Is it possible to run Snuggle in, say, http://ca.wikipedia.org ?-- Qgil ( talk) 18:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Can we test snuggle also in german language version? Thank you, Conny ( talk) 18:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC).
... is it only for official mentors and coaches? Or can other people also use it, for example after application? The Banner talk 20:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
First off, I am sorry to hear about your advisor. I understand the closeness of the student-advisor relationship and this must be a difficult time for you.
Secondly, I like the mockup that you posted. I believe that the tools other than rating should be more prominently displayed, and your proposal should do just that. Andrew 327 16:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Snuggle users and the Teahouse are co-hosting an IRC office hours session (Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC - #wikimedia-office connect) to discuss the state of new editor support in Wikipedia and introduce you to WP:Snuggle, a web-based tool designed to make finding good-faith newcomers who need help fast and easy. Give it a try by pointing your browser to http://snuggle.grouplens.org.
See the agenda for more info. -- EpochFail ( talk), Technical 13 ( talk), TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
For folks interesting in brainstorming current issues with mentorship systems and what we might try to do differently, see also this idea. Come join the discussion! Siko (WMF) ( talk) 17:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to follow up on a discussion that began during the Snuggle office hour session. One issue that I see a lot lately is that we have helpers and mentors in the various help spaces (Teahouse, Adoption program, #wikipedia-en-help, AfC review, etc.) who are not sufficiently experienced. I've seen users who are finishing up their own adoption programs jump right into trying to adopt new users, and I frequently see users with very little experience with the project come into #wikipedia-en-help to try to help new users. We don't really have any way of preventing this from happening, and we don't have any system of choosing who has enough experience to mentor.
I think it's very important that people who are helping our new users are experienced enough to answer most questions, and self-aware enough that they know when to say "I don't know" and pass the user on to someone who can help. How should we make sure this is the case? I do not like the idea of new userrights, and another dramatic RfA-like process is not something I seek to begin, but we need something: a set of criteria? A simple area where other experienced users can vouch for another user's experience? What are your thoughts? – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I have no issue with that kind of review. It's the idea of "mentoring the mentors" that I dislike. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
A potential problem was brought up in the last IRC session about Snuggle. If two Snuggle users are interacting with the same user at the same time, they might duplicate teahouse invites and other messages. There's a few potential solutions to this problem:
The easiest of these to implement is local refresh. Next is warning for duplicate actions. Synchronous visibility would require substantial restructuring to the code base and some experimental work with web sockets, but this restructuring would allow us to consider other types of synchronous activities such as a chat room and a live-updating "recent activity" log. Thoughts? -- EpochFail( talk • work) 19:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the responses, folks. I've added both the Local refresh and Duplicate action warning to the bug tracker. Once I've implemented the most recent mockups, solving this problem will be next on my plate. -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
There is an ongoing RfC going on at Category talk:Wikipedians#RfC: Is this category and current subcategories appropriate for Wikipedia that readers of this Wikipedian software page may be interested it. Technical 13 ( talk) 12:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I just tried out Snuggle for a few minutes. Here are my first impressions. First the good:
Things that could be improved:
Other things I thought of:
I didn't spend very much time at all in doing this, so I may have missed some (most?) of Snuggle's features, but I hope this proves useful to the devs. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
I have just been using Snuggle and come across these edits. Snuggle said they were reverted by ClueBot NG, when they were actually reverted by AussieLegend.
I was going to report it as a false positive by CBNG, since the edits weren't vandalism. But now I have seen AussieLegend's explanation this is not necessary.
Yaris678 ( talk) 12:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
I decided to sort the newbies by number of reverts. The people at the top of the list all had several hundred reverts, despite having only ten or so edits.
Yaris678 ( talk) 19:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
So I tried to finally test the tool today, but the feed for users that I could review was empty. I got a brief flash of "Starting Snuggle..." or such, and that's all: nothing on the green, yellow or red tabs... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this was mentioned on the WM-l recently. How do I use it? Is there a manual? Tony (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I got the following error message when attempting to invite someone to the teahouse.
mediawiki: Mediawiki return an error while attempting to performing an action {u'fields': {u'header': u"You're invited to the Teahouse.", u'message': u, u'template': u':Wikipedia:Teahouse/Invitation'}, u'watch': True, u'user': {u'id': 22200887, u'name': u'Wenno123'}, u'action_name': u'invite to teahouse'}. mustposttoken:The 'token' parameter must be POSTed
Any thoughts on the cause? Yaris678 ( talk) 10:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Update: I was able to reprodice that error a few times but now I don't even get that far. I now get an error message in the preview window.
[ERROR] permissions: You must be logged in to preview a user action.
This despite the fact that it says in the corner that I am logged in. Yaris678 ( talk) 11:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey folks. In order to be able to deploy Snuggle on other wikis, I need a source of revision scores (the scores used by ClueBot NG, WP:STiki, WP:Huggle, etc. to flag damaging revisions) on those wikis. For English Wikipedia, STiki has an API that provides these scores, but there's nothing comparable I could find for these other wikis. In trying to solve this problem for myself, I realized that this was a general issue. That a public revision scoring service could be helpful to more tools than Snuggle. So, I have been working with a few people (including STiki's developer West.andrew.g) to organize a project to set up such a public service.
If you have a moment, please take a look at the grant proposal ( m:Grants:IEG/Revision scoring as a service) and endorse it if you see fit. Thanks! -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 14:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
It looks like the desirability scores are not being generated. I don't have time to look at this now, but I wanted to leave a note (and a watchlist ping) for everyone to know that I've noticed the problem and plan to put some hours in on it tonight. I'll ping again when I have more information (or a fix). -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
The software is great for keeping track of the activity of a set of editors. Right now the candidates are automatically generated - would it be possible to instead supply a set of usernames? Then this could act as a sort of "mentoring dashboard". EdSaperia ( talk) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey folks,
I'd like to start making note of my work to keep Snuggle online and useful, so expect to see these kinds of updates more often.
So, I noticed that Snuggle stopped synchronizing on March 31st when I went to the server to do some unrelated maintenance. I restarted the sync server and as of this morning, we are up-to-date again.
I'd like to have an alert set up for when synchronization gets far behind, but I don't have the time to invest in that at the moment (pull requests welcome!). If, when using Snuggle, you notice that the activity graphs don't show any activity in the last few days from editors, please feel free to ping me here or in #wikipedia-snuggle (I'm 'halfak'). -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
My first time trying to use Snuggle, I see blank screens in all the categories (using Chrome and IE) and no activity since 4 May. Peter Chastain [habla, por favor] 08:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Further information: http://tools.wmflabs.org/videotutorials/Snuggle/
Leads to a 'not here' message
So I'm trying to use this for the first time, and when I click on 'start snuggle' I get the tabs, a flash that says 'Loading...' and then nothing. Same for all tabs. valereee ( talk) 14:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
>>> [d for d in docs if d['type'] in ('new', 'edit') and 'user' not in d] [{u'rcid': 754800455, u'pageid': 146167, u'timestamp': u'2015-08-05T22:13:35Z', u'userhidden': u'', u'revid': 674749914, u'old_revid': 674688103, u'type': u'edit'}, {u'rcid': 754800567, u'pageid': 146167, u'timestamp': u'2015-08-05T22:14:37Z', u'userhidden': u'', u'revid': 674750012, u'old_revid': 674749970, u'type': u'edit'}]
I still have problems with "Loading...". It appears to be not a server issue, since it depends on the settings. It always hangs when selecting "sorted by total edits". Also, in these cases, the display doesn't change when I switch back that setting; if I refresh, it logs me out, and I log back in, and I get the default settings again, and the server is obviously running. — Sebastian 18:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm also getting no editors in the lists. Happy Squirrel ( talk) 16:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Why do all the editors I looked at (in the uncategorized tab) have the identical, absurdly high desirability of 9.223e+18? — Sebastian 05:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
That seems to fit to what I remember. Sorry, I don't remember much since I only tried it out briefly and didn't use it anymore since my message of 18:33, 23 August 2015 above. I vaguely remember that I found the concept of just going by desirability a bit one-dimensional. There are moments when I just want to be nice and connect with nice people, and there are other moments when I feel up to the more challenging task of finding out whether a new user is nice or nasty. Who I want to connect with doesn't fit in a heuristic box of usefulness for Wikipedia. The more we draw on the variety of our users, the better for Wikipedia. So it would be nice if we could set up our own weighing function; maybe with a few predefined values for "nice people" and "potential troublemakers" and such.
