This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Science fiction or fantasy. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Science fiction and fantasy|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Science fiction or fantasy. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Redirect this page to King Grayskull's section in
List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. A quick online search doesn't show this character is notable. Moreover, from my understanding, he's a pretty minor character in the franchise to begin with. --
PanagiotisZois (
talk) 12:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The only sigcov source here
[1] and a bit useful IGN source
[2] still doesn't pass
WP:GNG with the demonstrated sources. The best thing is to merge it into a list of characters. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 11:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete and Section Move. I find it strange that this character ends up having her own page in this website, so I agree that the majority of the information in Demona's separate article should be merged in the list of Gargoyle characters. Anonymy365248 (
talk) 18:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep She's a decades-old character who is still popular today and has appeared in different forms of media including games and comics. --
DrBat (
talk) 21:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
"But without a single reliable source to verify its existence or accuracy, there is no way it can be included" doesn't apply here.
DrBat (
talk) 01:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
At this point, I'm not sure what I'm gonna respond to you. Show me more sources like Mary Sue that really doscuss the character in detail for it to prove that she's really notable. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 01:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I already brought up the IGN source. Demona is just a passing mention from the AV club source + that youtube source is unreliable. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 03:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The av club one has a whole section of the interview about the character, it's hardly a passing mention. --
DrBat (
talk) 04:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oops I missed this sorry, but we don't usually call this
WP:SIGCOV as a source somehow since Demona wasn't discussed as a character but as an interview to voice her in a short detail. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 04:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Can't see it passes
WP: GNG. All available sourcing are just about the actors. Proposing MERGE to
Baalveer or DELETE.
Twinkle1990 (
talk) 16:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep:The article "Baalveer Returns" has been supported by many reliable sources, including Mid Day, The Tribune India, Aaj Tak, Abp news and The Times of India as per
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources It seems like Twinkle1990 has a personal enmity with Baalveer, so they are trying to delete all Balveer- related articles.
Delete or Redirect to
Baalveer. Same here like Baalveer 3 and Baalveer 4 nomination. The sources do not have the quality and depth of coverage needed to warrant a page on this show. Fails
WP:GNG.
RangersRus (
talk) 21:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Please sign all comments in AFD discussions. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
There are two big issues: Firstly, there's no citations outside of the one character that already has his own page,
Newt Scamander. Secondly, this is for a three-film series - so not really a huge body of work - and, outside of the main four or five characters, there's one or two sentences for each person. Worse, the articles on the films have cast lists with one or two sentence descriptions of the characters, so it's redundant as well (The main characters' longer bits just being the plot summaries of the films). Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 23:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:CSC #2, no argument for deletion made that cannot be remedied by editing.
Jclemens (
talk) 04:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't think it rises to the level of notability where it can ever be sourced. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 04:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
These articles a little weird if we are trying to go by consistency.
List of Harry Potter characters exists, but that is for characters who appeared in any of the books, which a lot of these do not and are not mentioned in that article. There is also
List of Fantastic Beasts cast members which compliments
List of Harry Potter cast members (a featured list.) Maybe it might be beneficial to merge the two Fantastic Beasts articles since the cast members one is well sourced, while this one is not.
Aspects (
talk) 15:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not objecting to Fantastic Beasts having multiple articles, but the number of secondary articles on it seems vastly out of line with the material.
Fantastic Beasts (film series) and the three film articles are sensible enough,
Newt Scamander seems to have enough independant coverage - and crossover content between various things - that it's justified, but when you get to a list of the characters, and a cast list as a table without any context, it feels both redundant and weird. It feels like the cast list should be at the end of the article on the series, and the character list... well... it's really hard to see why that exists at all if this article the most we can come up with, and I don't think anything in it isn't in the cast sections of the articles for each film; indeed, I think those may be doing a slightly better job.
Harry Potter isn't a good guide to what should exist here, as that was a much, much bigger phenomenon than its spinoff, and, as a book series, had both a lot more characters than could plausibly fit in a plot summary and a lot more development and recurrence of minor characters (and Rowling talked a lot more about the development of those characters in interviews). Films just don't have the depth of books, and, if there's material about secondary characters that got left out of the films, as far as I'm aware, it's not reported on.
And, of course, Harry Potter in particular had a lot more secondary sources that went into detail about every character; Fantastic Beasts doesn't have anything like that depth of coverage. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 15:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment I feel there has to be a merge target as an
WP:ATD for this. The one suggested above seems less intuitive than if the main article had a characters section. Perhaps each individual film should have a characters section?
Conyo14 (
talk) 04:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
They already do, is the thing, with one or two sentence descriptions of the characters. And it covers pretty much all the information on this page except for the main cast, who are redundant to the plot summary. If I've missed that one doesn't appear, by all means copy it over. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 13:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Further pop culture sources, if somewhat focussed on a specific film of the series would be
[5],
[6], and with a fun bit of analysis,
[7]. So again, that there is not enough sourcing to constitute an article does not at all seem to be the case.
Daranios (
talk) 16:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Well, it feels redundant to the film articles, and there's an unstated presumption people care enough to actually make this into a decent article, but, well, sure. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 17:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Adam Cuerden:there's an unstated presumption people care enough to actually make this into a decent article: On the one hand I think that's a valid concern, seeing that some articles stay tagged and unimproved for long periods of time. But on the other hand I think that is the basic premise of Wikipedia, and the project is immensly successful! So I prefer to err on the side of hope in accordance with
WP:There is no deadline and especially
WP:Work in progress.
Daranios (
talk) 07:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Ay, but I think when the article's a spinoff that has redundant information to other articles at present, it's perhaps more of a question. As it stands, it's just the character lists already in the three films, but as an unreferenced, alphabetised list. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 10:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus yet. Please do not turn
List of Fantastic Beasts cast members into a Redirect as that article is being discussed as a possible Merge target article which can't occur if the page is a Redirect. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hmm.. "characters" does feel better.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 04:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more try… Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 08:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Science fiction or fantasy. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Science fiction and fantasy|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Science fiction or fantasy. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Redirect this page to King Grayskull's section in
List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. A quick online search doesn't show this character is notable. Moreover, from my understanding, he's a pretty minor character in the franchise to begin with. --
PanagiotisZois (
talk) 12:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The only sigcov source here
[1] and a bit useful IGN source
[2] still doesn't pass
WP:GNG with the demonstrated sources. The best thing is to merge it into a list of characters. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 11:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete and Section Move. I find it strange that this character ends up having her own page in this website, so I agree that the majority of the information in Demona's separate article should be merged in the list of Gargoyle characters. Anonymy365248 (
talk) 18:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep She's a decades-old character who is still popular today and has appeared in different forms of media including games and comics. --
DrBat (
talk) 21:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
"But without a single reliable source to verify its existence or accuracy, there is no way it can be included" doesn't apply here.
DrBat (
talk) 01:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
At this point, I'm not sure what I'm gonna respond to you. Show me more sources like Mary Sue that really doscuss the character in detail for it to prove that she's really notable. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 01:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I already brought up the IGN source. Demona is just a passing mention from the AV club source + that youtube source is unreliable. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 03:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The av club one has a whole section of the interview about the character, it's hardly a passing mention. --
DrBat (
talk) 04:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oops I missed this sorry, but we don't usually call this
WP:SIGCOV as a source somehow since Demona wasn't discussed as a character but as an interview to voice her in a short detail. 🍕
Boneless Pizza!🍕 (
🔔) 04:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Can't see it passes
WP: GNG. All available sourcing are just about the actors. Proposing MERGE to
Baalveer or DELETE.
Twinkle1990 (
talk) 16:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep:The article "Baalveer Returns" has been supported by many reliable sources, including Mid Day, The Tribune India, Aaj Tak, Abp news and The Times of India as per
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources It seems like Twinkle1990 has a personal enmity with Baalveer, so they are trying to delete all Balveer- related articles.
Delete or Redirect to
Baalveer. Same here like Baalveer 3 and Baalveer 4 nomination. The sources do not have the quality and depth of coverage needed to warrant a page on this show. Fails
WP:GNG.
RangersRus (
talk) 21:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Please sign all comments in AFD discussions. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
There are two big issues: Firstly, there's no citations outside of the one character that already has his own page,
Newt Scamander. Secondly, this is for a three-film series - so not really a huge body of work - and, outside of the main four or five characters, there's one or two sentences for each person. Worse, the articles on the films have cast lists with one or two sentence descriptions of the characters, so it's redundant as well (The main characters' longer bits just being the plot summaries of the films). Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 23:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:CSC #2, no argument for deletion made that cannot be remedied by editing.
Jclemens (
talk) 04:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I don't think it rises to the level of notability where it can ever be sourced. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 04:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
These articles a little weird if we are trying to go by consistency.
List of Harry Potter characters exists, but that is for characters who appeared in any of the books, which a lot of these do not and are not mentioned in that article. There is also
List of Fantastic Beasts cast members which compliments
List of Harry Potter cast members (a featured list.) Maybe it might be beneficial to merge the two Fantastic Beasts articles since the cast members one is well sourced, while this one is not.
Aspects (
talk) 15:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not objecting to Fantastic Beasts having multiple articles, but the number of secondary articles on it seems vastly out of line with the material.
Fantastic Beasts (film series) and the three film articles are sensible enough,
Newt Scamander seems to have enough independant coverage - and crossover content between various things - that it's justified, but when you get to a list of the characters, and a cast list as a table without any context, it feels both redundant and weird. It feels like the cast list should be at the end of the article on the series, and the character list... well... it's really hard to see why that exists at all if this article the most we can come up with, and I don't think anything in it isn't in the cast sections of the articles for each film; indeed, I think those may be doing a slightly better job.
Harry Potter isn't a good guide to what should exist here, as that was a much, much bigger phenomenon than its spinoff, and, as a book series, had both a lot more characters than could plausibly fit in a plot summary and a lot more development and recurrence of minor characters (and Rowling talked a lot more about the development of those characters in interviews). Films just don't have the depth of books, and, if there's material about secondary characters that got left out of the films, as far as I'm aware, it's not reported on.
And, of course, Harry Potter in particular had a lot more secondary sources that went into detail about every character; Fantastic Beasts doesn't have anything like that depth of coverage. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 15:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment I feel there has to be a merge target as an
WP:ATD for this. The one suggested above seems less intuitive than if the main article had a characters section. Perhaps each individual film should have a characters section?
Conyo14 (
talk) 04:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
They already do, is the thing, with one or two sentence descriptions of the characters. And it covers pretty much all the information on this page except for the main cast, who are redundant to the plot summary. If I've missed that one doesn't appear, by all means copy it over. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 13:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Further pop culture sources, if somewhat focussed on a specific film of the series would be
[5],
[6], and with a fun bit of analysis,
[7]. So again, that there is not enough sourcing to constitute an article does not at all seem to be the case.
Daranios (
talk) 16:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Well, it feels redundant to the film articles, and there's an unstated presumption people care enough to actually make this into a decent article, but, well, sure. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 17:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Adam Cuerden:there's an unstated presumption people care enough to actually make this into a decent article: On the one hand I think that's a valid concern, seeing that some articles stay tagged and unimproved for long periods of time. But on the other hand I think that is the basic premise of Wikipedia, and the project is immensly successful! So I prefer to err on the side of hope in accordance with
WP:There is no deadline and especially
WP:Work in progress.
Daranios (
talk) 07:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Ay, but I think when the article's a spinoff that has redundant information to other articles at present, it's perhaps more of a question. As it stands, it's just the character lists already in the three films, but as an unreferenced, alphabetised list. Adam Cuerden(
talk)Has about 8.8% of all
FPs. 10:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus yet. Please do not turn
List of Fantastic Beasts cast members into a Redirect as that article is being discussed as a possible Merge target article which can't occur if the page is a Redirect. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hmm.. "characters" does feel better.
Hyperbolick (
talk) 04:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more try… Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 08:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply