The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:58, 14 September 2010 [1].
List of Texas Tech Red Raiders bowl games ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because... this list meets all FL criteria. NThomas ( talk) 01:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Oppose for the following reasons:
After further consideration, while I still oppose promotion of this article for the reasons I state above, I ask that, if the FLC delegates believe there is a consensus to promote outside of my oppose, to please disregard my objection and go ahead and promote the list. I am new to FLC and realize that my judgment in this instance may not be fully aligned with the FL criteria.
–
Grondemar 01:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
Resolved comments from Courcelles 13:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Comment What is sourcing the attendance figures?
Courcelles 06:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 23:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 22:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply |
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from GrapedApe ( talk) 19:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
**Consider creating at least stubs for the redlinked games.
|
Support looks to be comprehensive, well-formatted, well-cited, and visually pleasing. As I mentioned earlier, I'm in favor of the format. A few suggestions to go along with my support !vote.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 19:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:58, 14 September 2010 [1].
List of Texas Tech Red Raiders bowl games ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because... this list meets all FL criteria. NThomas ( talk) 01:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Oppose for the following reasons:
After further consideration, while I still oppose promotion of this article for the reasons I state above, I ask that, if the FLC delegates believe there is a consensus to promote outside of my oppose, to please disregard my objection and go ahead and promote the list. I am new to FLC and realize that my judgment in this instance may not be fully aligned with the FL criteria.
–
Grondemar 01:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
Resolved comments from Courcelles 13:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
*Comment What is sourcing the attendance figures?
Courcelles 06:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 23:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments –
Giants2008 ( 27 and counting) 22:39, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply |
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC) reply
|
Resolved comments from GrapedApe ( talk) 19:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply |
---|
**Consider creating at least stubs for the redlinked games.
|
Support looks to be comprehensive, well-formatted, well-cited, and visually pleasing. As I mentioned earlier, I'm in favor of the format. A few suggestions to go along with my support !vote.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 19:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply