This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sinnamorato. Peer reviewers: Timothy Cecere.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Reverted edit referencing "Roman Mauro" after a google search for 'Roman Mauro GLAAD' failed to return results.
( unsigned at 06:40, 13 October 2006 by 18.96.6.225)
So, all three articles are stubs - by merging we can reduce the amount of stubs related to this particle article topic, GLAAD. The primary reason that I proposed this instead of simply being bold and doing it is that there might be other GLAAD-associated stubs in Wikipedia that I am unaware of and need help finding. And if someone objects, that's a lot of wasted time on my part. Thanks. Zue Jay ( talk) 19:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
This article is essentially a GLAAD ass-kissing fest even though they've faced enormous amounts of criticism throughout their existence. This article desperately needs coverage of that criticism to balance things out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.29.174.77 ( talk) 06:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
No, reading the talk pages is little different. Largely same liberals that should be supporting freedom of expression are diametrically opposed regardless of whether it is on a main page or in a talk section.
I agree. GLADD also likes to be PC to the point of censorship and now it seems as though GLADD is all about Trans people yet does nothing for bisexuals, gay men, or lesbians. 72.78.246.42 ( talk) 21:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
The acronym GLAAD is just one more proof that the term gay is not a gender neutral term. It's guys, end of discussion. And, otherwise, LGBT would be just GBT. Godofredo29 ( talk) 06:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry if you saw this as complaining or using the site as a forum. Rather, I was just stating a fact. My proof of my point was brief but to the point. That some people, mostly women, and frequently lesbians--who, for some reason, dislike the term lesbian--choose to use the term inappropriately is not a proof. Other proofs could be cited, such as, the term is never used as gender neutral in a legal context. The Supreme Court for example would never use the term as gender neutral as, say, in the incorrect application of it that way in the phrase gay marriage (instead of same-sex marriage). Just because one seeks the correct use of a word is not grounds claiming otherwise. It sounds like you're the one complaining and using the site as a forum. Lastly, I don't know who you are, but never contact me through my e-mail address again.
Godofredo29 (
talk)
18:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
What did you do to this article?! Now it is not an article but a disaster! Донат Николай ( talk) 22:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Донат_Николай
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GLAAD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User:Sinnamorato/sandbox I added some info on the president Sarah Kate Ellis and the work she did for GLAAD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinnamorato ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User:Sinnamorato/sandbox Timothy Cecere ( talk) 02:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
In the section "Movements", there is a sentence that reads "In 2016, Spirit Day is the world's largest and most-visible anti-bullying campaign." This sentence is grammatically incorrect but has 2 different meanings that it could possibly be changed to. Either:
"Since 2016, Spirit Day has been the world's largest and most-visible anti-bullying campaign."
or
"In 2016, Spirit Day was the world's largest and most-visible anti-bullying campaign."
If someone could find a source proving the top statement, then I would suggest the change. KieranStanley ( talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lexipie58 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Shaniceet.
Gays and Lesbians Against Drunk Driving. 72.72.204.23 ( talk) 04:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sinnamorato. Peer reviewers: Timothy Cecere.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Reverted edit referencing "Roman Mauro" after a google search for 'Roman Mauro GLAAD' failed to return results.
( unsigned at 06:40, 13 October 2006 by 18.96.6.225)
So, all three articles are stubs - by merging we can reduce the amount of stubs related to this particle article topic, GLAAD. The primary reason that I proposed this instead of simply being bold and doing it is that there might be other GLAAD-associated stubs in Wikipedia that I am unaware of and need help finding. And if someone objects, that's a lot of wasted time on my part. Thanks. Zue Jay ( talk) 19:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
This article is essentially a GLAAD ass-kissing fest even though they've faced enormous amounts of criticism throughout their existence. This article desperately needs coverage of that criticism to balance things out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.29.174.77 ( talk) 06:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
No, reading the talk pages is little different. Largely same liberals that should be supporting freedom of expression are diametrically opposed regardless of whether it is on a main page or in a talk section.
I agree. GLADD also likes to be PC to the point of censorship and now it seems as though GLADD is all about Trans people yet does nothing for bisexuals, gay men, or lesbians. 72.78.246.42 ( talk) 21:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
The acronym GLAAD is just one more proof that the term gay is not a gender neutral term. It's guys, end of discussion. And, otherwise, LGBT would be just GBT. Godofredo29 ( talk) 06:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry if you saw this as complaining or using the site as a forum. Rather, I was just stating a fact. My proof of my point was brief but to the point. That some people, mostly women, and frequently lesbians--who, for some reason, dislike the term lesbian--choose to use the term inappropriately is not a proof. Other proofs could be cited, such as, the term is never used as gender neutral in a legal context. The Supreme Court for example would never use the term as gender neutral as, say, in the incorrect application of it that way in the phrase gay marriage (instead of same-sex marriage). Just because one seeks the correct use of a word is not grounds claiming otherwise. It sounds like you're the one complaining and using the site as a forum. Lastly, I don't know who you are, but never contact me through my e-mail address again.
Godofredo29 (
talk)
18:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
What did you do to this article?! Now it is not an article but a disaster! Донат Николай ( talk) 22:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Донат_Николай
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on GLAAD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User:Sinnamorato/sandbox I added some info on the president Sarah Kate Ellis and the work she did for GLAAD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinnamorato ( talk • contribs) 23:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User:Sinnamorato/sandbox Timothy Cecere ( talk) 02:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
In the section "Movements", there is a sentence that reads "In 2016, Spirit Day is the world's largest and most-visible anti-bullying campaign." This sentence is grammatically incorrect but has 2 different meanings that it could possibly be changed to. Either:
"Since 2016, Spirit Day has been the world's largest and most-visible anti-bullying campaign."
or
"In 2016, Spirit Day was the world's largest and most-visible anti-bullying campaign."
If someone could find a source proving the top statement, then I would suggest the change. KieranStanley ( talk) 17:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lexipie58 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Shaniceet.
Gays and Lesbians Against Drunk Driving. 72.72.204.23 ( talk) 04:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)