Made soon after the block of User:Weathereditor1 (himself blocked for being a sock of User:Weathereditor) and like the others made a user sandbox containing only a climate diagram ( Previous sandboxes). Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 18:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sock #4 in the User:Weathereditor, User:Weathereditor1, User:Weathereditor2 and User:Weathereditor3 sequence. Three of them creating user sandboxes with climate diagrams. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 19:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same topics as previous socks. Edits on Ashford, Kent, (Eg: [1], [2], [3]) Deal, Kent and Baltasound are all based on weather boxes. Also carrying on edit wars with previous socks eg: [4] Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Adding Weathereditor6 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) to the list, per this sandbox with climate diagrams which gels with the sandboxes with climate diagrams created by previous socks (e.g User:Weathereditor5/sandbox and User:Weathereditor/sandbox - note also the "my world" which matches with the edit summary "my ideal sea temperature", albeit not strongly - and User:Weathereditor4/sandbox, User:Weathereditor2/sandbox). Also has a username that fits a Weathereditor - Weathereditor1 - Weathereditor2 - Weathereditor3 - Weathereditor4 - Weathereditor5 pattern. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Yet another sockpuppet, edit-warring the same articles, blocked indefinitely by User:Acroterion, and added to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Weathereditor by User:Bilorv. — Patrug ( talk) 20:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Yet another sockpuppet, edit-warring the same articles, blocked indefinitely by User:Tide rolls, and added to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Weathereditor. Someone just can't take a hint... Patrug ( talk) 20:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
[5] etc etc Martinevans123 ( talk) 18:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Corrected the username. How does that establish sockpuppetry, though? Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:DUCK; #7's edits are weather-related topics; names are too close to other socks to be coincidental Drm310 ( talk) 19:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Per WP:DUCK, named just like the other Weathereditor[x] socks. Drm310 ( talk) 17:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
As well as the obligatory sandbox with a climate diagram in it - better yet, with an admission of block evasion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Another account with the name Weathereditor and with an user sandbox containing a climate diagram of a climate s/he likes as previous socks (e.g User:Weathereditor2/sandbox) Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Socks already blocked, just adding them for archival purposes. Drm310 ( talk) 17:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Might be worth adding something to the MediaWiki:Titleblacklist to deal with this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Both accounts geolocate to a Sky account in Worcester, England (similar to other IP socks of this editor), and display typical Weathereditor behaviour: the first one adding unreliable data to climate sections of UK settlement articles, then the second one reverting without discussion after the edits are challenged. PaleCloudedWhite ( talk) 19:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Self-confessed at User talk:Minotdips and also exhibits same behaviour as master. User account already blocked, report only made to add material to archive. Nthep ( talk) 20:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Obvious sockpuppet, restoring edits by Weathereditor40. J. M. ( talk) 16:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I know reporting IP addresses here may look futile, but the situation is getting a bit desperate. The user just keeps using a new 2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:xxxx address every day, still restoring the same edits over and over again, in a number of articles. Some of the pages are already protected because of this user, but Weathereditor keeps edit warring on their talk pages (which are not protected), too, with repeated edit requests, despite repeated rejections (e.g. [6], [7]). Something has to be done, even though I'm not sure what exactly. Could a reasonable range from the 2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:xxxx addresses be blocked? Or could all the affected articles, including their talk pages, be protected? If that's too restrictive, is it possible to add an edit filter or something that 2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:xxxx cannot edit those articles and their talk pages?— J. M. ( talk) 19:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Prolific "new" user focusing on climate weather data, without due diligence to overall article (e.g. Bognor: [8] ), see contribution history of possible Sock per Special:Contributions/Climate.enthusiast. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Made soon after the block of User:Weathereditor1 (himself blocked for being a sock of User:Weathereditor) and like the others made a user sandbox containing only a climate diagram ( Previous sandboxes). Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 18:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sock #4 in the User:Weathereditor, User:Weathereditor1, User:Weathereditor2 and User:Weathereditor3 sequence. Three of them creating user sandboxes with climate diagrams. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 19:15, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same topics as previous socks. Edits on Ashford, Kent, (Eg: [1], [2], [3]) Deal, Kent and Baltasound are all based on weather boxes. Also carrying on edit wars with previous socks eg: [4] Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Adding Weathereditor6 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) to the list, per this sandbox with climate diagrams which gels with the sandboxes with climate diagrams created by previous socks (e.g User:Weathereditor5/sandbox and User:Weathereditor/sandbox - note also the "my world" which matches with the edit summary "my ideal sea temperature", albeit not strongly - and User:Weathereditor4/sandbox, User:Weathereditor2/sandbox). Also has a username that fits a Weathereditor - Weathereditor1 - Weathereditor2 - Weathereditor3 - Weathereditor4 - Weathereditor5 pattern. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Yet another sockpuppet, edit-warring the same articles, blocked indefinitely by User:Acroterion, and added to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Weathereditor by User:Bilorv. — Patrug ( talk) 20:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Yet another sockpuppet, edit-warring the same articles, blocked indefinitely by User:Tide rolls, and added to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Weathereditor. Someone just can't take a hint... Patrug ( talk) 20:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
[5] etc etc Martinevans123 ( talk) 18:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Corrected the username. How does that establish sockpuppetry, though? Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 18:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:DUCK; #7's edits are weather-related topics; names are too close to other socks to be coincidental Drm310 ( talk) 19:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Per WP:DUCK, named just like the other Weathereditor[x] socks. Drm310 ( talk) 17:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
As well as the obligatory sandbox with a climate diagram in it - better yet, with an admission of block evasion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Another account with the name Weathereditor and with an user sandbox containing a climate diagram of a climate s/he likes as previous socks (e.g User:Weathereditor2/sandbox) Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 15:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Socks already blocked, just adding them for archival purposes. Drm310 ( talk) 17:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Might be worth adding something to the MediaWiki:Titleblacklist to deal with this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:31, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Both accounts geolocate to a Sky account in Worcester, England (similar to other IP socks of this editor), and display typical Weathereditor behaviour: the first one adding unreliable data to climate sections of UK settlement articles, then the second one reverting without discussion after the edits are challenged. PaleCloudedWhite ( talk) 19:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Self-confessed at User talk:Minotdips and also exhibits same behaviour as master. User account already blocked, report only made to add material to archive. Nthep ( talk) 20:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Obvious sockpuppet, restoring edits by Weathereditor40. J. M. ( talk) 16:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I know reporting IP addresses here may look futile, but the situation is getting a bit desperate. The user just keeps using a new 2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:xxxx address every day, still restoring the same edits over and over again, in a number of articles. Some of the pages are already protected because of this user, but Weathereditor keeps edit warring on their talk pages (which are not protected), too, with repeated edit requests, despite repeated rejections (e.g. [6], [7]). Something has to be done, even though I'm not sure what exactly. Could a reasonable range from the 2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:xxxx addresses be blocked? Or could all the affected articles, including their talk pages, be protected? If that's too restrictive, is it possible to add an edit filter or something that 2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:xxxx cannot edit those articles and their talk pages?— J. M. ( talk) 19:18, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Prolific "new" user focusing on climate weather data, without due diligence to overall article (e.g. Bognor: [8] ), see contribution history of possible Sock per Special:Contributions/Climate.enthusiast. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.