| ||
---|---|---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. | ||
The article is worthy of presence in Wikipedia, citations have been improved and more citations can be added. Lazy-restless ( talk) 07:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Besides, I can give a lot of translation book link of the book in different prominent language from google books. Anyone can find them by searching with the writers name in the google books, which are worthy long in number to count to an end. see it here. Here are some links. There are countless translations. Few of them i gave below and got bored of collecting the links, so please search in google books with outhors name with inverted comma: inauthor:"Michael H. Hart". Many more translations are also found with the help of google translator by translating authors name in non-latin letter's languages on google books.
Lazy-restless ( talk) 14:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
| ||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I am notifying the DRV community that there is a WP:BLPDELETE review of Operation Voicer at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Tots & little ones matter! and BLPDELETE review ( permanent link). Cunard ( talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The deletion did not follow proper procedure. No notice of this AfD discussion was ever posted on List of countries by population (United Nations). No new comments on this earlier AfD were made after March 29. In fact, a later AfD specifically on List of countries by population (United Nations) was closed on April 6 with a result of keep. The points I made on April 2 in that later discussion were never addressed in the earlier discussion. To summarize the most important point I made there: while I agree that the use of the data for every year in every variant of the UN projection model would constitute an unambiguous copyright violation, use of just two years of projections in one particular variant of the UN model should satisfy the WP:NFCCP criteria, and should be allowed. Cobblet ( talk) 19:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Note: See follow-up below – the UN appears to allow free use of data from its database with proper attribution. I think undeletion is appropriate, and I will add the necessary citation. Cobblet ( talk) 15:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I had cited two national newspapers where the news was covered (there are others too) and two famous personalities who had inaugurated the festival in 2017 and 2018 (one of them is world-famous and the other a noted novelist and writer and famous all over India). I had given a link to the government location where this festival is held every year. This is more than say, what the Kerala Lit Fest has done but that article has not been deleted. My article has as much authenticity as say the Jaipur lit fest though I am not saying that the PILF is as great as that. I stated facts and there was no advertising, not even a little bit. I do not know what was in the first article on PILF as I have not read it. I came to search for a page on PILF as I live in Pune and love my city and was surprised to find that there was nothing on the PILF, the only significant English Language Literary Festival in the city. Pune is a hub of educational and cultural activities, a very prominent city. The deletion is illogical and unfair as the article I posted had good credentials. I was told I should write a draft article and then ask for a discussion on it, but there is no point as I would simply duplicate what I wrote yesterday. My article was short and there was no advertising. As I said, I do not know what was written earlier as I do not know the people who wrote it. If the article on PILF remains deleted that means that almost all the articles on lit fests in India should be deleted which would be quite shocking. People in India refer to Wikipedia to get information and it is a great pity that this is happening. No logical reason has been given to me for deletion. However, if the logic is that Pune is an insignificant city then we have to agree to disagree. - Nitajk. Nitajk ( talk) 02:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Nitajk ( talk) 02:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Yaniv was not notable in 2015. However she got a notablity during gender transition and transgender activism. Her new name is Jessica Yaniv. Sharouser ( talk) 15:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Belle Delphine is definitely notable enough for an article now. She wasn't earlier this month but is now. AdrianWikiEditor ( talk) 07:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
AdrianWikiEditor ( talk) 20:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
editbreak
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
1. Directi (a high-tech company) is actually very notable within the IT sector in India, and overseas.2.Directi directly spunoff a six-letter TLD and business,namely media dot net, which was bought for the sum of Nine Hundred Million Dollars, a substantial and notable transaction.3.The nomination for deletion and its debate did not progress past superficiality in that matters-of-fact were ignored or not taken into account.4.It is clear to the average reasonable man or woman that the Directi Group of companies easily qualifies for inclusion in wikipedia.5. A redirect happens when readers search for Directi, although redirect leads to a BLP-type wikipedia article on one of Directi's founding executives. 209.240.35.58 ( talk) 03:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Thonburi University Football Club ( Thai: สโมสรฟุตบอลมหาวิทยาลัยธนบุรี) is a football club in Thailand, it competed in Thai League 4 ( Thai: ไทยลีก 4) also know as Omsin League ( Thai: ออมสิน ลีก) since 2019 season. This is the club's data from Thai League official website. This article has deleted in 2018 since the club has not promoted to the professional league. At that time, there are not enough of sources. But now in 2019 season, they has promoted to Thai League 4 that is a professional league. This is the PR brochures of 4 professional football leagues of Thailand from Thai League official website, This is the news about the sponsorship of Omsin bank ( Thai: ธนาคารออมสิน) from FA Thailand's official website. We could found the club's info in the official website of Thai League that have a lot of data including fixture, result, standing, and all player's statistics. In addition, Thonburi University Football Club has competed in 2019 Thai League Cup also know as Toyota League Cup ( Thai: โตโยต้า ลีกคัพ) and advanced to the round of 16 by beaten the club from the top division Samut Prakan City. This is the news from Thai League official website about drawing in the round of 32. And this is drawing in the round of 16 Thonburi University vs PT Prachuap, this is the match highlight of Toyota League Cup round of 16. There are a lot of news about Thonburi University F.C. such as this show that Thonburi University is a club competed in Bangkok zone ( Thai: โซนกรุงเทพ) of Thai League 4, this showed that Thonburi University funded 5 millions Thai Baht to competed in the 2019 season of Thai League 4, and they will renaming to Thonburi United in 2020 season, now you can found this name on the club's official Facebook page that update every situations of the club.— Gunkiet ( talk) 06:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
AfD resulted in delete but the page has since been re-created. Speedy deletion was declined with the reason given that the original AfD was marginal -- there was a mix of opinions that didn't result in an entirely clear consensus. I am neutral on keep/delete, but would like clarity regarding the notability of this page. Paisarepa ( talk) 17:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Just two delete votes are not enough to delete an article. More consensus needed Erkin Alp Güney 20:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Closing is a difficult task and I think the closer did an admirable job when faced with a tough call. However, I feel this AfD would benefit from being reopened as an informed consensus has not been reached. I say "an informed consensus has not been reached" because "consensus is not based on a tally of votes, but on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments." (
WP:NotEarly) which was not achieved, as I describe next.
I feel the close should be overturned to no consensus and the discussion reopened to achieve an informed consensus. Chetsford ( talk) 04:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Chetsford ( talk) 04:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The keepers do not list any report from reliable source. One of them is the creator who referred me to a PR release of the festival which suggested many famous people received the award, note that you just invent an award and give it to anyone. If it is really as famous as they suggested I should easily find usable media reports on this, however, there is nothing more than press release. Specifically, the creator keeps making ad hominem arguments and as much I'd like an article to remain, I failed to see any reason in this case. The other keeper simply suggested there is coverage from international media, while the google news search resulted in a different result. Notice this festival is still running, therefore it doesn't make sense for media like NYT WashingtonPost and many more not have article on it if it is truly as the keepers said a famous international film festival. Viztor ( talk) 19:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
seeking review of deletion by editor without prior discussion Jmbranum ( talk) 18:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I'd be happy to review the sources given and add new, reliable sources where necessary. NinaUTA ( talk) 17:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
AFD Ali Sami ( talk) 17:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC) I would like to provide further references, ThinkMarkets has been awarded a license by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) to offer electronic financial trading services to South African investors. ThinkMarket is authorized by FCA, ASIC, and FSCA. Established in 2010, ThinkMarkets is a premium multi-asset online brokerage with headquarters in London and Melbourne and hubs in the Asia-Pacific, Middle East and North Africa, Europe, and South America. . I believe there are reasonable references online to support ThinkMarkets in order to have the Wikipedia page live https://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/judd-liberman-support-thinkmarkets-pre-ipo-raising-20190417-p51f34, https://www.europeanceo.com/finance/thinkmarkets-digital-strategy-puts-trading-back-on-the-customers-terms/ , https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/companies/thinkmarkets-an-international-online-trader-is-awarded-a-sa-licence-19640939
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Speedily deleted for rule G11 (spam/unambiguous promotion), but Operation Fastlink is a well-known international law enforcement operation referenced extensively in news reports [Fastlink 1] [Fastlink 2] [Fastlink 3] [Fastlink 4] and verified by the agencies themselves [Fastlink 5]. It’s unlikely that an article about such an event would constitute spam or promotion, especially as the article was notable enough to be referenced over a dozen times in what are now broken wikilinks. Danhomer ( talk) 16:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
(Notice:Old version)As an OTRS volunteer, I recently accepted the free permission given in Ticket:2019022210003023 regarding File:Apoyevmatini front page.jpg. May any administrators assist with restoring the old version of the file? 廣九直通車 ( talk) 09:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. | ||||
More recent and continuing references and sources that are significant, unsupported opinions on self-promotion and conflict of interest Contributingauthor ( talk) 11:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Contributingauthor ( talk) 12:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributingauthor ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
| ||||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The decision is made based on counting votes! Those people who voted for deleting the article ignored references that establish notability (I think because of time, feelings and the language barrier where many of these references are in Arabic and other languages). The article topic cover three closely related projects (Supernova, Ring & PWCT) by the same team and from references that cover all of them together, they are one topic and no other Wikipedia article cover them. References for notability in printed journals, magazines & research papers : Four articles in Youm7 by 3 different authors in 2011, 2016, 2018 provide significant coverage [20] [21] [22] [23] Three articles in 3 different printed magazines provide significant coverage [24] [25] [26] Other references too [27] [28] [29] Thanks! Charmk ( talk) 05:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I didn't violate any rules, the information I added contains only facts, which can be proofed. Also I added updates, pictures, where needed (on blank places, etc.) Leonid Zyabrev ( talk) 06:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Page created by 3rd party in 2012, arbitrarily reviewed and deleted in 2019 by Editor who discounted 3rd party citations and has since resigned (Spartaz) 173.56.44.222 ( talk) 18:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
| ||
---|---|---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. | ||
The article is worthy of presence in Wikipedia, citations have been improved and more citations can be added. Lazy-restless ( talk) 07:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Besides, I can give a lot of translation book link of the book in different prominent language from google books. Anyone can find them by searching with the writers name in the google books, which are worthy long in number to count to an end. see it here. Here are some links. There are countless translations. Few of them i gave below and got bored of collecting the links, so please search in google books with outhors name with inverted comma: inauthor:"Michael H. Hart". Many more translations are also found with the help of google translator by translating authors name in non-latin letter's languages on google books.
Lazy-restless ( talk) 14:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
| ||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I am notifying the DRV community that there is a WP:BLPDELETE review of Operation Voicer at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Tots & little ones matter! and BLPDELETE review ( permanent link). Cunard ( talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The deletion did not follow proper procedure. No notice of this AfD discussion was ever posted on List of countries by population (United Nations). No new comments on this earlier AfD were made after March 29. In fact, a later AfD specifically on List of countries by population (United Nations) was closed on April 6 with a result of keep. The points I made on April 2 in that later discussion were never addressed in the earlier discussion. To summarize the most important point I made there: while I agree that the use of the data for every year in every variant of the UN projection model would constitute an unambiguous copyright violation, use of just two years of projections in one particular variant of the UN model should satisfy the WP:NFCCP criteria, and should be allowed. Cobblet ( talk) 19:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Note: See follow-up below – the UN appears to allow free use of data from its database with proper attribution. I think undeletion is appropriate, and I will add the necessary citation. Cobblet ( talk) 15:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I had cited two national newspapers where the news was covered (there are others too) and two famous personalities who had inaugurated the festival in 2017 and 2018 (one of them is world-famous and the other a noted novelist and writer and famous all over India). I had given a link to the government location where this festival is held every year. This is more than say, what the Kerala Lit Fest has done but that article has not been deleted. My article has as much authenticity as say the Jaipur lit fest though I am not saying that the PILF is as great as that. I stated facts and there was no advertising, not even a little bit. I do not know what was in the first article on PILF as I have not read it. I came to search for a page on PILF as I live in Pune and love my city and was surprised to find that there was nothing on the PILF, the only significant English Language Literary Festival in the city. Pune is a hub of educational and cultural activities, a very prominent city. The deletion is illogical and unfair as the article I posted had good credentials. I was told I should write a draft article and then ask for a discussion on it, but there is no point as I would simply duplicate what I wrote yesterday. My article was short and there was no advertising. As I said, I do not know what was written earlier as I do not know the people who wrote it. If the article on PILF remains deleted that means that almost all the articles on lit fests in India should be deleted which would be quite shocking. People in India refer to Wikipedia to get information and it is a great pity that this is happening. No logical reason has been given to me for deletion. However, if the logic is that Pune is an insignificant city then we have to agree to disagree. - Nitajk. Nitajk ( talk) 02:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Nitajk ( talk) 02:13, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Yaniv was not notable in 2015. However she got a notablity during gender transition and transgender activism. Her new name is Jessica Yaniv. Sharouser ( talk) 15:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Belle Delphine is definitely notable enough for an article now. She wasn't earlier this month but is now. AdrianWikiEditor ( talk) 07:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
AdrianWikiEditor ( talk) 20:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
editbreak
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
1. Directi (a high-tech company) is actually very notable within the IT sector in India, and overseas.2.Directi directly spunoff a six-letter TLD and business,namely media dot net, which was bought for the sum of Nine Hundred Million Dollars, a substantial and notable transaction.3.The nomination for deletion and its debate did not progress past superficiality in that matters-of-fact were ignored or not taken into account.4.It is clear to the average reasonable man or woman that the Directi Group of companies easily qualifies for inclusion in wikipedia.5. A redirect happens when readers search for Directi, although redirect leads to a BLP-type wikipedia article on one of Directi's founding executives. 209.240.35.58 ( talk) 03:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Thonburi University Football Club ( Thai: สโมสรฟุตบอลมหาวิทยาลัยธนบุรี) is a football club in Thailand, it competed in Thai League 4 ( Thai: ไทยลีก 4) also know as Omsin League ( Thai: ออมสิน ลีก) since 2019 season. This is the club's data from Thai League official website. This article has deleted in 2018 since the club has not promoted to the professional league. At that time, there are not enough of sources. But now in 2019 season, they has promoted to Thai League 4 that is a professional league. This is the PR brochures of 4 professional football leagues of Thailand from Thai League official website, This is the news about the sponsorship of Omsin bank ( Thai: ธนาคารออมสิน) from FA Thailand's official website. We could found the club's info in the official website of Thai League that have a lot of data including fixture, result, standing, and all player's statistics. In addition, Thonburi University Football Club has competed in 2019 Thai League Cup also know as Toyota League Cup ( Thai: โตโยต้า ลีกคัพ) and advanced to the round of 16 by beaten the club from the top division Samut Prakan City. This is the news from Thai League official website about drawing in the round of 32. And this is drawing in the round of 16 Thonburi University vs PT Prachuap, this is the match highlight of Toyota League Cup round of 16. There are a lot of news about Thonburi University F.C. such as this show that Thonburi University is a club competed in Bangkok zone ( Thai: โซนกรุงเทพ) of Thai League 4, this showed that Thonburi University funded 5 millions Thai Baht to competed in the 2019 season of Thai League 4, and they will renaming to Thonburi United in 2020 season, now you can found this name on the club's official Facebook page that update every situations of the club.— Gunkiet ( talk) 06:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
AfD resulted in delete but the page has since been re-created. Speedy deletion was declined with the reason given that the original AfD was marginal -- there was a mix of opinions that didn't result in an entirely clear consensus. I am neutral on keep/delete, but would like clarity regarding the notability of this page. Paisarepa ( talk) 17:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Just two delete votes are not enough to delete an article. More consensus needed Erkin Alp Güney 20:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Closing is a difficult task and I think the closer did an admirable job when faced with a tough call. However, I feel this AfD would benefit from being reopened as an informed consensus has not been reached. I say "an informed consensus has not been reached" because "consensus is not based on a tally of votes, but on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments." (
WP:NotEarly) which was not achieved, as I describe next.
I feel the close should be overturned to no consensus and the discussion reopened to achieve an informed consensus. Chetsford ( talk) 04:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC) Chetsford ( talk) 04:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The keepers do not list any report from reliable source. One of them is the creator who referred me to a PR release of the festival which suggested many famous people received the award, note that you just invent an award and give it to anyone. If it is really as famous as they suggested I should easily find usable media reports on this, however, there is nothing more than press release. Specifically, the creator keeps making ad hominem arguments and as much I'd like an article to remain, I failed to see any reason in this case. The other keeper simply suggested there is coverage from international media, while the google news search resulted in a different result. Notice this festival is still running, therefore it doesn't make sense for media like NYT WashingtonPost and many more not have article on it if it is truly as the keepers said a famous international film festival. Viztor ( talk) 19:13, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
seeking review of deletion by editor without prior discussion Jmbranum ( talk) 18:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I'd be happy to review the sources given and add new, reliable sources where necessary. NinaUTA ( talk) 17:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
AFD Ali Sami ( talk) 17:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC) I would like to provide further references, ThinkMarkets has been awarded a license by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) to offer electronic financial trading services to South African investors. ThinkMarket is authorized by FCA, ASIC, and FSCA. Established in 2010, ThinkMarkets is a premium multi-asset online brokerage with headquarters in London and Melbourne and hubs in the Asia-Pacific, Middle East and North Africa, Europe, and South America. . I believe there are reasonable references online to support ThinkMarkets in order to have the Wikipedia page live https://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/judd-liberman-support-thinkmarkets-pre-ipo-raising-20190417-p51f34, https://www.europeanceo.com/finance/thinkmarkets-digital-strategy-puts-trading-back-on-the-customers-terms/ , https://www.iol.co.za/business-report/companies/thinkmarkets-an-international-online-trader-is-awarded-a-sa-licence-19640939
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Speedily deleted for rule G11 (spam/unambiguous promotion), but Operation Fastlink is a well-known international law enforcement operation referenced extensively in news reports [Fastlink 1] [Fastlink 2] [Fastlink 3] [Fastlink 4] and verified by the agencies themselves [Fastlink 5]. It’s unlikely that an article about such an event would constitute spam or promotion, especially as the article was notable enough to be referenced over a dozen times in what are now broken wikilinks. Danhomer ( talk) 16:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
(Notice:Old version)As an OTRS volunteer, I recently accepted the free permission given in Ticket:2019022210003023 regarding File:Apoyevmatini front page.jpg. May any administrators assist with restoring the old version of the file? 廣九直通車 ( talk) 09:18, 9 July 2019 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. | ||||
More recent and continuing references and sources that are significant, unsupported opinions on self-promotion and conflict of interest Contributingauthor ( talk) 11:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Contributingauthor ( talk) 12:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributingauthor ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
| ||||
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
The decision is made based on counting votes! Those people who voted for deleting the article ignored references that establish notability (I think because of time, feelings and the language barrier where many of these references are in Arabic and other languages). The article topic cover three closely related projects (Supernova, Ring & PWCT) by the same team and from references that cover all of them together, they are one topic and no other Wikipedia article cover them. References for notability in printed journals, magazines & research papers : Four articles in Youm7 by 3 different authors in 2011, 2016, 2018 provide significant coverage [20] [21] [22] [23] Three articles in 3 different printed magazines provide significant coverage [24] [25] [26] Other references too [27] [28] [29] Thanks! Charmk ( talk) 05:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
I didn't violate any rules, the information I added contains only facts, which can be proofed. Also I added updates, pictures, where needed (on blank places, etc.) Leonid Zyabrev ( talk) 06:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC) |
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it. |
Page created by 3rd party in 2012, arbitrarily reviewed and deleted in 2019 by Editor who discounted 3rd party citations and has since resigned (Spartaz) 173.56.44.222 ( talk) 18:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |