Andrew5
- Andrew5 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
30 May 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
Edit history would suggest this is a WP:DUCK of Andrew5. Between 2023-24, they have made less than 50 edits, consisting of sports (baseball) and weather edits, even on the same day (20 May 2023). This is exactly the lookout on WP:LTA/A5. Coincidentally (DUCK-coincidence), their first edit in several months happen to also be telling others to discount my !vote in a requested move discussion. This is also common Andrew5 behavior, with either personal attacks against other weather editors (plus a few admins) or inserting themselves in discussions in an attempt to say several long-term editors are stupid/irrelevent. Even if they have not edited recently when this SPI is reviewed, if the reviewing administrator feels this is Andrew5 DUCK evidence, I would still appreciate a block or some agreement statement at least, given they are involved in an ongoing RM discussion. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- So um what exactly did Andrew5 do wrong? Those edits look fine, not disruptive, quite helpful and productive actually. Is it just because he’s “socking?” Well, SchroCat blatantly engaged in abusive sockpuppetry but is still allowed to edit. In fact he never had to serve the sanctions that the community decided he deserved. Why doesn’t he get blocked?? Maybe it’s time to realize that Andrew5 is actually an enthusiastic contributor to wikipedia… or else block SchroCat. Can’t be treating certain people differently. Defjotme ( talk) 12:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Obvious sock blocked; closing.-- Ponyo bons mots 16:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've blocked Defjotme without tags.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 12:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
19 June 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
Second IP protested and re-inserted sports-related material that was deemed trivial on June 2024 South Florida floods, two areas Andrew is notorious in. After the first removal, the first IP reverted it again, and then when taken to talk page, the first IP proceeded to argue for its inclusion by mentioning the team names and score. Reeks of WP:DUCK here. Additionally, both added trivial information to Draft:Effects of Hurricane Ian in Florida. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 16:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I've blocked the /64. Note that this report wasn't opened correctly (it looks like it was tacked on as opposed to using the auto-create script)?-- Ponyo bons mots 20:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Andrew5
- Andrew5 ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
30 May 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
Edit history would suggest this is a WP:DUCK of Andrew5. Between 2023-24, they have made less than 50 edits, consisting of sports (baseball) and weather edits, even on the same day (20 May 2023). This is exactly the lookout on WP:LTA/A5. Coincidentally (DUCK-coincidence), their first edit in several months happen to also be telling others to discount my !vote in a requested move discussion. This is also common Andrew5 behavior, with either personal attacks against other weather editors (plus a few admins) or inserting themselves in discussions in an attempt to say several long-term editors are stupid/irrelevent. Even if they have not edited recently when this SPI is reviewed, if the reviewing administrator feels this is Andrew5 DUCK evidence, I would still appreciate a block or some agreement statement at least, given they are involved in an ongoing RM discussion. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- So um what exactly did Andrew5 do wrong? Those edits look fine, not disruptive, quite helpful and productive actually. Is it just because he’s “socking?” Well, SchroCat blatantly engaged in abusive sockpuppetry but is still allowed to edit. In fact he never had to serve the sanctions that the community decided he deserved. Why doesn’t he get blocked?? Maybe it’s time to realize that Andrew5 is actually an enthusiastic contributor to wikipedia… or else block SchroCat. Can’t be treating certain people differently. Defjotme ( talk) 12:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Obvious sock blocked; closing.-- Ponyo bons mots 16:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've blocked Defjotme without tags.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 12:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
19 June 2024
Suspected sockpuppets
Second IP protested and re-inserted sports-related material that was deemed trivial on June 2024 South Florida floods, two areas Andrew is notorious in. After the first removal, the first IP reverted it again, and then when taken to talk page, the first IP proceeded to argue for its inclusion by mentioning the team names and score. Reeks of WP:DUCK here. Additionally, both added trivial information to Draft:Effects of Hurricane Ian in Florida. -- MarioProtIV ( talk/ contribs) 16:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I've blocked the /64. Note that this report wasn't opened correctly (it looks like it was tacked on as opposed to using the auto-create script)?-- Ponyo bons mots 20:30, 20 June 2024 (UTC)