This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For egregious misuse of an admin tool, for losing the trust or confidence of the community, and for failing to address the concerns of the community within a reasonable time period, while being aware of those concerns, contrary to the expectations of admin conduct and accountability, Dbachmann ( talk · contribs) is desysopped. Dbachmann may regain the administrative tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permissions of Courcelles ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
An arbitration case, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland, has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked for up to 1 year. Administrators placing blocks should take into account an editor's overall conduct and Arbitration history and seriously consider increasing the duration of blocks. Any block 3 months or longer should be reported for automatic review either (1) at ARCA or (2) to an arbitrator or clerk who will open a review at ARCA. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary, up to and including a site ban.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong has now closed, and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 17:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Paradise Chronicle ( talk · contribs) is indefinitely site-banned.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to announce that ToBeFree ( talk · contribs) has been appointed a full clerk, effective immediately, concluding his successful traineeship.
The arbitration clerk team is often in need of new members, and any editor who would like to join the clerk team is welcome to apply by e-mail to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 22:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser and Oversight permissions of bradv ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac ( talk) 19:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The SmallCat dispute arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permission of ferret ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 12:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is seeking to appoint additional editors to the Checkuser and Oversight teams. The arbitrators overseeing this will be Cabayi and Wugapodes. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will assist in the vetting process. This year's timeline is as follows:
For the Arbitration Committee, Cabayi ( talk) 23:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser and Oversight permissions of RickinBaltimore ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac ( talk) 08:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 9 of the WikiProject Tropical Cyclones case (" MarioProtIV topic ban") is rescinded.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 12:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Please take this note as my formal resignation from the Arbitration Committee. I've been less available in 2023 than I'd like, and since we're near election season, I felt this was a good time for me to step down. Being an arbitrator is not the most appreciated role on the encyclopedia (something I've written about in the past), so I'd just like to express my personal gratitude to the remaining committee, who do so much work behind the scenes, dealing with things so the rest of the community doesn't have to. WormTT( talk) 14:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Mark Ironie ( talk · contribs) and CorbieVreccan ( talk · contribs) will be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes. When editing the same articles, participating in the same community discussion, or supporting each other in any sort of dispute, these editors must disclose their connection and observe relevant policies such as edit warring as if they were a single account.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
I am resigning from the Arbitration Committee at the end of this year - December 31, 2023. Due to age and health I have struggled with the requirements of clarity of thought, energy levels, and remaining emotionally detached that is required of an Arb, and don't feel I have given of my best during this term. The thought of another year is wearying. I have been impressed with the professionalism, knowledge, skills and work ethic of the current Committee, one of the best and most supportive I have worked with. The Arbitration Committee, thanks to the work of not just the current but also previous Committees, is moving forward into an efficient organisation, and - despite my resignation - I would recommend it for those younger admins who have not yet served as a place to learn and discover more about Wikipedia, to test and improve skills, and as a place to really satisfy those desires of wanting to help out. ArbCom really benefits from having a mix of newer and younger admins working alongside seasoned and experienced Arbs. Indeed, the Committee benefits from having a wide and active range of views and opinions and experiences - it's as good to have those who are mainly familiar with writing articles, or organising categories as it is to have those who are very familiar with the daily posts on AN. Step forward and step up.
Meanwhile, thanks to the Committee and to the Clerks for all that they do. SilkTork ( talk) 11:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
The community consultation portion of the functionary appointment process is now open. Editors may ask up to two (2) questions of each candidate (similar to RFA rules). However, since this is a consultation and not a !vote, please refrain from phrasing comments in a support/oppose/neutral fashion.
The vetting process was much quicker than anticipated resulting in the schedule for the rest of the process moving forward.
The Arbitration Committee invites editors to comment and ask questions until 23:59 UTC on September 23, 2023.
For the Arbitration Committee, Cabayi ( talk) 14:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to welcome the following editor to the functionary team:
The committee thanks all members of the community who participated and helped bring this process to a successful conclusion.
