
Michigan logging wheels
Westinghouse Time Capsules
The Teenie Weenies
Nebraska House
Lithophane
Burr Caswell
Sachet (scented bag)
Blue Ridge Parkway tunnels
Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri IX
Georgia Cayvan
Keedoozle
Bellifortis
Cone Mills Corporation
Pickle Barrel House
Columbus Letter on the First Voyage
Thaddeus Fairbanks
Whitcomb L. Judson
Walter Scott Lenox
Car cooler
Flash-lamp
Giovanni Caselli
English words first attested in Chaucer
The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report
Warren Antoine Cartier
Antoine Ephrem Cartier
Star Watch Case Company
SweeTango (apple)
Century tower clocks
Good Luck on your new articles.--Doug Coldwell talk 14:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips and links, Doug. Amadscientist listed Otium as the Classics Project's current collaboration, so it should probably start getting more views from Latinists. — the cardiff chestnut | talk — 17:28, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Great! This would be the Law of Attraction in action.--Doug Coldwell talk 19:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Another little tidbit:
IF you happen to expand an article and you want it to become a DYK, it must be 5 times larger within 5 days from when you started increasing its size to be able to qualify. Use this tool to measure before and after character count. This is a good tool also to count hook line characters, as that must be under 200 (with multiple article hooks an exception).--Doug Coldwell talk 15:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Doug. Good to know. — the cardiff chestnut | talk — 22:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit]Tidbits for a DYK
Usually doing items in 3s gives you a real good chance of getting a DYK. Looking at my latest article of Red Cross stove you will notice that it has 3000 characters. Only 1500 is needed, however IF someone objects to a sentence or even a paragraph and you have to remove, you STILL have plenty to qualify for a DYK. There are 3 other articles that link to this article (See "What links here" on left panel). This way it is NOT classified as an orphaned article. It has 3 Categories - then it has plenty without any objections. It has 3 reference sources - which is good for a starter article.
These items are good to know because when you do DYKs you will get the first 5 "free", then you will have to review others' DYKs before yours is approved. You have to be pretty familiar with the qualifications of DYKs to be able to approve another's DYK. Hope to see a list of your DYKs soon.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Do you think "For other uses, see Otium (disambiguate)" is necessary now, since there are no other articles that relate to Otium. After there are other articles that have Otium in the name, THEN I can see that it would be necessary. Now it leads to confussion I believe.-- Doug Coldwell talk 23:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
The script I use is by Ohconfucius, and it's wicked good. Add this line to User:7&6=thirteen/monobook.js (or vector.js, depending on your current skins setup).
Then bypass your browser's cache.
To fire it up, go to your toolbox and click "Body dates to dmy" Chris the speller yack 22:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you have Catton in the list of notable persons of Northern Michigan. I created the article A Stillness at Appomattox written by him. It won the 1954 Pulitzer Prize in history.-- Doug Coldwell talk 15:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for the edit of Yule marble.... All good changes. Any aspect of the subject that needs inclusion? OneHistoryGuy ( talk) 00:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
for your most timely and insightful editing at Alan Fisher (architect), with which you saved both the article and my already too shaky reputation. For that you have earned the seldom coveted Thumbs Up Award. Wear it with pride, or if you do throw it away, please recycle. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 06:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not repeat this reversion. Text which states what its alleged sources do not say is not verifiable, no matter how many footnotes it has. (And much of that text repeats matter elsewhere in the article, phrased more accurately and more clearly.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I've recently made the article more concise. Does it need more "fine tuning"? Good Article possibility?-- Doug Coldwell talk 17:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Our reverts crossed in the mail. Sorry. I also reported them to WP:AIV. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
On 2 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otium, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that otium, a Latin term, has a variety of meanings including leisure time in which a person can enjoy eating, playing, resting, contemplation and academic endeavors? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Otium.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 05:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Excellent improvements to Red Cross stove. Thanks! Enjoy the strawberries... Doug Coldwell talk 14:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC) |