But anyway, you now have one parameter for desirability and may not want to complicate matters, so let's look at the formula:
.
In this, what does the condition '|desirable' refer to: (A) That a certain edit was found to be desirable? If so, what is the purpose of multiplying by p(desirable); shouldn't it just be 1 in that case? Or (B) The proportion of desirable edits for a given user? And what does 'p(scores)' mean? The syntax suggests it's the probability that there are scores, but there should be scores for everyone, shouldn't there? Or the probability for certain scores, such as above a certain threshold? And what is the population that p is averaged over: All editors, all edits, or all edits by a given editor? Obviously, it would help to see a diagram for the Bayesian model.
But regardless, the usual formula in such cases has the form , which behaves nicely by not exceeding 1. And since probabilities are already ratios, there may even be no need to compute a ratio of ratios: If , you don't need a denominator. — Sebastian 01:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
fitdistr
method and then applying the parameters to pythons scipy.stats.beta
-- specifically
this code. I think you have the rough sense for what the graph is capturing. There are minor issues with your notation that mean different things, but I think we're on the same page.Hi :) Does Snuggle work on Arabic Wikipedia?-- Reem Al-Kashif ( talk) 16:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
@ EpochFail:, how's the status now? I'm asking, because it seems this tool might be useful on Polish wikipedia as well. // Halibu tt 11:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey folks, I'm going to be migrating Snuggle to a more recent version of linux (Ubuntu 12.04 --> Debian 8.6). To finish the process off, this will require a little bit of downtime. I'll be doing this migration tomorrow, Nov. 8th at 20:30 UTC. If all goes as planned, you should expect about 15 minutes of downtime. -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
@ EpochFail: Is this still active? I'm getting errors when I try to use it.
database: An database error occurred while attempting to getting a set of users with query {u'category': None, u'direction': u'ascending', u'min_edits': 1, u'skip': 0, u'namespace': u'all', u'limit': 10, u'sorted_by': u'desirability.ratio'Many thanks, Nick Moyes ( talk) 11:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
This is my ~third attempt to run Snuggle, and it mostly worked this time. It apparently needs wmflabs.org scripts, and snuggle-en.wmflabs.org cookies. I could easily log in with my account. However, no edits at all were displayed in any of the tables. There is the heading, "Username and stats | Interactive edit graph | Talk page activity", but below it, just blank grey. Not sure why this is: whether the server is down or if there is some incompatibility. HLHJ ( talk) 23:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
@ EpochFail, CAPTAIN MEDUSA, and OnePt618: I think it would be good to ask for new maintainers at village pump/technical, and/or to ask it through sign post. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to try Snuggle, but currently it's 502'ing... pandakekok9 ( talk) 09:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Everytime I tap on any Snuggle link it brings me to a page that says "502: Bad Gateway", is this a problem on my end? Is something wrong with the program? glowing regards, paperandscissors ( contact) 06:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey folks! I've taken Snuggle offline officially. The code is still available, and I have a database backup should someone want to bring it online again. Just let me know and I'll help you get started. The system is built in python and runs on flask/wsgi. -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Is it possible to run Snuggle in, say, http://ca.wikipedia.org ?-- Qgil ( talk) 18:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Can we test snuggle also in german language version? Thank you, Conny ( talk) 18:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC).
... is it only for official mentors and coaches? Or can other people also use it, for example after application? The Banner talk 20:36, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
First off, I am sorry to hear about your advisor. I understand the closeness of the student-advisor relationship and this must be a difficult time for you.
Secondly, I like the mockup that you posted. I believe that the tools other than rating should be more prominently displayed, and your proposal should do just that. Andrew 327 16:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Snuggle users and the Teahouse are co-hosting an IRC office hours session (Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC - #wikimedia-office connect) to discuss the state of new editor support in Wikipedia and introduce you to WP:Snuggle, a web-based tool designed to make finding good-faith newcomers who need help fast and easy. Give it a try by pointing your browser to http://snuggle.grouplens.org.
See the agenda for more info. -- EpochFail ( talk), Technical 13 ( talk), TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
For folks interesting in brainstorming current issues with mentorship systems and what we might try to do differently, see also this idea. Come join the discussion! Siko (WMF) ( talk) 17:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to follow up on a discussion that began during the Snuggle office hour session. One issue that I see a lot lately is that we have helpers and mentors in the various help spaces (Teahouse, Adoption program, #wikipedia-en-help, AfC review, etc.) who are not sufficiently experienced. I've seen users who are finishing up their own adoption programs jump right into trying to adopt new users, and I frequently see users with very little experience with the project come into #wikipedia-en-help to try to help new users. We don't really have any way of preventing this from happening, and we don't have any system of choosing who has enough experience to mentor.
I think it's very important that people who are helping our new users are experienced enough to answer most questions, and self-aware enough that they know when to say "I don't know" and pass the user on to someone who can help. How should we make sure this is the case? I do not like the idea of new userrights, and another dramatic RfA-like process is not something I seek to begin, but we need something: a set of criteria? A simple area where other experienced users can vouch for another user's experience? What are your thoughts? – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, I have no issue with that kind of review. It's the idea of "mentoring the mentors" that I dislike. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
A potential problem was brought up in the last IRC session about Snuggle. If two Snuggle users are interacting with the same user at the same time, they might duplicate teahouse invites and other messages. There's a few potential solutions to this problem:
The easiest of these to implement is local refresh. Next is warning for duplicate actions. Synchronous visibility would require substantial restructuring to the code base and some experimental work with web sockets, but this restructuring would allow us to consider other types of synchronous activities such as a chat room and a live-updating "recent activity" log. Thoughts? -- EpochFail( talk • work) 19:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the responses, folks. I've added both the Local refresh and Duplicate action warning to the bug tracker. Once I've implemented the most recent mockups, solving this problem will be next on my plate. -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
There is an ongoing RfC going on at Category talk:Wikipedians#RfC: Is this category and current subcategories appropriate for Wikipedia that readers of this Wikipedian software page may be interested it. Technical 13 ( talk) 12:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
I just tried out Snuggle for a few minutes. Here are my first impressions. First the good:
Things that could be improved:
Other things I thought of:
I didn't spend very much time at all in doing this, so I may have missed some (most?) of Snuggle's features, but I hope this proves useful to the devs. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
I have just been using Snuggle and come across these edits. Snuggle said they were reverted by ClueBot NG, when they were actually reverted by AussieLegend.
I was going to report it as a false positive by CBNG, since the edits weren't vandalism. But now I have seen AussieLegend's explanation this is not necessary.
Yaris678 ( talk) 12:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
I decided to sort the newbies by number of reverts. The people at the top of the list all had several hundred reverts, despite having only ten or so edits.
Yaris678 ( talk) 19:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
So I tried to finally test the tool today, but the feed for users that I could review was empty. I got a brief flash of "Starting Snuggle..." or such, and that's all: nothing on the green, yellow or red tabs... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, this was mentioned on the WM-l recently. How do I use it? Is there a manual? Tony (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
I got the following error message when attempting to invite someone to the teahouse.
mediawiki: Mediawiki return an error while attempting to performing an action {u'fields': {u'header': u"You're invited to the Teahouse.", u'message': u, u'template': u':Wikipedia:Teahouse/Invitation'}, u'watch': True, u'user': {u'id': 22200887, u'name': u'Wenno123'}, u'action_name': u'invite to teahouse'}. mustposttoken:The 'token' parameter must be POSTed
Any thoughts on the cause? Yaris678 ( talk) 10:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Update: I was able to reprodice that error a few times but now I don't even get that far. I now get an error message in the preview window.
[ERROR] permissions: You must be logged in to preview a user action.
This despite the fact that it says in the corner that I am logged in. Yaris678 ( talk) 11:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey folks. In order to be able to deploy Snuggle on other wikis, I need a source of revision scores (the scores used by ClueBot NG, WP:STiki, WP:Huggle, etc. to flag damaging revisions) on those wikis. For English Wikipedia, STiki has an API that provides these scores, but there's nothing comparable I could find for these other wikis. In trying to solve this problem for myself, I realized that this was a general issue. That a public revision scoring service could be helpful to more tools than Snuggle. So, I have been working with a few people (including STiki's developer West.andrew.g) to organize a project to set up such a public service.
If you have a moment, please take a look at the grant proposal ( m:Grants:IEG/Revision scoring as a service) and endorse it if you see fit. Thanks! -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 14:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
It looks like the desirability scores are not being generated. I don't have time to look at this now, but I wanted to leave a note (and a watchlist ping) for everyone to know that I've noticed the problem and plan to put some hours in on it tonight. I'll ping again when I have more information (or a fix). -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 15:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
The software is great for keeping track of the activity of a set of editors. Right now the candidates are automatically generated - would it be possible to instead supply a set of usernames? Then this could act as a sort of "mentoring dashboard". EdSaperia ( talk) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hey folks,
I'd like to start making note of my work to keep Snuggle online and useful, so expect to see these kinds of updates more often.
So, I noticed that Snuggle stopped synchronizing on March 31st when I went to the server to do some unrelated maintenance. I restarted the sync server and as of this morning, we are up-to-date again.
I'd like to have an alert set up for when synchronization gets far behind, but I don't have the time to invest in that at the moment (pull requests welcome!). If, when using Snuggle, you notice that the activity graphs don't show any activity in the last few days from editors, please feel free to ping me here or in #wikipedia-snuggle (I'm 'halfak'). -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
My first time trying to use Snuggle, I see blank screens in all the categories (using Chrome and IE) and no activity since 4 May. Peter Chastain [habla, por favor] 08:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Further information: http://tools.wmflabs.org/videotutorials/Snuggle/
Leads to a 'not here' message
So I'm trying to use this for the first time, and when I click on 'start snuggle' I get the tabs, a flash that says 'Loading...' and then nothing. Same for all tabs. valereee ( talk) 14:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
>>> [d for d in docs if d['type'] in ('new', 'edit') and 'user' not in d] [{u'rcid': 754800455, u'pageid': 146167, u'timestamp': u'2015-08-05T22:13:35Z', u'userhidden': u'', u'revid': 674749914, u'old_revid': 674688103, u'type': u'edit'}, {u'rcid': 754800567, u'pageid': 146167, u'timestamp': u'2015-08-05T22:14:37Z', u'userhidden': u'', u'revid': 674750012, u'old_revid': 674749970, u'type': u'edit'}]
I still have problems with "Loading...". It appears to be not a server issue, since it depends on the settings. It always hangs when selecting "sorted by total edits". Also, in these cases, the display doesn't change when I switch back that setting; if I refresh, it logs me out, and I log back in, and I get the default settings again, and the server is obviously running. — Sebastian 18:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm also getting no editors in the lists. Happy Squirrel ( talk) 16:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Why do all the editors I looked at (in the uncategorized tab) have the identical, absurdly high desirability of 9.223e+18? — Sebastian 05:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
That seems to fit to what I remember. Sorry, I don't remember much since I only tried it out briefly and didn't use it anymore since my message of 18:33, 23 August 2015 above. I vaguely remember that I found the concept of just going by desirability a bit one-dimensional. There are moments when I just want to be nice and connect with nice people, and there are other moments when I feel up to the more challenging task of finding out whether a new user is nice or nasty. Who I want to connect with doesn't fit in a heuristic box of usefulness for Wikipedia. The more we draw on the variety of our users, the better for Wikipedia. So it would be nice if we could set up our own weighing function; maybe with a few predefined values for "nice people" and "potential troublemakers" and such.
But anyway, you now have one parameter for desirability and may not want to complicate matters, so let's look at the formula:
.
In this, what does the condition '|desirable' refer to: (A) That a certain edit was found to be desirable? If so, what is the purpose of multiplying by p(desirable); shouldn't it just be 1 in that case? Or (B) The proportion of desirable edits for a given user? And what does 'p(scores)' mean? The syntax suggests it's the probability that there are scores, but there should be scores for everyone, shouldn't there? Or the probability for certain scores, such as above a certain threshold? And what is the population that p is averaged over: All editors, all edits, or all edits by a given editor? Obviously, it would help to see a diagram for the Bayesian model.
But regardless, the usual formula in such cases has the form , which behaves nicely by not exceeding 1. And since probabilities are already ratios, there may even be no need to compute a ratio of ratios: If , you don't need a denominator. — Sebastian 01:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
fitdistr
method and then applying the parameters to pythons scipy.stats.beta
-- specifically
this code. I think you have the rough sense for what the graph is capturing. There are minor issues with your notation that mean different things, but I think we're on the same page.Hi :) Does Snuggle work on Arabic Wikipedia?-- Reem Al-Kashif ( talk) 16:13, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
@ EpochFail:, how's the status now? I'm asking, because it seems this tool might be useful on Polish wikipedia as well. // Halibu tt 11:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey folks, I'm going to be migrating Snuggle to a more recent version of linux (Ubuntu 12.04 --> Debian 8.6). To finish the process off, this will require a little bit of downtime. I'll be doing this migration tomorrow, Nov. 8th at 20:30 UTC. If all goes as planned, you should expect about 15 minutes of downtime. -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
@ EpochFail: Is this still active? I'm getting errors when I try to use it.
database: An database error occurred while attempting to getting a set of users with query {u'category': None, u'direction': u'ascending', u'min_edits': 1, u'skip': 0, u'namespace': u'all', u'limit': 10, u'sorted_by': u'desirability.ratio'Many thanks, Nick Moyes ( talk) 11:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
This is my ~third attempt to run Snuggle, and it mostly worked this time. It apparently needs wmflabs.org scripts, and snuggle-en.wmflabs.org cookies. I could easily log in with my account. However, no edits at all were displayed in any of the tables. There is the heading, "Username and stats | Interactive edit graph | Talk page activity", but below it, just blank grey. Not sure why this is: whether the server is down or if there is some incompatibility. HLHJ ( talk) 23:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
@ EpochFail, CAPTAIN MEDUSA, and OnePt618: I think it would be good to ask for new maintainers at village pump/technical, and/or to ask it through sign post. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to try Snuggle, but currently it's 502'ing... pandakekok9 ( talk) 09:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Everytime I tap on any Snuggle link it brings me to a page that says "502: Bad Gateway", is this a problem on my end? Is something wrong with the program? glowing regards, paperandscissors ( contact) 06:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey folks! I've taken Snuggle offline officially. The code is still available, and I have a database backup should someone want to bring it online again. Just let me know and I'll help you get started. The system is built in python and runs on flask/wsgi. -- EpochFail ( talk • contribs) 21:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)