Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 17
February 19 >

February 18

Category:Racing drivers from Mesa, Arizona

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT (1 article). It is already in Category:Racing drivers from Arizona. User:Namiba 23:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Seasons in Aruban football

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 22:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. Merge/delete. The lone articles are already in the parent trees, so an additional merge is unnecessary. – Aidan721 ( talk) 21:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fairfield Stags rugby

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in category Let'srun ( talk) 19:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Assassinated cartoonists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT. Very few cartoonists are assassinated aside from the Charlie Hebdo incident. The one article in this category was murdered during a robbery, not assassinated for being a cartoonist. User:Namiba 16:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge per nom. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 17:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Spree killers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 22:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per discussion at the CfD for "fictional spree killers". I apologize if I did this incorrectly I have little experience with CfD (I intended to nominate all the subcategories by nationality, idk how to do that though)

Spree killers is a used term that I have no opposition to being used in articles, I do not dispute that. The problem is that it is almost entirely used subjectively as one of three things:

1 - a mass killer who committed the act in multiple places, which is not defining (it used to be considered defining, but no longer is), however people who technically qualify as this are often never called it

2 - serial killers without a proper cooldown period, which are still serial killers under the view of most criminologists nowadays

3 - synonym for mass murderer used to avoid the fact that mass killing has a secondary definition of "state sponsored killing of a lot of people" vs the act of one person

Sometimes spree killer is defined as being in multiple locations, and sometimes mass killer is excluded to one location, but just as often not. They're basically synonyms with different connotations. TLDR: Subjectivecat with 95% overlap with mass murderer, similar to the active shooter incidents category which was deleted per discussion a while back. Some entries should be instead merged to serial killer depending on context (though the vast majority are mass murderers). It is a term used yes, but not separate enough from mass murder to be defining. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 15:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Merge per nom. @ PARAKANYAA: you should also list and tag the subcategories, but otherwise your nomination is good. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Marcocapelle I don't know how to do that as part of one nomination. Do I tag them with the discussion template manually and then just add them here? PARAKANYAA ( talk) 20:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment Spree killing and mass murder is different though. Not sure what the benefit is of merging all of these long-standing cats. ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 02:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)] reply
@ WikiOriginal-9 The difference is subjective and extremely inconsistent between definitions which is not good for categories. The benefit is we don't have a bunch of categories that are 1) largely duplicative and 2) you can predict know who will be in what category, which is not true at the moment.
When do you count someone as having gone on a "spree"? Multiple locations? How far away does it have to be to count as multiple? Timespan - How much timespan between Mass, serial, and spree? There is no line. Are you just going by what the source calls em? Well too bad, they might just be called a mass murderer even though they hit a bunch of different locations (this happens constantly nowadays) or the source might be really old and just say they "ran amuck". Sometimes someone who only hit one location was described as a "spree killer"
This has been bothering me since the moment I started editing. There's a 'difference' between a lot of things that are categorized together, like for example, "Active Shooter Incidents" are a notable subtype of mass shooting, but it has such high overlap with mass shooting that it's pointless to sort by (and was deleted) PARAKANYAA ( talk) 11:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Emirati shipbuilders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: No people are in this category, just the companies that build ships .Upmerge for now. Mason ( talk) 14:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:17th-century Danish shipbuilders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Triple upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 14:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:16th-century male musicians by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. only one category in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 14:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works about taxi drivers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 26#Category:Works about taxi drivers

Category:EuroBasket Women templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:EuroBasket Women navigational boxes. (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "FIBA Women's EuroBasket" is the official name of that competition; "navigational boxes" are Wikipedia naming standard for such categories, see the men's version: Category:FIBA EuroBasket navigational boxes. Maiō T. ( talk) 17:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Roman waystations in Bulgaria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge, currently only one article in the category, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Heaven and hell novels

