The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused and does seem to be that useful. WOSlinker ( talk) 23:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker ( talk) 20:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Recreated template that was previously deleted in February 2010. Only used on one inactive WikiProject. WOSlinker ( talk) 19:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Template just contains redlinks. Suprisingly it is actually in use. WOSlinker ( talk) 18:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete, per CSD T3. (Non-admin closure - if some of these old discussions aren't closed, TfD is going to begin to mount up hugely.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Completly redundant with the {{ Top Gear}} template - all the articles in the former are also in the latter. Lugnuts ( talk) 12:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
In May 2007, "[t]his template [was] made for future proposals." No longer needed. Unused. Not even any incoming links. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
One single usage of {{ wikipedians}}, the others are unused. This is a bad idea. Why would one want to navigate to a list of, say, Wikipedian homebrewers, from Talk:Homebrewing? It's a self-reference of the worst kind (of course, talk pages are immense self-references anyway...) But it is just unnecessary. If kept, some plan for its use and development must be established. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
A list of non-notable people who are correctly omitted from the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Pioneers article. Unused, unnecessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
This "unnamed top-level women's football league" is probably the {{ WFA}}. Unused. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Very poor template. It's supposed to be about windsurfing. But one link is about an asteroid, one is to surfboard, one is about a manufacturing company which actually makes sails, and so on. Unused. Also delete redirect. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by list in article World Figure Skating Championships#Ice Dancing. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Documentation provided, purpose is now clear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Purpose unclear. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Purpose now clear. I put the comment below on the doc page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Seems (?) to render {{ xpd}} in plain text, not monospace. No real reason why you would want this; the fact that it is unused is testament to that fact. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete.
This template seems to be intended for grouping together the templates that generally appear at the top of a year article. However, it is potentially confusing for editors, and it is currently not in use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. It appears that all characters are listed in the article List of characters in the Xenosaga series, rendering this infobox-segment without much place. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. All links redirect to same article, X the album. Not useful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. Specific purpose unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete, orphaned, and no clear purpose. Can be recreated or userfied if this is actually needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. Seems to be a basic citation template. But it is redundant to our friendly "cite" family of templates. Its exact purpose is unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, template has been reformatted, renamed, and the parent articles have been restructured. Feel free to renominate if there is still a desire to delete it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Pair of identical templates. Only one blue link, in which the correctly-spelt one has its only transclusion. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep As decades. I will expand 1970s shortly.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) →♠ Gƒoley↔ Four♣← 03:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Rather unnecessary boilerplate text. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was BOLDly moved to Portal: space. It seems that other portals do it this way. (non-admin closure) →♠ Gƒoley↔ Four♣← 17:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
This sort of template is not used by other WikiProjects. The status of selected/featured picture on a portal is not important enough to deserve a box on the image page. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:52, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Only one aviation incident present. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, directory only has three films to his credit. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 02:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, director navbox with only three films. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 02:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
The template:byline was deleted: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_17#Template:Byline. For me it maybe looks like the Wikipedia:Captions#Credits must be rewritten or this template deleted? As far as I've understood cc-by-sa 3.0 can require that the Photographer must be credited below the picture? Nsaa ( talk) 21:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was BOLDly redirect. Nobody seems too fussed. The two templates are an obvious duplication, and in my view (and apparently that of cymru.lass), the other one is better. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ UserContribs}}, should be redirected there. c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 08:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused and does seem to be that useful. WOSlinker ( talk) 23:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker ( talk) 20:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Recreated template that was previously deleted in February 2010. Only used on one inactive WikiProject. WOSlinker ( talk) 19:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Template just contains redlinks. Suprisingly it is actually in use. WOSlinker ( talk) 18:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete, per CSD T3. (Non-admin closure - if some of these old discussions aren't closed, TfD is going to begin to mount up hugely.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Completly redundant with the {{ Top Gear}} template - all the articles in the former are also in the latter. Lugnuts ( talk) 12:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
In May 2007, "[t]his template [was] made for future proposals." No longer needed. Unused. Not even any incoming links. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
One single usage of {{ wikipedians}}, the others are unused. This is a bad idea. Why would one want to navigate to a list of, say, Wikipedian homebrewers, from Talk:Homebrewing? It's a self-reference of the worst kind (of course, talk pages are immense self-references anyway...) But it is just unnecessary. If kept, some plan for its use and development must be established. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
A list of non-notable people who are correctly omitted from the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Pioneers article. Unused, unnecessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
This "unnamed top-level women's football league" is probably the {{ WFA}}. Unused. No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Very poor template. It's supposed to be about windsurfing. But one link is about an asteroid, one is to surfboard, one is about a manufacturing company which actually makes sails, and so on. Unused. Also delete redirect. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by list in article World Figure Skating Championships#Ice Dancing. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Documentation provided, purpose is now clear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Purpose unclear. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Purpose now clear. I put the comment below on the doc page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Seems (?) to render {{ xpd}} in plain text, not monospace. No real reason why you would want this; the fact that it is unused is testament to that fact. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was speedy delete.
This template seems to be intended for grouping together the templates that generally appear at the top of a year article. However, it is potentially confusing for editors, and it is currently not in use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. It appears that all characters are listed in the article List of characters in the Xenosaga series, rendering this infobox-segment without much place. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. All links redirect to same article, X the album. Not useful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. Specific purpose unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete, orphaned, and no clear purpose. Can be recreated or userfied if this is actually needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Unused. Seems to be a basic citation template. But it is redundant to our friendly "cite" family of templates. Its exact purpose is unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was no consensus, template has been reformatted, renamed, and the parent articles have been restructured. Feel free to renominate if there is still a desire to delete it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Pair of identical templates. Only one blue link, in which the correctly-spelt one has its only transclusion. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep As decades. I will expand 1970s shortly.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) →♠ Gƒoley↔ Four♣← 03:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Rather unnecessary boilerplate text. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was BOLDly moved to Portal: space. It seems that other portals do it this way. (non-admin closure) →♠ Gƒoley↔ Four♣← 17:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
This sort of template is not used by other WikiProjects. The status of selected/featured picture on a portal is not important enough to deserve a box on the image page. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Keep. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:52, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Only one aviation incident present. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, directory only has three films to his credit. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 02:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
WP:NENAN, director navbox with only three films. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 02:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:36, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
The template:byline was deleted: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_March_17#Template:Byline. For me it maybe looks like the Wikipedia:Captions#Credits must be rewritten or this template deleted? As far as I've understood cc-by-sa 3.0 can require that the Photographer must be credited below the picture? Nsaa ( talk) 21:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was BOLDly redirect. Nobody seems too fussed. The two templates are an obvious duplication, and in my view (and apparently that of cymru.lass), the other one is better. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Redundant to {{ UserContribs}}, should be redirected there. c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 08:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)