INFO ABOUT LIST
Book stubs that probably should be novel stubs. Approximately 90% of these need to be changed to novel stubs.. When you are done with a article, please delete what you have finished. DO NOT STRIKE OUT WHAT YOU FINISHED, rather just remove the links that are done. They are in groups of 10, try and go group by group!!
Book stubs to Novel stubs -- New format
This is an old list done with the new format. What you see is the article link as normal, than information about the articles after the link. ANY suggestions on what kind of info is wanted after the lists should be put on the talk page, I will respond to every suggestion no matter how crazy it is!Note: I will do my best to suit any requests given.
This list has the article links, then information about the number of words it contains. Words in bold are to be taken as suggestions for something to be changed. Words not in bold means that everything is A-Okay.
Note The "bold" can be changed to colors, so that when we have more than one item, we can have a color code to easily tell what the program is suggesting. Suggestions on this go to the talk page.
Note the program suggests that the article is not a stub when the article has more than 400 TOTAL words in the article. Suggestions on changing this threshold should be disscussed on the talk page. Note: the threshold is arbitrary, and probably should be changed... I await suggestions :).
These can be 1)Totally wrong, should not be on list. (Note: keep it to things that are not human error... I can't fix people). 2)Messed up suggestions (new format) (Note: Any messed up suggestion is MY ERROR, so report it :)).
It's Your Misfortune and None of My Own;isStub(444) -- nonfiction history book, not novel. Thanks for noting this, but this is human error as the article is in the wrong category, if I am wrong please let me know in a post below this false hit. Thanks!
Maritonic knight;isStub(82), [[Category:YYYY novels]] needed, is not a novel
yes this is about a book character or group. This does not even belong in
Category:Book stubs. This is a false hit related to human error. I suggest changing the category to something like book characters, fictional groups, non-fiction groups ect. Bottom line, this is not even about a book, let alone a novel. :)
Eagle talk16:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Thanks for reporting this, this is a book, but not a novel (In particular, this is a reference book on a set of novels). I will set the program to skip articles with an instance of "reference book" in it. If anyone knows a more general (catch-all) term that applies to only non-novels, please tell me! An attempt to fix this problem will be made on future runs.
Eagle talk16:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
INFO ABOUT LIST
Book stubs that probably should be novel stubs. Approximately 90% of these need to be changed to novel stubs.. When you are done with a article, please delete what you have finished. DO NOT STRIKE OUT WHAT YOU FINISHED, rather just remove the links that are done. They are in groups of 10, try and go group by group!!
Book stubs to Novel stubs -- New format
This is an old list done with the new format. What you see is the article link as normal, than information about the articles after the link. ANY suggestions on what kind of info is wanted after the lists should be put on the talk page, I will respond to every suggestion no matter how crazy it is!Note: I will do my best to suit any requests given.
This list has the article links, then information about the number of words it contains. Words in bold are to be taken as suggestions for something to be changed. Words not in bold means that everything is A-Okay.
Note The "bold" can be changed to colors, so that when we have more than one item, we can have a color code to easily tell what the program is suggesting. Suggestions on this go to the talk page.
Note the program suggests that the article is not a stub when the article has more than 400 TOTAL words in the article. Suggestions on changing this threshold should be disscussed on the talk page. Note: the threshold is arbitrary, and probably should be changed... I await suggestions :).
These can be 1)Totally wrong, should not be on list. (Note: keep it to things that are not human error... I can't fix people). 2)Messed up suggestions (new format) (Note: Any messed up suggestion is MY ERROR, so report it :)).
It's Your Misfortune and None of My Own;isStub(444) -- nonfiction history book, not novel. Thanks for noting this, but this is human error as the article is in the wrong category, if I am wrong please let me know in a post below this false hit. Thanks!
Maritonic knight;isStub(82), [[Category:YYYY novels]] needed, is not a novel
yes this is about a book character or group. This does not even belong in
Category:Book stubs. This is a false hit related to human error. I suggest changing the category to something like book characters, fictional groups, non-fiction groups ect. Bottom line, this is not even about a book, let alone a novel. :)
Eagle talk16:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Thanks for reporting this, this is a book, but not a novel (In particular, this is a reference book on a set of novels). I will set the program to skip articles with an instance of "reference book" in it. If anyone knows a more general (catch-all) term that applies to only non-novels, please tell me! An attempt to fix this problem will be made on future runs.
Eagle talk16:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)reply