Yes, Mississauga is the third largest city on the Great Lakes. Detroit has 713,777, Buffalo has 261,310, and Mississauga has 738,000. Check the city page if you do not believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waldenbg ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I'd probably count as "odd", but only because I haven't yet got even... Easy to get the adjective wrong; I only know it from the number of times I've tried to Wikilink the name, and come up with a redlink for "International...". Happily, no one's created a redirect from the wrong I-word. Ammodramus ( talk) 23:57, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm curious why you added The Tridge to the "see also" section of Saginaw River, since the Tridge doesn't actually span this river.-- Asher196 ( talk) 05:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Is the closing of The Tridge in November 2011 temporary, or permanent? If the former, has a reopening date been set yet? Thank you for your work on this article, I didn't know there was a Y-bridge in Michigan. Bigturtle ( talk) 23:15, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In The Tridge, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Y-Bridge ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Just a reminder that the Good Article Nomination for Oliver Hazard Perry is still open; it's been open for a couple of weeks now, so let me know if you need an extension on it, or if I can close it for the time being. Hchc2009 ( talk) 07:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
The lastest article I created is William Hamlin, Rhode Island's first engraver. You have related e-mail.-- Doug Coldwell talk 20:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
This looks interesting. Perhaps in a week or so it will be an official DYK.-- Doug Coldwell talk 15:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure you didn't intend it that way; but if you'll re-read your comment regarding my recent edit at Yule Marble, I think you'll agree that it comes across as somewhat snappish. I'll attribute it to your having a bad day, or just to an unfortunate choice of words that you didn't spot until you'd hit the "Save" button. However, will urge you to proceed cautiously on other talk pages if you're feeling a bit put-upon or generally short-fused today.
Will respond to the comment itself at the article's talk page; however, wanted to communicate this to you as privately as possible. By all means, delete this once you've read it; I'm certainly not trying to embarrass you or to publicly accuse you of wanting courtesy to your fellow editors. Ammodramus ( talk) 00:44, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
I found this information interesting about the Octave flute.-- Doug Coldwell talk 12:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
The only thing I remember in speech from Mitt Romney is: "Come over here honey, he wants to take a picture of us!" I went on the same Shipley boat he did to Mackinac Island in 2007. He sat directly behind us on the boat. Shook his hand.-- Doug Coldwell talk 13:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
On 12 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Hamlin, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that William Hamlin was the first engraver for the state of Rhode Island? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Hamlin.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cheers, Casliber ( talk · contribs) 19:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Is above article like below boat?
http://books.google.com/books?id=1vI8AQAAIAAJ&pg=PA146&lpg=PA146&dq=The+Experiment+horse+boat&source=bl&ots=_mtOn1Wkmp&sig=j2r9cXrn1kHF_OHWSpqS9NkNXoA&hl=en&ei=wGTmTtjNJq3E2QWkiam8BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&sqi=2&ved=0CD8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=The%20Experiment%20horse%20boat&f=false
Do you think then that the "first"
Airboat would support an article by itself, since it looks they are one and the same (just earlier or later versions)?--
Doug Coldwell
talk 23:51, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Experiment | |
Excellent research on the Experiment. Great job in finding the facts and putting the loose ends together. Doug Coldwell talk 15:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks for the citation on Pictured Rocks. TexianPolitico ( talk) 21:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
I have discovered that Famous First Facts by Joseph Nathan Kane is an excellent source for potential DYKs.-- Doug Coldwell talk 20:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
On 16 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Experiment (horse powered boat), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Experiment was a boat powered by horses running on a treadmill and propelled by a then-novel type of screw propeller? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Experiment (horse powered boat).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 14:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Why did you add {{ User Page}} to by talk page? Not that I'm getting rid of it, but were you on a mirror site or something? Why me? BCS (Talk) 02:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Great teamwork and outstanding improvements you have made on Patent Office 1836 fire Doug Coldwell talk 12:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC) |
I hearby give you an
accolade (an article I created) for the grand work you have done on
Patent Office 1836 fire.
I dub thee Knight Editor. I declare you are officially one of the
Wikipedia Editors of the Round Table.
Looks like I received some accolades on
Otium.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 20:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
I hereby give you a couple more accolades: one for
1877 U. S. Patent Office fire,
and another well deserved one for
Abraham Lincoln's patent.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 21:38, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
and still another for the speedy work on
John Henry Devereux.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 22:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
discovered Starr Kempf - who I had forgotten was an architect. A Colorado one. The picture there is one of my favorites - the sculpture, one of three which was set up in an almost abandoned weird shopping center in the middle of nowhere NM have since been removed, and i miss them. I am not usually a big fan of modern sculpture but his stuff rocked! Literally and figuratively. eek aka Carptrash ( talk) 16:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
On 22 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Patent Office 1836 fire, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the U.S. Patent Office 1836 fire occurred in the same building that housed the local fire department? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patent Office 1836 fire.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
i have made what u want so please delete your headtitle from an article. i will put citates from journals too. The neutrality of this article is not disputed, it is fact what i whote
for the edit to the alberger prossece. my brother found my password. i dont know why i didnt say that before, but i have a new password. Jake1993811 ( talk) 06:46, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on Mildred Lewis Rutherford. Ladyof Shalott 02:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, 7&6=thirteen, and thank you for your contributions!
An article you worked on Mildred Seydell, appears to be directly copied from http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-2460. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Mildred Seydell if necessary. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 22:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
On 3 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 1877 U. S. Patent Office fire, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that despite the devastation of the second U.S. Patent Office fire (pictured), in a supposedly fireproof building, not one patent was lost? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
I was guessing 10,000 views. We got 6,900 and maybe a couple thousand more as the world turns. Let's see how close I was on my Road to Prediction tommorrow night.-- Doug Coldwell talk 00:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
On 3 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Abraham Lincoln's patent, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abraham Lincoln's patent.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 23:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Congratulations! It looks like you are getting DYKs left and right.-- Doug Coldwell talk 00:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | ||
Lovely article, and exemplary cooperation. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 03:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
Happy new year, my best wishes of health and happiness for year 2012. Je vous offre mes meilleurs vœux de santé et de bonheur pour l'année 2012, ושל אושר לשנה 2012. -- Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève ( talk) 10:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Great citation improvements to Christopher Werner and a great job in expanding the article. Doug Coldwell talk 22:59, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
There are two Roman swords laying horizonital in the middle of the gates at handle level.
Can you look into:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/John_Henry_Devereux
I copyedited the hook line replacing the word "made" with "designed".
After you do what-ever fixing, then maybe drop a note to
User talk:Drmies that we have fixed the problems and if he would now give us a "tick". Thanks.--
Doug Coldwell
talk 20:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
You've been doing on those CFS articles. :) Ladyof Shalott 02:52, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Charleston Female Seminary (Massachusetts), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Baptist Church ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
The relevant guideline is WP:Copying within Wikipedia. Proper attribution is in an edit summary, and {{ Copied}} on the talk page is a recommended additional step. WP:Plagiarism#Copying within Wikipedia has a little on why footnotes would be excessive. Flatscan ( talk) 05:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
On 31 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Henry Devereux, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Irish plasterer John Henry Devereux became a noted architect in South Carolina, designing a church (pictured) that was the state's tallest building for 101 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Henry Devereux.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady ( talk) 08:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on my talkpage. However I am not very clear about your message. Cheers AKS 20:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm not really under siege; I just cut everything out of the article except a list of accomplishments and everyone agreed that was wonderful. However, my account was blocked without warning when the article was deleted, apparently on the basis of the article's chronological structure and "style" rather than paraphrasing. The blocking suggests an attack. This is a volunteer activity, after all, and I'm a prolific contributor. It will be difficult to justify the time and effort if that kind of thing starts happening. Pkeets ( talk) 20:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey there 7&6=thirteen, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:DASHBot/Logs/2012/February#February 02.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thriteen, I reviewed Ablaq and the nomination looks set to pass, but there's one little issue regarding a missing inline citation that needs to be taken care of before I could approve. See DYK nom. -- Al Ameer son ( talk) 23:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
I am intrigued to know what you meant in this edit by "give the piggies fodder for their trough". 79.123.71.209 ( talk) 15:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for defending the article. This time when I checked for references, I located a listing in the Norton/Grove dictionary, which is a definitive citation for notability. It should be proof against any further proposals for deletion. Would you have any idea why the proposed deletion didn't show up in my watchlist? Pkeets ( talk) 14:49, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
For such a unique Wikipedia ID, and so many DYK nominations :) Keep Editing,Keep Inspiring! AbhiSuryawanshi ( talk) 03:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC) |
Ping.-- Doug Coldwell talk 19:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Antoinette Kirkwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Collection ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Feel free to expand the article. What's there is very brief, but there's some traffic on the history and various activities of the organization(s) and it probably warrants a larger article, including maybe a paragraph on the history of each of the organizations that merged. I spent about half my time on it working on redirects for the awards and the three organizations. There were mentions in a number of articles, and I see that a Bot has been busy overnight tidying up double redirects. The Composers' Guild of Great Britain (CGGB), in particular, provides a number of links. I just didn't see a lot of information available right off. It would take a bit of research. Pkeets ( talk) 14:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
On 5 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mildred Seydell, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mildred Seydell was one of the first women newspaper journalists in the State of Georgia while breaking the gender barrier in journalism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mildred Seydell.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
On 6 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christopher Werner, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Christopher Werner made a lifelike South Carolina Palmetto tree out of iron, copper, and brass? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christopher Werner.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Victuallers ( talk) 00:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Charleston Female Seminary at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady ( talk) 04:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
On 8 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mildred Lewis Rutherford, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mildred Lewis Rutherford thought that the only problem with slavery was the burden it placed on white slaveholders? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mildred Lewis Rutherford.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
On 9 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ablaq, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that ablaq is an Arabic term for the use in stonework of alternating or fluctuating rows of light and dark color stone (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ablaq.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Rs chen 7754 02:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Susan (dog), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corgi ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
On 19 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that members of the British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors include United Kingdom's most experienced and successful songwriters like Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney and Elton John? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 22:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
A ref was already provided and the link you added had NOTHING to do with the species in question. Please do not vandalize the page. You have an obvious agenda, don't you? You stated it was the same source (ABC news) when in fact it wasn't. How about you leave the page in question ALONE. Thank you. SaberToothedWhale ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Frank Gehry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Museum ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi there! When using certain templates on talk pages, such as welcome templates and user warnings, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:welcome}} instead of {{welcome}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. If you need any further help on the matter just ask me on my talk page. Cheers. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 01:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station
I did a few tweaks and did a review of Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station. There is a small question about "the only." You might want to address that. Otherwise, nicely done! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Ellin, You might want to put the newly inserted "Further reading" in someplace as an in line reference. Just a thought. It is generally preferred. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:21, 14 April 2012 (UTC) You don't need to do this, because you haven't had your fifth DYK yet, but it might be good practice to
check Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria find a DYK that hasn't been reviewed yet. Review it and specifically state 1) was it nominated with 5 days of creation or (minor eligibility criteria), 2) long enough ( have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose) 3) is the hook properly cited - i.e. from the sources do you actually believe what the hook says? 4) policy considerations - no BLP problems, no verifiability problems, and a hard one - no plagiarism problems including close parallelism. How to check for copyright problems? - check the sources, maybe search for a strange phrase, use your judgement. Then put in the template you created for your hook "Reviewed:XYZ Darning Needles" or similar. Just being tough on you today - but it will help the guy whose hook you review, and will also help you next time you submit a DYK.
All the best,
Smallbones (talk) 23:07, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
On 6 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charleston Female Seminary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 19th-century American female seminary movement, which aimed to give women educational opportunities, lent its name to a pair of similarly named institutions in Charleston, South Carolina, and Charlestown, Massachusetts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charleston Female Seminary.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
On 6 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charlestown Female Seminary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 19th-century American female seminary movement, which aimed to give women educational opportunities, lent its name to a pair of similarly named institutions in Charleston, South Carolina, and Charlestown, Massachusetts? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
On 6 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Female seminary, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 19th-century American female seminary movement, which aimed to give women educational opportunities, lent its name to a pair of similarly named institutions in Charleston, South Carolina, and Charlestown, Massachusetts? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
...
