The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
An unnecessary
content fork of
List of drone strikes in Afghanistan, the recent change of regime is easily reflected in the main article and until/unless substantial new 'striking' is done post-US-withdrawal, the subject is better covered as a continuation of the main article. The principal target and 'striker' having remained the same and all content in this list already being in the 'main' list article, the two are effectively already MERGED.
Pincrete (
talk) 12:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. There is no pressing need for a separate "listicle" comprising just the two most recent strikes.
TheTimesAreAChanging (
talk) 16:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, no need to split off ever finer-grained sub-listicles on a single topic, especially when their titles have a political ring to them.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 17:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Ugh, topic banned (and now AE blocked) editor violating TB to create and maintain this page, during which he also removed the PROD. I wish there was a speedy to avoid seven days of clogging the AfD list StarMississippi 19:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Change to redirect per
Tdl1060 comment below. Rest of prior comment holds true. StarMississippi 23:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per the above. You wish people wouldn't take the available rope given them and use it in such a manner, but what can you do? No objection to SNOW closure if conditions are met in advance of 7d.
Jclemens (
talk) 21:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete The creator of the article being indefinitely banned, and everyone agrees the brief information is fine in the other article. You can just speed delete this.
DreamFocus 00:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment Content from this article was apparently copied in
this edit, I am unsure if that means this needs to remain as a redirect as opposed to complete deletion.
CMD (
talk) 15:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
An unnecessary
content fork of
List of drone strikes in Afghanistan, the recent change of regime is easily reflected in the main article and until/unless substantial new 'striking' is done post-US-withdrawal, the subject is better covered as a continuation of the main article. The principal target and 'striker' having remained the same and all content in this list already being in the 'main' list article, the two are effectively already MERGED.
Pincrete (
talk) 12:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. There is no pressing need for a separate "listicle" comprising just the two most recent strikes.
TheTimesAreAChanging (
talk) 16:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, no need to split off ever finer-grained sub-listicles on a single topic, especially when their titles have a political ring to them.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 17:36, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Ugh, topic banned (and now AE blocked) editor violating TB to create and maintain this page, during which he also removed the PROD. I wish there was a speedy to avoid seven days of clogging the AfD list StarMississippi 19:30, 2 September 2021 (UTC) Change to redirect per
Tdl1060 comment below. Rest of prior comment holds true. StarMississippi 23:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per the above. You wish people wouldn't take the available rope given them and use it in such a manner, but what can you do? No objection to SNOW closure if conditions are met in advance of 7d.
Jclemens (
talk) 21:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete The creator of the article being indefinitely banned, and everyone agrees the brief information is fine in the other article. You can just speed delete this.
DreamFocus 00:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment Content from this article was apparently copied in
this edit, I am unsure if that means this needs to remain as a redirect as opposed to complete deletion.
CMD (
talk) 15:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.