Novels Project‑class | |||||||
|
For discussion of the project membership list
Hi, how do I join this? Iris Medallion ( talk) 14:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
are web novels considered novels? even though they are published a chapter at a time? Avyfain 08:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
How about alphabetizing the list on user names? The only objection would be the loss of 'seniority' but this is retained by the 'joined...' statement. Alphabetizing seems sensible. I'll do it if there is a consensus as I've done it at another projects participant list to good effect. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 16:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I purged the list of inactive members. Unfortnately, this meant active members went from 295 to 191. The inactive list grew from 8 to 111. Thus, the project has lost 104 members who have left Wikipedia; or at least no longer edit. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 03:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
If the last action above was bold the current review looks to be like a nuclear detonation by comparison. To stay in this project appears to involve great effort. I question the wisdom of this approach although agreeing with the motivation which I take to be keeping the list to those genuinely taking part. We should be able to identify anyone who wishes to be associated and is active anytime in "maybe" a 6 month period. We could well be "hacking off" those we should be encouraging. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 08:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I am an active member of the project (well, sort of) and don't get the newsletter. I don't remember checking a box or anything about it when I joined, but I definitely do want to get it now. How would I go about fixing that? PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 04:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Novels Project‑class | |||||||
|
For discussion of the project membership list
Hi, how do I join this? Iris Medallion ( talk) 14:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
are web novels considered novels? even though they are published a chapter at a time? Avyfain 08:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
How about alphabetizing the list on user names? The only objection would be the loss of 'seniority' but this is retained by the 'joined...' statement. Alphabetizing seems sensible. I'll do it if there is a consensus as I've done it at another projects participant list to good effect. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 16:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
I purged the list of inactive members. Unfortnately, this meant active members went from 295 to 191. The inactive list grew from 8 to 111. Thus, the project has lost 104 members who have left Wikipedia; or at least no longer edit. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 03:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
If the last action above was bold the current review looks to be like a nuclear detonation by comparison. To stay in this project appears to involve great effort. I question the wisdom of this approach although agreeing with the motivation which I take to be keeping the list to those genuinely taking part. We should be able to identify anyone who wishes to be associated and is active anytime in "maybe" a 6 month period. We could well be "hacking off" those we should be encouraging. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 08:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I am an active member of the project (well, sort of) and don't get the newsletter. I don't remember checking a box or anything about it when I joined, but I definitely do want to get it now. How would I go about fixing that? PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 04:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)