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: By "split" here I mean dual merge. Appears to be a WP:ARBITRARYCAT (i.e. why not "heaven, hell and purgatory" novels or "Earth and heaven" novels, etc.) Novels that are set in both heaven and hell can simply be in both categories at once. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 07:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Overly narrow category of unclear necessity.
Firstly, the Papal States were never exactly a country in the conventional sense, but more a ragtag collection of territories under the direct rule of the Pope -- so Category:People from the Papal States doesn't have nearly as developed a scheme of subcategories as most real countries do, including virtually no scheme of "XX-century anything from the Papal States" categories for anybody besides the popes themselves. For instance, we don't have a Category:19th-century bishops in the Papal States, or a Category:Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States, or even a Category:19th-century people from the Papal States, to parent this at all.
Secondly, and perhaps even more importantly, this was created in such a way that it was essentially broken right from the start: it's using one of those automated "Thing by country and century category header" templates that standardize the format of related categories and farm their category parentage off to a module, but said module is not coded to recognize the Papal States as a country at all for the purposes of generating "in the Papal States" categories, meaning it's only generating disabled or redlinked nonsense categories like Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops in and Category:19th century in that can't legitimately be created at all -- so I've had to suppress the template's autogenerated categories for being unfixable nonsense, and manually categorize it in parent categories that actually exist, which rather defeats the purpose of even using the template.
So for both of those reasons, it's far from clear that an inherently broken category with very few logical parents would be needed for just two people at all. Bearcat ( talk) 22:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Generally, I would agree with you. I would suggest using the categories for bishop in the existing countries, instead, I believe, it was an editors' consensus which led to creation of these categories for non-existing historical states (for example: Category:17th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Republic of Geneva or Category:17th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Ottoman Empire‎). The Papal States are a historical country, just as much the Republic of Geneva or the Ottoman Empire are. And there's lots of clergy and bishops who lived and died in the State of the Church as it was officialy called. Governor Sheng ( talk) 22:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I am not against the category per se, the Papal States are generally recognized as a country in its own right until the unification of Italy. However, there are currently only an apostolic administrator and an auxilary bishop in this category, so I am not opposing either. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Comment. If not kept, it should be merged to Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops and Category:Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States. Second, as the person who wrote and maintains the Bishops in Foo templates, I just haven't had the time to add non-current countries to the template. So I don't think that that's a good reason to support deletion. Mason ( talk) 23:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Theoretically, all of the Popes who rulled the Papal States, could be added to the category(ies). Governor Sheng ( talk) 19:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 11:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete The conclusion of the above discussion seems to be that this category is redundant as it stands. Renaming as Mason suggests above would result in an incomplete category that it's unlikely anyone will bother to fill, and hence be misleading in a different way. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modern Latin-language writers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OVERLAPCAT, all of this is contained in Category:Neo-Latin writers. Modern Latin redirects to Neo-Latin. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom Mason ( talk) 03:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. This category was nominated for deletion by the same nominator, and kept less than two months ago. Additionally, the rationale given appears to be erroneous: the category is presumably for modern writers in Latin, not writers of any era in neo-Latin. It doesn't matter what variety of Latin the author writes in, but whether the writing occurs in modern times, here defined by its contents as from the nineteenth century to the present. P Aculeius ( talk) 11:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per last time and P Aculeius. "Modern" is used to modify different terms in the category and article redirect. Johnbod ( talk) 14:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This was previously nominated at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 28#Category:Modern Latin-language writers.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. This is not a useful categorization. – Aidan721 ( talk) 21:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Atheist writers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Writers on Atheism and purge. (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I think that we should rename this category to make it clearer that these are people who write about the subject of atheism. rather than writers who are atheists. I modeled the rename on Category:Writers on Germanic paganism‎ and other categories like it in Category:Writers by non-fiction subject area. Mason ( talk) 04:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • That would require quite a bit of purging too. The current category rather contains writers who are atheists. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. Although this page includes the phrase "People who write about atheism, the page for the subcategory Category:English atheist writers contains the following: "English writers who are or were atheists." There seems to be a central confusion about whether the category should refer to the beliefs of the writers, or their subject matter. No doubt there would be considerable overlap between Category:Atheist writers and Category:Writers on Atheism as many of the writers whom editors think to categorize as atheists write about atheism, but the two are by no means interchangeable. I think the phrase "People who write about atheism" should be changed to "Writers who are or were atheists" as that reflects more natural and unambiguous language usage. For example, if the proposed change were made, how would an editor characterize a religious writer who wrote against atheism? Category:Atheist writers would be misleading. And confusing, if combined with a religious category. — scribbling woman 18:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Well, how do you suggest we resolve the contradiction? The intersection between being an atheist and being a writer isn't a defining one, whereas being a writer about athesim is. Mason ( talk) 03:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - that is a complete redefinition of the category which has no direct connection to the current content. It would be better to instead create/propose the desired category, and separately submit this one for deletion if it is warranted (I don't see how it would be - they can live side-by-side). Repurposing this category with a rename is the wrong way to handle it. edit: I've corrected the categorization of this so that it reflects correctly that this is not intended as a subject area category. -- Netoholic @ 04:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Addendum: There is a huge list of writers who were atheists here on Wikipedia: List of atheist authors. The category could be better used, certainly. Work for a rainy day. — scribbling woman 03:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Support (including purging), keeping the category as is results in a trivial intersection per WP:EGRS, it should rather be converted to something that is really defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom. It is the topic of writing that is notable. The category in its current name is already better served by the list mentioned by Scibblingwoman. – Aidan721 ( talk) 21:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch atheist writers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 26#Category:Dutch atheist writers

