Final 114/0/0. Closed as successful by WJBscribe at 11:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Fainites ( talk · contribs) – Faintes has been in the project since December 2006, where he has over 12,000 edits. He has three featured articles in his credit. He fights vandalism [1] [2], and is an civil expert in an area which is full of POV pushers and such with Psychology. We need more expert adminstrators and Fainites fits the bill. Thanks Secret account 15:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Neutral Although I should say that I respect the RfA judgement of some of the supporters in this particular one, I'm going to stick to my guns. X!'s edit counter was a good place to get ideas of areas where we can be reasonably confident of suitability (by "areas" I'm talking deletion, blocking and protecting in general, rather than CSD#TF8-2) and pages and areas where closer scrutiny is warranted. As such, I will not support any candidacy started between the 13th and the 17th, because doing enough research to be confident that a candidate passes would involve an unreasonable amount of work. If it were disabled permanently I would obviously have to reconsider my position, but my belief is that doing so would enhance the weight given to diffs that may or may not be isolated incidents. In answer to the rationale for the pause, I would say that even as a regular in the unpopular column, opposes based solely on editcountitis can be, should be and are already ignored by crats. --
W
F
C--
18:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
reply
Final 114/0/0. Closed as successful by WJBscribe at 11:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Fainites ( talk · contribs) – Faintes has been in the project since December 2006, where he has over 12,000 edits. He has three featured articles in his credit. He fights vandalism [1] [2], and is an civil expert in an area which is full of POV pushers and such with Psychology. We need more expert adminstrators and Fainites fits the bill. Thanks Secret account 15:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Neutral Although I should say that I respect the RfA judgement of some of the supporters in this particular one, I'm going to stick to my guns. X!'s edit counter was a good place to get ideas of areas where we can be reasonably confident of suitability (by "areas" I'm talking deletion, blocking and protecting in general, rather than CSD#TF8-2) and pages and areas where closer scrutiny is warranted. As such, I will not support any candidacy started between the 13th and the 17th, because doing enough research to be confident that a candidate passes would involve an unreasonable amount of work. If it were disabled permanently I would obviously have to reconsider my position, but my belief is that doing so would enhance the weight given to diffs that may or may not be isolated incidents. In answer to the rationale for the pause, I would say that even as a regular in the unpopular column, opposes based solely on editcountitis can be, should be and are already ignored by crats. --
W
F
C--
18:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
reply