The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. It also appears that most of the text of this article has been copied and pasted from his bio page on the Army sports website (
1). How has this existed for 10+ years and not been caught yet? Ugh.
Ejgreen77 (
talk) 10:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Switching to keep per the excellent rescue work performed by BeanieFan11. Meets
WP:GNG.
Ejgreen77 (
talk) 23:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Keep - Although I think this player may be notable (see articles
[1][2][3]), the article as it exists currently is basically one big copyright violation, and it's probably best that it be deleted and started from scratch (
WP:TNT).
Hatman31 (
talk) 12:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hatman31: TNT has been applied and article restarted.
Cbl62 (
talk) 17:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Okay, guess I'll change my vote then.
Hatman31 (
talk) 00:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
DeleteKeep, this is just a copy and paste for someone who only played for 2 years in college and isn't really notable.Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Changing my vote to keep as the article has been improved.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 13:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep but remove copyvio. Meets NBIO/GNG People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, see
here (NYT),
here,
here, and
here.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 15:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Plainly passes
WP:GNG with the coverage cited above by BeanieFan11 ... including an in-depth
feature story in the freaking New York Times. Also, I see that the copyvio has now been removed, so that is no longer a basis for deletion.
Cbl62 (
talk) 17:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. It also appears that most of the text of this article has been copied and pasted from his bio page on the Army sports website (
1). How has this existed for 10+ years and not been caught yet? Ugh.
Ejgreen77 (
talk) 10:41, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Switching to keep per the excellent rescue work performed by BeanieFan11. Meets
WP:GNG.
Ejgreen77 (
talk) 23:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Keep - Although I think this player may be notable (see articles
[1][2][3]), the article as it exists currently is basically one big copyright violation, and it's probably best that it be deleted and started from scratch (
WP:TNT).
Hatman31 (
talk) 12:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Hatman31: TNT has been applied and article restarted.
Cbl62 (
talk) 17:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Okay, guess I'll change my vote then.
Hatman31 (
talk) 00:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
DeleteKeep, this is just a copy and paste for someone who only played for 2 years in college and isn't really notable.Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Changing my vote to keep as the article has been improved.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 13:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep but remove copyvio. Meets NBIO/GNG People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, see
here (NYT),
here,
here, and
here.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 15:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. Plainly passes
WP:GNG with the coverage cited above by BeanieFan11 ... including an in-depth
feature story in the freaking New York Times. Also, I see that the copyvio has now been removed, so that is no longer a basis for deletion.
Cbl62 (
talk) 17:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.