(55/17/6); ended 22:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Kwsn ( talk · contribs) - Please let me introduce Kwsn to you. He's been a wikipedian since March 2007 and has just over 4000 edits. Kwsn does some great anti-antivandalism work and always appropriately warns users after they have vandalised, giving them a chance to change their ways. In discussion, Kwsn is always well reasoned and sticks to policy. His speedy tagging of pages is always accurate, showing a good understanding of the notability criteria, this is also shown in his work at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you take a look at Kwsn's talk page edits you will notice he is a very diligent user who always remains civil - a quick look at his own talk page will show that people appreciate what he does here. I've been very impressed with the way he has improved from his first RfA and feel he is now ready to use the tools wisely. I ask that you support this request and give Kwsn the admin flag. Ryan Postlethwaite 22:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Questions by Miranda:
Question from User:Pedro
James Jones is a well know artist from England. His work has appeared at the Tate Modern and it's great. More to follow soon.
Question from Carnildo
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Kwsn before commenting.
I dont understand why he tagged my update on Memory leak as vandalism I beleive the information is totally incorrect in the example of a elevator/lift personally beleive this person just clicks undo/vandalism button without reading ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.235.188 ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Apology for screwing things up with my previous edit to this page - Majoreditor drew my attention to the irregularity of my last edit and when I reviewed it, I was puzzled to see that the edit counts had dropped from 51/13/6 to 45/11/5. At first, I thought that somebody had managed to hijack my account or something but I figured it out. The "vandal" is me. I got here by looking at Mikkalai's !vote (there's some controversy about the way he's !voting against "professional police"). I started reading the entire RFA and decided to add a follow-up to Pedro's question but I forgot that I needed to edit the current revision so I accidentally edited the old revision. Yeah, yeah, I know there's a big pink bar up there at the top that says "This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mikkalai...". I guess I haven't woken up completely yet. My apologies, once again. -- Richard 16:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC) reply
(55/17/6); ended 22:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Kwsn ( talk · contribs) - Please let me introduce Kwsn to you. He's been a wikipedian since March 2007 and has just over 4000 edits. Kwsn does some great anti-antivandalism work and always appropriately warns users after they have vandalised, giving them a chance to change their ways. In discussion, Kwsn is always well reasoned and sticks to policy. His speedy tagging of pages is always accurate, showing a good understanding of the notability criteria, this is also shown in his work at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you take a look at Kwsn's talk page edits you will notice he is a very diligent user who always remains civil - a quick look at his own talk page will show that people appreciate what he does here. I've been very impressed with the way he has improved from his first RfA and feel he is now ready to use the tools wisely. I ask that you support this request and give Kwsn the admin flag. Ryan Postlethwaite 22:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Questions by Miranda:
Question from User:Pedro
James Jones is a well know artist from England. His work has appeared at the Tate Modern and it's great. More to follow soon.
Question from Carnildo
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Kwsn before commenting.
I dont understand why he tagged my update on Memory leak as vandalism I beleive the information is totally incorrect in the example of a elevator/lift personally beleive this person just clicks undo/vandalism button without reading ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.49.235.188 ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC) reply
Apology for screwing things up with my previous edit to this page - Majoreditor drew my attention to the irregularity of my last edit and when I reviewed it, I was puzzled to see that the edit counts had dropped from 51/13/6 to 45/11/5. At first, I thought that somebody had managed to hijack my account or something but I figured it out. The "vandal" is me. I got here by looking at Mikkalai's !vote (there's some controversy about the way he's !voting against "professional police"). I started reading the entire RFA and decided to add a follow-up to Pedro's question but I forgot that I needed to edit the current revision so I accidentally edited the old revision. Yeah, yeah, I know there's a big pink bar up there at the top that says "This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mikkalai...". I guess I haven't woken up completely yet. My apologies, once again. -- Richard 16:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC) reply