Category:Translators of Ray Bradbury

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination (especially nominating the entire tree). (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining; WP:OCASSOC -- wooden superman 10:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 03:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • I'm not entirely convinced we need translators by writer, but if it's a valid category this appears like it would also be a valid category. SportingFlyer T· C 19:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mesoamerican music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 07:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only one category in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 01:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose I doubt that the category is useful, and would not mind deleting it. But Category:Mesoamerican art is part of a category tree for visual arts. Music is not a visual medium. Dimadick ( talk) 13:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge as nom. Category:Mesoamerican art is defined as "the artistic expression documented for Pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures and civilizations" and already includes Maya dance. The term of art is inherently ambiguous between visual arts stricto sensu and art at large. Place Clichy ( talk) 15:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Changed to Neutral. I don't feel strongly about that one, I'll defer to other editors. Place Clichy ( talk) 17:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Very Strong Oppose per Dimadick. We have a very long-standing, useful and necessary convention that in category names "art" means visual art. Place Clichy, we absolutely should not screw that up, or there will be chaos, with hundreds if not thousands of nominations. Instead we should do as we do everywhere else, and set up Category:Mesoamerican arts (or similar title, but with "arts"), with a visual art sub-cat, & the dance and music, plus no doubt other stuff. Marcocapelle, with all your experience, I'm slightly amazed and horrified you didn't pick up on this. Johnbod ( talk) 18:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on the merge target would be appreciated!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Latin American people by descent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary overlap and conflict with the traditional six-continent scheme. Please note that this category serves only as a container. Yorkporter ( talk) 10:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom but the Latin American subcategories should be nominated too. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Sure, I tagged them right at the moment of the initial nomination but forgot to add them here. By the way, they have been empty for 6 days, so they will probably be deleted tomorrow by CSD C1 anyway. Yorkporter ( talk) 06:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Yorkporter, categories are not eligible for CSD C1 if they are being discussed in a CFD nomination so that won't happen. CFD takes priority over speedy deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Latin America is its own region/culture and this category serves to help navigate articles related to the topic. Dash9Z ( talk) 10:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Categories named after Latin America are only useful when they bring readers to content that specifically deals with Latin American culture. If they are used as containers for national categories, as is the case here, they are in fact a nuisance because they overlap with the existing scheme of South/North American/Caribbean people by descent. Overlap means that content ends up being placed in duplicate locations, or one, or the other, or none at all, depending on the actions of uncoordinated good-faith editors. Place Clichy ( talk) 20:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per Place Clichy's arguments. -- Stisorder ( talk) 22:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Category:Latin American people of North American descent, Category:Latin American people of European descent and Category:Latin American people of African descent have all been tagged CSD C1 for almost a week. As stated above, I'm not sure why it was brought to CFD. To the nominator, if you decide to nominate a category for a deletion discussion and it is empty for some reason, please remove the CSD tag. But you might also just let them be deleted as speedy deletion unless you are concerned they will be recreated. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Military of Seoul

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Just two pages. Both pages currently have other adequate categories I think; can probably just be deleted. toobigtokale ( talk) 10:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. I can't see much scope for military by city anyway. Only military history by city is relevant, and that has a well-developed tree as such. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Jewish American filmmakers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. No need to merge there isn't Category:Jewish screenwriters, presumably because of WP:EGRS considerations. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom and possibly per WP:G4 since there is a previous discussion related to this type of category. @ Marcocapelle, would you agree? Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:EGRS. The other deletion discussions either point to EGRS, which says "Categorization by ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, or disability is permitted", or to each others, creating a circular loop of precedents ultimately based on nothing. The category should be populated rather than deleted. Uriahheep228 ( talk) 16:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • The main point of WP:EGRS is: "Do not create categories that intersect a particular topic (such as occupation, place of residence, or other such characteristics), with an ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or disability, unless these characteristics are relevant to that topic.". Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Place Clichy ( talk) 20:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Burials in Ontario

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: containerize. (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: containerize, we only categorize articles by notable burial places. Otherwise it is trivial and non-defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support containerization of these and all of the Burials in LOCATION categories. I don't think this needs to be at CFD though.-- User:Namiba 16:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Miami Hurricanes track and field athletes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is the naming convention for college sports teams. If the school fields a men's and women's team in a given sport, the category for members of that team includes "men's" or "women's." See, e.g., Category:Miami Hurricanes athletes. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 05:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Rename for consistency. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Rename for consistancy. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Rename for consistency. I applied the original name but always agree these categories should maintain consistency and support the renaming. TheGables ( talk) 01:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:BBC World Service foreign language

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I'm not sure what to make of this category. Should we just add 'stations' to the end of the name? Is this just a collection of World Service stations, in which case 'foreign language' isn't really necessary. Fuddle ( talk) 04:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on rename target would be appreciated!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • If nobody else adds something here, then let's keep it at stations. It would be unnecessary to have this closed as no consensus. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vikkstar123

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Requesting deletion per WP:OCEPON. There are a total of 3 related articles combined in two subcats which already interlink to one another. No need for the parent. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 02:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_18&oldid=1210367311"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 17
February 19 >

February 18

Category:Racing drivers from Mesa, Arizona

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 02:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT (1 article). It is already in Category:Racing drivers from Arizona. User:Namiba 23:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Seasons in Aruban football

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 22:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT. Merge/delete. The lone articles are already in the parent trees, so an additional merge is unnecessary. – Aidan721 ( talk) 21:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fairfield Stags rugby

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in category Let'srun ( talk) 19:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Assassinated cartoonists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT. Very few cartoonists are assassinated aside from the Charlie Hebdo incident. The one article in this category was murdered during a robbery, not assassinated for being a cartoonist. User:Namiba 16:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Merge per nom. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 17:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Spree killers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 22:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Per discussion at the CfD for "fictional spree killers". I apologize if I did this incorrectly I have little experience with CfD (I intended to nominate all the subcategories by nationality, idk how to do that though)

Spree killers is a used term that I have no opposition to being used in articles, I do not dispute that. The problem is that it is almost entirely used subjectively as one of three things:

1 - a mass killer who committed the act in multiple places, which is not defining (it used to be considered defining, but no longer is), however people who technically qualify as this are often never called it

2 - serial killers without a proper cooldown period, which are still serial killers under the view of most criminologists nowadays

3 - synonym for mass murderer used to avoid the fact that mass killing has a secondary definition of "state sponsored killing of a lot of people" vs the act of one person

Sometimes spree killer is defined as being in multiple locations, and sometimes mass killer is excluded to one location, but just as often not. They're basically synonyms with different connotations. TLDR: Subjectivecat with 95% overlap with mass murderer, similar to the active shooter incidents category which was deleted per discussion a while back. Some entries should be instead merged to serial killer depending on context (though the vast majority are mass murderers). It is a term used yes, but not separate enough from mass murder to be defining. PARAKANYAA ( talk) 15:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Merge per nom. @ PARAKANYAA: you should also list and tag the subcategories, but otherwise your nomination is good. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Marcocapelle I don't know how to do that as part of one nomination. Do I tag them with the discussion template manually and then just add them here? PARAKANYAA ( talk) 20:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Comment Spree killing and mass murder is different though. Not sure what the benefit is of merging all of these long-standing cats. ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 02:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)] reply
@ WikiOriginal-9 The difference is subjective and extremely inconsistent between definitions which is not good for categories. The benefit is we don't have a bunch of categories that are 1) largely duplicative and 2) you can predict know who will be in what category, which is not true at the moment.
When do you count someone as having gone on a "spree"? Multiple locations? How far away does it have to be to count as multiple? Timespan - How much timespan between Mass, serial, and spree? There is no line. Are you just going by what the source calls em? Well too bad, they might just be called a mass murderer even though they hit a bunch of different locations (this happens constantly nowadays) or the source might be really old and just say they "ran amuck". Sometimes someone who only hit one location was described as a "spree killer"
This has been bothering me since the moment I started editing. There's a 'difference' between a lot of things that are categorized together, like for example, "Active Shooter Incidents" are a notable subtype of mass shooting, but it has such high overlap with mass shooting that it's pointless to sort by (and was deleted) PARAKANYAA ( talk) 11:28, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Emirati shipbuilders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: No people are in this category, just the companies that build ships .Upmerge for now. Mason ( talk) 14:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:17th-century Danish shipbuilders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Triple upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 14:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:16th-century male musicians by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. only one category in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 14:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works about taxi drivers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 26#Category:Works about taxi drivers

Category:EuroBasket Women templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:EuroBasket Women navigational boxes. (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: "FIBA Women's EuroBasket" is the official name of that competition; "navigational boxes" are Wikipedia naming standard for such categories, see the men's version: Category:FIBA EuroBasket navigational boxes. Maiō T. ( talk) 17:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Roman waystations in Bulgaria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: merge, currently only one article in the category, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom Mason ( talk) 02:23, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Heaven and hell novels

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: By "split" here I mean dual merge. Appears to be a WP:ARBITRARYCAT (i.e. why not "heaven, hell and purgatory" novels or "Earth and heaven" novels, etc.) Novels that are set in both heaven and hell can simply be in both categories at once. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 07:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Overly narrow category of unclear necessity.
Firstly, the Papal States were never exactly a country in the conventional sense, but more a ragtag collection of territories under the direct rule of the Pope -- so Category:People from the Papal States doesn't have nearly as developed a scheme of subcategories as most real countries do, including virtually no scheme of "XX-century anything from the Papal States" categories for anybody besides the popes themselves. For instance, we don't have a Category:19th-century bishops in the Papal States, or a Category:Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States, or even a Category:19th-century people from the Papal States, to parent this at all.
Secondly, and perhaps even more importantly, this was created in such a way that it was essentially broken right from the start: it's using one of those automated "Thing by country and century category header" templates that standardize the format of related categories and farm their category parentage off to a module, but said module is not coded to recognize the Papal States as a country at all for the purposes of generating "in the Papal States" categories, meaning it's only generating disabled or redlinked nonsense categories like Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops in and Category:19th century in that can't legitimately be created at all -- so I've had to suppress the template's autogenerated categories for being unfixable nonsense, and manually categorize it in parent categories that actually exist, which rather defeats the purpose of even using the template.
So for both of those reasons, it's far from clear that an inherently broken category with very few logical parents would be needed for just two people at all. Bearcat ( talk) 22:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Generally, I would agree with you. I would suggest using the categories for bishop in the existing countries, instead, I believe, it was an editors' consensus which led to creation of these categories for non-existing historical states (for example: Category:17th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Republic of Geneva or Category:17th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Ottoman Empire‎). The Papal States are a historical country, just as much the Republic of Geneva or the Ottoman Empire are. And there's lots of clergy and bishops who lived and died in the State of the Church as it was officialy called. Governor Sheng ( talk) 22:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • I am not against the category per se, the Papal States are generally recognized as a country in its own right until the unification of Italy. However, there are currently only an apostolic administrator and an auxilary bishop in this category, so I am not opposing either. Marcocapelle ( talk) 22:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Comment. If not kept, it should be merged to Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops and Category:Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States. Second, as the person who wrote and maintains the Bishops in Foo templates, I just haven't had the time to add non-current countries to the template. So I don't think that that's a good reason to support deletion. Mason ( talk) 23:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Theoretically, all of the Popes who rulled the Papal States, could be added to the category(ies). Governor Sheng ( talk) 19:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 11:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete The conclusion of the above discussion seems to be that this category is redundant as it stands. Renaming as Mason suggests above would result in an incomplete category that it's unlikely anyone will bother to fill, and hence be misleading in a different way. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modern Latin-language writers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OVERLAPCAT, all of this is contained in Category:Neo-Latin writers. Modern Latin redirects to Neo-Latin. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom Mason ( talk) 03:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. This category was nominated for deletion by the same nominator, and kept less than two months ago. Additionally, the rationale given appears to be erroneous: the category is presumably for modern writers in Latin, not writers of any era in neo-Latin. It doesn't matter what variety of Latin the author writes in, but whether the writing occurs in modern times, here defined by its contents as from the nineteenth century to the present. P Aculeius ( talk) 11:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per last time and P Aculeius. "Modern" is used to modify different terms in the category and article redirect. Johnbod ( talk) 14:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This was previously nominated at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 28#Category:Modern Latin-language writers.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. This is not a useful categorization. – Aidan721 ( talk) 21:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Atheist writers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Writers on Atheism and purge. (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I think that we should rename this category to make it clearer that these are people who write about the subject of atheism. rather than writers who are atheists. I modeled the rename on Category:Writers on Germanic paganism‎ and other categories like it in Category:Writers by non-fiction subject area. Mason ( talk) 04:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • That would require quite a bit of purging too. The current category rather contains writers who are atheists. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose. Although this page includes the phrase "People who write about atheism, the page for the subcategory Category:English atheist writers contains the following: "English writers who are or were atheists." There seems to be a central confusion about whether the category should refer to the beliefs of the writers, or their subject matter. No doubt there would be considerable overlap between Category:Atheist writers and Category:Writers on Atheism as many of the writers whom editors think to categorize as atheists write about atheism, but the two are by no means interchangeable. I think the phrase "People who write about atheism" should be changed to "Writers who are or were atheists" as that reflects more natural and unambiguous language usage. For example, if the proposed change were made, how would an editor characterize a religious writer who wrote against atheism? Category:Atheist writers would be misleading. And confusing, if combined with a religious category. — scribbling woman 18:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Well, how do you suggest we resolve the contradiction? The intersection between being an atheist and being a writer isn't a defining one, whereas being a writer about athesim is. Mason ( talk) 03:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - that is a complete redefinition of the category which has no direct connection to the current content. It would be better to instead create/propose the desired category, and separately submit this one for deletion if it is warranted (I don't see how it would be - they can live side-by-side). Repurposing this category with a rename is the wrong way to handle it. edit: I've corrected the categorization of this so that it reflects correctly that this is not intended as a subject area category. -- Netoholic @ 04:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Addendum: There is a huge list of writers who were atheists here on Wikipedia: List of atheist authors. The category could be better used, certainly. Work for a rainy day. — scribbling woman 03:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Support (including purging), keeping the category as is results in a trivial intersection per WP:EGRS, it should rather be converted to something that is really defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom. It is the topic of writing that is notable. The category in its current name is already better served by the list mentioned by Scibblingwoman. – Aidan721 ( talk) 21:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dutch atheist writers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 26#Category:Dutch atheist writers

Category:Translators of Ray Bradbury

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination (especially nominating the entire tree). (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:41, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining; WP:OCASSOC -- wooden superman 10:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 03:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • I'm not entirely convinced we need translators by writer, but if it's a valid category this appears like it would also be a valid category. SportingFlyer T· C 19:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mesoamerican music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 07:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Only one category in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason ( talk) 01:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose I doubt that the category is useful, and would not mind deleting it. But Category:Mesoamerican art is part of a category tree for visual arts. Music is not a visual medium. Dimadick ( talk) 13:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Merge as nom. Category:Mesoamerican art is defined as "the artistic expression documented for Pre-Columbian Mesoamerican cultures and civilizations" and already includes Maya dance. The term of art is inherently ambiguous between visual arts stricto sensu and art at large. Place Clichy ( talk) 15:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Changed to Neutral. I don't feel strongly about that one, I'll defer to other editors. Place Clichy ( talk) 17:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Very Strong Oppose per Dimadick. We have a very long-standing, useful and necessary convention that in category names "art" means visual art. Place Clichy, we absolutely should not screw that up, or there will be chaos, with hundreds if not thousands of nominations. Instead we should do as we do everywhere else, and set up Category:Mesoamerican arts (or similar title, but with "arts"), with a visual art sub-cat, & the dance and music, plus no doubt other stuff. Marcocapelle, with all your experience, I'm slightly amazed and horrified you didn't pick up on this. Johnbod ( talk) 18:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on the merge target would be appreciated!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 12:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Latin American people by descent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary overlap and conflict with the traditional six-continent scheme. Please note that this category serves only as a container. Yorkporter ( talk) 10:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per nom but the Latin American subcategories should be nominated too. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Sure, I tagged them right at the moment of the initial nomination but forgot to add them here. By the way, they have been empty for 6 days, so they will probably be deleted tomorrow by CSD C1 anyway. Yorkporter ( talk) 06:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Yorkporter, categories are not eligible for CSD C1 if they are being discussed in a CFD nomination so that won't happen. CFD takes priority over speedy deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Latin America is its own region/culture and this category serves to help navigate articles related to the topic. Dash9Z ( talk) 10:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Categories named after Latin America are only useful when they bring readers to content that specifically deals with Latin American culture. If they are used as containers for national categories, as is the case here, they are in fact a nuisance because they overlap with the existing scheme of South/North American/Caribbean people by descent. Overlap means that content ends up being placed in duplicate locations, or one, or the other, or none at all, depending on the actions of uncoordinated good-faith editors. Place Clichy ( talk) 20:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support per Place Clichy's arguments. -- Stisorder ( talk) 22:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Category:Latin American people of North American descent, Category:Latin American people of European descent and Category:Latin American people of African descent have all been tagged CSD C1 for almost a week. As stated above, I'm not sure why it was brought to CFD. To the nominator, if you decide to nominate a category for a deletion discussion and it is empty for some reason, please remove the CSD tag. But you might also just let them be deleted as speedy deletion unless you are concerned they will be recreated. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Military of Seoul

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Just two pages. Both pages currently have other adequate categories I think; can probably just be deleted. toobigtokale ( talk) 10:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. I can't see much scope for military by city anyway. Only military history by city is relevant, and that has a well-developed tree as such. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Jewish American filmmakers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 20:35, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. No need to merge there isn't Category:Jewish screenwriters, presumably because of WP:EGRS considerations. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete per nom and possibly per WP:G4 since there is a previous discussion related to this type of category. @ Marcocapelle, would you agree? Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per WP:EGRS. The other deletion discussions either point to EGRS, which says "Categorization by ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, or disability is permitted", or to each others, creating a circular loop of precedents ultimately based on nothing. The category should be populated rather than deleted. Uriahheep228 ( talk) 16:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • The main point of WP:EGRS is: "Do not create categories that intersect a particular topic (such as occupation, place of residence, or other such characteristics), with an ethnicity, gender, religion, sexual orientation, or disability, unless these characteristics are relevant to that topic.". Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Place Clichy ( talk) 20:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Burials in Ontario

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: containerize. (non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: containerize, we only categorize articles by notable burial places. Otherwise it is trivial and non-defining. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Support containerization of these and all of the Burials in LOCATION categories. I don't think this needs to be at CFD though.-- User:Namiba 16:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Miami Hurricanes track and field athletes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: This is the naming convention for college sports teams. If the school fields a men's and women's team in a given sport, the category for members of that team includes "men's" or "women's." See, e.g., Category:Miami Hurricanes athletes. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 05:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Rename for consistency. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
    Rename for consistancy. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 14:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Rename for consistency. I applied the original name but always agree these categories should maintain consistency and support the renaming. TheGables ( talk) 01:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:BBC World Service foreign language

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 16:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: I'm not sure what to make of this category. Should we just add 'stations' to the end of the name? Is this just a collection of World Service stations, in which case 'foreign language' isn't really necessary. Fuddle ( talk) 04:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on rename target would be appreciated!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  • If nobody else adds something here, then let's keep it at stations. It would be unnecessary to have this closed as no consensus. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Vikkstar123

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete ( non-admin closure) House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Nominator's rationale: Requesting deletion per WP:OCEPON. There are a total of 3 related articles combined in two subcats which already interlink to one another. No need for the parent. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 02:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_18&oldid=1210367311"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE