This is the
talk page for discussing
Requested moves and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
![]() | NOTE: This is not the place to request moves. Please follow the instructions given on the project page. If you seek instruction on closing existing requests, please see the closing instructions. |
![]() | Please use the Wikipedia:Move review process for contested move request closes. |
![]() | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, most subpages of Wikipedia:Requested moves that are unused have talk pages that redirect here. |
![]() | This page has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Since there's a huge disparity between the amount of watchers between here and the template talk page, allow me to link Template talk:Requested move#helpful links section from here.
Indeed, the top of this page seems to have some helpful search links that sound like they could also be included in such a list of helpful links in the template (to help people find previous RMs for the same topics). -- Joy ( talk) 21:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I first brought this to the Teahouse and then once again here: Article Page; but I am not really sure how to go about requesting 2 page moves in one request. I would like to move the article Saddle tramp as the main article under that title at WP and move the (disambiguation) page to its own disambiguation title - which will be linked from the header link on the Saddle tramp article. But it is not very clear how to do that on the Requested moves page. Thanks. Maineartists ( talk) 13:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
13:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)I'm not sure where to find the templates for requesting a page move I.e opening the discussion. It will be more logical to have this information prominently at the top of the page. As it stand, the first /lead is filled with the closing instructions and a page mover guide, etc, but doesn't seem to have an immediate clear guidance on how to request a move or a link to do so. Has anyone considered this? Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 06:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Over the years I have come across many cases that would be much better moved via an Rfc rather than RM. This is because in the cases, there also needs to be a scope change. Consider the move requests at 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation and Nuseirat refugee camp massacre. At the move request many users express concerns about scope and potential merger. At the merger discussion, users express concern about the name. Its a circular discussion. An Rfc would clearly lay out the options at the table: "Move to X, with merger", "Move to X, without merger" etc. In such cases, can a user start a RfC instead of a RM? VR (Please ping on reply) 17:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
See talk:Magique (disambiguation), where it is said that a redirect containing edit history should be moved to a nonsensical title "Magique (disambiguation)" when the content is not a disambiguation page, but a former character article. This kind of movement would make edit histories of many topics end up at nonsense names, whenever a primary topic changes a primary redirect with history swapped with an article. That unrelated disambiguated title would now contain the former article come redirect's edit history, for a merged article. The edit summary will never keep up with multiple moves, so the attribution templates on the talk pages should be used to track the location of edit histories, with sensible names; and through the move logs.
-- 65.92.247.96 ( talk) 22:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I have initiated a discussion at the Village Pump on the question, Are new rules needed for high-profile or previously contested proposals? BD2412 T 00:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Snowing. ( closed by non-admin page mover) LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 22:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requested moves → Wikipedia:Requested title changes – title changes seems like a better name because we are requesting to change the name or title of the page. for example in this requested move the request is to change the TITLE to Wikipedia:Requested title changes so that is why title changes is a more appropriate name for this page. 173.72.3.91 ( talk) 19:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
reconsider the move request above to change page title to Wikipedia:Requested title changes as it was closed too fast in less than a day as most move requests take more than a week for consensus. the instructions on top of the closed move say Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page but the talk page of the closer is extended confirmed protected so i am starting that discussion here on this talk page. 173.72.3.91 ( talk) 14:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
remove the Russia-Ukraine War and 2020 Oregon State Senate election move requests from malformed requests as they are also in the july 30 section 173.72.3.91 ( talk) 15:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing
Requested moves and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
![]() | NOTE: This is not the place to request moves. Please follow the instructions given on the project page. If you seek instruction on closing existing requests, please see the closing instructions. |
![]() | Please use the Wikipedia:Move review process for contested move request closes. |
![]() | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, most subpages of Wikipedia:Requested moves that are unused have talk pages that redirect here. |
![]() | This page has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Since there's a huge disparity between the amount of watchers between here and the template talk page, allow me to link Template talk:Requested move#helpful links section from here.
Indeed, the top of this page seems to have some helpful search links that sound like they could also be included in such a list of helpful links in the template (to help people find previous RMs for the same topics). -- Joy ( talk) 21:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
I first brought this to the Teahouse and then once again here: Article Page; but I am not really sure how to go about requesting 2 page moves in one request. I would like to move the article Saddle tramp as the main article under that title at WP and move the (disambiguation) page to its own disambiguation title - which will be linked from the header link on the Saddle tramp article. But it is not very clear how to do that on the Requested moves page. Thanks. Maineartists ( talk) 13:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
13:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)I'm not sure where to find the templates for requesting a page move I.e opening the discussion. It will be more logical to have this information prominently at the top of the page. As it stand, the first /lead is filled with the closing instructions and a page mover guide, etc, but doesn't seem to have an immediate clear guidance on how to request a move or a link to do so. Has anyone considered this? Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 06:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Over the years I have come across many cases that would be much better moved via an Rfc rather than RM. This is because in the cases, there also needs to be a scope change. Consider the move requests at 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation and Nuseirat refugee camp massacre. At the move request many users express concerns about scope and potential merger. At the merger discussion, users express concern about the name. Its a circular discussion. An Rfc would clearly lay out the options at the table: "Move to X, with merger", "Move to X, without merger" etc. In such cases, can a user start a RfC instead of a RM? VR (Please ping on reply) 17:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
See talk:Magique (disambiguation), where it is said that a redirect containing edit history should be moved to a nonsensical title "Magique (disambiguation)" when the content is not a disambiguation page, but a former character article. This kind of movement would make edit histories of many topics end up at nonsense names, whenever a primary topic changes a primary redirect with history swapped with an article. That unrelated disambiguated title would now contain the former article come redirect's edit history, for a merged article. The edit summary will never keep up with multiple moves, so the attribution templates on the talk pages should be used to track the location of edit histories, with sensible names; and through the move logs.
-- 65.92.247.96 ( talk) 22:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I have initiated a discussion at the Village Pump on the question, Are new rules needed for high-profile or previously contested proposals? BD2412 T 00:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. Snowing. ( closed by non-admin page mover) LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 22:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requested moves → Wikipedia:Requested title changes – title changes seems like a better name because we are requesting to change the name or title of the page. for example in this requested move the request is to change the TITLE to Wikipedia:Requested title changes so that is why title changes is a more appropriate name for this page. 173.72.3.91 ( talk) 19:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
reconsider the move request above to change page title to Wikipedia:Requested title changes as it was closed too fast in less than a day as most move requests take more than a week for consensus. the instructions on top of the closed move say Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page but the talk page of the closer is extended confirmed protected so i am starting that discussion here on this talk page. 173.72.3.91 ( talk) 14:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
remove the Russia-Ukraine War and 2020 Oregon State Senate election move requests from malformed requests as they are also in the july 30 section 173.72.3.91 ( talk) 15:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)