The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith!
Missvain (
talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The subject of the article fails
WP:GNG. A Google search of him doesn't show him being discussed in signification coverage independent of him. None of the sources in the article (the ones that actually discuss him) are independent of him. All of the awards and nominations he's received are not notable.
Versace1608Wanna Talk? 15:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 January 14. The gist of the review was that we need a more detailed and rigorous discussion of the sources in the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 19:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, possibly a stronger keep, per
my comments at DRV where I explained that based on my review of Google web and news searches, I'm able to provide two sources
here (in-depth, and
reliable and independent source) and
here (another in-depth, and
reliable and independent source), from Guardian Nigeria and News Ghana respectively, that meet our
common sense definition of
reliable, independent sources. Moreover, the articles themselves are both at length and in-depth. Moreover, these are just two sources I found, and I haven't, and am not able to assess offline sources, which I expect there to be. Thus, an easy
WP:GNG pass here. Finally, as a professor who has generated
significant press source in mainly African news sources, he passes the SNG(s).
Doug MehusT·C 21:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per Dmehus. Sources appear over the GNG bar.
Hobit (
talk) 02:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith!
Missvain (
talk) 16:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The subject of the article fails
WP:GNG. A Google search of him doesn't show him being discussed in signification coverage independent of him. None of the sources in the article (the ones that actually discuss him) are independent of him. All of the awards and nominations he's received are not notable.
Versace1608Wanna Talk? 15:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 January 14. The gist of the review was that we need a more detailed and rigorous discussion of the sources in the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 19:08, 21 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, possibly a stronger keep, per
my comments at DRV where I explained that based on my review of Google web and news searches, I'm able to provide two sources
here (in-depth, and
reliable and independent source) and
here (another in-depth, and
reliable and independent source), from Guardian Nigeria and News Ghana respectively, that meet our
common sense definition of
reliable, independent sources. Moreover, the articles themselves are both at length and in-depth. Moreover, these are just two sources I found, and I haven't, and am not able to assess offline sources, which I expect there to be. Thus, an easy
WP:GNG pass here. Finally, as a professor who has generated
significant press source in mainly African news sources, he passes the SNG(s).
Doug MehusT·C 21:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per Dmehus. Sources appear over the GNG bar.
Hobit (
talk) 02:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.