Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
♠ TomasBat 02:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have reverted your last change. I didn't look closely enough at it, I thought you were doing the same edit as before.— Chowbok ☠ 12:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CDJ-100S is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDJ-100S until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 18:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, SNAFU , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cnilep ( talk) 01:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw your latest comments on the AfDs for the Apple and iOS outlines. Thank you.
By the way, to withdraw a nomination for deletion (AfD) that you have made, add an entry to the end of the voting section, like this:
Then contact an admin who closes AfDs (look at the edit history for a recently closed AfD for who closed it), and he or she will probably be happy to close the AfD. It must be someone who has not participated in the discussion being closed. The Transhumanist 18:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Over at AfD, you wrote:
I'd never heard of these "outlines" either, so they need some decent exposure including info on how they came into being on WP.
Cut and paste moves aren't the way to do it as they do not preserve the edit history. See WP:MOVE. If the redirect is the issue, see WP:MOR for info. Thanks. -- Jtalledo (talk) 04:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Trying to do 3 things: (a) Delete wrongly created Retina Displays, (b) Move Retina display to a current redirect page Retina Display, (c) After doing b, then redirect Retina display back to Retina Display instead?? Mucked around hours ago, and nothing has happened?! Read the help but don't get it. Jimthing ( talk) 11:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Retina Display, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPI ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia ads | file info – #210 |
This user is a member of the iOS task force. |
Would you like to become a member of WikiProject Apple Inc. – iOS task force? Seeing your recent edits to iOS-related articles, I thought you might be interested.
–– 76.10.241.86 Talk Contribs 22:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Leveson Inquiry".
Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 22:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, quick question: I'm confused as to why both the Channel 4 links should be there; they both point to the same file, they're not separate sites. Why is it necessary to link to a static redirect? drewmunn talk 20:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Control Center for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Control Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Did you decide what to do with iPad Mini and iPad Mini (1st generation)? I thought the first article should redirect to the second, but perhaps you have other plans? Frmorrison ( talk) 21:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Template:Apple". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.245.78.133 ( talk) 15:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC) About your recent move request on WP:RM/TRI went ahead and formatted your move request for IPad Mini (second generation) so that it appears properly on WP:RM/TR. For future reference, some instructions on how to post these types of moves are located on the WP:RM/TR page, as well as usually as hidden text when editing the page/inputting a request. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Restless Soul (record producer)
A tag has been placed on Restless Soul (record producer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche ( talk) 03:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC) I've moved the article to your userspace at User:Jimthing/Restless Soul (artist/label) so you can work on it at your leisure. The big thing to remember is that you'll have to show notability per WP:ORG by way of reliable sources, but at least with it in the userspace you'll have plenty of time and won't have to worry about it being deleted before you're finished. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Hi. I could swear I copied and pasted your entire proposal ad-hoc. Sorry if the comment was somehow left out. By the way, if we are to go absolutely by the book, we also have to wait for
FleetCommand's consent but judging by her modus operandi, I doubt it is necessary. I think
WP:SILENCE applies here. Best regards, Hi! Would you be interested in reviewing my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 ( talk) 14:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC) You keep adding a birthdate to the Babita Sharma article. I can't tell what "PO" is, but other than that you didn't cite any references. Please do not add information on living persons without a reliable source, particularly keeping WP:BLPPRIMARY in mind. Please also keep in mind that the burden of evidence rests with the editor who wants to add information. Huon ( talk) 12:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC) The article Accton Technology Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Talk:tvOS".The discussion is about the topic TvOS. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom29739 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC) Hello, I'm Tom29739. Your recent edit to the page tvOS appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia does. Per this RfC: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters/Archive_22 Tom29739 [ talk 11:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
It appears that in 2008 you believed that such a company was the production company for
Criminal Justice (TV series). Is it possible (since i find no existence of an organization with that exact title) that you have some insight into whether it might actually have been
BBC/World Productions or
BBC World Productions, making that firm or its successor an appropriate link in both the old one and our related article
The Night Of? ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Jimthing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, I flagged the article because you failed to properly establish notability. With 7700 edits under your belt and numerous articles created, I'm totally baffled at how our notability guidelines for corporations or our general notability guideline have not been met here. I mean seriously, we've got Quora being used as a reference twice in the article. Quora. Was there nothing available at Yahoo! Answers? Your assertion that the company is notable is not the same thing as properly establishing notability per Wikipedia standards, i.e. with significant coverage from reliable published sources that are independent from the subject. A Quora write-up and an Alexa rank doesn't cut it. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Please take your issues to the talkpage, I'm not fussed who's right or wrong point is you've both gone over WP:3rr so you both need to discuss otherwise your both going to end up blocked, Thank you. – Davey2010 Talk 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Tip: Chat on your talk page, then use the 'talkback' template on my talk page. ;-) Hello, Jimthing. You have new messages at
Rodneykeeling's talk page.
Jimthing (
talk) 14:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Nomination of On-again, off-again relationship for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article
On-again, off-again relationship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On-again, off-again relationship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nate • ( chatter) 00:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC) Hello, Jimthing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
♠ TomasBat 02:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have reverted your last change. I didn't look closely enough at it, I thought you were doing the same edit as before.— Chowbok ☠ 12:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CDJ-100S is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDJ-100S until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 18:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, SNAFU , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cnilep ( talk) 01:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw your latest comments on the AfDs for the Apple and iOS outlines. Thank you.
By the way, to withdraw a nomination for deletion (AfD) that you have made, add an entry to the end of the voting section, like this:
Then contact an admin who closes AfDs (look at the edit history for a recently closed AfD for who closed it), and he or she will probably be happy to close the AfD. It must be someone who has not participated in the discussion being closed. The Transhumanist 18:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Over at AfD, you wrote:
I'd never heard of these "outlines" either, so they need some decent exposure including info on how they came into being on WP.
Cut and paste moves aren't the way to do it as they do not preserve the edit history. See WP:MOVE. If the redirect is the issue, see WP:MOR for info. Thanks. -- Jtalledo (talk) 04:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Trying to do 3 things: (a) Delete wrongly created Retina Displays, (b) Move Retina display to a current redirect page Retina Display, (c) After doing b, then redirect Retina display back to Retina Display instead?? Mucked around hours ago, and nothing has happened?! Read the help but don't get it. Jimthing ( talk) 11:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Retina Display, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPI ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia ads | file info – #210 |
This user is a member of the iOS task force. |
Would you like to become a member of WikiProject Apple Inc. – iOS task force? Seeing your recent edits to iOS-related articles, I thought you might be interested.
–– 76.10.241.86 Talk Contribs 22:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Leveson Inquiry".
Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 22:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, quick question: I'm confused as to why both the Channel 4 links should be there; they both point to the same file, they're not separate sites. Why is it necessary to link to a static redirect? drewmunn talk 20:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Nomination of Control Center for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Control Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Control Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:09, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Did you decide what to do with iPad Mini and iPad Mini (1st generation)? I thought the first article should redirect to the second, but perhaps you have other plans? Frmorrison ( talk) 21:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Template:Apple". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.245.78.133 ( talk) 15:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC) About your recent move request on WP:RM/TRI went ahead and formatted your move request for IPad Mini (second generation) so that it appears properly on WP:RM/TR. For future reference, some instructions on how to post these types of moves are located on the WP:RM/TR page, as well as usually as hidden text when editing the page/inputting a request. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Restless Soul (record producer)
A tag has been placed on Restless Soul (record producer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche ( talk) 03:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC) I've moved the article to your userspace at User:Jimthing/Restless Soul (artist/label) so you can work on it at your leisure. The big thing to remember is that you'll have to show notability per WP:ORG by way of reliable sources, but at least with it in the userspace you'll have plenty of time and won't have to worry about it being deleted before you're finished. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Hi. I could swear I copied and pasted your entire proposal ad-hoc. Sorry if the comment was somehow left out. By the way, if we are to go absolutely by the book, we also have to wait for
FleetCommand's consent but judging by her modus operandi, I doubt it is necessary. I think
WP:SILENCE applies here. Best regards, Hi! Would you be interested in reviewing my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 ( talk) 14:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC) You keep adding a birthdate to the Babita Sharma article. I can't tell what "PO" is, but other than that you didn't cite any references. Please do not add information on living persons without a reliable source, particularly keeping WP:BLPPRIMARY in mind. Please also keep in mind that the burden of evidence rests with the editor who wants to add information. Huon ( talk) 12:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC) The article Accton Technology Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Talk:tvOS".The discussion is about the topic TvOS. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom29739 ( talk • contribs) 18:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC) Hello, I'm Tom29739. Your recent edit to the page tvOS appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Wikipedia does. Per this RfC: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters/Archive_22 Tom29739 [ talk 11:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
It appears that in 2008 you believed that such a company was the production company for
Criminal Justice (TV series). Is it possible (since i find no existence of an organization with that exact title) that you have some insight into whether it might actually have been
BBC/World Productions or
BBC World Productions, making that firm or its successor an appropriate link in both the old one and our related article
The Night Of? ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Hello, Jimthing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, I flagged the article because you failed to properly establish notability. With 7700 edits under your belt and numerous articles created, I'm totally baffled at how our notability guidelines for corporations or our general notability guideline have not been met here. I mean seriously, we've got Quora being used as a reference twice in the article. Quora. Was there nothing available at Yahoo! Answers? Your assertion that the company is notable is not the same thing as properly establishing notability per Wikipedia standards, i.e. with significant coverage from reliable published sources that are independent from the subject. A Quora write-up and an Alexa rank doesn't cut it. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Please take your issues to the talkpage, I'm not fussed who's right or wrong point is you've both gone over WP:3rr so you both need to discuss otherwise your both going to end up blocked, Thank you. – Davey2010 Talk 05:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Tip: Chat on your talk page, then use the 'talkback' template on my talk page. ;-) Hello, Jimthing. You have new messages at
Rodneykeeling's talk page.
Jimthing (
talk) 14:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Nomination of On-again, off-again relationship for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article
On-again, off-again relationship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On-again, off-again relationship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nate • ( chatter) 00:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC) Hello, Jimthing. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|