Toolbox |
»Vandalism → UTM • RC • HUG • TW |
»Wikipedia → AfD • BL • DYK • FAC • FAR • GAN ( vg) • GAR • RfA |
»Admin → DASH • AIV • AN • ANI • RAA • RFPP • UAA • RM • AC/N • IANB |
»Tools → AP • ATS • CIU • ELC • GLBCON • IPL • OEC • PHS • PROJ • SQL • WCHKR • WLH • WHOIS |
»Other → COPY • CSD • DEL • NP • NUL • PARSE • UBX ( vg) • UW-warn |
Toolbox format |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled(
add request ·
view requests)
Hello! I believe I've shown a sufficient track record of creating valid articles, and I plan to continue doing so. In particular, I have a list of red links with potential that I plan to create articles for in the near future, and I don't want to fill up the new page feed if I don't have to. Thanks for your time and consideration! Bsoyka ( t • c • g) 06:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser(
add request ·
view requests)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo ( talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand ( talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed(
add request ·
view requests)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed(
add request ·
view requests)
So last night I made over 50-70 edits on the page Jim Cornette in order to hit 500 edits so I can edit more articles about politics because I was limited on what I could edit. Last night I didn't know I was breaking the rules, I found out when an administrator went on my talk page and said I lost extended confirmed status. He also told me I can't be trusted with extended confirmed status because those 50-70 edits weren't genuine. I think I can be trusted, I went over 2 months with making over 400 edits, and throughout those 2 months I haven't been blocked once and most my edits were productive, there were hardly any mistakes so I got hardly any warnings throughout the months. And when I hit 500 edits I edited the page about Hamas, my edits were constructive and I added valuable information and images to the page. I'm here to make pages better, if I get extended confirmed status again there won't be original research, edit warring, or vandalism, I've made hundreds of edits without doing that. So can I be trusted and get my extended confirmed thing back. I didn't know gaming extended confirmed isnt allowed. I had no idea, if I did I wouldn't have did it, I didnt know doing that was a problem, you might say I have to make a few hundread more constructive edits, Ive already made 420-430 of them in the past 2 months. And also it'll probably take a long time to get a few hundred more edits, I'm busy most of the day, I have a job and 3 kids to take care of. HumansRightsIsCool ( talk) 01:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request extended confirmed user rights. I have come across several articles on Wikipedia that are incomplete or contain misleading information, and are currently under the extended confirmed protection policy. I believe these articles require attention and correction. Granting me extended confirmed user permissions would enable me to amend and improve these articles. Thank you for considering my request. IamAnisurrahman ( talk) 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover(
add request ·
view requests)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer(
add request ·
view requests)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
With my expertise in the field, I am confident in my ability to assist fellow Wikipedians in reviewing newly created articles on Iranian art and culture, with a particular focus on modern and contemporary art. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute in this capacity and respectfully request the necessary permissions to do so. Persian-art-and-culture ( talk) 10:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Experience with AfC reviewing, as well as tagging pages for CSD (although I do not often tag pages for CSD). I meet all of the criteria, and have read the expectations and requirements for this role. I am looking to be a new page reviewer to try out new avenues for ways I can contribute to Wikipedia. I have a page for my AfC reviews, for easy viewing. OnlyNano talk 18:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover(
add request ·
view requests)
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm a somewhat active AfC reviewer and new page patroller, so I often have to move pages to and from draftspace. Page mover rights will help reduce the number of R2 tags in the backlog. I also have some prior experience in RMs. Thanks for considering my request. (please
I am an active AfC reviewer, and I frequently move pages, either from userspace to draftspace, or publishing articles. My request for this privilege comes from my anti-vandalism work (which I am highly involved in). I notice several sleeper accounts, in their early stages, however I am unable to effectively take action with move vandalism in a productive manner. OnlyNano talk 15:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Was granted page mover for a few months; now requesting it to be extended as the expiry date is coming up. I admit in the interim I earned a 24h block for a 3RR violation that I had to learn from, so I understand if that's a reason it would be appropriate to decline this. Remsense 诉 19:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. Toadette Edit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer(
add request ·
view requests)
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf ( Chat Edits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RCP for a little while now, and recently started NPP. I believe I could assist in patrolling recent changes to expand on my anti-vandalism work. Thanks, Lord serious pig 06:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Have experience in monitoring recent changes and believe this tool would help in improving Wikipedia as I generally know the difference between constructive and unconstructive changes MarksmanRifle ( talk) 23:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback(
add request ·
view requests)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lord serious pig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Have been participating in counter vandalism for a while now and have developed strong interest in continuing in this area of editing. I request this right to enhance my counter vandalism capacity. Ednabrenze ( talk) 07:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Mainly patrol the recent changes page for problematic edits, and believe that rollback would assist further with the most obvious vandalism MarksmanRifle ( talk) 23:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor(
add request ·
view requests)
I am a frequent editor and creator of templates and modules, and I have encountered several instances where having the template editor permission would be helpful. Many of my requested edits on protected templates have been performing minor visual fixes or fixing small bugs with the template's logic. For these uncontroversial edits, having to submit a request and involve another editor feels unnecessary, considering the nature of the requested edits. In other cases with more significant changes, going through the edit request process works fine for the most part, but I like to be able to avoid the process because of the backlog the edit queue can have at times and the added potential confusion added by having to request technical changes. Because of this, I'd much rather be able to have a standard discussion on template talk pages, if necessary, followed by implementing the agreed upon changes myself rather than having to request someone else to implement the changes. In the near future, I plan on exploring adding support for the new dark mode to more templates and being able to implement these changes on protected templates myself would be of great help. In the future, I would also like to use my technical knowledge of wikitext and Lua to help with processing the template edit request queue. Another issue that the template editor permission would resolve is that several templates I've created or rewrote are now template editor protected: Template:For-multi, Template:Country name, Template:Yearly archive list/display, Template:Visible anchor/styles.css, Template:Divbox/styles.css, and Module:Outdent. As a result, I am unable to edit them, which makes several of them difficult to maintain. Per the guidelines, three templates sandboxes I've worked on include Module:Jcon/sandbox, Template:Visible anchor/sandbox/styles.css, and Template:Infobox road/sandbox and at some requested template edits are [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Also, I acknowledge that I performed what ended up being (unintentionally) disruptive templates several years ago. Since then, I have learned a lot about collaborating with others on Wikipedia and being mindful of the impact template edits can have on articles across the wiki. Since then, I have been much more careful with the edits I perform, as these past experiences have shown me the dangers of not doing so. With the template edit permission, I intend to take from these past mistakes, and I will follow the best practices to ensure the template edits I perform are well-tested, agreed upon, and non-disruptive. I find that now I am very cautious with my template edits, and I always create thorough test cases (e.g. Template:Jcon/testcases) before performing changes. – BrandonXLF ( talk) 19:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
Toolbox |
»Vandalism → UTM • RC • HUG • TW |
»Wikipedia → AfD • BL • DYK • FAC • FAR • GAN ( vg) • GAR • RfA |
»Admin → DASH • AIV • AN • ANI • RAA • RFPP • UAA • RM • AC/N • IANB |
»Tools → AP • ATS • CIU • ELC • GLBCON • IPL • OEC • PHS • PROJ • SQL • WCHKR • WLH • WHOIS |
»Other → COPY • CSD • DEL • NP • NUL • PARSE • UBX ( vg) • UW-warn |
Toolbox format |
Immediate requests | Entries |
---|---|
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 103 |
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 52 |
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests | 72 |
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests | 17 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 4 |
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 193 |
Requested RD1 redactions | 4 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 10 |
Open sockpuppet investigations | 246 |
Click here to locate other admin backlogs |
|
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: | ||||||||||||||||
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 8 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 39 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently Requested RD1 redactions – 4 items
|
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled(
add request ·
view requests)
Hello! I believe I've shown a sufficient track record of creating valid articles, and I plan to continue doing so. In particular, I have a list of red links with potential that I plan to create articles for in the near future, and I don't want to fill up the new page feed if I don't have to. Thanks for your time and consideration! Bsoyka ( t • c • g) 06:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser(
add request ·
view requests)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo ( talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand ( talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed(
add request ·
view requests)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed(
add request ·
view requests)
So last night I made over 50-70 edits on the page Jim Cornette in order to hit 500 edits so I can edit more articles about politics because I was limited on what I could edit. Last night I didn't know I was breaking the rules, I found out when an administrator went on my talk page and said I lost extended confirmed status. He also told me I can't be trusted with extended confirmed status because those 50-70 edits weren't genuine. I think I can be trusted, I went over 2 months with making over 400 edits, and throughout those 2 months I haven't been blocked once and most my edits were productive, there were hardly any mistakes so I got hardly any warnings throughout the months. And when I hit 500 edits I edited the page about Hamas, my edits were constructive and I added valuable information and images to the page. I'm here to make pages better, if I get extended confirmed status again there won't be original research, edit warring, or vandalism, I've made hundreds of edits without doing that. So can I be trusted and get my extended confirmed thing back. I didn't know gaming extended confirmed isnt allowed. I had no idea, if I did I wouldn't have did it, I didnt know doing that was a problem, you might say I have to make a few hundread more constructive edits, Ive already made 420-430 of them in the past 2 months. And also it'll probably take a long time to get a few hundred more edits, I'm busy most of the day, I have a job and 3 kids to take care of. HumansRightsIsCool ( talk) 01:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request extended confirmed user rights. I have come across several articles on Wikipedia that are incomplete or contain misleading information, and are currently under the extended confirmed protection policy. I believe these articles require attention and correction. Granting me extended confirmed user permissions would enable me to amend and improve these articles. Thank you for considering my request. IamAnisurrahman ( talk) 07:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
---|
File mover(
add request ·
view requests)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer(
add request ·
view requests)
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami ( talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar 💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
With my expertise in the field, I am confident in my ability to assist fellow Wikipedians in reviewing newly created articles on Iranian art and culture, with a particular focus on modern and contemporary art. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute in this capacity and respectfully request the necessary permissions to do so. Persian-art-and-culture ( talk) 10:59, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Experience with AfC reviewing, as well as tagging pages for CSD (although I do not often tag pages for CSD). I meet all of the criteria, and have read the expectations and requirements for this role. I am looking to be a new page reviewer to try out new avenues for ways I can contribute to Wikipedia. I have a page for my AfC reviews, for easy viewing. OnlyNano talk 18:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover(
add request ·
view requests)
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord ( talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm a somewhat active AfC reviewer and new page patroller, so I often have to move pages to and from draftspace. Page mover rights will help reduce the number of R2 tags in the backlog. I also have some prior experience in RMs. Thanks for considering my request. (please
I am an active AfC reviewer, and I frequently move pages, either from userspace to draftspace, or publishing articles. My request for this privilege comes from my anti-vandalism work (which I am highly involved in). I notice several sleeper accounts, in their early stages, however I am unable to effectively take action with move vandalism in a productive manner. OnlyNano talk 15:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Was granted page mover for a few months; now requesting it to be extended as the expiry date is coming up. I admit in the interim I earned a 24h block for a 3RR violation that I had to learn from, so I understand if that's a reason it would be appropriate to decline this. Remsense 诉 19:17, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. Toadette Edit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer(
add request ·
view requests)
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf ( Chat Edits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RCP for a little while now, and recently started NPP. I believe I could assist in patrolling recent changes to expand on my anti-vandalism work. Thanks, Lord serious pig 06:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Have experience in monitoring recent changes and believe this tool would help in improving Wikipedia as I generally know the difference between constructive and unconstructive changes MarksmanRifle ( talk) 23:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback(
add request ·
view requests)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lord serious pig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Have been participating in counter vandalism for a while now and have developed strong interest in continuing in this area of editing. I request this right to enhance my counter vandalism capacity. Ednabrenze ( talk) 07:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Mainly patrol the recent changes page for problematic edits, and believe that rollback would assist further with the most obvious vandalism MarksmanRifle ( talk) 23:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor(
add request ·
view requests)
I am a frequent editor and creator of templates and modules, and I have encountered several instances where having the template editor permission would be helpful. Many of my requested edits on protected templates have been performing minor visual fixes or fixing small bugs with the template's logic. For these uncontroversial edits, having to submit a request and involve another editor feels unnecessary, considering the nature of the requested edits. In other cases with more significant changes, going through the edit request process works fine for the most part, but I like to be able to avoid the process because of the backlog the edit queue can have at times and the added potential confusion added by having to request technical changes. Because of this, I'd much rather be able to have a standard discussion on template talk pages, if necessary, followed by implementing the agreed upon changes myself rather than having to request someone else to implement the changes. In the near future, I plan on exploring adding support for the new dark mode to more templates and being able to implement these changes on protected templates myself would be of great help. In the future, I would also like to use my technical knowledge of wikitext and Lua to help with processing the template edit request queue. Another issue that the template editor permission would resolve is that several templates I've created or rewrote are now template editor protected: Template:For-multi, Template:Country name, Template:Yearly archive list/display, Template:Visible anchor/styles.css, Template:Divbox/styles.css, and Module:Outdent. As a result, I am unable to edit them, which makes several of them difficult to maintain. Per the guidelines, three templates sandboxes I've worked on include Module:Jcon/sandbox, Template:Visible anchor/sandbox/styles.css, and Template:Infobox road/sandbox and at some requested template edits are [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Also, I acknowledge that I performed what ended up being (unintentionally) disruptive templates several years ago. Since then, I have learned a lot about collaborating with others on Wikipedia and being mindful of the impact template edits can have on articles across the wiki. Since then, I have been much more careful with the edits I perform, as these past experiences have shown me the dangers of not doing so. With the template edit permission, I intend to take from these past mistakes, and I will follow the best practices to ensure the template edits I perform are well-tested, agreed upon, and non-disruptive. I find that now I am very cautious with my template edits, and I always create thorough test cases (e.g. Template:Jcon/testcases) before performing changes. – BrandonXLF ( talk) 19:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |