- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep the updated version. -- ais523 09:33, 16 November 2006 ( U T C)
No longer updated for en.wiki. Accurizer 22:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete useless †he Bread 05:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep with URL changed to one that still works.
Edit count for freakofnurture—
freak(
talk) 10:21, Nov. 10, 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The above link does not seem to work for me, the browser times out. Does this work for anyone else?
Accurizer 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not me, it does the same thing.
Neil916 (
Talk) 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, must be because I have too many edits. This link might be easier to load:
Edit count for Neil916 (I'm showing 3,949 for you). —
freak(
talk) 16:35, Nov. 11, 2006 (UTC)
- That's better. Thanks, Freakofnurture, for fixing it. Now that the link works my reason for nominating it no longer applies. I have no problem withdrawing the nom. Accurizer 03:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, must be because I have too many edits. This link might be easier to load:
Edit count for Neil916 (I'm showing 3,949 for you). —
freak(
talk) 16:35, Nov. 11, 2006 (UTC)
- Not me, it does the same thing.
Neil916 (
Talk) 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The above link does not seem to work for me, the browser times out. Does this work for anyone else?
Accurizer 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. This is quite useful. Never knew about it until now. --- RockMFR 18:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, target changed to Wannabe Kate. -- Gray Porpois e What have I done‽ 16:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep working version.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 02:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. — dima /s-ko/ 02:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep now that it works. Neil916 ( Talk) 16:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep useful aid in measuring Wikipedia contributions. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 17:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep (I know the nom already withdrew, but still tossing in my keep). — Doug Bell talk• contrib 08:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted -- humble fool ® 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Useless template, used in one article to put info there that looks like the rest of the info put there without templates. Move into article and delete template. Gene Nygaard 16:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Moved content into article. Cheers. -- Ch e z ( Discuss / Email) 01:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom †he Bread 05:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Chezhiyan. Neil916 ( Talk) 18:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was obsolete and deleted -- humble fool ® 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
template is redundant and no longer used (broader " Asterix" template is now used in all cases). Invisifan 16:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete redundant †he Bread 05:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was obsolete and deleted -- humble fool ® 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
template is redundant and no longer used (broader " Asterix" template is now used in all cases). Invisifan 16:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as I did above †he Bread 05:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy close, wrong forum for this debate. -- ais523 09:35, 16 November 2006 ( U T C)
Discussion transferred to WP:SFD where it belongs, as per instructions at the top opf the page. Grutness... wha? 21:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was same as below. — freak( talk) 10:26, Nov. 10, 2006 (UTC)
The template is not helpful or noteworthy, it was created and is only used by a user that is blocked indefinitely. Lino Mastrodomenico 01:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jcam 04:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, nom says it all. Neil916 ( Talk) 06:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- speedy delete. The image that the template points to, which is all of the template's content, was deleted. Slambo (Speak) 11:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Slambo. -- Brad Beattie (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. the template appeared to contain only a deleted image. — freak( talk) 10:26, Nov. 10, 2006 (UTC)
The template is not helpful or noteworthy, it was created and is only used by a user that is blocked indefinitely. Lino Mastrodomenico 01:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- And delete this one, too. Jcam 04:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Neil916 ( Talk) 06:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- speedy delete. like {{User On}} above, the image that the template points to, which is all of the template's content, was deleted. Slambo (Speak) 11:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Slambo. -- Brad Beattie (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep the updated version. -- ais523 09:33, 16 November 2006 ( U T C)
No longer updated for en.wiki. Accurizer 22:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete useless †he Bread 05:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep with URL changed to one that still works.
Edit count for freakofnurture—
freak(
talk) 10:21, Nov. 10, 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The above link does not seem to work for me, the browser times out. Does this work for anyone else?
Accurizer 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not me, it does the same thing.
Neil916 (
Talk) 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, must be because I have too many edits. This link might be easier to load:
Edit count for Neil916 (I'm showing 3,949 for you). —
freak(
talk) 16:35, Nov. 11, 2006 (UTC)
- That's better. Thanks, Freakofnurture, for fixing it. Now that the link works my reason for nominating it no longer applies. I have no problem withdrawing the nom. Accurizer 03:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, must be because I have too many edits. This link might be easier to load:
Edit count for Neil916 (I'm showing 3,949 for you). —
freak(
talk) 16:35, Nov. 11, 2006 (UTC)
- Not me, it does the same thing.
Neil916 (
Talk) 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The above link does not seem to work for me, the browser times out. Does this work for anyone else?
Accurizer 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. This is quite useful. Never knew about it until now. --- RockMFR 18:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, target changed to Wannabe Kate. -- Gray Porpois e What have I done‽ 16:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep working version.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 02:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. — dima /s-ko/ 02:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep now that it works. Neil916 ( Talk) 16:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep useful aid in measuring Wikipedia contributions. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 17:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep (I know the nom already withdrew, but still tossing in my keep). — Doug Bell talk• contrib 08:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted -- humble fool ® 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Useless template, used in one article to put info there that looks like the rest of the info put there without templates. Move into article and delete template. Gene Nygaard 16:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Moved content into article. Cheers. -- Ch e z ( Discuss / Email) 01:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom †he Bread 05:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Chezhiyan. Neil916 ( Talk) 18:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was obsolete and deleted -- humble fool ® 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
template is redundant and no longer used (broader " Asterix" template is now used in all cases). Invisifan 16:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete redundant †he Bread 05:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was obsolete and deleted -- humble fool ® 03:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
template is redundant and no longer used (broader " Asterix" template is now used in all cases). Invisifan 16:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as I did above †he Bread 05:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy close, wrong forum for this debate. -- ais523 09:35, 16 November 2006 ( U T C)
Discussion transferred to WP:SFD where it belongs, as per instructions at the top opf the page. Grutness... wha? 21:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was same as below. — freak( talk) 10:26, Nov. 10, 2006 (UTC)
The template is not helpful or noteworthy, it was created and is only used by a user that is blocked indefinitely. Lino Mastrodomenico 01:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jcam 04:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, nom says it all. Neil916 ( Talk) 06:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- speedy delete. The image that the template points to, which is all of the template's content, was deleted. Slambo (Speak) 11:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Slambo. -- Brad Beattie (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. the template appeared to contain only a deleted image. — freak( talk) 10:26, Nov. 10, 2006 (UTC)
The template is not helpful or noteworthy, it was created and is only used by a user that is blocked indefinitely. Lino Mastrodomenico 01:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- And delete this one, too. Jcam 04:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Neil916 ( Talk) 06:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- speedy delete. like {{User On}} above, the image that the template points to, which is all of the template's content, was deleted. Slambo (Speak) 11:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Slambo. -- Brad Beattie (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.