![]() | Vilnius Castle Complex was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think the title should be really Vilnius Castles since there are 3 castles: upper, lower and kreivoji (btw, I am looking for a more proper translation for this one). Renata 19:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
btw why all centuries in wikipedia are writen in 9,5, form not in V, XIX?
About Curved castle - it should have separate history part also, but there are only few facts on it; several sentences tops. Maybe merge cuz stub will spoil article? M.K.
and another note - upper castle as such is called gediminas castle not gediminas tower M.K.
I am thinking – do we need write separate article on Vilnius Bastille Vilnius Fortress is better I think or it is enough to make separate section of Vilnius Castle Complex? I am personally leaning to write separate article on Vilnius Bastille and make it as main article and used it as I did with Cathedral within Castle Complex articale. What other editors thinks about it? M.K. 18:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
There needs to be something written about all the rivers: Vilnia, the one that's now underground. Because now the plan shows the territory completely surrounded by water, but there is nothing mentioned of that sort in the article. Renata 14:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Doing some grammatical edits - Novickas 16:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm having some problems with the arsenals. In re New Arsenal: the article mentioned that it was "established in one of the oldest castle buildings in the 18th century" but later in the same paragaph it states that "during the 16th century its tower featured a beacon that guided ships in the Neris river", an anachronism.
Re Old arsenal - it states that "In contrast to New arsenal, which was adopted for this need in 18 th. century, Old arsenal was already established in 15 th. century". Does that mean that the old arsenal had already been built by then? If so, what are the suggested date ranges for its creation?
Novickas 14:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
New Arsenal was adapted to Arsenal needs in 18 th century. It was adopted/established in one of the oldest castle buildings, which prior 18 th century was not used for Arsenal and only in 18 th century building was proclaimed as Aresnal. This old building (which in 18th became Arsenal), at least from 16 th century, had and beacon.
Old arsenal, as such, was used for arsenal needs in 15 th century, while New Arsenal only in 18 th. Old Arsenal of 15 th century disintegrated and undergone big reconstructions in 16 th. Is it a bit better explanation ? M.K. 14:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thanks Novickas 14:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
This GA nomination is on hold for 7 days for these reasons: there should be no space between punctuation and a footnote, multiple footnotes should not have a space between them, and single years (ex 1327) do not get wikilinked. Let me know when you've fixed this.Discuss the architectural styles too. Rlevse 12:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
M.K. 12:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Done. M.K. 18:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Would references to Vilnius Fort or Vilnius Fortress be references to Vilnius Castle, or is there something else? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The Polish name of this castle should be in lead, as it is used in English literature: [1], [2]. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Very strange calling this "English Literature" :
Cambridge History of Poland. radek ( talk) 02:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Actually, yes, and as impressive as the ENTIRE google search might strike you as, I suspect that the Jan Dlugosz (didn't incude it, but Dlugosz has got to be the most convincing example to include the Polish translation into English WP ) entry, was a translation from Latin into Polish into English. Or did he write it in English because I'm pretty sure the original was not written in Polish? Dr. Dan ( talk) 02:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells ( talk) 22:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
:::Allow me a week or so for the improvements. Thanks,
M.K. (
talk)
11:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
There are several places within the article that need references; as such this article does not seem to meet GA standards. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
The primary problem with this article is insufficient citations; there are outstanding citation needed tags. At least two references need page needed templates. Titles of Lithuanian references should be translated into English. I am afraid that if those issues are not addressed, the article cannot lay a claim to a modern GA standard. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Vilnius Castle Complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Vilnius Castle Complex was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think the title should be really Vilnius Castles since there are 3 castles: upper, lower and kreivoji (btw, I am looking for a more proper translation for this one). Renata 19:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
btw why all centuries in wikipedia are writen in 9,5, form not in V, XIX?
About Curved castle - it should have separate history part also, but there are only few facts on it; several sentences tops. Maybe merge cuz stub will spoil article? M.K.
and another note - upper castle as such is called gediminas castle not gediminas tower M.K.
I am thinking – do we need write separate article on Vilnius Bastille Vilnius Fortress is better I think or it is enough to make separate section of Vilnius Castle Complex? I am personally leaning to write separate article on Vilnius Bastille and make it as main article and used it as I did with Cathedral within Castle Complex articale. What other editors thinks about it? M.K. 18:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
There needs to be something written about all the rivers: Vilnia, the one that's now underground. Because now the plan shows the territory completely surrounded by water, but there is nothing mentioned of that sort in the article. Renata 14:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Doing some grammatical edits - Novickas 16:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm having some problems with the arsenals. In re New Arsenal: the article mentioned that it was "established in one of the oldest castle buildings in the 18th century" but later in the same paragaph it states that "during the 16th century its tower featured a beacon that guided ships in the Neris river", an anachronism.
Re Old arsenal - it states that "In contrast to New arsenal, which was adopted for this need in 18 th. century, Old arsenal was already established in 15 th. century". Does that mean that the old arsenal had already been built by then? If so, what are the suggested date ranges for its creation?
Novickas 14:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
New Arsenal was adapted to Arsenal needs in 18 th century. It was adopted/established in one of the oldest castle buildings, which prior 18 th century was not used for Arsenal and only in 18 th century building was proclaimed as Aresnal. This old building (which in 18th became Arsenal), at least from 16 th century, had and beacon.
Old arsenal, as such, was used for arsenal needs in 15 th century, while New Arsenal only in 18 th. Old Arsenal of 15 th century disintegrated and undergone big reconstructions in 16 th. Is it a bit better explanation ? M.K. 14:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, thanks Novickas 14:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
This GA nomination is on hold for 7 days for these reasons: there should be no space between punctuation and a footnote, multiple footnotes should not have a space between them, and single years (ex 1327) do not get wikilinked. Let me know when you've fixed this.Discuss the architectural styles too. Rlevse 12:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
M.K. 12:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Done. M.K. 18:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Would references to Vilnius Fort or Vilnius Fortress be references to Vilnius Castle, or is there something else? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The Polish name of this castle should be in lead, as it is used in English literature: [1], [2]. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Very strange calling this "English Literature" :
Cambridge History of Poland. radek ( talk) 02:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Actually, yes, and as impressive as the ENTIRE google search might strike you as, I suspect that the Jan Dlugosz (didn't incude it, but Dlugosz has got to be the most convincing example to include the Polish translation into English WP ) entry, was a translation from Latin into Polish into English. Or did he write it in English because I'm pretty sure the original was not written in Polish? Dr. Dan ( talk) 02:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells ( talk) 22:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
:::Allow me a week or so for the improvements. Thanks,
M.K. (
talk)
11:12, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
There are several places within the article that need references; as such this article does not seem to meet GA standards. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
The primary problem with this article is insufficient citations; there are outstanding citation needed tags. At least two references need page needed templates. Titles of Lithuanian references should be translated into English. I am afraid that if those issues are not addressed, the article cannot lay a claim to a modern GA standard. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Vilnius Castle Complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)