The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance.
Debartolo2917 (
talk) 06:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - plenty of sources to meet GNG. Notability depends on available sources, not just the sources in the article at the time of nomination.
Rlendog (
talk) 16:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm copying my rationale from
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Martin because it's an identical situation even down to the editor who provided the sources: This is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per
WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. -
Aoidh (
talk) 22:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance.
Debartolo2917 (
talk) 06:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - plenty of sources to meet GNG. Notability depends on available sources, not just the sources in the article at the time of nomination.
Rlendog (
talk) 16:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm copying my rationale from
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Martin because it's an identical situation even down to the editor who provided the sources: This is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per
WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. -
Aoidh (
talk) 22:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.