- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Social-liberal conservatism
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Social-liberal conservatism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article seems to be based largely on WP:OR. I'm only seeing passing mentions with a before search and the references in the article. Just i yaya 01:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 01:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - The sources so far are abysmal. Additionally, the article was created by copying a declined draft and putting it into article space. ''Flux55'' ( talk) 05:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Economics, and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - As noted by User:Flux55, the author has also created a draft, Draft:Social liberal conservatism. If the article is deleted, the draft will still be in draft space for possible improvement of sourcing. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Most sources (if not all) don't mention the term the article is about. Two citations are the article's own draft. The penultimate one Politic-Ed.com, redirects to a porn site, despite the citations supposedly having been added within the last 24h. Amazing.
Cortador (
talk) 22:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Huh. It doesn't redirect there for me. Although even that isn't much of an improvement as the site is just a thinly-veiled political blog. ''Flux55'' ( talk) 06:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Social-liberal conservatism
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Social-liberal conservatism ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article seems to be based largely on WP:OR. I'm only seeing passing mentions with a before search and the references in the article. Just i yaya 01:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 01:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - The sources so far are abysmal. Additionally, the article was created by copying a declined draft and putting it into article space. ''Flux55'' ( talk) 05:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Economics, and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - As noted by User:Flux55, the author has also created a draft, Draft:Social liberal conservatism. If the article is deleted, the draft will still be in draft space for possible improvement of sourcing. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Most sources (if not all) don't mention the term the article is about. Two citations are the article's own draft. The penultimate one Politic-Ed.com, redirects to a porn site, despite the citations supposedly having been added within the last 24h. Amazing.
Cortador (
talk) 22:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Huh. It doesn't redirect there for me. Although even that isn't much of an improvement as the site is just a thinly-veiled political blog. ''Flux55'' ( talk) 06:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.