The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Underused, incomplete template which is currently used only on two articles: Regular graph and Butterfly graph. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Arrow. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Arw with
Template:Arrow/core.
We have three templates that all basically do the same thing, and not even all that well from what I can tell. Most of these could probably just be replaced by → and similar (i.e. should we even have coloured arrows in article space?).
Primefac (
talk)
19:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
“Most of these could probably just be replaced by →”would break some legacy stuff that used
{{
arw|l}}
, surely. 〜
Festucalex •
talk
05:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
{{arrow/core|left}}
, which gives ← as well).
Primefac (
talk)
06:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 04:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
This seems to have the same functionality of {{ huge}}, i.e. make the text 180%. I am also not sure why it seems to only be used on Islamic pages, and why we need this specifically for that situation. Primefac ( talk) 19:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused for at least a decade, only currently transcluded on a handful of pages, and having chatted with someone in ACC they don't know why this still exists. "Historical" is nice but I see no reason to keep this around. Primefac ( talk) 18:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
WP:OR and redundant, as combined table for 2021–22 A-League Men and 2022–23 A-League Men is not necessary to determine qualification for 2023 AFC Champions League as Melbourne City FC were Premiers in both seasons Macosal ( talk) 11:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
On the surface this seems like a reasonable template - input number, get out a linked Islamic month and its name. It only has one use here though, which indicates that it is either not as useful as one would expect, or that people name the Islamic months in ways that this template does not offer (or, as a third thought, the name is convoluted and no one knows it exists). I feel like this does not offer a huge amount of help when writing an article, hence the nomination. At an absolute bare minimum the template should be renamed. Primefac ( talk) 11:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete/keep. Delete "add" and replace with "new discussion" Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Add with
Template:New discussion.
These two templates are nearly identical, with the only difference being that {{
New discussion}} puts the message inside of an mbox. Each template is only used ~50 times so there's no clear indication whether it would make more sense to have the mbox option opt-in or opt-out, but given the low usage I don't see the need to have two templates doing essentially the same thing.
Primefac (
talk)
09:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:POV map of India. The WP:NPOV data is located at Module:Location map/data/India which should be used — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 09:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 17. (non-admin closure) Aaron Liu ( talk) 17:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Underused, incomplete template which is currently used only on two articles: Regular graph and Butterfly graph. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:20, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Arrow. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Arw with
Template:Arrow/core.
We have three templates that all basically do the same thing, and not even all that well from what I can tell. Most of these could probably just be replaced by → and similar (i.e. should we even have coloured arrows in article space?).
Primefac (
talk)
19:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
“Most of these could probably just be replaced by →”would break some legacy stuff that used
{{
arw|l}}
, surely. 〜
Festucalex •
talk
05:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
{{arrow/core|left}}
, which gives ← as well).
Primefac (
talk)
06:43, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 04:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
This seems to have the same functionality of {{ huge}}, i.e. make the text 180%. I am also not sure why it seems to only be used on Islamic pages, and why we need this specifically for that situation. Primefac ( talk) 19:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused for at least a decade, only currently transcluded on a handful of pages, and having chatted with someone in ACC they don't know why this still exists. "Historical" is nice but I see no reason to keep this around. Primefac ( talk) 18:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:16, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
WP:OR and redundant, as combined table for 2021–22 A-League Men and 2022–23 A-League Men is not necessary to determine qualification for 2023 AFC Champions League as Melbourne City FC were Premiers in both seasons Macosal ( talk) 11:51, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
On the surface this seems like a reasonable template - input number, get out a linked Islamic month and its name. It only has one use here though, which indicates that it is either not as useful as one would expect, or that people name the Islamic months in ways that this template does not offer (or, as a third thought, the name is convoluted and no one knows it exists). I feel like this does not offer a huge amount of help when writing an article, hence the nomination. At an absolute bare minimum the template should be renamed. Primefac ( talk) 11:21, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete/keep. Delete "add" and replace with "new discussion" Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Add with
Template:New discussion.
These two templates are nearly identical, with the only difference being that {{
New discussion}} puts the message inside of an mbox. Each template is only used ~50 times so there's no clear indication whether it would make more sense to have the mbox option opt-in or opt-out, but given the low usage I don't see the need to have two templates doing essentially the same thing.
Primefac (
talk)
09:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:POV map of India. The WP:NPOV data is located at Module:Location map/data/India which should be used — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 09:04, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 17. (non-admin closure) Aaron Liu ( talk) 17:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)