Someone copied your sig...mostly.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Got Baileys? | |
This Irish coffee is for you to celebrate St. Patrick's Day and clear the palette before downing copious amounts of stout. Drink early, drink often! ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 14:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Just FYI, "See also" sections are generally put before "References" sections, not after. Just a convention, arguments can be made in support of either placement. Best, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 06:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Has this been brought to your attention? [ [4]] The HighBeam paywalled database people would like to improve the public profile of their database, and to accomplish this goal have offered to grant free access to diligent Wikipedians who fill out a short, two-line application prior to April 9. It sounds mildly interesting; I am frustrated by the amount of U.S. newspaper archival material that is stuck behind paywalls, and HighBeam apparently has access to a fair amount of it. At any rate I thought you should learn about this offer. Bigturtle ( talk) 05:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
So User:Brightgalrs, without once discussing it with anyone else, looking at the article histories, or bothering to read the talk pages (not to mention Wikipedia:Consensus) has suddenly shown up and made a massive 22,000 character addition to List of American Civil War Generals (Union) and a 307,000 character deletion from List of American Civil War Generals (Confederate), both of which (particularly the latter) drastically change the very nature of both articles. When asked why, the user insisted that her (?) way was "superior" and that she would allow for no discussion on this point from anyone. As another editor of the page, I'm turning to you and a few others to ask assistance in trying to reign in actions that frankly border on vandalism. While some of her changes are more than welcome (additions of photos of Union officers, for example), the wholesale elimination of notations that were being worked on and the changes is format, to say nothing of refusing to discuss it with anyone else - either before or after - are, in my opinion, invasive. May I ask for you to take a look and give your opinion on the matter? IcarusPhoenix ( talk) 20:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi 7&6=thirteen. Thank you for your fine work reviewing the article's DYK nomination. If doesn't meet the criteria for a DYK article that would appear on the mainpage as a DYK, then it won't appear on the mainpage as a DYK, but will remain be a little WP:STARTCLASS article. I'm fine with that. Thanks again.-- Shirt58 ( talk) 13:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Imzadi 1979 → 18:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Imzadi, I am (more or less) the sole editor of this new article. It has gotten nearly 18,000 views in the last 2 days. Lots of traffic. It needs a fresh set of eyes. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 18:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
{{#tag:ref||group="nb"|name=""}}
for doing
nested references. That way you aren't repeated the full citation inside the explanatory footnote.|deadurl= no
at the end of the citation template, the template will link the title to the original online source and list the archive link afterwards. Then if/when the link goes dead in the future, you just removed that deadurl parameter and the template switches to link to the archive as the title and put the original link later. Most online news articles will go dead when the publisher moves them behind a paywall or simply deletes the article from their website. The only caveat is that video is not archived, and I'm concerned by the number of online videos you've used.
Imzadi 1979
→ 18:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits and review on Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station, much appreciated !! I replied to your comment at Template:Did you know nominations/Humboldt Bay Life-Saving Station. Ellin Beltz ( talk) 19:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but nesting footnotes still elude me. Please tweak. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
You should see this. [5] ...William 15:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Catch me if you can.
...William 15:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld, The German Wikipedia has a nice article on this subject. I posted a long time ago asking for volunteers to interpret the article. It would be a good addition. I hesitate to ask you, although you seem to have the requisite proficiency. Any suggestions? 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 18:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
User:Gerda Arendt, User:Bermicourt are fluent German speakers but also very busy. I'm not I'm afraid. I use google translate and then request proof reading! Perhaps you could have a go at translating from de wiki using google translate and then ask one of them to check it for you?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
There is a Straw Poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 02:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Millie's been promoted to GA. :) Ladyof Shalott 13:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
We're getting real close to a natural benchmark. Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. 3,997,655 articles in English. How cool is that! 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 19:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mishipeshu , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Uyvsdi ( talk) 19:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
WHat was that message about? TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud ( talk) 19:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Stan, I've noticed that you are working hard on the Pierce Butler article and wanted to let you know that there are
several photos at Commons in case that helps. Cheers,
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 22:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your careful construction of a South Carolina entry for 270 King Street, Charleston, South Carolina, within List of Masonic buildings in the United States back in January. I just got around to restoring and expanding it. I considered developing separate articles for other South Carolina masonic buildings but ended up agreeing with your implicit judgment about that one being most notable in the state. So i just added back yours, bolstered with 5 or so references, mostly from the architect Devereux article. Thanks for your contribution. -- do ncr am 17:54, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
your cleaning up the recent vandalism at my user page. It is, I believe, the first time that this has happened ant it's comforting to know that there are folks such as yourself around to help out. Life is good. Einar aka Carptrash ( talk) 22:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
I had the chance to look at the Owney article, and made some changes. I imagine this article, with your improvements, will be much better viewed than most and may average at the 100-views-a-day mark for some time. A few readers may be troubled by a reference in one of your sources to a post office in "Hardacre, Minnesota." A quick search on a well-known search engine does not indicate that a substantial history exists for any town or settlement of that name. There is probably no good solution to this dilemma, as "Hardacre" is what the source says; it looks like a secondary-source misprint.
Should the article make a reference to the role of the New York-based St. Nicholas Magazine in developing Owney's image? I'll bet the pooch hopped the New York Central down the Hudson many times and his well-tagged collar repeatedly jingled in Manhattan, and his image would have gone nowhere with a leg (or paw) up from friends in the national media capital.
Does the USPS grant us the right to embed an image of the Forever Stamp honoring Owney? Bigturtle ( talk) 22:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
.....for getting back to me and explaining the process. It is, however typical of what happens. I have had several disputes over precedence being given to US versions of particular breeds, which, as in the case of the Akita, may differ considerably from those bred in the country of origin. The US version is almost always "bigger" or "cuter" or more brightly coloured than that at the source of origin. Amandajm ( talk) 03:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! You might like to take a look at the talk page of El Grande. I'm afraid that having seen the debris and blown the whistle, I was shattered by what happened. That tree, standing as isolated as it was after the other tall trees had been logged, was the most spectacular living thing that I have ever seen in my life. The El Grande talk page says rather more than is in the article, but because I am the source, and didn't put it in writing at the time, I can't publish it. The lesson that I have learnt from that is always issue properly prepared lecture notes with name, date and copyright.
I must say that if that tree had been in the US, then it would have been identified much sooner, World Heritage listed and be a major tourist attraction.
Part of the experience was that we met a man on the road whose vehicle had broken down. We gave him a lift, and the poor bugger found himself sitting in the back seat with a six-year-old conservationist who asked him all the hard questions that the adults in the front seat were avoiding: "Just exactly what work do you do in the forest? Oh, you drive a bull-dozer? And what do you bull-doze? Trees? Those big trees? The eagles' homes? And what do you do with the wombats when you bull-doze their burrows? You bait them before you bull-doze. What are baits?"
If you Google earth the map of Tasmania, much of the south looks beautifully green. When you zoom you become aware that the greenness is tidy rows of plantation timber, mainly pinus radiata. Australian fauna doesn't survive in pinus radiata forests.
I could rave on about this interminably...... Amandajm ( talk) 04:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Great tweaking of the citations for mail bag, mail sack, mail pouch, mail satchel, catcher pouch, Pony Express mochila, and portmanteau. Good job! Doug Coldwell talk 11:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Citation app 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 21:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Trying to sort out a few things here. I think that the archiving bot doesn't like the div tags but maybe it will come around tomorrow and actually do the archiving now that I've moved it. You also have an index which wasn't showing properly and I've had to kluge it because something appears wrong with the template. The odd link presentation in your archive box is a side effect.
Are you able to create the above linked page with just any simple text like "hello"? ...or were you trying to copy over from your talk when doing it?
—
Berean Hunter
(talk) 15:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
If you receive this message when trying to edit, create or move an existing page, follow these instructions:
You may also contact any administrator on their talk page or by e-mail. Be sure to specify the exact title of the page you are trying to create or edit, and if it might be misunderstood (for example, an article with an unusual name), consider explaining briefly what you want to do. If you wrote any text, save it temporarily on your computer until you can edit the page. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Misza bots are just plain buggy since May when something went wrong at toolserver.org. I notice that May 25 was the last time it archived your page so the timeline matches. Without being able to get an answer from Misza13 you can archive manually or switch to ClueBot III. That's the only solution I can see for now. Brad ( talk) 20:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Ditto :) ComputerJA ( talk) 19:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)