![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
I conducted an experiment to see if LLMs (Chat-GPT4) could identify sourced and unsourced information in a Wikipedia article. The experiment can be viewed step-by-step here. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 03:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Wikipedia:CHATGPT has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Wikipedia:CHATGPT until a consensus is reached. -
CHAMPION (
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 10:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Based on the discussion above, #RfC: Is this proposal ready to be promoted?, it is clear that this page will not be promoted either to policy or to guideline. However, the RfC didn't really specify what would happen to the page if it isn't promoted. In the absence of such clarity, I am considering swapping out the {{ Proposal}} template with {{ Information page}}. (An information page is a kind of project-space page that "intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices", and it doesn't require much consensus for a page to be labelled as such.) Would there be any objection to that? It would be a softer template than something like {{ failed}}, and I'm not sure if we have enough consensus to use {{ supplement}}. Mz7 ( talk) 03:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Good paper on the topic of LLM assisted writing and the kind of tools we might like to create if there are any software folk here. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.15337.pdf Talpedia 14:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
@ ActivelyDisinterested has suggested a list in the Wikipedia: project namespace to collect notes on sources that we have considered reliable in the past, but which seem to be using LLM-generated content. Please see Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources#Use of AI content generation by previously reliable sources if you're interested in this subject and/or would like to help compile the list. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 4 § Template:OpenAI. –
Novem Linguae (
talk) 05:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 4 § Template:AI-generated notification. –
Novem Linguae (
talk) 05:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
I conducted an experiment to see if LLMs (Chat-GPT4) could identify sourced and unsourced information in a Wikipedia article. The experiment can be viewed step-by-step here. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 03:05, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
Wikipedia:CHATGPT has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § Wikipedia:CHATGPT until a consensus is reached. -
CHAMPION (
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 10:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Based on the discussion above, #RfC: Is this proposal ready to be promoted?, it is clear that this page will not be promoted either to policy or to guideline. However, the RfC didn't really specify what would happen to the page if it isn't promoted. In the absence of such clarity, I am considering swapping out the {{ Proposal}} template with {{ Information page}}. (An information page is a kind of project-space page that "intends to describe some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices", and it doesn't require much consensus for a page to be labelled as such.) Would there be any objection to that? It would be a softer template than something like {{ failed}}, and I'm not sure if we have enough consensus to use {{ supplement}}. Mz7 ( talk) 03:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Good paper on the topic of LLM assisted writing and the kind of tools we might like to create if there are any software folk here. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.15337.pdf Talpedia 14:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
@ ActivelyDisinterested has suggested a list in the Wikipedia: project namespace to collect notes on sources that we have considered reliable in the past, but which seem to be using LLM-generated content. Please see Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources#Use of AI content generation by previously reliable sources if you're interested in this subject and/or would like to help compile the list. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 22:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 4 § Template:OpenAI. –
Novem Linguae (
talk) 05:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 4 § Template:AI-generated notification. –
Novem Linguae (
talk) 05:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)