For the Arbitration Committee, Cabayi ( talk) 20:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Wellington Bay ( talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 17:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Bkbray ( talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 18:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The Prem Rawat case is amended by striking the remedy designating Prem Rawat as a contentious topic ( Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat § Contentious topic designation). Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the contentious topics procedure.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 19:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is currently considering a series of motions to rescind remedies (including contentious topic designations) that may no longer be necessary to prevent disruption. Community feedback is welcome at the motions page in the "community discussion" sections. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Kolya Butternut ( talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to the following restriction indefinitely, which may be appealed after 12 months have elapsed:
Kolya Butternut may discuss no other editor's undisclosed personal details anywhere. This includes both onwiki as well as any other online location or other Wikimedia-associated offline location.
For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 17:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by a series of motions that:
Motions that passed
|
---|
Remedy 1 of Editor conduct in e-cigs articles ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. The final remedy of Liancourt Rocks ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 1 of Longevity ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 2 of Medicine ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 2 of September 11 conspiracy theories ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded due to the topic area being covered by the post-1992 American Politics contentious topic. All actions taken under the rescinded authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 1 of Shakespeare authorship question ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. The following remedies from Macedonia 2 are rescinded:
Editors are reminded that Eastern Europe and the Balkans, broadly construed, continues to be a contentious topic. Remedy 6 of the The Troubles case ("One-revert rule") is amended to read as follows:
|
For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion over email that:
On recommendation of the Electoral Commission, temporary English Wikipedia checkuser privileges are granted to stewards Superpes15, Martin Urbanec, and Mykola7 solely for the purpose of their acting as scrutineers in the 2023 Arbitration Committee election.
For the Arbitration Committee, — Wug· a·po·des 18:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to modify the provisions of the extended confirmed restriction. Comments are welcome at the relevant request for clarification.
In accordance with the procedural requirements for modifications of the Arbitration Committee procedures, a duplicate copy of the motion is available at the Committee's public motions page.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 01:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The Extended Confirmed Restriction is amended as follows:
The Committee may apply the "extended confirmed restriction" to specified topic areas. When such a restriction is in effect in a topic area, only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, subject to the following provisions:
- The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed, with the following exceptions:
- Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
post constructive comments andmake edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions described in "B" or "C" below.However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even within the "Talk:" namespace. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, RMs, and noticeboard discussions.- Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
- If a page (other than a "Talk:" page) mostly or entirely relates to the topic area, broadly construed, this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection, though this is not required.
- On any page where the restriction is not enforced through extended confirmed protection, this restriction may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.
- Reverts made solely to enforce this restriction are not considered edit warring.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 18:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee announces that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year. This reflects a change from past practice, which provided that only "extraordinary" candidates would be considered outside of an annual appointment process. The steps for interested candidates will remain the following:
The 2024 Arbitration Committee will decide whether it will continue to conduct an annual call for functionary candidates, or if instead this process will be the primary process for functionary appointments going forward.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 14:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The committee has received an appeal from Ethan2345678 ( talk · contribs) and would like to hear feedback from the community before coming to a final decision. You can post comments either in the linked discussion below or send them to arbcom-enwikimedia.org. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
In light of the voting phase of the arbcom election starting soon, I've decided to make official what has been de facto true for a while now and resign from the committee. Obviously I have been overtaken by real-life commitments and haven't had the time to contribute as I'd hoped this year, and I don't see that changing in the short time left in my term. Apologies and appreciation to those who picked up more work than they signed up for in my absence. I will also be giving up CU/OS, since I don't have time to do those jobs either. For everyone running in this year's election, good luck, and best wishes to the 2024 committee! Opabinia regalis ( talk) 07:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For the Arbitration Committee, — Wug· a·po·des 09:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has determined that
Beeblebrox (
talk ·
contribs) has repeatedly failed to [p]reserve in appropriate confidence the contents of private correspondence sent to the Committee and the Committee's internal discussions and deliberations
by making disclosures on off-wiki forums. These failures followed a previous formal warning issued to Beeblebrox in September 2021 by the Arbitration Committee concerning his conduct in off-wiki forums. Therefore, in accordance with
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy § Conduct of arbitrators, Beeblebrox is suspended from Arbitration Committee membership for a period of six months from this date. During this period, Beeblebrox's CheckUser and Oversight permissions and his access to
applicable mailing lists (including the functionaries' mailing list) are revoked. Following this period, Beeblebrox may request reinstatement of his permissions or mailing list access by applying to the Arbitration Committee. Beeblebrox may also regain access via
election to the committee.
Support: Barkeep49, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Enterprisey, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, Izno, L235, Primefac, SilkTork, Wugapodes
Oppose:
Abstain: Moneytrees
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 04:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has received applications for functionary permissions from several editors, consistent with its previous announcement that applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions will be accepted at any point in the year. The following editors have applied for the CheckUser permission and have subsequently been reviewed and vetted by the functionary team, and the community is invited to comment on the associated consultation pages:
The community consultations will remain open through 11 December 2023.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The two Ireland page name move discussion restrictions enacted in June 2009 are rescinded.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 17:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, MelroseReporter ( talk · contribs) is unblocked (as time served) subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 03:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to welcome the following editors to the functionary team:
The committee thanks all members of the community who participated in the community consultations and helped bring this process to a successful conclusion.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 13:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
An arbitration case, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Industrial agriculture, has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 16:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee welcomes the following new and returning arbitrators following their election by the community. The two-year terms of these arbitrators formally begin on 1 January 2024:
Upon meeting the Wikimedia Foundation's criteria for access to non-public personal data and signing the Foundation's non-public information confidentiality agreement, all incoming arbitrators will be subscribed to all Committee-managed email lists, assigned the CheckUser and Oversight permissions for use in office, and given access to the CheckUser and Oversight queues on the VRTS system.
We also thank our outgoing colleagues whose terms end on 31 December 2023:
Outgoing arbitrators are eligible to retain the CheckUser and Oversight permissions, to remain active on cases accepted before their term ended, and to remain subscribed to the functionaries' and arbitration clerks' mailing lists following their term on the committee. To that effect:
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to amend the procedures and to extend reliable source requirements to Lithuania as a topic area. Comments are welcome at the relevant request for clarification.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Clerks are instructed to add a new section, entitled "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to the Enforcement section of the Arbitration Procedures with the following text:
The Committee may apply the "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to specified topic areas. For topic areas with this restriction, when a source that is not an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution is removed from an article, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Administrators may enforce this restriction with page protections, topic bans, or blocks; enforcement decisions should consider not merely the severity of the violation but the general disciplinary record of the editor in violation.
Remedy 5 of Antisemitism in Poland is superseded by the following restriction:
All articles and edits in the topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction".
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe is amended to include the following restriction:
All articles and edits in the topic area of Lithuania history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Lithuania are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction."
Clerks are instructed to link to the Arbitration Procedures in the two restrictions above and are empowered to make other changes necessary to implement this new enforcement procedure.
For the Arbitration Committee,
–
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a series of proposed motions related to allegations of inappropriate email canvassing within the Israel-Palestine topic area in violation of Wikipedia policy. Community statements and evidence submissions are welcome at the above link, or by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org if information cannot be posted publicly. For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 21:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 1.2 of the GiantSnowman case ("GiantSnowman admonished and placed under review") is amended to read as follows:
1.2) GiantSnowman is admonished for overuse of the rollback and blocking functions, and reminded to "lead by example" and "strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy"; to "respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrative actions and to justify them when needed"; to not use admin tools in "cases in which they have been involved" including "conflicts with an editor" and "disputes on topics"; to "treat newcomers with kindness and patience"; and to apply these principles in all interactions with all editors.
With the exception of obvious vandalism or obvious violations of the policy on biographies of living persons:
- GiantSnowman is prohibited from reverting another editor's contribution without providing an explanation in the edit summary. Default edit summaries provided by MediaWiki or user scripts are not sufficient for the purpose of this restriction. For the avoidance of doubt, use of MediaWiki rollback with an edit summary via a user script such as this one, or via massRollback.js, is permitted.
- GiantSnowman is prohibited from blocking an editor who has not been recently warned for the conduct in question. For the purposes of this restriction, "recently" is assumed to be within 7 days.
Violations may be reported by any editor to the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard. GiantSnowman may appeal these restrictions directly to the Arbitration Committee at any time.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 19:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Since at least October 2023, there has been an ongoing effort by one or more banned editors to canvass discussions within the Israel-Palestine topic area and asking for proxy edits to promote a pro-Israel point of view. Based on the evidence received by the Committee, the following discussions have been targeted:
The Arbitration Committee would like to thank the editors who reported canvassing. If editors have any additional canvassing evidence, please bring it to the Committee's attention. The Arbitration Committee asks the Wikimedia Foundation for assistance creating technical measures to prevent the ongoing abuse.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Dovidroth ( talk · contribs) most likely participated in discussions due to canvassing and made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Dovidroth ( talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that EytanMelech ( talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, he is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that EytanMelech ( talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Homerethegreat ( talk · contribs) most likely participated in discussions due to canvassing and made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh ( talk) 15:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
A motion to formalize the Arbitration Committee's usage of remind, warn, and admonish in the procedures is now being considered at Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE. The draft text and feedback section can be found at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Consultation: Admin information draft. Thank you to everyone who participates. Z1720 ( talk) 20:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Add the following to the Arbitration Procedures as a subsection of "Arbitration Proceedings"
When used in arbitration motions or remedies, the words below should be considered to have the following order of severity:
- Remind (weakest)
- Warn
- Admonish (strongest)
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, Wugapodes' CheckUser access has been removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks Wugapodes for their service as a CheckUser and their continuing service as an Oversighter.
On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Two motions are proposed to amend the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee at Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. Maxim ( talk) 16:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Given Mzajac ( talk · contribs)'s absence from editing, the Mzajac case will be suspended for a period of three months and Mzajac will be temporarily desysopped.
Should Mzajac return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org or at the clerks' noticeboard. Mzajac will remain temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.
If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Mzajac resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Mzajac shall remain desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Mzajac may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The Arbitration Committee resolves to amend the scope of block appeals it handles, thus updating the guidance from previous motion in 2015, as follows:
The Arbitration Committee hears appeals from editors who are (a) blocked for reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion, or (b) blocked or banned by Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement decisions. Examples of reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion include blocks (i) marked as an Oversight block, or (ii) based on CheckUser evidence, and where there exists disagreement between checkusers as to the interpretation of the technical evidence. It is expected that blocks marked as a CheckUser block are by default appealed on-wiki; however, the Arbitration Committee may hear appeals of such blocks if there are compelling reasons to hear an appeal in private.
For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim ( talk) 13:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Mschwartz1 ( talk · contribs) is granted the extended-confirmed user group for the exclusive purpose of participating in a case request about Israel-Palestine.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I resign my seat on ArbCom with immediate effect. To all those who voted for me - I'm sorry I wasn't the arbitrator either of us hoped I'd be. GeneralNotability ( talk) 11:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee makes the following update to its 20 March announcement:
Mschwartz1 ( talk · contribs)'s extended-confirmed permission is revoked as they did not meet the Arbitration Committee's expectations when the request for the permission was granted. The Committee apologises for the time spent by the wider Community on this affair.
Guerillero is recused from consideration of this matter.
On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For egregious misuse of an admin tool, for losing the trust or confidence of the community, and for failing to address the concerns of the community within a reasonable time period, while being aware of those concerns, contrary to the expectations of admin conduct and accountability, Dbachmann ( talk · contribs) is desysopped. Dbachmann may regain the administrative tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permissions of Courcelles ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
An arbitration case, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/World War II and the history of Jews in Poland, has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked for up to 1 year. Administrators placing blocks should take into account an editor's overall conduct and Arbitration history and seriously consider increasing the duration of blocks. Any block 3 months or longer should be reported for automatic review either (1) at ARCA or (2) to an arbitrator or clerk who will open a review at ARCA. The committee will consider presented evidence and statements before deciding by motion what, if any, actions are necessary, up to and including a site ban.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:56, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Scottywong has now closed, and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 17:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
The arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/AlisonW has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedy has been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Paradise Chronicle ( talk · contribs) is indefinitely site-banned.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 17:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to announce that ToBeFree ( talk · contribs) has been appointed a full clerk, effective immediately, concluding his successful traineeship.
The arbitration clerk team is often in need of new members, and any editor who would like to join the clerk team is welcome to apply by e-mail to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 22:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser and Oversight permissions of bradv ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac ( talk) 19:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The SmallCat dispute arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision is viewable at the case page. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser permission of ferret ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) has been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 12:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is seeking to appoint additional editors to the Checkuser and Oversight teams. The arbitrators overseeing this will be Cabayi and Wugapodes. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will assist in the vetting process. This year's timeline is as follows:
For the Arbitration Committee, Cabayi ( talk) 23:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, the CheckUser and Oversight permissions of RickinBaltimore ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) have been restored.
For the Arbitration Committee, Primefac ( talk) 08:21, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 9 of the WikiProject Tropical Cyclones case (" MarioProtIV topic ban") is rescinded.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 12:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Please take this note as my formal resignation from the Arbitration Committee. I've been less available in 2023 than I'd like, and since we're near election season, I felt this was a good time for me to step down. Being an arbitrator is not the most appreciated role on the encyclopedia (something I've written about in the past), so I'd just like to express my personal gratitude to the remaining committee, who do so much work behind the scenes, dealing with things so the rest of the community doesn't have to. WormTT( talk) 14:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Mark Ironie ( talk · contribs) and CorbieVreccan ( talk · contribs) will be considered a single user for Wikipedia's purposes. When editing the same articles, participating in the same community discussion, or supporting each other in any sort of dispute, these editors must disclose their connection and observe relevant policies such as edit warring as if they were a single account.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
I am resigning from the Arbitration Committee at the end of this year - December 31, 2023. Due to age and health I have struggled with the requirements of clarity of thought, energy levels, and remaining emotionally detached that is required of an Arb, and don't feel I have given of my best during this term. The thought of another year is wearying. I have been impressed with the professionalism, knowledge, skills and work ethic of the current Committee, one of the best and most supportive I have worked with. The Arbitration Committee, thanks to the work of not just the current but also previous Committees, is moving forward into an efficient organisation, and - despite my resignation - I would recommend it for those younger admins who have not yet served as a place to learn and discover more about Wikipedia, to test and improve skills, and as a place to really satisfy those desires of wanting to help out. ArbCom really benefits from having a mix of newer and younger admins working alongside seasoned and experienced Arbs. Indeed, the Committee benefits from having a wide and active range of views and opinions and experiences - it's as good to have those who are mainly familiar with writing articles, or organising categories as it is to have those who are very familiar with the daily posts on AN. Step forward and step up.
Meanwhile, thanks to the Committee and to the Clerks for all that they do. SilkTork ( talk) 11:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
The community consultation portion of the functionary appointment process is now open. Editors may ask up to two (2) questions of each candidate (similar to RFA rules). However, since this is a consultation and not a !vote, please refrain from phrasing comments in a support/oppose/neutral fashion.
The vetting process was much quicker than anticipated resulting in the schedule for the rest of the process moving forward.
The Arbitration Committee invites editors to comment and ask questions until 23:59 UTC on September 23, 2023.
For the Arbitration Committee, Cabayi ( talk) 14:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to welcome the following editor to the functionary team:
The committee thanks all members of the community who participated and helped bring this process to a successful conclusion.
For the Arbitration Committee, Cabayi ( talk) 20:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Wellington Bay ( talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 17:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Bkbray ( talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 18:05, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The Prem Rawat case is amended by striking the remedy designating Prem Rawat as a contentious topic ( Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat § Contentious topic designation). Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the contentious topics procedure.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 19:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is currently considering a series of motions to rescind remedies (including contentious topic designations) that may no longer be necessary to prevent disruption. Community feedback is welcome at the motions page in the "community discussion" sections. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, Kolya Butternut ( talk · contribs) is unblocked subject to the following restriction indefinitely, which may be appealed after 12 months have elapsed:
Kolya Butternut may discuss no other editor's undisclosed personal details anywhere. This includes both onwiki as well as any other online location or other Wikimedia-associated offline location.
For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 17:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by a series of motions that:
Motions that passed
|
---|
Remedy 1 of Editor conduct in e-cigs articles ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. The final remedy of Liancourt Rocks ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 1 of Longevity ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 2 of Medicine ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 2 of September 11 conspiracy theories ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded due to the topic area being covered by the post-1992 American Politics contentious topic. All actions taken under the rescinded authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. Remedy 1 of Shakespeare authorship question ("Contentious topic designation") is rescinded. Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic authorization remain in force and are governed by the procedures. The following remedies from Macedonia 2 are rescinded:
Editors are reminded that Eastern Europe and the Balkans, broadly construed, continues to be a contentious topic. Remedy 6 of the The Troubles case ("One-revert rule") is amended to read as follows:
|
For the Arbitration Committee, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:09, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion over email that:
On recommendation of the Electoral Commission, temporary English Wikipedia checkuser privileges are granted to stewards Superpes15, Martin Urbanec, and Mykola7 solely for the purpose of their acting as scrutineers in the 2023 Arbitration Committee election.
For the Arbitration Committee, — Wug· a·po·des 18:18, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to modify the provisions of the extended confirmed restriction. Comments are welcome at the relevant request for clarification.
In accordance with the procedural requirements for modifications of the Arbitration Committee procedures, a duplicate copy of the motion is available at the Committee's public motions page.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 01:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The Extended Confirmed Restriction is amended as follows:
The Committee may apply the "extended confirmed restriction" to specified topic areas. When such a restriction is in effect in a topic area, only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, subject to the following provisions:
- The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed, with the following exceptions:
- Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
post constructive comments andmake edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Should disruption occur on "Talk:" pages, administrators may take enforcement actions described in "B" or "C" below.However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even within the "Talk:" namespace. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, RMs, and noticeboard discussions.- Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
- If a page (other than a "Talk:" page) mostly or entirely relates to the topic area, broadly construed, this restriction is preferably enforced through extended confirmed protection, though this is not required.
- On any page where the restriction is not enforced through extended confirmed protection, this restriction may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.
- Reverts made solely to enforce this restriction are not considered edit warring.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 18:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee announces that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year. This reflects a change from past practice, which provided that only "extraordinary" candidates would be considered outside of an annual appointment process. The steps for interested candidates will remain the following:
The 2024 Arbitration Committee will decide whether it will continue to conduct an annual call for functionary candidates, or if instead this process will be the primary process for functionary appointments going forward.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 14:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The committee has received an appeal from Ethan2345678 ( talk · contribs) and would like to hear feedback from the community before coming to a final decision. You can post comments either in the linked discussion below or send them to arbcom-enwikimedia.org. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
In light of the voting phase of the arbcom election starting soon, I've decided to make official what has been de facto true for a while now and resign from the committee. Obviously I have been overtaken by real-life commitments and haven't had the time to contribute as I'd hoped this year, and I don't see that changing in the short time left in my term. Apologies and appreciation to those who picked up more work than they signed up for in my absence. I will also be giving up CU/OS, since I don't have time to do those jobs either. For everyone running in this year's election, good luck, and best wishes to the 2024 committee! Opabinia regalis ( talk) 07:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
For the Arbitration Committee, — Wug· a·po·des 09:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has determined that
Beeblebrox (
talk ·
contribs) has repeatedly failed to [p]reserve in appropriate confidence the contents of private correspondence sent to the Committee and the Committee's internal discussions and deliberations
by making disclosures on off-wiki forums. These failures followed a previous formal warning issued to Beeblebrox in September 2021 by the Arbitration Committee concerning his conduct in off-wiki forums. Therefore, in accordance with
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy § Conduct of arbitrators, Beeblebrox is suspended from Arbitration Committee membership for a period of six months from this date. During this period, Beeblebrox's CheckUser and Oversight permissions and his access to
applicable mailing lists (including the functionaries' mailing list) are revoked. Following this period, Beeblebrox may request reinstatement of his permissions or mailing list access by applying to the Arbitration Committee. Beeblebrox may also regain access via
election to the committee.
Support: Barkeep49, Cabayi, CaptainEek, Enterprisey, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, Izno, L235, Primefac, SilkTork, Wugapodes
Oppose:
Abstain: Moneytrees
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 04:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has received applications for functionary permissions from several editors, consistent with its previous announcement that applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions will be accepted at any point in the year. The following editors have applied for the CheckUser permission and have subsequently been reviewed and vetted by the functionary team, and the community is invited to comment on the associated consultation pages:
The community consultations will remain open through 11 December 2023.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The two Ireland page name move discussion restrictions enacted in June 2009 are rescinded.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 17:59, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, MelroseReporter ( talk · contribs) is unblocked (as time served) subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno ( talk) 03:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is pleased to welcome the following editors to the functionary team:
The committee thanks all members of the community who participated in the community consultations and helped bring this process to a successful conclusion.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 13:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
An arbitration case, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Industrial agriculture, has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 16:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee welcomes the following new and returning arbitrators following their election by the community. The two-year terms of these arbitrators formally begin on 1 January 2024:
Upon meeting the Wikimedia Foundation's criteria for access to non-public personal data and signing the Foundation's non-public information confidentiality agreement, all incoming arbitrators will be subscribed to all Committee-managed email lists, assigned the CheckUser and Oversight permissions for use in office, and given access to the CheckUser and Oversight queues on the VRTS system.
We also thank our outgoing colleagues whose terms end on 31 December 2023:
Outgoing arbitrators are eligible to retain the CheckUser and Oversight permissions, to remain active on cases accepted before their term ended, and to remain subscribed to the functionaries' and arbitration clerks' mailing lists following their term on the committee. To that effect:
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to amend the procedures and to extend reliable source requirements to Lithuania as a topic area. Comments are welcome at the relevant request for clarification.
For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 ( talk) 18:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Clerks are instructed to add a new section, entitled "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to the Enforcement section of the Arbitration Procedures with the following text:
The Committee may apply the "Reliable source consensus-required restriction" to specified topic areas. For topic areas with this restriction, when a source that is not an article in a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, an academically focused book by a reputable publisher, and/or an article published by a reputable institution is removed from an article, no editor may reinstate the source without first obtaining consensus on the talk page of the article in question or consensus about the reliability of the source in a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Administrators may enforce this restriction with page protections, topic bans, or blocks; enforcement decisions should consider not merely the severity of the violation but the general disciplinary record of the editor in violation.
Remedy 5 of Antisemitism in Poland is superseded by the following restriction:
All articles and edits in the topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction".
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe is amended to include the following restriction:
All articles and edits in the topic area of Lithuania history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Lithuania are subject to a "reliable source consensus-required restriction."
Clerks are instructed to link to the Arbitration Procedures in the two restrictions above and are empowered to make other changes necessary to implement this new enforcement procedure.
For the Arbitration Committee,
–
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖ 21:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a series of proposed motions related to allegations of inappropriate email canvassing within the Israel-Palestine topic area in violation of Wikipedia policy. Community statements and evidence submissions are welcome at the above link, or by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org if information cannot be posted publicly. For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 21:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 1.2 of the GiantSnowman case ("GiantSnowman admonished and placed under review") is amended to read as follows:
1.2) GiantSnowman is admonished for overuse of the rollback and blocking functions, and reminded to "lead by example" and "strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy"; to "respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrative actions and to justify them when needed"; to not use admin tools in "cases in which they have been involved" including "conflicts with an editor" and "disputes on topics"; to "treat newcomers with kindness and patience"; and to apply these principles in all interactions with all editors.
With the exception of obvious vandalism or obvious violations of the policy on biographies of living persons:
- GiantSnowman is prohibited from reverting another editor's contribution without providing an explanation in the edit summary. Default edit summaries provided by MediaWiki or user scripts are not sufficient for the purpose of this restriction. For the avoidance of doubt, use of MediaWiki rollback with an edit summary via a user script such as this one, or via massRollback.js, is permitted.
- GiantSnowman is prohibited from blocking an editor who has not been recently warned for the conduct in question. For the purposes of this restriction, "recently" is assumed to be within 7 days.
Violations may be reported by any editor to the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard. GiantSnowman may appeal these restrictions directly to the Arbitration Committee at any time.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 19:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Since at least October 2023, there has been an ongoing effort by one or more banned editors to canvass discussions within the Israel-Palestine topic area and asking for proxy edits to promote a pro-Israel point of view. Based on the evidence received by the Committee, the following discussions have been targeted:
The Arbitration Committee would like to thank the editors who reported canvassing. If editors have any additional canvassing evidence, please bring it to the Committee's attention. The Arbitration Committee asks the Wikimedia Foundation for assistance creating technical measures to prevent the ongoing abuse.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Dovidroth ( talk · contribs) most likely participated in discussions due to canvassing and made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Dovidroth ( talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that EytanMelech ( talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, he is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that EytanMelech ( talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Homerethegreat ( talk · contribs) most likely participated in discussions due to canvassing and made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh ( talk) 15:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
A motion to formalize the Arbitration Committee's usage of remind, warn, and admonish in the procedures is now being considered at Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE. The draft text and feedback section can be found at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Consultation: Admin information draft. Thank you to everyone who participates. Z1720 ( talk) 20:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Add the following to the Arbitration Procedures as a subsection of "Arbitration Proceedings"
When used in arbitration motions or remedies, the words below should be considered to have the following order of severity:
- Remind (weakest)
- Warn
- Admonish (strongest)
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Following a request to the Committee, Wugapodes' CheckUser access has been removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks Wugapodes for their service as a CheckUser and their continuing service as an Oversighter.
On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Two motions are proposed to amend the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee at Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. Maxim ( talk) 16:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Given Mzajac ( talk · contribs)'s absence from editing, the Mzajac case will be suspended for a period of three months and Mzajac will be temporarily desysopped.
Should Mzajac return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org or at the clerks' noticeboard. Mzajac will remain temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.
If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Mzajac resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Mzajac shall remain desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Mzajac may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The Arbitration Committee resolves to amend the scope of block appeals it handles, thus updating the guidance from previous motion in 2015, as follows:
The Arbitration Committee hears appeals from editors who are (a) blocked for reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion, or (b) blocked or banned by Arbitration and Arbitration Enforcement decisions. Examples of reasons that are unsuitable for public discussion include blocks (i) marked as an Oversight block, or (ii) based on CheckUser evidence, and where there exists disagreement between checkusers as to the interpretation of the technical evidence. It is expected that blocks marked as a CheckUser block are by default appealed on-wiki; however, the Arbitration Committee may hear appeals of such blocks if there are compelling reasons to hear an appeal in private.
For the Arbitration Committee, Maxim ( talk) 13:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Mschwartz1 ( talk · contribs) is granted the extended-confirmed user group for the exclusive purpose of participating in a case request about Israel-Palestine.
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I resign my seat on ArbCom with immediate effect. To all those who voted for me - I'm sorry I wasn't the arbitrator either of us hoped I'd be. GeneralNotability ( talk) 11:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee makes the following update to its 20 March announcement:
Mschwartz1 ( talk · contribs)'s extended-confirmed permission is revoked as they did not meet the Arbitration Committee's expectations when the request for the permission was granted. The Committee apologises for the time spent by the wider Community on this affair.
Guerillero is recused from consideration of this matter.
On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)