Hello, Fish567, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Th-fronting. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sir Joseph (talk) 19:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. clpo13( talk) 19:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on English a pronunciation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that
administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (
talk) 20:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi, I'm Zppix. Fish567, thanks for creating Alterations in the pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. fix the 1st refs and other broken/error refs
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 20:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Rhotacism (language change) into
Rhotacism (speech impediment). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
Uanfala (
talk) 18:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 00:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
From-rum merger listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect From-rum merger. Since you had some involvement with the From-rum merger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LakeKayak ( talk) 20:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I reverted some of your changes with your splits on the page on the article listed above. The new articles are still intact. I myself made a similar split on the page Phonological history of English low back vowels, making a separate article Cot-caught merger. However, there was a period of time when the information on the two articles overlapped, where both pages had the same information.
I think that might be the stage you are at right now. I have no objection to the topics Trap-bath split and Æ-tensing being on separate pages. However, until the pages are established, it makes the most sense for the content still to remain on the parent page. I will be willing to help you out on the article if you need it. Thank you. LakeKayak ( talk) 01:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
By the way, I have an idea for the page Æ-tensing. However, as the page is still in the beginning stages, I would rather have your approval before I make such a change. I think that possibly we could have a separate section for the New York City system, another for the Philadelphia system, and another for the nasal system. (These would not be the only sections of the article.) For the NYC system, in particular, Labov report a different variation used in some areas New Jersey, which we could put into a subsection under the NYC system. Anyway, do you approve? Thank you. LakeKayak ( talk) 23:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
I am having trouble finding the section of Green (2002) that mentions a longer vowel. Does she say this or is this a bit of editorializing on your part? — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 00:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- It mentions such here
http://www.rehabmed.ualberta.ca/spa/phonology/features.htm that devoiced "cub" pronounced with a "p" at the end retains the vowel length that occurs after voiced consonants. It says this under the section "final obstruent devoicing"
Fish567 (
talk) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- I see. In this case, you would want to cite either the website or (even better) seek out the sources used and cite one of them. The way you have edited the article, you make it seem as though Green (2002) is saying this when she isn't, which is a big no-no. — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 14:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Oldest people. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Newshunter12 (
talk) 21:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567
Thank you for creating Blackboard Scraping.
User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
FYI there's no need to create redirects for alternative capitalizations pointing to the same target. Wikipedia internally corrects capitalization mismatches when searching.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
signed, Rosguill talk 15:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Th-fronting. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sir Joseph (talk) 19:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. clpo13( talk) 19:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on English a pronunciation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that
administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{
hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's
talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (
talk) 20:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
|
Hi, I'm Zppix. Fish567, thanks for creating Alterations in the pronunciation of English ⟨th⟩!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. fix the 1st refs and other broken/error refs
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ ( talk) 20:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Rhotacism (language change) into
Rhotacism (speech impediment). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
Uanfala (
talk) 18:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 00:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
From-rum merger listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect From-rum merger. Since you had some involvement with the From-rum merger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. LakeKayak ( talk) 20:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I reverted some of your changes with your splits on the page on the article listed above. The new articles are still intact. I myself made a similar split on the page Phonological history of English low back vowels, making a separate article Cot-caught merger. However, there was a period of time when the information on the two articles overlapped, where both pages had the same information.
I think that might be the stage you are at right now. I have no objection to the topics Trap-bath split and Æ-tensing being on separate pages. However, until the pages are established, it makes the most sense for the content still to remain on the parent page. I will be willing to help you out on the article if you need it. Thank you. LakeKayak ( talk) 01:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
By the way, I have an idea for the page Æ-tensing. However, as the page is still in the beginning stages, I would rather have your approval before I make such a change. I think that possibly we could have a separate section for the New York City system, another for the Philadelphia system, and another for the nasal system. (These would not be the only sections of the article.) For the NYC system, in particular, Labov report a different variation used in some areas New Jersey, which we could put into a subsection under the NYC system. Anyway, do you approve? Thank you. LakeKayak ( talk) 23:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
I am having trouble finding the section of Green (2002) that mentions a longer vowel. Does she say this or is this a bit of editorializing on your part? — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 00:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- It mentions such here
http://www.rehabmed.ualberta.ca/spa/phonology/features.htm that devoiced "cub" pronounced with a "p" at the end retains the vowel length that occurs after voiced consonants. It says this under the section "final obstruent devoicing"
Fish567 (
talk) 03:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- I see. In this case, you would want to cite either the website or (even better) seek out the sources used and cite one of them. The way you have edited the article, you make it seem as though Green (2002) is saying this when she isn't, which is a big no-no. — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 14:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Oldest people. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Newshunter12 (
talk) 21:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Fish567
Thank you for creating Blackboard Scraping.
User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
FYI there's no need to create redirects for alternative capitalizations pointing to the same target. Wikipedia internally corrects capitalization mismatches when searching.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
signed, Rosguill talk 15:39, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)