|
Good to see you're here as well as on the Simple English Wikipedia. -- Dylan 620 Contribs Sign! 16:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Corruptcopper, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback.
In addition, I noticed that you currently don't have many edits, but at the same time, the vandalism-reverting that you did was good. Remember, if you find edit edit that needs reverting, but think that using rollback to revert it would be inappopriate, then don't revert it with rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I replied on my talk page.-- Knulclunk ( talk) 18:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations on your vandal-reverting work! However, could you please review this reversion? Thanks! Gail ( talk) 20:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes sorry I will revert it. I was going too fast and I havent ever used huggle before so its just getting into it. But thanks for pointing it out to me. Corruptcopper ( talk) 20:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good :) You might find the {{ Welcome-anon}} template convenient for welcoming new users in the future. Take care! Gail ( talk) 23:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Please see the Physical Therapy page history and discussion. User:TristanTzara seems to be going around changing common use english to British english. Please revert your edit of my change back to physical therapy. DoctorDW ( talk) 21:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Really nasty vandalism. -- Unpopular Opinion ( talk) 20:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Looks like you're doing a good job so far, particularly in terms of vandal-fighting. However, you only about 900 contributions; while edit count isn't everything, candidates rarely pass RfA with fewer than 5,000 or so. So for the moment, I think admin coaching would be a good idea. Regards, – Juliancolton | Talk 20:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Cool thanks for also looking into it. I will apply and see if get a coach. Corruptcopper ( talk) 20:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Please only use rollback for cases of blatant vandalism or blatant BLP violations. This edit was not an appropriate use of ROLLBACK. If you want to use HUGGLE to revert edits like that, please use the build in edit summary features to do so. Thanks. Protonk ( talk) 19:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok.
- I'm going to remove your rollback permission until it is clear that you understand WP:ROLLBACK and WP:VAND. Protonk ( talk) 19:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I've removed rollback privileges from this account. After it is clear that you understand the related procedures you can reapply at WP:PERM or from any admin, provided you inform them that your privileges were revoked previously. I'm sorry to have to do this. Protonk ( talk) 19:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I found your page by accident and reviewed the situation at hand. Please be advised that I have restored your rollback rights -- your rights were removed without any appropriate warning of a potential problem, which I find to be an unfair punishment. That being said, please be aware that there has already been a concern raised on your use of rollback, and it is possible that these rights can be removed if the earlier situation is repeated. Thank you and be careful in your editing! :) Pastor Theo ( talk) 01:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks and sorry if I have got you into trouble over restoring the rollback.
Corruptcopper (
talk) 09:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Bear in mind that revocation of rollback is not a punishment, it is preventative. Protonk's
comment clearly shows that the removal was indeed preventative. —
neuro
(talk) 19:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- A better place to continue this discussion might be my talk page or Pastor Theo's, though I think things are pretty much ironed out. Protonk ( talk) 20:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Bear in mind that revocation of rollback is not a punishment, it is preventative. Protonk's
comment clearly shows that the removal was indeed preventative. —
neuro
(talk) 19:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
"Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Eidos Interactive has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)"
Sorry, but I haven't made any recent edits... I just logged on to my ISP a minute ago. 91.110.157.136 ( talk) 20:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there I have just looked through your logs and if you say that you have just logged on then don't worry but someone edited from this IP address and then they created some vandalism on the page. Corruptcopper ( talk) 20:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, my ISP uses dynamic IP allocation so that might be why it's like this. 91.110.157.136 ( talk) 20:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I didn't.-- 91.148.159.4 ( talk) 20:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Best, -- 91.148.159.4 ( talk) 20:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Did'nt you watch Joe The Condor's match on youtube.
I've seen the videos about his assist characters was 2 official playable Tatsunoko characters of Gatchaman: 1st video he was with Jun the Swan: she will on assist his ultra moves 2nd video he with the others (Example with Frank West or Tekkaman Blade): Ken the Eagle will assit his ultra moves
I'm not since Jun was defeated first. Is Joe the Condor ultra moves assist is still her or replaced by Ken the Eagle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.136.10.197 ( talk) 07:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
My contribution to We Came as Romans
I'm sorry that my English skills aren't very well. I do my edits usually in the german wiki. I don't want to vandalize the english wikipedia. I don't know why you think so. I've only reverted two senseless edits on the We Came as Romans page. Could you please explain, why you are still thinking it was vandalism? SigmaB ( talk) 15:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Here are the examples of why you were warned, these seem to me to be in perfect english despite you claiming that your english skills are not that good. First set of vandalism, Vandalism 2nd Time Corruptcopper ( talk) 15:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- The sentences you have reverted weren't my sentences. Please have another look on the history page of We Came as Romans. I haven't written one single word.
The editor of the sentences was 64.26.124.1. I only did the same as you, I wanted to revert the page -- SigmaB ( talk) 17:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Having looked through the contributions you added the ones stated, I have gone back through the whole of the contributions made my the ip address and can not see where they have put it. Corruptcopper ( talk) 19:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, we've received a request on the Account Creation tool for an account there in your name. Could you please confirm that this request was made by you? Thank you. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 21:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't expect the confirmation to have been removed; I see you've already done so in your talk page history. Never mind! I've approved your access to the tool. Please be sure to review the interface guide before logging in. Thanks! Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 21:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello Corruptcopper, This was my first article, and I spent a lot of time learning how to enter the information and resources, and I felt proud that I was able to create the article. I am sorry that my article on Florian Hutter was deleted. I am having trouble understanding all of the guidelines and I think I need some help. Was my article totally wrong, or was there anything I could have done to edit the article and prevent deletion? Any guidance that you could provide to me would me of great help. The deletion of my article was on 12:25, 24 January 2011.
Thanks! Mark Bruno 19:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Corruptcopper. I have now moved the RfA reform and its associated pages to project space. The main page has been updated and streamlined. We now also have a new table on voter profiles. Please take a moment to check in and keep the pages on your watchlist. Regards, -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for updating me on this, just hope that we can achieve something out of this.
Corruptcopper (
talk) 21:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Kudpung has asked me to 'nudge' some people .. as I'm an idle get, I'm just going through the entire Task Force list so my apologies if you didn't need a nudge! You can slap me about over on WP:EfD if you like :o)
Straw polling various options: over here - please add views, agree with views, all that usual stuff. Pesky ( talk) 12:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I've removed the account creator userbox from your user page. Please don't display userboxes for permissions you don't have, as it is misleading. Regards, MacMed talk stalk 14:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, even though I am in the process of having them placed back onto my account. Corruptcopper ( talk) 13:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Greetings!
As a member of the RfA improvement task force, your input is requested at the possible proposals page, which consists of ideas that have not yet been discussed or developed.
Please look though the ideas and leave a comment on the talk page on the proposal(s) you would most like to see go forward. Your feedback will help decide which proposals to put to the community. And, as always, feel free to add new suggestions. Thanks!
Swarm, coordinator, RfA reform 2011
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 07:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC).
A detailed table and notes have now been created and posted. It compares how RfA is carried out on major Wikipedias (English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). If you feel that other important language Wikipedias should be added, please let us know. This may however depend on our/your language skills!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 22:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC).
Hi. It's been a little while since the last message on RfA reform, and there's been a fair amount of slow but steady progress. However, there is currently a flurry of activity due to some conversations on Jimbo's talk page.
I think we're very close to putting an idea or two forward before the community and there are at least two newer ones in the pipeline. So if you have a moment:
- Have a look at the min requirement proposal and familiarise yourself with the statistics, I'd appreciate comment on where we should put the bar.
- Any final comments would be appreciated on the clerks proposal.
- Feedback on the two newer proposals - Pre-RfA & Wikipedia:RfA reform 2011/Sysop on request. Both are more radical reforms of RfA and might run along side the current system.
Thanks for reading and for any comments that you've now made.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 21:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC).
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Corruptcopper! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Speedy on Neoprot
I noticed that you tagged Neoprot for speedy deletion based on WP:CSD#A2. Please keep in mind that this criterion only applies if the article actually exists on another Wikipedia. Since this one does not, it is not eligible for speedy deletion simply for having been written in a language other than English. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- My fault as I am using Huggle and couldn't remember the template for whcih one to use. But I know know that it is {not english} that is needed on the page. Corruptcopper ( talk) 18:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Grojband
Hello Corruptcopper. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Grojband, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this article has no substantial edits by others. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- D'oh, clearly I meant "has substantial edits by others"... Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar on the article The Lord of the Rings Online: Helm's Deep man, much appreciated! I love that game and was a great chance to get to actually create the wiki page on its new expansion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMatulaak ( talk • contribs) 16:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Hey Corruptcopper! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers
I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/
Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.
Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb ( talk) 09:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Corruptcopper,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Corruptcopper! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Corruptcopper, thanks for your comments at WP:UAA. However, per instruction #6 at the top of that page, users have a choice between warning or reporting, not both. For this reason, when a report appears at WP:UAA, it is correct if the user didn't receive a warning. An administrator can then choose to decline the report and warn the user instead. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion- although at the top of the page where I think I misunderstood was about it being an immediate thing for an administrator to have a look at, and when on Huggle I have noticed it does say do not warn/report users if they have not edited from that account. Corruptcopper ( talk) 22:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
Good to see you're here as well as on the Simple English Wikipedia. -- Dylan 620 Contribs Sign! 16:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello Corruptcopper, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback.
In addition, I noticed that you currently don't have many edits, but at the same time, the vandalism-reverting that you did was good. Remember, if you find edit edit that needs reverting, but think that using rollback to revert it would be inappopriate, then don't revert it with rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I replied on my talk page.-- Knulclunk ( talk) 18:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations on your vandal-reverting work! However, could you please review this reversion? Thanks! Gail ( talk) 20:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes sorry I will revert it. I was going too fast and I havent ever used huggle before so its just getting into it. But thanks for pointing it out to me. Corruptcopper ( talk) 20:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good :) You might find the {{ Welcome-anon}} template convenient for welcoming new users in the future. Take care! Gail ( talk) 23:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Please see the Physical Therapy page history and discussion. User:TristanTzara seems to be going around changing common use english to British english. Please revert your edit of my change back to physical therapy. DoctorDW ( talk) 21:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
No problem. Really nasty vandalism. -- Unpopular Opinion ( talk) 20:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Looks like you're doing a good job so far, particularly in terms of vandal-fighting. However, you only about 900 contributions; while edit count isn't everything, candidates rarely pass RfA with fewer than 5,000 or so. So for the moment, I think admin coaching would be a good idea. Regards, – Juliancolton | Talk 20:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Cool thanks for also looking into it. I will apply and see if get a coach. Corruptcopper ( talk) 20:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Please only use rollback for cases of blatant vandalism or blatant BLP violations. This edit was not an appropriate use of ROLLBACK. If you want to use HUGGLE to revert edits like that, please use the build in edit summary features to do so. Thanks. Protonk ( talk) 19:31, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok.
- I'm going to remove your rollback permission until it is clear that you understand WP:ROLLBACK and WP:VAND. Protonk ( talk) 19:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
I've removed rollback privileges from this account. After it is clear that you understand the related procedures you can reapply at WP:PERM or from any admin, provided you inform them that your privileges were revoked previously. I'm sorry to have to do this. Protonk ( talk) 19:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I found your page by accident and reviewed the situation at hand. Please be advised that I have restored your rollback rights -- your rights were removed without any appropriate warning of a potential problem, which I find to be an unfair punishment. That being said, please be aware that there has already been a concern raised on your use of rollback, and it is possible that these rights can be removed if the earlier situation is repeated. Thank you and be careful in your editing! :) Pastor Theo ( talk) 01:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks and sorry if I have got you into trouble over restoring the rollback.
Corruptcopper (
talk) 09:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Bear in mind that revocation of rollback is not a punishment, it is preventative. Protonk's
comment clearly shows that the removal was indeed preventative. —
neuro
(talk) 19:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- A better place to continue this discussion might be my talk page or Pastor Theo's, though I think things are pretty much ironed out. Protonk ( talk) 20:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Bear in mind that revocation of rollback is not a punishment, it is preventative. Protonk's
comment clearly shows that the removal was indeed preventative. —
neuro
(talk) 19:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
"Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Eidos Interactive has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)"
Sorry, but I haven't made any recent edits... I just logged on to my ISP a minute ago. 91.110.157.136 ( talk) 20:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi there I have just looked through your logs and if you say that you have just logged on then don't worry but someone edited from this IP address and then they created some vandalism on the page. Corruptcopper ( talk) 20:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, my ISP uses dynamic IP allocation so that might be why it's like this. 91.110.157.136 ( talk) 20:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I didn't.-- 91.148.159.4 ( talk) 20:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Best, -- 91.148.159.4 ( talk) 20:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Did'nt you watch Joe The Condor's match on youtube.
I've seen the videos about his assist characters was 2 official playable Tatsunoko characters of Gatchaman: 1st video he was with Jun the Swan: she will on assist his ultra moves 2nd video he with the others (Example with Frank West or Tekkaman Blade): Ken the Eagle will assit his ultra moves
I'm not since Jun was defeated first. Is Joe the Condor ultra moves assist is still her or replaced by Ken the Eagle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.136.10.197 ( talk) 07:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
My contribution to We Came as Romans
I'm sorry that my English skills aren't very well. I do my edits usually in the german wiki. I don't want to vandalize the english wikipedia. I don't know why you think so. I've only reverted two senseless edits on the We Came as Romans page. Could you please explain, why you are still thinking it was vandalism? SigmaB ( talk) 15:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Here are the examples of why you were warned, these seem to me to be in perfect english despite you claiming that your english skills are not that good. First set of vandalism, Vandalism 2nd Time Corruptcopper ( talk) 15:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- The sentences you have reverted weren't my sentences. Please have another look on the history page of We Came as Romans. I haven't written one single word.
The editor of the sentences was 64.26.124.1. I only did the same as you, I wanted to revert the page -- SigmaB ( talk) 17:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Having looked through the contributions you added the ones stated, I have gone back through the whole of the contributions made my the ip address and can not see where they have put it. Corruptcopper ( talk) 19:46, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, we've received a request on the Account Creation tool for an account there in your name. Could you please confirm that this request was made by you? Thank you. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 21:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't expect the confirmation to have been removed; I see you've already done so in your talk page history. Never mind! I've approved your access to the tool. Please be sure to review the interface guide before logging in. Thanks! Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 21:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello Corruptcopper, This was my first article, and I spent a lot of time learning how to enter the information and resources, and I felt proud that I was able to create the article. I am sorry that my article on Florian Hutter was deleted. I am having trouble understanding all of the guidelines and I think I need some help. Was my article totally wrong, or was there anything I could have done to edit the article and prevent deletion? Any guidance that you could provide to me would me of great help. The deletion of my article was on 12:25, 24 January 2011.
Thanks! Mark Bruno 19:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Corruptcopper. I have now moved the RfA reform and its associated pages to project space. The main page has been updated and streamlined. We now also have a new table on voter profiles. Please take a moment to check in and keep the pages on your watchlist. Regards, -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for updating me on this, just hope that we can achieve something out of this.
Corruptcopper (
talk) 21:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Kudpung has asked me to 'nudge' some people .. as I'm an idle get, I'm just going through the entire Task Force list so my apologies if you didn't need a nudge! You can slap me about over on WP:EfD if you like :o)
Straw polling various options: over here - please add views, agree with views, all that usual stuff. Pesky ( talk) 12:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I've removed the account creator userbox from your user page. Please don't display userboxes for permissions you don't have, as it is misleading. Regards, MacMed talk stalk 14:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, even though I am in the process of having them placed back onto my account. Corruptcopper ( talk) 13:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Greetings!
As a member of the RfA improvement task force, your input is requested at the possible proposals page, which consists of ideas that have not yet been discussed or developed.
Please look though the ideas and leave a comment on the talk page on the proposal(s) you would most like to see go forward. Your feedback will help decide which proposals to put to the community. And, as always, feel free to add new suggestions. Thanks!
Swarm, coordinator, RfA reform 2011
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 07:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC).
A detailed table and notes have now been created and posted. It compares how RfA is carried out on major Wikipedias (English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). If you feel that other important language Wikipedias should be added, please let us know. This may however depend on our/your language skills!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 22:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC).
Hi. It's been a little while since the last message on RfA reform, and there's been a fair amount of slow but steady progress. However, there is currently a flurry of activity due to some conversations on Jimbo's talk page.
I think we're very close to putting an idea or two forward before the community and there are at least two newer ones in the pipeline. So if you have a moment:
- Have a look at the min requirement proposal and familiarise yourself with the statistics, I'd appreciate comment on where we should put the bar.
- Any final comments would be appreciated on the clerks proposal.
- Feedback on the two newer proposals - Pre-RfA & Wikipedia:RfA reform 2011/Sysop on request. Both are more radical reforms of RfA and might run along side the current system.
Thanks for reading and for any comments that you've now made.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 21:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC).
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Corruptcopper! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Speedy on Neoprot
I noticed that you tagged Neoprot for speedy deletion based on WP:CSD#A2. Please keep in mind that this criterion only applies if the article actually exists on another Wikipedia. Since this one does not, it is not eligible for speedy deletion simply for having been written in a language other than English. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 18:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- My fault as I am using Huggle and couldn't remember the template for whcih one to use. But I know know that it is {not english} that is needed on the page. Corruptcopper ( talk) 18:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Grojband
Hello Corruptcopper. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Grojband, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this article has no substantial edits by others. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- D'oh, clearly I meant "has substantial edits by others"... Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar on the article The Lord of the Rings Online: Helm's Deep man, much appreciated! I love that game and was a great chance to get to actually create the wiki page on its new expansion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMatulaak ( talk • contribs) 16:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Hey Corruptcopper! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers
I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/
Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.
Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb ( talk) 09:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Corruptcopper,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Corruptcopper! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Corruptcopper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Corruptcopper, thanks for your comments at WP:UAA. However, per instruction #6 at the top of that page, users have a choice between warning or reporting, not both. For this reason, when a report appears at WP:UAA, it is correct if the user didn't receive a warning. An administrator can then choose to decline the report and warn the user instead. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion- although at the top of the page where I think I misunderstood was about it being an immediate thing for an administrator to have a look at, and when on Huggle I have noticed it does say do not warn/report users if they have not edited from that account. Corruptcopper ( talk) 22:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |