This project is largely dormant but it is still watched and contains a vast resource of reliable research data that is still relevant today and will often be cited in discussions. |
This page in a nutshell: This is a collection of suggestions for a proposal for reform of the admin selection process and links to its discussion pages on the various aspects of possible reform. Other views and solutions are more than welcome on its talk page. |
Contrary to the Wikipedia mantra 'Adminship is not a big deal', it is - because of the very stressful and oft humiliating experience of the inquisition itself. The trials and tribulations of being a sysop come later. - User:Kudpung The problem with RfA is NOT the process. It is the participants. - User:Fetchcomms We need to disengage ourselves from the community's anger over admin abuse, and we need to find a way not to get in a candidate's face when they show up for RFA. - User:Dank |
Welcome! Some Wikipedians have formed a task force to better organize discussions and make viable proposals for RfA reform. This project contains their suggestions, resources, and things to discuss. If you would like to be of active help, please join the task force page. Many pages, proposals and discussions fall under the scope of this project, and all that information may seem overwhelming. Don't be intimidated! It's all neatly organized in the pink box above.
These items are not within the remit of the current project. They are, or have been, the subject of perennial discussions around Wikipedia, in particular at WT:RfA. To learn more, follow the links above to some of the more recent discussions, or use keywords in the WT:RfA archive search box.
For a more comprehensive list of ideas conceived by this reform, please visit the Possible proposals page
This section details the progress which has been made since
RfA reform 2011 started.
(Since 11 July)
None as yet
(See What this project is not about)
Still at the drawing board, these proposals need more work before they are presented to the community:
While the task force is currently inactive, the membership list below is retained for historical puroposes. |
This is a list of those who feel they can collaborate with each other to move this RfA reform project along. Just sign your name the normal way. No comments other than your signature are needed. Outside views are more than welcome on the various talk pages.
Kudpung ( talk) • | Pyfan ( talk) • | Swarm ( talk) • | Worm That Turned ( talk) |
Consider reading the comments on the project talk page first before joining this list. This is not a list of passive supporters for the project. Joining here assumes you are already firmly in favour of reform, and can invest time to regularly and actively take part in its development. |
Long message list for Message Delivery Bot. Includes task force and all users who have posted on the project talk pages
This project is largely dormant but it is still watched and contains a vast resource of reliable research data that is still relevant today and will often be cited in discussions. |
This page in a nutshell: This is a collection of suggestions for a proposal for reform of the admin selection process and links to its discussion pages on the various aspects of possible reform. Other views and solutions are more than welcome on its talk page. |
Contrary to the Wikipedia mantra 'Adminship is not a big deal', it is - because of the very stressful and oft humiliating experience of the inquisition itself. The trials and tribulations of being a sysop come later. - User:Kudpung The problem with RfA is NOT the process. It is the participants. - User:Fetchcomms We need to disengage ourselves from the community's anger over admin abuse, and we need to find a way not to get in a candidate's face when they show up for RFA. - User:Dank |
Welcome! Some Wikipedians have formed a task force to better organize discussions and make viable proposals for RfA reform. This project contains their suggestions, resources, and things to discuss. If you would like to be of active help, please join the task force page. Many pages, proposals and discussions fall under the scope of this project, and all that information may seem overwhelming. Don't be intimidated! It's all neatly organized in the pink box above.
These items are not within the remit of the current project. They are, or have been, the subject of perennial discussions around Wikipedia, in particular at WT:RfA. To learn more, follow the links above to some of the more recent discussions, or use keywords in the WT:RfA archive search box.
For a more comprehensive list of ideas conceived by this reform, please visit the Possible proposals page
This section details the progress which has been made since
RfA reform 2011 started.
(Since 11 July)
None as yet
(See What this project is not about)
Still at the drawing board, these proposals need more work before they are presented to the community:
While the task force is currently inactive, the membership list below is retained for historical puroposes. |
This is a list of those who feel they can collaborate with each other to move this RfA reform project along. Just sign your name the normal way. No comments other than your signature are needed. Outside views are more than welcome on the various talk pages.
Kudpung ( talk) • | Pyfan ( talk) • | Swarm ( talk) • | Worm That Turned ( talk) |
Consider reading the comments on the project talk page first before joining this list. This is not a list of passive supporters for the project. Joining here assumes you are already firmly in favour of reform, and can invest time to regularly and actively take part in its development. |
Long message list for Message Delivery Bot. Includes task force and all users who have posted on the project talk pages