Final (64/3/1). Closed as successful by WJBscribe @ 18:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Peridon ( talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen of Wikipedia, may I in one of my infrequent nominations present for your consideration Peridon as a suitable editor to be entrusted with the mop and bucket.
Peridon has had an account here since May 2008, and has demonstrated competence in editing since that time both in article creation and in admin-related areas. I first came across this editor last year, and was impressed with their knowledge and expertise of Wikipedia procedures, policies and guidelines as evidenced by the competence shown in their work at speedy deletion pages and at deletion discussions. This editor's speedy deletion nominations (last five hundred edits) have been followed by deletion by an admin in almost 99% of cases, and several of the remainder have been saved only by hasty improvements made after tagging. There is a similarly high correlation with subsequent admin activity in his/her AfD proposals.
S/he shows a good level of editing skills in article creation and editing, and is competent at non-admin related housekeeping activities such as reversion and copy-editing. S/he is a reviewer and a rollbacker, and has a completely clean block log.
I believe that this editor would be a significant asset to the community if given admin responsibility, and herewith commend Peridon to you. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 13:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Final (64/3/1). Closed as successful by WJBscribe @ 18:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Peridon ( talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen of Wikipedia, may I in one of my infrequent nominations present for your consideration Peridon as a suitable editor to be entrusted with the mop and bucket.
Peridon has had an account here since May 2008, and has demonstrated competence in editing since that time both in article creation and in admin-related areas. I first came across this editor last year, and was impressed with their knowledge and expertise of Wikipedia procedures, policies and guidelines as evidenced by the competence shown in their work at speedy deletion pages and at deletion discussions. This editor's speedy deletion nominations (last five hundred edits) have been followed by deletion by an admin in almost 99% of cases, and several of the remainder have been saved only by hasty improvements made after tagging. There is a similarly high correlation with subsequent admin activity in his/her AfD proposals.
S/he shows a good level of editing skills in article creation and editing, and is competent at non-admin related housekeeping activities such as reversion and copy-editing. S/he is a reviewer and a rollbacker, and has a completely clean block log.
I believe that this editor would be a significant asset to the community if given admin responsibility, and herewith commend Peridon to you. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 13:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |