|
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.
In the interest of continued transparency when possible:
I was informed by the Ombuds Commission today that they do consider even sharing vague details with no personal information of any kind from a volunteer-run mailing list a violation of the access to nonpublic data policy and they have accordingly issued me a "final warning" on the subject for "reckless handling of nonpublic information."
They only considered two parts of the "totality of evidence" that ArbCom used to boot me off as the rest of it was outside of their jurisdiction (and some of it was arguably outside of ArbCom's jurisdiction as well if you ask me but that's another matter for another day) They did also note that they do not consider anything I did to have been done out of malice, so that was nice anyway.
I personally think this is an overreach as the ANPDP does not say a single word about volunteer-run mailing lists, but apparently I was supposed to know better anyway. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
|
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: This page is for discussing announcements relating to the Arbitration Committee. Editors commenting here are required to act with appropriate decorum. While grievances, complaints, or criticism of arbitration decisions are frequently posted here, you are expected to present them without being rude or hostile. Comments that are uncivil may be removed without warning. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions.
In the interest of continued transparency when possible:
I was informed by the Ombuds Commission today that they do consider even sharing vague details with no personal information of any kind from a volunteer-run mailing list a violation of the access to nonpublic data policy and they have accordingly issued me a "final warning" on the subject for "reckless handling of nonpublic information."
They only considered two parts of the "totality of evidence" that ArbCom used to boot me off as the rest of it was outside of their jurisdiction (and some of it was arguably outside of ArbCom's jurisdiction as well if you ask me but that's another matter for another day) They did also note that they do not consider anything I did to have been done out of malice, so that was nice anyway.
I personally think this is an overreach as the ANPDP does not say a single word about volunteer-run mailing lists, but apparently I was supposed to know better anyway. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)