Voice your opinion on this candidate ( talk page) Final: (94/0/0); Closed by bibliomaniac15 on 19:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
2over0 ( talk · contribs) – I'd like to present 2over0, formerly User:Eldereft, for your consideration. 2/0 has been editing actively for almost 2 years, and has made a little over 8,000 edits. He's consistently impressed me (and, I think, many others) with his thoughtfulness, maturity, and cluefulness. 2/0 has been active on a number of challenging and controversial articles, where he's consistently been a voice of reason and moderation, earning accolades from editors of all persuasions (see also [1], this brief exchange, and this thread for representative examples where he's found common ground, or at least mutual respect, with editors despite differing views on content).
Why do I think 2/0 would be a good admin?
Overall, 2/0 has a good balance of content and project-related contributions, he's demonstrated maturity and level-headedness in the trenches of some of our most controversial articles, and he's an active, experienced, and clueful Wikipedian. I hope you'll agree with me that Wikipedia will benefit by giving him a few additional tools to help out around here. MastCell Talk 00:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/2over0 before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Voice your opinion on this candidate ( talk page) Final: (94/0/0); Closed by bibliomaniac15 on 19:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply
2over0 ( talk · contribs) – I'd like to present 2over0, formerly User:Eldereft, for your consideration. 2/0 has been editing actively for almost 2 years, and has made a little over 8,000 edits. He's consistently impressed me (and, I think, many others) with his thoughtfulness, maturity, and cluefulness. 2/0 has been active on a number of challenging and controversial articles, where he's consistently been a voice of reason and moderation, earning accolades from editors of all persuasions (see also [1], this brief exchange, and this thread for representative examples where he's found common ground, or at least mutual respect, with editors despite differing views on content).
Why do I think 2/0 would be a good admin?
Overall, 2/0 has a good balance of content and project-related contributions, he's demonstrated maturity and level-headedness in the trenches of some of our most controversial articles, and he's an active, experienced, and clueful Wikipedian. I hope you'll agree with me that Wikipedia will benefit by giving him a few additional tools to help out around here. MastCell Talk 00:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/2over0 before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |