Essays High‑impact | ||||||||||
|
This project page was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
The following editors endorse the contents of this essay:
There should be a section for people that don't endorse this sophomoric illogical essay. Shouting "Nazi" at anyone that disagrees with you based on association is pathetic behavior. 2.202.28.72 ( talk) 09:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Shouting "Nazi" at anyone that disagrees with youis not what this article does. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 16:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
This is not going anywhere productive, and off-topic to boot. Let it go, please. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 13:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
violent "solutions", normalizing these ideas are more than enough to cause real damage to people, and, for that reason, I don't think they should be allowed (something between welcome and unwelcome) here as long as they behave. Isabelle 🏳🌈 23:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
The following editors do not endorse the contents of this essay.
And they think the same way about youNo, no. They think the other guys' very existence is immoral and evil by definition, not their thinking. Big difference. A Nazi can stop being a Nazi and get accepted by anti-Nazis, but a Jew (for example) cannot stop being a Jew in a way that will get them accepted by Nazis. Potato, hand grenade. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 08:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
we all have our private definitions of symbols or statementsSure, and that's why we rely on the consensus of wikpedia editors (and outside scholars) to determine which symbols/statements would qualify. This is the English wikipedia, not the Russian, Turkish, or Israeli wikipedia. We draw the line at ideologies which seek to deprive others of rights, or systematically murder, rape, or enslave those who are different. Rainbow flags advocate no such thing, and as Isabelle has said, this argument is a false equivalency. It also reminds me of this billboard — Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 16:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
A good example of the correlation between white supremacist ideologies and disruptive editing. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 18:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
American Liberalism since the Trump era has become just as vengeful and warring as neo-Nazi or other genocidal groups.It's not personal offense, mind you. I'm not a liberal. But... Jesus. I'm not sure which interpretation of that comment is more alarming: "Liberals support genocide" or "Supporting genocide is no worse than cancelling people on Twitter [or whatever other scary thing liberals are doing]".This isn't a change in opinion. Just seeking to differentiate myself from those who make a mockery of the slaughter of my ancestors and my peers. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 16:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Just because someone has a different opinion than yours, doesn't make them Nazis. A Proud Alabamian ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Talk:True_North_Centre_for_Public_Policy#Request_for_comment_on_opening_sentence that may interest followers of this topic. Additionally, it does appear that at least one editor involved in that discussion has been editing the articles of right-wing figures to erase information linking them to the far-right and/or neo-Nazis. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 22:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
There should be a place where non-endorses can state their opinion. 188.212.135.1 ( talk) 18:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Essays High‑impact | ||||||||||
|
This project page was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
The following editors endorse the contents of this essay:
There should be a section for people that don't endorse this sophomoric illogical essay. Shouting "Nazi" at anyone that disagrees with you based on association is pathetic behavior. 2.202.28.72 ( talk) 09:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Shouting "Nazi" at anyone that disagrees with youis not what this article does. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 16:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
This is not going anywhere productive, and off-topic to boot. Let it go, please. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 13:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
violent "solutions", normalizing these ideas are more than enough to cause real damage to people, and, for that reason, I don't think they should be allowed (something between welcome and unwelcome) here as long as they behave. Isabelle 🏳🌈 23:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
The following editors do not endorse the contents of this essay.
And they think the same way about youNo, no. They think the other guys' very existence is immoral and evil by definition, not their thinking. Big difference. A Nazi can stop being a Nazi and get accepted by anti-Nazis, but a Jew (for example) cannot stop being a Jew in a way that will get them accepted by Nazis. Potato, hand grenade. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 08:41, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
we all have our private definitions of symbols or statementsSure, and that's why we rely on the consensus of wikpedia editors (and outside scholars) to determine which symbols/statements would qualify. This is the English wikipedia, not the Russian, Turkish, or Israeli wikipedia. We draw the line at ideologies which seek to deprive others of rights, or systematically murder, rape, or enslave those who are different. Rainbow flags advocate no such thing, and as Isabelle has said, this argument is a false equivalency. It also reminds me of this billboard — Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 16:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
A good example of the correlation between white supremacist ideologies and disruptive editing. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 18:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
American Liberalism since the Trump era has become just as vengeful and warring as neo-Nazi or other genocidal groups.It's not personal offense, mind you. I'm not a liberal. But... Jesus. I'm not sure which interpretation of that comment is more alarming: "Liberals support genocide" or "Supporting genocide is no worse than cancelling people on Twitter [or whatever other scary thing liberals are doing]".This isn't a change in opinion. Just seeking to differentiate myself from those who make a mockery of the slaughter of my ancestors and my peers. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 16:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Just because someone has a different opinion than yours, doesn't make them Nazis. A Proud Alabamian ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 04:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Talk:True_North_Centre_for_Public_Policy#Request_for_comment_on_opening_sentence that may interest followers of this topic. Additionally, it does appear that at least one editor involved in that discussion has been editing the articles of right-wing figures to erase information linking them to the far-right and/or neo-Nazis. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 22:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
There should be a place where non-endorses can state their opinion. 188.212.135.1 ( talk) 18:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)