- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Frank Anchor 19:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Brock Hoffman
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brock Hoffman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance. Debartolo2917 ( talk) 05:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ohio. Shellwood ( talk) 07:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes GNG, see this, this, this, this, this, this, etc. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG with the sources provided by BeanieFan11. Alvaldi ( talk) 09:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - plenty of coverage to meet GNG. Rlendog ( talk) 16:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I'm copying my rationale from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Martin because it's an identical situation even down to the editor who provided the sources: This is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. - Aoidh ( talk) 22:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 14:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- keep clearly passess WP:GNG; add to it WP:BASIC and even WP:IMPACT if you like. I see multiple sources, not a "single source" as the nominator states.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Frank Anchor 19:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Brock Hoffman
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brock Hoffman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:Notability (people) for sports. Relies on a single source of a signing, but this does not signify importance. Debartolo2917 ( talk) 05:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Ohio. Shellwood ( talk) 07:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes GNG, see this, this, this, this, this, this, etc. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG with the sources provided by BeanieFan11. Alvaldi ( talk) 09:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - plenty of coverage to meet GNG. Rlendog ( talk) 16:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I'm copying my rationale from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Martin because it's an identical situation even down to the editor who provided the sources: This is an easy keep. BeanieFan11's sources more than show notability per WP:GNG and the nom's rationale is no longer applicable due to these sources, so at this point there's no valid argument that I can see for deletion. - Aoidh ( talk) 22:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 ( talk) 14:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- keep clearly passess WP:GNG; add to it WP:BASIC and even WP:IMPACT if you like. I see multiple sources, not a "single source" as the nominator states.-- Paul McDonald ( talk) 14:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.