The result was keep. I realize this is early, but reading the talkpage of this article, there seems to be a very strong effort being put into this article, and the majority here says "keep" and ....do something with it. I'm not convinced that the article's title is correct, but also not convinced that the painting is the notable thing, or the painter, or if it was the redlinked photographer from Auschwitz, but there is definitely an article here. Ignoring all "time rules" and closing this so that work can continue. Keeper ǀ 76 14:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Sad story, but Wikipedia is not a memorial DimaG ( talk) 19:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. I realize this is early, but reading the talkpage of this article, there seems to be a very strong effort being put into this article, and the majority here says "keep" and ....do something with it. I'm not convinced that the article's title is correct, but also not convinced that the painting is the notable thing, or the painter, or if it was the redlinked photographer from Auschwitz, but there is definitely an article here. Ignoring all "time rules" and closing this so that work can continue. Keeper ǀ 76 14:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Sad story, but Wikipedia is not a memorial DimaG ( talk) 19:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC) reply