This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:13, May 14, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Tasmania Story is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
gvnayr, I think this article should be about the movie too (just like the JA wiki), and not only the Game. --
Hydao (
talk) 01:11, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Also, the two versions (JP and NA) are the same? or...? you have to provide this kind of info. --
Hydao (
talk) 01:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
This does not belong here and theese types of edits and redirects are destroying Wikipedia. Why not just link to the game or source. As with the recent events of trying to create a Franchise or Merchandise on theese films you are destroying a different project and hopes of expanding it. As it can be construed that most games are based off some type of media. When people do searches it's like walking into a store if I were looking for a film I would look in the film dept. If I was looking for a game I would look in the game dept. If I were looking for a book in the book dept. In the real world you can not combine or find them all in the same section. I'm sure the person who looks for the film has no intrest in its merchandise.(in most cases a t-shirt or poster) In these articles that you want to create they should be a bullet list linking to the source not taking or moving the source to fit your own agenda. The task force really need to look at this practice where the source in one section can be moved to another. It would better to serve without moving the source but by linking to the source. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.206.144.147 (
talk) 12:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:13, May 14, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Tasmania Story is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
gvnayr, I think this article should be about the movie too (just like the JA wiki), and not only the Game. --
Hydao (
talk) 01:11, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Also, the two versions (JP and NA) are the same? or...? you have to provide this kind of info. --
Hydao (
talk) 01:23, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
This does not belong here and theese types of edits and redirects are destroying Wikipedia. Why not just link to the game or source. As with the recent events of trying to create a Franchise or Merchandise on theese films you are destroying a different project and hopes of expanding it. As it can be construed that most games are based off some type of media. When people do searches it's like walking into a store if I were looking for a film I would look in the film dept. If I was looking for a game I would look in the game dept. If I were looking for a book in the book dept. In the real world you can not combine or find them all in the same section. I'm sure the person who looks for the film has no intrest in its merchandise.(in most cases a t-shirt or poster) In these articles that you want to create they should be a bullet list linking to the source not taking or moving the source to fit your own agenda. The task force really need to look at this practice where the source in one section can be moved to another. It would better to serve without moving the source but by linking to the source. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.206.144.147 (
talk) 12:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)reply
.svg){kind=logo}
