This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the page of all the approved nominations for the " Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the third-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the post-expand include size limit.
The article notes: "Ms Chang does not delve into the Pacific ties that might have made such a man. She does say that, during the gold rush, many Californians shipped their laundry to be cleaned in Hong Kong, at $1 a shirt. If this is true--and it is a staggering proposition, given that the Pacific Mail Steamship Company made just a dozen sailings a year, taking 33 days--then the subject deserves a chapter, not just the briefest of mentions."
Cunard ( talk) 11:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC).
Rjjiii ( talk · contribs), I think the hook is fine. Although the source questions the accuracy of the statement, the source verifies that the book makes this statement. Here are sources that verify that people in California during the gold rush era sent their laundry to Hong Kong:
This is not a reliable source as the author is a eugenicist. But I am including it here as it's the earliest source I can find that mentions that California gold miners shipped their laundry to Hong Kong. The book notes: "Apparently eggs from Hong Kong, Canton then were being shipped here with California miners' returned laundry."
The book notes: "When the Gold Rush started, some of the San Franciscans sent their laundry to Honolulu and even to Hong Kong by sailing vessel because there was no one around to do it. By sailing vessel, it required about forty days for a round trip to Honolulu and about sixty days to Hong Kong."
The book notes: "Rich gold miners who didn't have a laundry nearby sent their shirts out to be washed, starched, and ironed-in Hong Kong, China! It cost as much as a dollar a shirt and took two to four months for the shirts to make the round-trip."
The book notes: "In the early days of the Gold Rush, Euroamerican men shipped their soiled laundry to Hong Kong or Honolulu for cleaning, and received it again after two or three months."
The book notes: "As the San Francisco economy boomed with hopeful gold seekers, the city experienced continual labor shortages throughout the 1850s and 1860s. It was cheaper for male miners who refused to wash their own clothes, for example, either to send their dirty laundry on a clipper ship to Hong Kong or Honolulu to be washed or to simply throw it away, than to pay the rates to have their clothes done locally."
The book notes: "I am describing the mid-nineteenth-century genesis of Chinese laundry shops (yi-shan-guan in Chinese) during and after the California Gold Rush. Due to the perception of laundry as women's work and the scarcity of women in California during the Gold Rush era, the local cost for doing laundry was exorbitant. Miners, both white and Chinese, routinely shipped their laundry to Honolulu and even Hong Kong for cleaning and pressing. Even then, the price was high and the process took four months. As Iris Chang describes in The Chinese in America, Chinese entrepreneurs took advantage of this economic opportunity and created local laundry shops."
The book notes: "The perception by most whites that washing was work demeaning to men, together with the absence of women on the Western frontier, made laundry a service in demand. Before the arrival of the Chinese, and with California labor in short supply and hence expensive, dirty laundry was routed to Hong Kong to be washed for $12 a dozen items, and then later to Hawaii for $8 a dozen. But Chinese entrepreneurs in San Francisco saw the potential profits in doing the washing themselves on the West Coast, and prices dropped to $5 a dozen as shipping and handling costs decreased. Soon, local laundries replaced the overseas ones."
This source predates the 2003 book Chinese in America and discusses how laundry was shipped from San Francisco to Hawaii which cost $8 and took six to eight weeks.
The book notes: "But it cost money for the San Franciscans to achieve such stylishness and respectability, for the laundry bills were terrific. In order to have their linen washed, starched and ironed to the right degree of whiteness and rigidity cost them eight dollars per dozen, sometimes even more. The men didn't mind paying from three to five dollars for an order of ham and eggs or a steak, but eight dollars just to scrub and iron some pieces of shirt was an excessive price. So there were grumblings aplenty. And not only that, there was also the annoyance of waiting from six to eight weeks for one's laundry to come back each time one sent it off, for mostly they were shipped to the Hawaiian Islands to be washed. And then the shirts might return with buttons missing or collars separated."
The book notes: "3: Number of months it took prospectors to get their clean clothes back before Wah Lee opened San Francisco's first Chinese laundry in 1851. Prior to that, there were so few laundries that miners sent dirty clothes by ship to Hong Kong, where they were cleaned, pressed, and then shipped back."
The book notes: "By the mid-1800s, some people, mostly white, had managed to get rich in the Gold Rush. ... They often thought of laundry as a "woman's job," and therefore, beneath them. Without many other options, it became pretty common for people to ship their laundry all the way to Hong Kong to be cleaned. This took nearly four months and cost about twelve dollars for a dozen shirts, which is equal to about four hundred dollars today. Still, this was way cheaper than the alternative, to send the clothes back to the East Coast of the United States to be cleaned. Remember, the Transcontinental Rail- road wasn't finished yet, so the laundry would have had to go by boat all the way around the continent or over land on a wagon. Hong Kong was the best option for people with the money to spend on laundry, and so the shipment of clothing back and forth across the Pacific Ocean became another link between the coasts of the United States and China, another lane on the highway connecting Chinese Americans between their two lands. In the middle of the Pacific Ocean, and closer to San Francisco than to Hong Kong, you will find the islands of Hawai'i. By the mid-1800s, Hawai'i had become a stopover for people and goods as they went back and forth between China and the West Coast of the continental United States. The rich people who had been shipping their laundry to Hong Kong now had a closer, more affordable option. Instead of spending twelve dollars to have a dozen shirts washed in Hong Kong, they could spend eight dollars to have a dozen shirts washed in Honolulu."
The book notes: "As the gold fever cooled, there was a shift in Chinese business patterns, first from mining to laundries, and then to railway construction. The second was the result of quintessentially Chinese entrepreneurship. The Chinese noticed that people in California were prepared to pay for laundry services, which involved shipping to the East Coast, Honolulu and even Hong Kong, which were all both costly and took time. It was obviously beneficial for customers to pay $5 for a dozen shirts rather than $12, and to receive the shirts in a few days rather than up to four months."
The book notes: "A similar story unfolded on the Pacific coast of the Americas. North American trade with Asia and Australia grew rapidly in the 1860s and 1870s, but failed to live up to that potential in subsequent years. In the first years of the gold rush, prices for goods and labour in California were so high that laundry was famously sent from San Francisco to Hong Kong to be washed. By the end of the 1850s, California had begun shipping wheat, quicksilver, hides, lumber, oats, beans, potatoes and wool across the Pacific to Asia and the Australian"
The book notes: "Most of the men who arrived in California to hunt for gold came alone. Mining was dirty, dusty work, but washing grimy, mud-caked clothes was considered a "woman's job." Some of the more successful single men shipped dirty clothes to Hong Kong and waited months for their return. For the rest, since local Spanish and Native American women charged too high a price, Chinese men filled the void. Within a few years, the Chinese came to dominate the laundry business in San Francisco."
Cunard ( talk) 09:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. You're right. Rather than doing a review, I'd like to offer an alternative hook. Since multiple university press sources state it as a fact, could we run a hook that also presents it as a historical fact? Like this:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Very good article, balanced in tone and content. ALT1 hook works well. Good to go.
Onceinawhile (
talk)
17:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
CSJJ104 ( talk) 21:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I assume good faith on the references that I can't access, and it's helpful that the nominator included the relevant text. The promoter can choose the hook.
SL93 (
talk)
00:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hybernator ( talk) 00:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
ZKang123 ( talk) 01:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Got GA status 5 days ago, so the article and its hook is okay. I omitted the word "rare" because the sources don't exactly state that this type of protest is rare in Singapore. If the nominator can provide source for the claim then I will reverse it.
Mehedi Abedin
13:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, according to Public demonstrations in Singapore, yes they are rare.-- ZKang123 ( talk) 14:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
CurryTime7-24 ( talk) 01:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
Toadboy123 ( talk) 07:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
Ornithoptera ( talk) 01:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
Kimikel ( talk) 00:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, plagiarism free and a QPQ is done. ALT0 is cited and interesting, but (from my reading) ALT1 might not work: isn't it that the fort was named after the princess, and the museum is named after the fort? So slightly different in the hook to the article. I might be overthinking though!
Lajmmoore (
talk)
13:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
SL93 ( talk) 00:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
Ergo Sum 15:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Can we say "co-consecrated" instead of "consecrated" in the hook to reflect the citation more accurately?
Sohom (
talk)
03:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 20:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
All sources verified. Good to go with main or either ALT.
Hawkeye7
(discuss)
20:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Sounder Bruce 02:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
Turini2 ( talk) 12:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Some problems need fixing.
TheNuggeteer (
talk)
02:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
🍗TheNugg
eteer🍗
23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 19:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Looks good. Nice work. AGF on hook source.
BeanieFan11 (
talk)
20:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kimikel ( talk) 01:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
Valereee ( talk) 17:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Great expansion; very informative article on a local delicacy. QPQ and Earwig all good. The problem is the hook, which is misleadingly written in
wikivoice. The hook needs to make clear that it is not stating an objective fact, but referring to an opinion from the cited source. —
CurryTime7-24 (
talk)
21:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Ping CurryTime7-24 -- does one of these work for you? Valereee ( talk) 17:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Storye book ( talk) 09:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
Bluethricecreamman ( talk) 03:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
awkwafaba (
📥)
16:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
@
Bluethricecreamman: Thank you for your hard work. Please fix copyvios and sourcing issues and then we can proceed.
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 19:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Epicgenius (
talk)
15:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
4meter4 ( talk) 17:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
The trees thrived in the rich volcanic soil, and by the early 1900s, São Tomé and Príncipe was the biggest exporter of cacao in the world, earning it the nickname of 'The Chocolate Islands'.
Yue 🌙 07:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 17:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
no concerns; it's a new GA. prefer ALT1 as clearer and hook-ier to a general audience. good work! ...
sawyer * he/they *
talk
01:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Faldi00 ( talk) 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
― Howard • 🌽33 20:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
"At first, it was all for fun, but suddenly it went super fast and I was busy with it full time."Per DYK guidelines, the hook fact needs to also have a footnote directly following it; I would put one where the fact appears in both the lead and body.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
Howardcorn33: Meets criteria, Earwig clear, very well-sourced, image is CC licensed, just a couple of tweaks needed. –
T
C
Memoire
14:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Op welke dag ben jij jarig? 🎉 Michiel 6 april & Celine 8 december!
CeeGee 15:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Great work! I'm currently in Turkey and I enjoyed reading and reviewing the article, and it looks like it has no obvious issues from what I can see. I'm partial to the second hook but open to either hook being used depending on the final decision of the closing reviewer. --
Sky Harbor (
talk)
16:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 06:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC).
Sahaib ( talk) 13:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
I am concerned about the hook for
WP:BLP focusing on the negative aspects of his career. Can you share some alternatives?
AnotherColonialHistorian (
talk)
15:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
48 JCL 16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Going to review this one, since my DYK nomination has a distribution in Botswana as well. Was on DYK previously, but guidelines were changed to allow for renominations after 5 years (previous inclusion was in 2012). New enough, long enough, sourced, neutral, and plagiarism free. Hook is cited and interesting. I'm going to hold on to the confirmation temporarily to ensure whether @
48JCL: wants to include the photograph as well, since there appears to be a caption but there is no photograph included in the template.
Ornithoptera (
talk)
01:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 03:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Ready to go.
Sahaib (
talk)
15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Laun chba ller 09:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC).
Pretzelles ( talk) 21:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Promoted to GA on 5 July. The following sentence lacks an inline citation: "In 2010, Lofaro published Southern Manuscript Sermons before 1800: A Bibliography, dedicating the work to Davis and noting him as one of four contributing editors."
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Moved to mainspace on 12 July. The synopsis doesn't need citations. For this DYK nomination, only one QPQ is needed, as the nominator had four nominations beforehand.
Skyshifter
talk
23:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
SL93 ( talk) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Thank you for this useful article, on a subject which needs to be written about.
When a source is found for the above fact, this nomination should be good to go.
Storye book (
talk)
09:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
AbhiSuryawanshi ( talk) 21:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
awkwafaba (
📥)
15:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Llewee ( talk) 01:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC).
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy ( talk) 09:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go.
Thriley (
talk)
20:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
– T C Memoire 10:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
Kev min § 15:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I like ALT0 the best, but both are cleared
awkwafaba (
📥)
02:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Looks good. Nice work.
BeanieFan11 (
talk)
20:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
In 1941, he was appointed head of Boulden House, the junior school at TCS, ... the former junior school headmaster also held the title of Most Honourable, the Eighth Marquess of Ely ... .
In 1941, he was appointed head of Boulden House, the junior school at TCS, ... the former junior school headmaster also held the title of Most Honourable, the Eighth Marquess of Ely ... .
Lord Ely doesn't use the title at all in Canada ... .
RONIN TALK 20:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
This page transcludes a subset of the nominations found on the page of all the approved nominations for the " Did you know" section of the Main Page. It only transcludes the nominations filed under dates of the third-most recent week. The page is intended to allow editors to easily review recent nominations that may not be displaying correctly on the complete page of approved nominations if that page's contents are causing the page to hit the post-expand include size limit.
The article notes: "Ms Chang does not delve into the Pacific ties that might have made such a man. She does say that, during the gold rush, many Californians shipped their laundry to be cleaned in Hong Kong, at $1 a shirt. If this is true--and it is a staggering proposition, given that the Pacific Mail Steamship Company made just a dozen sailings a year, taking 33 days--then the subject deserves a chapter, not just the briefest of mentions."
Cunard ( talk) 11:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC).
Rjjiii ( talk · contribs), I think the hook is fine. Although the source questions the accuracy of the statement, the source verifies that the book makes this statement. Here are sources that verify that people in California during the gold rush era sent their laundry to Hong Kong:
This is not a reliable source as the author is a eugenicist. But I am including it here as it's the earliest source I can find that mentions that California gold miners shipped their laundry to Hong Kong. The book notes: "Apparently eggs from Hong Kong, Canton then were being shipped here with California miners' returned laundry."
The book notes: "When the Gold Rush started, some of the San Franciscans sent their laundry to Honolulu and even to Hong Kong by sailing vessel because there was no one around to do it. By sailing vessel, it required about forty days for a round trip to Honolulu and about sixty days to Hong Kong."
The book notes: "Rich gold miners who didn't have a laundry nearby sent their shirts out to be washed, starched, and ironed-in Hong Kong, China! It cost as much as a dollar a shirt and took two to four months for the shirts to make the round-trip."
The book notes: "In the early days of the Gold Rush, Euroamerican men shipped their soiled laundry to Hong Kong or Honolulu for cleaning, and received it again after two or three months."
The book notes: "As the San Francisco economy boomed with hopeful gold seekers, the city experienced continual labor shortages throughout the 1850s and 1860s. It was cheaper for male miners who refused to wash their own clothes, for example, either to send their dirty laundry on a clipper ship to Hong Kong or Honolulu to be washed or to simply throw it away, than to pay the rates to have their clothes done locally."
The book notes: "I am describing the mid-nineteenth-century genesis of Chinese laundry shops (yi-shan-guan in Chinese) during and after the California Gold Rush. Due to the perception of laundry as women's work and the scarcity of women in California during the Gold Rush era, the local cost for doing laundry was exorbitant. Miners, both white and Chinese, routinely shipped their laundry to Honolulu and even Hong Kong for cleaning and pressing. Even then, the price was high and the process took four months. As Iris Chang describes in The Chinese in America, Chinese entrepreneurs took advantage of this economic opportunity and created local laundry shops."
The book notes: "The perception by most whites that washing was work demeaning to men, together with the absence of women on the Western frontier, made laundry a service in demand. Before the arrival of the Chinese, and with California labor in short supply and hence expensive, dirty laundry was routed to Hong Kong to be washed for $12 a dozen items, and then later to Hawaii for $8 a dozen. But Chinese entrepreneurs in San Francisco saw the potential profits in doing the washing themselves on the West Coast, and prices dropped to $5 a dozen as shipping and handling costs decreased. Soon, local laundries replaced the overseas ones."
This source predates the 2003 book Chinese in America and discusses how laundry was shipped from San Francisco to Hawaii which cost $8 and took six to eight weeks.
The book notes: "But it cost money for the San Franciscans to achieve such stylishness and respectability, for the laundry bills were terrific. In order to have their linen washed, starched and ironed to the right degree of whiteness and rigidity cost them eight dollars per dozen, sometimes even more. The men didn't mind paying from three to five dollars for an order of ham and eggs or a steak, but eight dollars just to scrub and iron some pieces of shirt was an excessive price. So there were grumblings aplenty. And not only that, there was also the annoyance of waiting from six to eight weeks for one's laundry to come back each time one sent it off, for mostly they were shipped to the Hawaiian Islands to be washed. And then the shirts might return with buttons missing or collars separated."
The book notes: "3: Number of months it took prospectors to get their clean clothes back before Wah Lee opened San Francisco's first Chinese laundry in 1851. Prior to that, there were so few laundries that miners sent dirty clothes by ship to Hong Kong, where they were cleaned, pressed, and then shipped back."
The book notes: "By the mid-1800s, some people, mostly white, had managed to get rich in the Gold Rush. ... They often thought of laundry as a "woman's job," and therefore, beneath them. Without many other options, it became pretty common for people to ship their laundry all the way to Hong Kong to be cleaned. This took nearly four months and cost about twelve dollars for a dozen shirts, which is equal to about four hundred dollars today. Still, this was way cheaper than the alternative, to send the clothes back to the East Coast of the United States to be cleaned. Remember, the Transcontinental Rail- road wasn't finished yet, so the laundry would have had to go by boat all the way around the continent or over land on a wagon. Hong Kong was the best option for people with the money to spend on laundry, and so the shipment of clothing back and forth across the Pacific Ocean became another link between the coasts of the United States and China, another lane on the highway connecting Chinese Americans between their two lands. In the middle of the Pacific Ocean, and closer to San Francisco than to Hong Kong, you will find the islands of Hawai'i. By the mid-1800s, Hawai'i had become a stopover for people and goods as they went back and forth between China and the West Coast of the continental United States. The rich people who had been shipping their laundry to Hong Kong now had a closer, more affordable option. Instead of spending twelve dollars to have a dozen shirts washed in Hong Kong, they could spend eight dollars to have a dozen shirts washed in Honolulu."
The book notes: "As the gold fever cooled, there was a shift in Chinese business patterns, first from mining to laundries, and then to railway construction. The second was the result of quintessentially Chinese entrepreneurship. The Chinese noticed that people in California were prepared to pay for laundry services, which involved shipping to the East Coast, Honolulu and even Hong Kong, which were all both costly and took time. It was obviously beneficial for customers to pay $5 for a dozen shirts rather than $12, and to receive the shirts in a few days rather than up to four months."
The book notes: "A similar story unfolded on the Pacific coast of the Americas. North American trade with Asia and Australia grew rapidly in the 1860s and 1870s, but failed to live up to that potential in subsequent years. In the first years of the gold rush, prices for goods and labour in California were so high that laundry was famously sent from San Francisco to Hong Kong to be washed. By the end of the 1850s, California had begun shipping wheat, quicksilver, hides, lumber, oats, beans, potatoes and wool across the Pacific to Asia and the Australian"
The book notes: "Most of the men who arrived in California to hunt for gold came alone. Mining was dirty, dusty work, but washing grimy, mud-caked clothes was considered a "woman's job." Some of the more successful single men shipped dirty clothes to Hong Kong and waited months for their return. For the rest, since local Spanish and Native American women charged too high a price, Chinese men filled the void. Within a few years, the Chinese came to dominate the laundry business in San Francisco."
Cunard ( talk) 09:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. You're right. Rather than doing a review, I'd like to offer an alternative hook. Since multiple university press sources state it as a fact, could we run a hook that also presents it as a historical fact? Like this:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Very good article, balanced in tone and content. ALT1 hook works well. Good to go.
Onceinawhile (
talk)
17:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
CSJJ104 ( talk) 21:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I assume good faith on the references that I can't access, and it's helpful that the nominator included the relevant text. The promoter can choose the hook.
SL93 (
talk)
00:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hybernator ( talk) 00:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
ZKang123 ( talk) 01:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC).
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Got GA status 5 days ago, so the article and its hook is okay. I omitted the word "rare" because the sources don't exactly state that this type of protest is rare in Singapore. If the nominator can provide source for the claim then I will reverse it.
Mehedi Abedin
13:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, according to Public demonstrations in Singapore, yes they are rare.-- ZKang123 ( talk) 14:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
CurryTime7-24 ( talk) 01:38, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
Toadboy123 ( talk) 07:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
Ornithoptera ( talk) 01:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
Kimikel ( talk) 00:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, plagiarism free and a QPQ is done. ALT0 is cited and interesting, but (from my reading) ALT1 might not work: isn't it that the fort was named after the princess, and the museum is named after the fort? So slightly different in the hook to the article. I might be overthinking though!
Lajmmoore (
talk)
13:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
SL93 ( talk) 00:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
Ergo Sum 15:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Can we say "co-consecrated" instead of "consecrated" in the hook to reflect the citation more accurately?
Sohom (
talk)
03:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 20:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
All sources verified. Good to go with main or either ALT.
Hawkeye7
(discuss)
20:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Sounder Bruce 02:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
Turini2 ( talk) 12:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Some problems need fixing.
TheNuggeteer (
talk)
02:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
🍗TheNugg
eteer🍗
23:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 19:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Looks good. Nice work. AGF on hook source.
BeanieFan11 (
talk)
20:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Kimikel ( talk) 01:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
Valereee ( talk) 17:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Great expansion; very informative article on a local delicacy. QPQ and Earwig all good. The problem is the hook, which is misleadingly written in
wikivoice. The hook needs to make clear that it is not stating an objective fact, but referring to an opinion from the cited source. —
CurryTime7-24 (
talk)
21:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Ping CurryTime7-24 -- does one of these work for you? Valereee ( talk) 17:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Storye book ( talk) 09:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
Bluethricecreamman ( talk) 03:58, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
awkwafaba (
📥)
16:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
@
Bluethricecreamman: Thank you for your hard work. Please fix copyvios and sourcing issues and then we can proceed.
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 19:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Epicgenius (
talk)
15:21, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
4meter4 ( talk) 17:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
The trees thrived in the rich volcanic soil, and by the early 1900s, São Tomé and Príncipe was the biggest exporter of cacao in the world, earning it the nickname of 'The Chocolate Islands'.
Yue 🌙 07:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC).
Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 17:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
no concerns; it's a new GA. prefer ALT1 as clearer and hook-ier to a general audience. good work! ...
sawyer * he/they *
talk
01:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Faldi00 ( talk) 08:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
― Howard • 🌽33 20:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
"At first, it was all for fun, but suddenly it went super fast and I was busy with it full time."Per DYK guidelines, the hook fact needs to also have a footnote directly following it; I would put one where the fact appears in both the lead and body.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
@
Howardcorn33: Meets criteria, Earwig clear, very well-sourced, image is CC licensed, just a couple of tweaks needed. –
T
C
Memoire
14:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Op welke dag ben jij jarig? 🎉 Michiel 6 april & Celine 8 december!
CeeGee 15:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Great work! I'm currently in Turkey and I enjoyed reading and reviewing the article, and it looks like it has no obvious issues from what I can see. I'm partial to the second hook but open to either hook being used depending on the final decision of the closing reviewer. --
Sky Harbor (
talk)
16:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Generalissima ( talk) (it/she) 06:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC).
Sahaib ( talk) 13:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
I am concerned about the hook for
WP:BLP focusing on the negative aspects of his career. Can you share some alternatives?
AnotherColonialHistorian (
talk)
15:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
48 JCL 16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Going to review this one, since my DYK nomination has a distribution in Botswana as well. Was on DYK previously, but guidelines were changed to allow for renominations after 5 years (previous inclusion was in 2012). New enough, long enough, sourced, neutral, and plagiarism free. Hook is cited and interesting. I'm going to hold on to the confirmation temporarily to ensure whether @
48JCL: wants to include the photograph as well, since there appears to be a caption but there is no photograph included in the template.
Ornithoptera (
talk)
01:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 03:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General eligibility:
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Ready to go.
Sahaib (
talk)
15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Laun chba ller 09:26, 5 July 2024 (UTC).
Pretzelles ( talk) 21:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Promoted to GA on 5 July. The following sentence lacks an inline citation: "In 2010, Lofaro published Southern Manuscript Sermons before 1800: A Bibliography, dedicating the work to Davis and noting him as one of four contributing editors."
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Moved to mainspace on 12 July. The synopsis doesn't need citations. For this DYK nomination, only one QPQ is needed, as the nominator had four nominations beforehand.
Skyshifter
talk
23:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
SL93 ( talk) 21:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Thank you for this useful article, on a subject which needs to be written about.
When a source is found for the above fact, this nomination should be good to go.
Storye book (
talk)
09:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
AbhiSuryawanshi ( talk) 21:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
awkwafaba (
📥)
15:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Llewee ( talk) 01:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC).
Nineteen Ninety-Four guy ( talk) 09:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC).
Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hooks are interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go.
Thriley (
talk)
20:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
– T C Memoire 10:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC).
Kev min § 15:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
I like ALT0 the best, but both are cleared
awkwafaba (
📥)
02:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Arcahaeoindris ( talk) 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Looks good. Nice work.
BeanieFan11 (
talk)
20:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
In 1941, he was appointed head of Boulden House, the junior school at TCS, ... the former junior school headmaster also held the title of Most Honourable, the Eighth Marquess of Ely ... .
In 1941, he was appointed head of Boulden House, the junior school at TCS, ... the former junior school headmaster also held the title of Most Honourable, the Eighth Marquess of Ely ... .
Lord Ely doesn't use the title at all in Canada ... .
RONIN TALK 20:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC).