The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance.
Debartolo2917 (
talk) 06:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, passes GNG. Article needs expansion however. There should be enough information in the sources provided to expand.--Rockchalk717 22:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Easy GNG pass. GNG is our criteria for notability, not the nominator's opinion of whether those sources "signify importance."
Rlendog (
talk) 16:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - It seems clear at this point, but this is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per
WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. -
Aoidh (
talk) 22:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance.
Debartolo2917 (
talk) 06:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, passes GNG. Article needs expansion however. There should be enough information in the sources provided to expand.--Rockchalk717 22:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Easy GNG pass. GNG is our criteria for notability, not the nominator's opinion of whether those sources "signify importance."
Rlendog (
talk) 16:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - It seems clear at this point, but this is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per
WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. -
Aoidh (
talk) 22:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.