The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) | free Thailand 05:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• ReamWorks → Tim Minear  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Might mean DreamWorks, so perhaps weak keep as plausible typo (skipping a keystroke), otherwise delete. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep, now that it's mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) | free Thailand 05:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Teakwood Lane Productions → Howard Gordon  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete to allow article creation if possible. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Zeke, the Mad Horrorist: Now mentioned. Also, the mention was added four hours before your comment. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep, now mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. It's mentioned now, so the nominator's rationale no longer holds. Wanting to delete to encourage an article to be created at the title is still valid if the production company is notable, but a claim has not been made either way to its notability. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

• Waverly Films (production company) → Nancy Meyers  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete to allow article creation if possible. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Zeke, the Mad Horrorist: Now mentioned. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move Wolfhound (disambiguation) to Wolfhound. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

• Wolfhound → Wolf hunting with dogs  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

In 2014 User:Ego White Tray moved the disambiguation page to Wolfhound (disambiguation) and redirected this title. It seems to me, though, that Irish wolfhound is at least as likely to be the primary usage. Or perhaps other things also vie, in which case there is no primary usage. Cnilep ( talk) 02:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Irish wolfhound is mentioned and linked in the second sentence of Wolf hunting with dogs. If this is an argument that there is no primary topic, then that's a WP:Requested move of Wolfhound (disambiguation) to Wolfhound. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 07:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment: The modern Irish wolfhound is a Great Dane/Scottish Deerhound derivative as per its article - you certainly cannot go wolf hunting with it. Perhaps the redirect needs to go back to the disimbag page. William Harris (talk) 10:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Move Disambiguation page over this base title. I'll say the same if we head to RM instead. -- BDD ( talk) 16:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

*Move (retarget) Wolfhound → Wolfhound (disambiguation), as it offers more variables to choose from than "Wolf hunting with dogs". William Harris (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• • @ William Harris: Wolfhound can't redirect to Wolfhound (disambiguation) because the disambiguation page would be WP:Malplaced. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
    • Thanks, I did know that policy existed. William Harris (talk) 06:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Move Disambiguation page over this base title, as per User:BDD. William Harris (talk) 06:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment as nominator: Moving the disambiguation page to this title seems like a good solution to me. I apologize if my failure to request a preferred outcome confused contributors to this discussion. Cnilep ( talk) 01:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 18:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Skateboarding Hall of Fame → Skatelab  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

There is no mention of any "Hall of Fame" at the target article Skatelab. Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 19:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 18:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• 333-333-333 → Something Awful  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This redirect is an ID or a phone number, so it's not a possible search term. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 18:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Not mentioned, so delete as ambiguous and confusing. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete ambiguous -- Devokewater (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Asmodea Oaktree ( talk) 22:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Congregation of Indulgences → Congregation (Roman Curia)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sacred Congregation of Indulgences → Congregation (Roman Curia)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sacred Congregation of Indulgences and Relics → Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sacred Congregation of Indulgences and Sacred Relics → Congregation (Roman Curia)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No mention of such a congregation in either target article. Wikisource says the indulgence and relic congregations were merged in 1904. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments seems to handle relics now, though this body isn't mentioned in the article either. I propose deleting per WP:REDLINK. -- BDD ( talk) 17:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 18:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Mandol (instrument 2) → Mandolute  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

• Delete this redirect which is confusing. "Mandol" is not mentioned in Mandolute, but there is a hatnote to Algerian mandole which is the correct target of Mandol (instrument). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. I worked on both the Algerian Mandole article and the mandolute article. I also made the redirect. I don’t know what happened; if the redirect should point anywhere it should be to the Algerian mandole. I don’t think it is needed. Jacqke ( talk) 10:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete per author's request Staszek Lem ( talk) 15:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 18:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• New Northern and Western provinces of Poland → Recovered Territories  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Strange redirect just created by a user who claimed that the name of the target article is not neutral. But that name is widely used in the literature, while this descriptive term is pure WP:OR (not really used outside Wikipedia). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Northwest Poland is a neutral term. "Recovered Territories" is propaganda as seen in : Uprooted: How Breslau Became Wroclaw During the Century of Expulsions, pp 215 and A Clean Sweep?: The Politics of Ethnic Cleansing in Western Poland, 1945-1960.-- Graf von Aehrenthal ( talk) 08:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Northwest Poland is something else. Staszek Lem ( talk) 14:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• delete Term invented by a wikipedian; not searchable. Staszek Lem ( talk) 14:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete made up term. Super Ψ Dro 22:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete if the linked article's name is objectionable, they should try to have it moved. Knowing full well that chances of that happing are almost as low as the German-Polish border being changed, they came up with this misuse of a redirect. I was alterted to this because they are changing dozens of links, and it would probably be helpful to put a quick stop to this. Matthias Winkelmann ( talk) 15:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.