The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This template was only used on Ghana national football team, but I've removed it there because there were (AFAIK) no Akan special characters on that page. Also, as far as I can find (we don't have a lot of info about the Akan alphabet onwiki), the Akan language only uses Latin characters and some IPA symbols, which are probably well supported on almost all platforms. rchard2scout ( talk) 10:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Same as Contains Akan text. Barely used, and the only special characters that this language uses are the "open o" (`ɔ`) and epsilon (`ɛ`), which are part of IPA and generally well-supported. rchard2scout ( talk) 18:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:MoreInfo,
Template:Notsure,
Template:Investigating and
Template:LEG? with
Template:Question.
This set of templates all feature a blue question mark inside a blue circle with some text. {{
Question}} offers the option to customize the text, as such there really is no reason why there should be a different template for every variation of text anyone can think of, when it can be done with {{Question|label=foo}}
.
Gonnym (
talk) 13:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
=}}
and use HTML syntax directly. The key differentiator is user experience. --
qedk (
t 桜
c) 15:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
We still use all of these templates at SPI, but that is inaccurate. {{ moreinfo}} is the only one that has been used at SPI. However, this doesn't appear to affect the rest of your point. eπi ( talk | contribs) 16:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
Notsure}}
sometimes and seen it used as well. As for {{
Investigating}}
, not too sure, figured it would be (Sockpuppet investigations afterall, there's also CCI, but again, not sure). --
qedk (
t 桜
c) 16:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
{{question|label=Not sure.}}
and {{question|label=Investigating}}
, but I don't think template simplification outweighs the costs of disturbing already-completed discussions or denying these options to future users. {{
moreinfo}} should clearly remain a separate template.
eπi (
talk |
contribs) 12:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Other uses. Primefac ( talk) 13:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Module:Other uses2 with
Module:Other uses.
If there really needs to two templates for this, then this module should be handled as another function inside
Module:Other uses.
Gonnym (
talk) 17:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union. No opposition, template content has been merged. Primefac ( talk) 13:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Design-EU with
Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union.
Overlapping templates. {{
Intellectual property laws of the European Union}} was just recently merged with {{
Trademark-EU}} per
this TfD for the same reasons.
Gonnym (
talk) 19:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:55, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Folk of {{
32TeamBracket-Compact|seeds=no}}
Hhkohh (
talk) 14:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
{{32TeamBracket|compact=yes|seeds=no
and delete.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC){{
32TeamBracket-Compact|seeds=no}}
can probably be revised to remove these differences, but this was good to bring up.
eπi (
talk |
contribs) 12:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
All but four of the 28 non-header articles were deleted by AfD in 2016. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. And replace with {{ Infobox settlement}} beforehand Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Municipality-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
States, towns, villages etc. already transclude {{ Infobox settlement}} directly. 78.55.48.101 ( talk) 08:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{ Infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Northern Ireland townland-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
Counties, towns, villages etc. already transclude {{ Infobox settlement}} directly.
|
89.12.139.236 ( talk) 13:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
"Perhaps a good first step would be to refactor the template as a frontend, and then discuss the merits of having the template as a frontend vs. substituting it.". The refactoring has been done; this is the discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:58, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
This template was only used on Ghana national football team, but I've removed it there because there were (AFAIK) no Akan special characters on that page. Also, as far as I can find (we don't have a lot of info about the Akan alphabet onwiki), the Akan language only uses Latin characters and some IPA symbols, which are probably well supported on almost all platforms. rchard2scout ( talk) 10:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Same as Contains Akan text. Barely used, and the only special characters that this language uses are the "open o" (`ɔ`) and epsilon (`ɛ`), which are part of IPA and generally well-supported. rchard2scout ( talk) 18:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:MoreInfo,
Template:Notsure,
Template:Investigating and
Template:LEG? with
Template:Question.
This set of templates all feature a blue question mark inside a blue circle with some text. {{
Question}} offers the option to customize the text, as such there really is no reason why there should be a different template for every variation of text anyone can think of, when it can be done with {{Question|label=foo}}
.
Gonnym (
talk) 13:14, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
=}}
and use HTML syntax directly. The key differentiator is user experience. --
qedk (
t 桜
c) 15:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
We still use all of these templates at SPI, but that is inaccurate. {{ moreinfo}} is the only one that has been used at SPI. However, this doesn't appear to affect the rest of your point. eπi ( talk | contribs) 16:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
{{
Notsure}}
sometimes and seen it used as well. As for {{
Investigating}}
, not too sure, figured it would be (Sockpuppet investigations afterall, there's also CCI, but again, not sure). --
qedk (
t 桜
c) 16:58, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
{{question|label=Not sure.}}
and {{question|label=Investigating}}
, but I don't think template simplification outweighs the costs of disturbing already-completed discussions or denying these options to future users. {{
moreinfo}} should clearly remain a separate template.
eπi (
talk |
contribs) 12:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Other uses. Primefac ( talk) 13:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Module:Other uses2 with
Module:Other uses.
If there really needs to two templates for this, then this module should be handled as another function inside
Module:Other uses.
Gonnym (
talk) 17:35, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union. No opposition, template content has been merged. Primefac ( talk) 13:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Propose merging
Template:Design-EU with
Template:Intellectual property laws of the European Union.
Overlapping templates. {{
Intellectual property laws of the European Union}} was just recently merged with {{
Trademark-EU}} per
this TfD for the same reasons.
Gonnym (
talk) 19:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:55, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Folk of {{
32TeamBracket-Compact|seeds=no}}
Hhkohh (
talk) 14:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
{{32TeamBracket|compact=yes|seeds=no
and delete.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC){{
32TeamBracket-Compact|seeds=no}}
can probably be revised to remove these differences, but this was good to bring up.
eπi (
talk |
contribs) 12:31, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
All but four of the 28 non-header articles were deleted by AfD in 2016. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:31, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete. And replace with {{ Infobox settlement}} beforehand Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Municipality-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
States, towns, villages etc. already transclude {{ Infobox settlement}} directly. 78.55.48.101 ( talk) 08:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{ Infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Replace and delete
Northern Ireland townland-specific wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.
Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country"
.
Counties, towns, villages etc. already transclude {{ Infobox settlement}} directly.
|
89.12.139.236 ( talk) 13:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
"Perhaps a good first step would be to refactor the template as a frontend, and then discuss the merits of having the template as a frontend vs. substituting it.". The refactoring has been done; this is the discussion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)