This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 5, 2024.
Only a redirect to the number one list of songs in Austria. No other information whatsoever. CeolAnGhra ( talk) 23:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13#WGBH in Boston
RDAB title, but has some history which duplicates its target. I feel it should be deleted, but it definitely shouldn't be kept as there's multiple films with this title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Neither of these devices has any mention in the target article. They should be deleted. Marsbar8 ( talk) 17:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
00:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try, considering that the edit history may need to be considered...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This is not a name referred to at the target page. This title is seemingly in reference to a meme that Cena was involved in, but using this alternative name to reach the subject does not seem likely, with this many deviations from his actual name. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete. There is no Convention 192; it does not exist. This was orginally made as a redirect to Convention 182 (Worst Forms of Child Labour), but subsequently changed to a redirect to the ILO. Both are confusing, since redirecting to the ILO implies it might actually be something in existence, while 182 is clearly not 192 and a redirect could imply an equivalance, rather than a mistaken entry, which I do not see as a common problem. Furthermore, the next convention will be numbered 192, so at the point the new Convention is adopted (not likely for a number of years) a new article can be created. Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk) 05:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other redirect as suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
00:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#List of atheists, agnostics and other nontheists
Should be deleted, as there's no mention of PHP on PPD's Wikipedia or official website (at least major one) 83.168.137.1 ( talk) 18:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Both should be deleted. Neither term is used in the film or in coverage of the film. Avengers 1.5 was mentioned briefly in one interview in 2013 by Anthony Mackie, but that is all. -- Zoo Blazer 17:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete. This links to an article which doesn't mention "Cube-free integers", nor is there any good reason why it should. The redirect was created in May 2022, and redirected to a section in the target article which was removed less than eight hours after it was introduced. The edit-summary given for the removal said, rightly I think, that the concept of a "Cube-free integer" is not notable. The expression does occur in some web pages and publications, but unlike "square-free integer" it does not appear extensively in mathematical literature, and my searches have failed to find evidence that the concept is notable enough to be the topic of a Wikipedia article; moreover, whether it is notable enough or not, it isn't mentioned in the target article for this redirect, so having the redirect is unhelpful.
JBW (
talk)
15:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 5, 2024.
Only a redirect to the number one list of songs in Austria. No other information whatsoever. CeolAnGhra ( talk) 23:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13#WGBH in Boston
RDAB title, but has some history which duplicates its target. I feel it should be deleted, but it definitely shouldn't be kept as there's multiple films with this title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Neither of these devices has any mention in the target article. They should be deleted. Marsbar8 ( talk) 17:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
00:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try, considering that the edit history may need to be considered...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This is not a name referred to at the target page. This title is seemingly in reference to a meme that Cena was involved in, but using this alternative name to reach the subject does not seem likely, with this many deviations from his actual name. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete. There is no Convention 192; it does not exist. This was orginally made as a redirect to Convention 182 (Worst Forms of Child Labour), but subsequently changed to a redirect to the ILO. Both are confusing, since redirecting to the ILO implies it might actually be something in existence, while 182 is clearly not 192 and a redirect could imply an equivalance, rather than a mistaken entry, which I do not see as a common problem. Furthermore, the next convention will be numbered 192, so at the point the new Convention is adopted (not likely for a number of years) a new article can be created. Regards, Goldsztajn ( talk) 05:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other redirect as suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont)
00:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17#List of atheists, agnostics and other nontheists
Should be deleted, as there's no mention of PHP on PPD's Wikipedia or official website (at least major one) 83.168.137.1 ( talk) 18:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Both should be deleted. Neither term is used in the film or in coverage of the film. Avengers 1.5 was mentioned briefly in one interview in 2013 by Anthony Mackie, but that is all. -- Zoo Blazer 17:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete. This links to an article which doesn't mention "Cube-free integers", nor is there any good reason why it should. The redirect was created in May 2022, and redirected to a section in the target article which was removed less than eight hours after it was introduced. The edit-summary given for the removal said, rightly I think, that the concept of a "Cube-free integer" is not notable. The expression does occur in some web pages and publications, but unlike "square-free integer" it does not appear extensively in mathematical literature, and my searches have failed to find evidence that the concept is notable enough to be the topic of a Wikipedia article; moreover, whether it is notable enough or not, it isn't mentioned in the target article for this redirect, so having the redirect is unhelpful.
JBW (
talk)
15:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)