Use this page to discuss information on the page (and subpages) attached to this one. This includes limited discussion of the Arbitration Committee itself, as a body. Some things belong on other pages:
|
![]() | This Arbitration Committee has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Current text: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Suggested text: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
I feell like I've seen a number of non-ECP users recently asking for clarification of what this means. To me it seems perfectly clear already but the bolding makes it harder to argue that it says anything other than what it does say. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 16:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-extended-confirmed editors may only use the "Talk:" namespace, and only to make edit requestswould be less ambiguous? - Aoidh ( talk) 23:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-extended confirmed may not make any edits with the sole exception of making edit requests in the talk namespace? (I'm also happy with Aoidh's suggestion) The current text can be read as the intended "the only thing non-EC editors are allowed to do is make edit requests, and the only place they are allowed to that is the talk namespace" but it could also be read as "the only thing non-ECR editors are allowed to do in the talk namespace is to make edit requests, there are no restrictions on other namespaces." I agree that adding boldface alone will not resolve this. Thryduulf ( talk) 00:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-extended-confirmed editors may submit edit requests within the topic area provided the request is non-disruptive and is confined to a single comment using an edit request template on the article talk page. If the article talk page is protected, the request may be made at WP:RFED.Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 00:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
ARBCOM contentious topic templates (and anything about the talk page subtopics, really) do not show up in mobile web. - Desine ( talk) 02:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Use this page to discuss information on the page (and subpages) attached to this one. This includes limited discussion of the Arbitration Committee itself, as a body. Some things belong on other pages:
|
![]() | This Arbitration Committee has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
![]() |
|
Track related changes |
Current text: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Suggested text: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
I feell like I've seen a number of non-ECP users recently asking for clarification of what this means. To me it seems perfectly clear already but the bolding makes it harder to argue that it says anything other than what it does say. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 16:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-extended-confirmed editors may only use the "Talk:" namespace, and only to make edit requestswould be less ambiguous? - Aoidh ( talk) 23:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-extended confirmed may not make any edits with the sole exception of making edit requests in the talk namespace? (I'm also happy with Aoidh's suggestion) The current text can be read as the intended "the only thing non-EC editors are allowed to do is make edit requests, and the only place they are allowed to that is the talk namespace" but it could also be read as "the only thing non-ECR editors are allowed to do in the talk namespace is to make edit requests, there are no restrictions on other namespaces." I agree that adding boldface alone will not resolve this. Thryduulf ( talk) 00:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-extended-confirmed editors may submit edit requests within the topic area provided the request is non-disruptive and is confined to a single comment using an edit request template on the article talk page. If the article talk page is protected, the request may be made at WP:RFED.Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 00:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
ARBCOM contentious topic templates (and anything about the talk page subtopics, really) do not show up in mobile web. - Desine ( talk) 02:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)