< December 6 | December 8 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused infobox template. Frietjes ( talk) 23:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicates the links in Template:Economy of Australia. Frietjes ( talk) 23:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused and duplicates recent roster in article. Frietjes ( talk) 22:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused and duplicates recent roster in article. Frietjes ( talk) 22:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 22:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicates August 2010 in sports, which was created by the same author? Frietjes ( talk) 22:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 22:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Consensus is clear. delldot ∇. 02:43, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
This template should be deleted as it encourages linking to a website (www.discogs.com) that is user-generated and thus not always verifiable. Information on discogs often relates to promotional releases which the general public does not have access to. It also encourages the use of self-published references, hence at WP:DISCOGSTYLE it says "discogs.com should be avoided". This deletion also includes nominations for the sister templates:
The result of the discussion was Speedied G7. Black Kite ( talk) 11:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
an apparent duplicate of the previously nominated "Template", which its not. did not check where its linked, if anywhere. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
this is not a template at all, and if bracketed on a user page, does nothing. its embedded in at least one userbox, which wont help much. maybe this can be a redirect to the page which documents how to recover an article Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicate of existing navigation. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 01:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
We don't have templates that list every game of every Steam promotion, either, and it seems a tad bit silly that we would do so for XBLA titles. What useful information does this template add at articles like Galaga Legions? "Oh, hey, this game was promoted once!" Well.. yeah. Duh. Template-cruft. -- Conti| ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
< December 6 | December 8 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused infobox template. Frietjes ( talk) 23:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:06, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicates the links in Template:Economy of Australia. Frietjes ( talk) 23:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused and duplicates recent roster in article. Frietjes ( talk) 22:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused and duplicates recent roster in article. Frietjes ( talk) 22:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 22:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicates August 2010 in sports, which was created by the same author? Frietjes ( talk) 22:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes ( talk) 22:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep. Consensus is clear. delldot ∇. 02:43, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
This template should be deleted as it encourages linking to a website (www.discogs.com) that is user-generated and thus not always verifiable. Information on discogs often relates to promotional releases which the general public does not have access to. It also encourages the use of self-published references, hence at WP:DISCOGSTYLE it says "discogs.com should be avoided". This deletion also includes nominations for the sister templates:
The result of the discussion was Speedied G7. Black Kite ( talk) 11:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
an apparent duplicate of the previously nominated "Template", which its not. did not check where its linked, if anywhere. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
this is not a template at all, and if bracketed on a user page, does nothing. its embedded in at least one userbox, which wont help much. maybe this can be a redirect to the page which documents how to recover an article Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicate of existing navigation. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 01:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
We don't have templates that list every game of every Steam promotion, either, and it seems a tad bit silly that we would do so for XBLA titles. What useful information does this template add at articles like Galaga Legions? "Oh, hey, this game was promoted once!" Well.. yeah. Duh. Template-cruft. -- Conti| ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)