![]() Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using {{
School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
![]() |
Hello, I'm
Trusilver. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made to
Incest, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Trusilver
17:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Brisk tradition and Soloveitchik dynasty has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Brisk tradition and Soloveitchik dynasty was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://tzedek-tzedek.blogspot.com/2012/08/marrying-soloveitchik.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
20:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
Ahron Soloveichik, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links. Thank you.
Your edit
here to
Ahron Soloveichik was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://haemtza.blogspot.com/2011/10/on-10-th-yahrzeit-of-my-rebbe.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
20:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Brooklyn Law School may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Rijinatwiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
The North Face because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Rijin
Talk
17:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page
Diego Schwartzman, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
Diego Schwartzman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://twitter.com/dieschwartzman) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
21:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Re: == Vandalism; possible conflict of interest ==
Hello, I would like to respond to what you wrote concerning my changes to Shana Maddoff's page. As you must have noticed, I did not delete everything and in fact had left many of the footnotes. The problem with the previous page was that it had inaccuracies concerning the hard facts, such as the birth date, birth place etc. In an attempt to rectify the dates and names I also realised that much of the text was based on speculations despite the sources, such as Madoff's 'untimely' involvement with Eric Swanson. It was (and now is again) as such not a neutral portrayal of the person presented but leaves no doubt as to what the editor believes is the 'truth' concerning Shana Swanson's involvement in the scandal - in other words it is a biased presentation that that may also stem from a possible conflict of interest?! I suggest that the 'hard facts' be changed back to what I had entered. The rest may lie on the editor's conscience. In general I strongly feel that caution should be used when describing a person's private life and involvement in a matter so tremendous, especially when guilt has so far not been proven.
( Krass08 ( talk) 22:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC))
You tried it. 70.60.96.165 ( talk) 03:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
How can a non-practicing Jew be said to have a religion? That's absurd. And that's not "clear by all the other uses of this infobox on WP". Furthermore, his Bar Mitzvah is irrelevant to his religion as an adult; see WP:BLPCAT. Beyond the fact that you have added incorrect information, your edit has been challenged. Get consensus on the talk page before restoring it. Sundayclose ( talk) 01:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Stanley Milgram. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose ( talk) 01:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on other people again, as you did at
Talk:Stanley Milgram, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Sundayclose (
talk)
02:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Jeppiz (
talk)
16:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for
inappropriate discussions, as you did at
Talk:Jews. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
02:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
"for the purpose of discussing how to improve articles."
Just read this. It is exactly what I am doing. It says - "An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following:
I as that says want to draw a wider range of informed but uninvolved editors to a discussion by placing a note on the talk page of one or more articles directly related to the topic under discussion.
And read what wikipedia says. The talk page of one or more articles. Plural is absolutely, 100 per cent perfect. You cannot say, I, and editor, don't care what wikipedia says.
How in the world can you disagree with that? It leads to the people who are uninvolved but informed helping discuss something, where the involved editors had a problem because there were just two of them. That has to be good. That helps us not have different results in different places on the exact same subject. You should be giving me a medal. Not trying to shut me up. This is why people stop contributing. 199.102.168.8 ( talk) 02:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
More than one article is as you can see quite fine.
You agree dont you that posting the same message on multiple talk pages is exactly what wikipedia says when is says "articles".
Are they related? You have to read the discussion to see. If you are too busy then you can't tell either way.
And if you read the discussion, the question at the center of it is whether Milgrim was Jewish. That is directly related for example to Who is a Jew. Certainly the people who watch that page are exactly the sort of informed (on the subject of who is a Jew) editors that could help.
Same with "Jews." Why? That starts with an explanation as to who they are. The discussion is whether Milgram was one of them.
Also - as you will have now seen from the discussion, a central argument turned around whether one isn't Jewish if they are not practicing, and the people who discussed Jewish atheists are certainly informed on this issue.
Maybe you were hasty? You seemed to think that nobody can post on multiple pages that attract informed editors? But now see that that is what wikipedia itself says is proper and ok? And that wikipedia says you dont have to limit yourself to a wikiproject but can leave such messages at articles talk pages that are directly related?
The goal is to get informed editors who want to to discuss it. That is all. And as wikipedia says it is ok to post on more than one talk page, all of these are directly related to the issues of whether milgram was jewish, and whether (well, we do know he was in synagogue for his bar mitzvah and marriage and said he was very jewish and was a lifelong identifier with judaism according to his main biographer) has to have said more than he did or been recorded as being in synagogue more than he was recorded to be considered jewish by wikipedia in an information box. 199.102.168.8 ( talk) 03:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Amortias. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Hot Wheels without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Intelligent
sium
01:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
2601:1C0:107:71C3:704B:3255:9741:9C1B. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
2601:1C0:107:71C3:704B:3255:9741:9C1B (
talk)
01:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Liberal Democrats (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
David J Johnson (
talk)
18:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, although if you wish to acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome! Sm8900 ( talk) 02:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
![]() Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a
soft block using {{
School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
![]() |
Hello, I'm
Trusilver. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made to
Incest, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Trusilver
17:31, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Brisk tradition and Soloveitchik dynasty has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Brisk tradition and Soloveitchik dynasty was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://tzedek-tzedek.blogspot.com/2012/08/marrying-soloveitchik.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
20:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page
Ahron Soloveichik, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links. Thank you.
Your edit
here to
Ahron Soloveichik was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://haemtza.blogspot.com/2011/10/on-10-th-yahrzeit-of-my-rebbe.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
20:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Brooklyn Law School may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Rijinatwiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
The North Face because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Rijin
Talk
17:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page
Diego Schwartzman, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
Diego Schwartzman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
https://twitter.com/dieschwartzman) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a
blog,
forum,
free web hosting service,
fansite, or similar site (see
'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's
copyright (see
Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised,
reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see
conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
21:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
If this is a shared
IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Re: == Vandalism; possible conflict of interest ==
Hello, I would like to respond to what you wrote concerning my changes to Shana Maddoff's page. As you must have noticed, I did not delete everything and in fact had left many of the footnotes. The problem with the previous page was that it had inaccuracies concerning the hard facts, such as the birth date, birth place etc. In an attempt to rectify the dates and names I also realised that much of the text was based on speculations despite the sources, such as Madoff's 'untimely' involvement with Eric Swanson. It was (and now is again) as such not a neutral portrayal of the person presented but leaves no doubt as to what the editor believes is the 'truth' concerning Shana Swanson's involvement in the scandal - in other words it is a biased presentation that that may also stem from a possible conflict of interest?! I suggest that the 'hard facts' be changed back to what I had entered. The rest may lie on the editor's conscience. In general I strongly feel that caution should be used when describing a person's private life and involvement in a matter so tremendous, especially when guilt has so far not been proven.
( Krass08 ( talk) 22:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC))
You tried it. 70.60.96.165 ( talk) 03:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
How can a non-practicing Jew be said to have a religion? That's absurd. And that's not "clear by all the other uses of this infobox on WP". Furthermore, his Bar Mitzvah is irrelevant to his religion as an adult; see WP:BLPCAT. Beyond the fact that you have added incorrect information, your edit has been challenged. Get consensus on the talk page before restoring it. Sundayclose ( talk) 01:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Stanley Milgram. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose ( talk) 01:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on other people again, as you did at
Talk:Stanley Milgram, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Sundayclose (
talk)
02:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for
inappropriate discussion, you may be
blocked from editing.
Jeppiz (
talk)
16:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for
inappropriate discussions, as you did at
Talk:Jews. —
Malik Shabazz
Talk/
Stalk
02:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
"for the purpose of discussing how to improve articles."
Just read this. It is exactly what I am doing. It says - "An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following:
I as that says want to draw a wider range of informed but uninvolved editors to a discussion by placing a note on the talk page of one or more articles directly related to the topic under discussion.
And read what wikipedia says. The talk page of one or more articles. Plural is absolutely, 100 per cent perfect. You cannot say, I, and editor, don't care what wikipedia says.
How in the world can you disagree with that? It leads to the people who are uninvolved but informed helping discuss something, where the involved editors had a problem because there were just two of them. That has to be good. That helps us not have different results in different places on the exact same subject. You should be giving me a medal. Not trying to shut me up. This is why people stop contributing. 199.102.168.8 ( talk) 02:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
More than one article is as you can see quite fine.
You agree dont you that posting the same message on multiple talk pages is exactly what wikipedia says when is says "articles".
Are they related? You have to read the discussion to see. If you are too busy then you can't tell either way.
And if you read the discussion, the question at the center of it is whether Milgrim was Jewish. That is directly related for example to Who is a Jew. Certainly the people who watch that page are exactly the sort of informed (on the subject of who is a Jew) editors that could help.
Same with "Jews." Why? That starts with an explanation as to who they are. The discussion is whether Milgram was one of them.
Also - as you will have now seen from the discussion, a central argument turned around whether one isn't Jewish if they are not practicing, and the people who discussed Jewish atheists are certainly informed on this issue.
Maybe you were hasty? You seemed to think that nobody can post on multiple pages that attract informed editors? But now see that that is what wikipedia itself says is proper and ok? And that wikipedia says you dont have to limit yourself to a wikiproject but can leave such messages at articles talk pages that are directly related?
The goal is to get informed editors who want to to discuss it. That is all. And as wikipedia says it is ok to post on more than one talk page, all of these are directly related to the issues of whether milgram was jewish, and whether (well, we do know he was in synagogue for his bar mitzvah and marriage and said he was very jewish and was a lifelong identifier with judaism according to his main biographer) has to have said more than he did or been recorded as being in synagogue more than he was recorded to be considered jewish by wikipedia in an information box. 199.102.168.8 ( talk) 03:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Amortias. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Hot Wheels without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
21:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Intelligent
sium
01:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
2601:1C0:107:71C3:704B:3255:9741:9C1B. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
2601:1C0:107:71C3:704B:3255:9741:9C1B (
talk)
01:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Liberal Democrats (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
David J Johnson (
talk)
18:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, although if you wish to acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome! Sm8900 ( talk) 02:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |